₦airaland Forum

GREATIGBOMAN:
Very funny.


And if u choose to advice the guy he'll abuse you.


That site is ugliest forum project currently on Nairaland.


I don't think anyone reasonable enough will spend more than a second there.



You have a better chance of making change if u convert the forum to pornsite

I did not ask for your corroboration.

Darteyyyy:
I built something similar and running it since 2020, building the site is not the issue, its marketing it and have people use it... I've had a bit of luck since 2020 that I started but ofcourse I'm running at a loss since, server fee and the likes. My site is 9jalinks dot com

I feel if you want to build something similar, you'd need a bit of luck, building is the easy part... but can you push for long (5-7 years), do you have a deep pocket, are you ready to collaborate with others?

TikTok didn't just beat FB, IG, SNAP by luck... it spent a lot of money, also acquiring Musical.ly by the way.

Checkout my site and let me know what you think.

Selah

I visited your site.

It needs a UI revamp. It looks like something from the days of geocities. Your site must be better than NL to even start competing in the first instance.

Secondly, it is plagued with the Nigerian webmasters addiction to intrusive adverts. As long as you dont have enough views/engagements to give you at least $1,000 every month, splurging with ads should be avoided. If you want to sha do adverts to at least meet hosting costs, then make them non intrusive. Look at Nairaland.

Tip: Take a look at Quora.

No vex say i dey blunt small.

stevonics:
Bros you have tried.
Your explanation removed every physics I should know about the landing and take off. It actually looks like UFO flying succer. Please from that craft you are seeing what type of fuel are they using. See how the pride of United States of America is causing sleepless night to two curious Nigerians just because they want to intimidate Russia. If this is so simple why can't Elon musk Spacex and NASA replicate this, why should they wait till 2024. Please don't bother replying me, even the picture increased my doubts and exposed USA desperation.

You are done here.

I just went through your entire history on Nairaland and it is very unfortunate that i crawled in the very bottom to engage with you.

You are as shallow as a river, one atom deep.

I tried to educate you on the difference between Elon's objective (which is reusability) and NASA's. The fact that you cannot learn this shows how permanent your brain status is.

Continue to rent out your projectors and try to eke a living from registering business names. You see this thing called knowledge, it is not for you.

As regards that your blog and 'website', let me assure you that it perfectly represents you.

Your old windows Vista/7 laptop with bad battery (yeah, i know) should have been a source of knowledge but i wonder if the virus on it has somehow affected. your brain.

Look at my moniker and remember it. The next time you see it on a thread......RUN!!!

stevonics:
So this is the picture you believed that propelled the astronaut out of moon. Ok no problem. I only believed the videos of propulsion from earth. I was trained by superiors not to believe that your picture. They Should save Elon musk the energy and recreate it. Bye.

Then you are a fool.

stevonics:
Oh you now agree that if the trip to moon were single-use equipment, how could the astronaut reuse the craft/ equipment from moon back to space and earth. Dull brain. i know your type. Shallow minded being.

Let me explain to you slowly using Apollo 11.

When they got to the moon, two crafts were attached. They were named Columbia and Eagle.

There were three astronauts...Collins (who stayed in Columbia) while Armstrong and Aldrin (who transferred into Eagle) detached from Columbia and landed. Collins continued to orbit in Columbia.

When they were done on the moon, Eagle ascended, joined Columbia for both astronauts to board and Eagle was discarded. Columbia returned to earth.

First picture is Columbia photographed from Eagle.
Second picture is Eagle photographed from Columbia
Third picture is a clearer view of Eagle in lunar orbit
Final picture is Columbia after touchdown on earth

What Elon is trying to achieve is that the crafts should be reusable after any mission.

The simple fact that you have built your confidence around ignorance shows that you are a wreck.

stevonics:
This fool. In the latest things I added after the 1960s did you see Rocket launch. Which Nigeria can even do. Ignoramus, it depends on what you are launching and how you intend to use and communicate with it. That matters.
Try harder, you are only proving how dumb you are.

You said there was no means of propulsion. We told you rockets. If you agree rockets can propel, then why argue that it was impossible?

stevonics:
What did you say about the video op posted where one of the astronaut said they destroyed or lost the technology. How? So the brains of those that did it were cut off. See I love science, technology and exploration. You see the procedures they are taking concerning mars with the updates. These knowledge are needed in the academic field. Universities should be updated with their results. So when you keep the academics in the dark about your achievement no body will believe you. NASA should make the moon take off videos public. How is the relaunch setup and the propulsion machanism. The knowledge of the atomic bomb is in public. I have seen patents of defense missile systems. I am not alone in disputing that claim. Go online and you will read professors, professionals and engineers all over the world disputing it with sound technical logic. I can also argue this way just like millions of enthusiasts if you claim that you have created a perpetual motion machine that does not use fuel which can drive an alternator to generate electricity. There are a lot of fake videos online. But professors all over the world said it is impossible. So please it is not my fault, some claims can't displace the kind of training I have received. Politics influenced that claim and we understand.

Quote renowned professors in the field of physics, electronics etc that said moon travel was possible and share their academic works on the subject.

I am sure you would either ramble on or ignore.

stevonics:
I understand your point. There are technologies that started very early; starting with civil/structural/metallurgy, mechanical, chemicals(which includes the atomic bomb), these were so physical to experiment with and create results (invention). They put so much effort to develop these more physical technologies, which focused on designs and Reactions. A lot of physical parameters were considered to formulate equations and designs: complex- structures, Auto Engines, Chemicals/Radioactive etc. Planetary researchers then started building Telescopes and formulated equations. when electrical started it took several stages of development, from observing electrostatic discharges to creating electric cells then electrical power evolved to developing components, electronics of tubes and discharge components improved to semiconductors ( solid state: discrete- integrated- and then micro processors. Even till today, most changes are seen in electrical/ electronics/ materials. The eras of shortwave transmission, telegram, telex, fax, etc). It was when electronics developed to an advanced stage to control mechanical systems that Robotics/ Mechtronics/ Automations/ Remote Sensing and control came into full stage( plus the improvement in solid fuel/cells) We are now at the stage to start thinking of how to get to Moon and back by integrating all available advanced technologies. That is what Elon musk is doing. What is available now wasn't then in 1960's apart from fake videos inspired by James Bond.

What is this otondo saying?

You went to dig out one of your handouts and started copying?

You can bamboozle your room mates but when you come online, remember that every cadre of intelligence is represented here.

Didirin does not know that rocket science was developed during the 40s.

Na me go school you. You this FUTO SUB Zobo seller.

stevonics:
You are a kid. I don't think you read all my post. Or maybe you do not understand anything. By integrating all the available advanced technologies of today Elon musk is planning of a reusable rocket/Spaceship combo that can take man to moon and back. Remember his fit in electrical power tech. That is why NASA is partnering with him to see if his 2024 launch date is feasible. So I believe it is possible now not in 1960's. Read all my posts and quotes. Research what I just wrote before you start your argument. Counter my points without insults. You said the landed astronaut can easily launch out of moon with his used craft because it is just 59 miles to space. That is when I realized that you are a kid that think they use helicopter to moon. And I don't think you have television to watch space programs and craft launching. So keep off my mention.

I assumed there was some brain matter in your weathered skull. Alas, the last few cells have turned faecal.

I asked you to summarise the constraints you think would have made the landing impossible in the 60s and was specific that rants were extra weight. What did you do? 100% rant and not a single point. You would have scored better if you had simply ignored.

List the points and i would educate you.

You would be difficult in real life. Proud, full of himself with your Chinese shirts and 'Lude' polished shoes, looking down on your fellow face-me-i-hit-you owerri co-tenants as you try to roll smarter than a worn dice. You see a television as an achievement. Hope you did not engrave your name on the TV box you inherited?

You call me a kid. It is evident that you go around the village looking for who would greet you with 'good afternoon brother'.

You ramble on to Elon. If you were not so dumb, you would know that Elon is investing on reusable space crafts. The key here is reusable. Prior trips were mainly single-use equipment. Maybe we should look for a FUTO lecturer to explain reusability to you?

You know nothing.

stevonics:
It is Moons Atmosphere relative to its size, composition, gravity and other constants associated with just moon. Do not make up your own comparison to earth, because the landing and taking off we are talking about happens in the moon. what ever parameters and constants you want to use in your calculation to take off from moon must be relative to moon. Before leaving earth station all the calculations to break away from earth's gravity to space are relative to earth.
NASA admitted that moon has atmosphere, the comparison to that of earth makes no meaning if you are the astronaut in Moon trying to take off.

You are a clown. You only know about voice communication. And that is what you posted. Tell me more about the craft system remote/feedback communication to earth. You think the astronaut voice is all that is needed.
If you have undergone any post graduate work experience and training you can't be reasoning like this.
You can continue your insult, that shows your level.

What exactly have you said with so much words?

It is only people who are shallow in knowledge that claim things are not possible.

I am ready to help you. List out (no long epistles) the reasons why you believe there was no moon landing and i would provide answers to them for you.

Victoronah1:
running around the goalposts. You're asking what a country will gain by successfully landing in the moon, or what earth will gain. Which country would be proud to announce that their technology is the best, and from going to the moon successfully they can learn alot about space and use that to even know if there are other planets with life. The usefulness is endless bro.

Us never went to the moon, it's propaganda and politics. Simple. Same way they wrote the Bible and you are shipishly following them.

So the US wrote the bible? Is that why we are here? You are angry and aggressive for reasons that don't concern this discourse.

How much do you think it each space expedition costs?

Do you even understand what cost vs benefit analysis mean? Have you heard of comparative advantages?

Internet don dey anonymous and your small yansh wantu dey shake?

If we ask you to provide evidence to back your claims up now, you go de do like monkey wey tail enter fire.

Phd Conspiracy Science oshi

stevonics:
A block head is one that refused to read NASA report but prefer to quote unknown literature. If you are finding it difficult to read. Just Google "Moon Atmosphere'. It will first display NASA report. Moon's atmospheric composition is almost proportional to its size.
"Appreciable Atmosphere" Kai how do we measure the "Appreciability", with what parameter ?, mr know all. Atmosphere is atmosphere.

How would you say atmosphere is atmosphere? It is like saying transportation is transportation in comparing donkeys and airplanes.

You think you know but you dont.

You, a graduate of engineering from FUTO claim that there was no way to communicate from the moon. When your ignorance was painted in colors, you backtracked.

Physicists, Astronomers, Astronauts, brilliant minds etc all confirm that the moon landing was done. But you want us to listen to you, a polytechnic drop out who only scrambled to get admission to FUTO to study metallurgy at the BSc level and who has never left Owerri but sells business registration.

You want us all to discard scientific works done by Phd geeks from Harvard, Yale, Cambridge, MIT and listen to your dumb theories?

You cannot even rebuild a car engine if your life depended on it and you want us to believe there is no propulsion system that can lift a lunar module housing only two men to a height of 69 miles above the moon surface.

We have an international space station in orbit which is continuously crewed by astronauts from all over the world but we should discount all the years in space research because you, a man who doesn't even know how basic radios work says it is a hoax?

I have a question for you. Who is your hemp dealer?

Victoronah1:
What you should be asking yourself is, why is it only NASA since then. So Russia, or China or even Japan can't also go to the moon themselves to see everything first hand. Lol only NASA, where world power is, lies and propaganda to remain world power.

Same way they came to Africa to tell us that our religion is the devil and that Jesus is the right god and then told us that Jesus is white. Conquered us and now some of us are following their nonsense. Just to feel superior and remain world power

Because of funding and capacity.

Cost vs Benefit.

What does China stand to gain in spending almost 1 trillion USD on a trip to the moon?

While you are asking such questions, you can also ask why those countries dont have Aircraft carriers on the scale of US. Boeing and Airbus alone have technologies that many countries don't have.

You want to go to the moon but you cannot build efficient passenger planes or aircraft carriers?

larryUG:
Are you implying that the moon has atmosphere? What will cause the ablative defect upon approaching the moon?

Ordinary atmosphere. Moon that has Iya Nkechi cool spot where they sell peppered kponmo and cold Guinness. The only issue is that the girl that does POS recently got pregnant and has not opened shop, so you have to come with cash.

Ordinary atmosphere.

Ovaltine:
Interesting.. I am really trying to learn from your technical explanations. I watched YouTube and read blogs just enough to understand what might be the problem.

Here is the actual error:



I am surprised that could be an SSD issue. THe product was marketed to have one of the best SSDs (great speed and performance).

Meanwhile, It doesn't make a lot of sense to create machines that have such many points of failure. I have not used a lot of modern high-end Windows outside X1 Carbons and HP Pro books.

My Question:
How do you know about all these and do you repair Macbooks?

Apologies, i am not as methodical as you (in regards to segmenting responses).

SSD issues could mean the system cannot access the SSD at the moment, due to other issues.

I would suggest getting the MBP opened again, checking for any loose cable, physical burn or even antelope and be sure it is not a physical issue. Afterwards, i would suggest trying the NVRAM and SMC resets to see if it would even recognise those sequences. You can also try to remember the flow of events prior to the crash. I had an experience with a Macbook once when i was trying to dual boot with linux. I modified the EFI then installed one useless EXFAT software and after a restart, my serial number was dead. I had to use a bootable disk with a special Apple software and my iphone's lucky store of my MBP's serial number to get the frigging thing back.

Let's do a forensic re evaluation and see if we can remember the steps that happened before the village people landed on your laptop.

Answer:
I am just a website developer who loves apple products and tries to resolve issues by troubleshooting. I am not a certified engineer but i fix my things.

ekineme:
Thanks for the link, it's content is quite educating but I will like if you can go through Stevonics comments objectively, there are some important facts he pointed out that has not been addressed.
Secondly how were they able to survive the Cosmic Radiation, let's assume they are shielded by the LM, but the thickness was so thin, my question of what kind of glue was used to hold the parts together considering that riveting and Welding won't be possible in such scenario.
Google is not giving me the answer I need hence I seek opinions from knowledgeable individual.

What do you mean by objective in this context? Are you implying i should agree with his submissions like "the hubble telescope and the lunar ranging mirror is the same" or that 'no human has ever landed on the moon'. I cannot agree to such tepid statements.

There are resources online that cover aspects of the moon landing and space travel.

I would suggest you approach them objectively too, without a bias in your mind.

stevonics:
If there is any lunar reflector it must have been dropped by an unmanned rover. they have started showing us pink aliens in Mars, very soon they will say man landed in Mars after several unmanned exploration.
I repeat man has not entered moon and returned.

First, you claim there is no lunar reflector. You were very clear in your claims. Now you are saying 'if there is...' and now you shit out another claim that '...it must have been dropped by an unmanned rover'.

Why not choose a conspiracy?

From your owerri rented apartment, you are stamping your foot and saying no man has entered the moon and returned.

You are out of your depth.

stevonics:
I read materials and metallurgy in Futo, Electronics in Poly( to be frank with you some of the boys I mentored in electronics, when I had an eclub in poly are lecturing there, and they can challenge any professor (that is how it is with electronics).
To what you posted.
These guys did a paper work of going to moon, they are talking about the voice and data communication as at then. They tried to make it match the then technology. The craft itself need an advanced technology- Mechtronics and automations. Yes a good radio engineer can make such suggestion for voice and data relay to earth. But the core issue is propelling out of moon. You need exactly the equipments, materials and fuel you used on earth to do same in moon. Moon is not space but a body with gravity( one sixth of earth
This is a conspiracy United States of America will live to defend.

Now that you have indirectly agreed that it is possible to communicate from the moon despite your initial claims, we can move to the other subjects.

To propel out of the moon, you dont need the exact equipment to push you from earth to the moon.

First, the gravity of the moon is only a sixth of earth's.
Secondly, there is no atmosphere on the moon. You are not fighting against a huge force to leave.
Thirdly, the lunar module had the main ship in orbit just 69 miles above it so all it needs to do is propel at exactly the right time to reach, join, egress and dump.

If your team of electronics wizards cannot recreate a simple radio, how then can you fathom space travel?

The fact that you dont understand how it was done does not mean smarter people dont.

Victoronah1:


The confidence you're using to spill this trash is shocking me. You only read reports from books that people wrote, and you're fighting and standing as if you were there first hand. You're merely relying on a report. Sometimes I wonder how humans think. If you said you are not sure as the event has not occurred for the past 50 years since then, we could just manage to pass. But the enfrontery to spill this rubbish with so much confidence is bizzare

If you like, type in gold, your dumb-foolery would not be masked.

Yes, i read books and listen to experts speak on subjects. Is that not what we call knowledge?

Science is very simple. If you make claims, be ready to back them up with facts and they must be reproducible.

It is either you did not know who to quote or you are typing from your ass because i did not make any claims. I am here to dispel the conspiracy theories that the OP initiated that says the moon landing was a hoax.

Now, if you know your brain matter cannot understand what is being discussed, just browse on and keep quiet. Your lack of knowledge is not my fault.

If you quote me again, ensure your brain is connected to your fingers.

stevonics:
Bro, if manned moon landing was successful, there a lot of benefits and experimentations. See how they are using Antarctica.
A moon station should be similar to an earth station and not space station.
Because you need a propulsion to overcome gravity from such stations. You don't need such in space station, which serve best as control and monitoring unit.
So to escape moon gravity, you need exactly all the equipments, materials and fuel you used on earth in moon to eject you first to space before you proceed to earth.
The Technology and equipment were not there. No body had entered the moon. The mirror people are talking about is a Hubble Telescope which NASA even trained some Africans to go and repair when it had issues. One of my friend then in Futo was among.

Dear students, graduates, lecturers, staff and governing council of FUTO, one of your Engineering graduates is making claims that the Hubble telescope and the Moon Laser Ranging Mirror is one and the same. He is very confident based on his extended studies and research on the subject in FUTO.

Do you guys agree with him?

stevonics:
Bro, if manned moon landing was successful, there a lot of benefits and experimentations. See how they are using Antarctica.
A moon station should be similar to an earth station and not space station.
Because you need a propulsion to overcome gravity from such stations. You don't need such in space station, which serve best as control and monitoring unit.
So to escape moon gravity, you need exactly all the equipments, materials and fuel on moon to eject you first to space before you proceed to earth.
The Technology and equipment were not there. No body have entered the moon. The mirror people are talking about is a Hubble Telescope. Which NASA even trained some Africans to go and repair when it had issues. One of my friend then in Futo was among.

LMAO.

So you claim that the Hubble telescope is also the same as the Lunar Laser Reflector (aka moon mirror)?

I am helping you again. I am attaching images of both. Hope you can see the difference.

Mention the name of your FUTO friend that was on the repair mission and let's hold a live discussion where he would confirm all your allegations as being true.

stevonics:
You must be a fool to believe that conspiracy.
Please explain how to communicate from moon, at what frequency, short wave, amplitude, pulse, modulation, is it a line- of-sight. Where are the moon booster repeaters, the power and how can that bring them back. Mumu man.
All the equipments on earth that sends a craft to space, are required in moon to send a craft to space and back to earth. That is not even enough, because your entry into moon can damage the craft.
Why am I even replying stupid kids that refused to learn.

What did you study at FUTO?

I will help you. This is an excerpt from an article on Forbes on this subject.




The PLSS life support backpack contained a VHF band radio which transmitted voice and biosensor data from the spacesuit to the LEM communications system, and voice signals from the LEM to the suited astronaut. The LEM communications system, then communicated voice and bio sensor signals with Earth using S-band, a UHF frequency range widely used in space because of its ability to pass through Earth’s ionosphere without distortion or reflection.

All voice communication was amplitude modulated, which is why it carried readily recognizable AM signal distortions and noise. The S-band transmitter that talked to Earth also acted as a transponder, responding to coded ranging signals from Earth which were used to accurately measure the distance from a ground station on Earth to the LEM. Voice and data could also be routed through the CSM in orbit, and there stored on the DSE recorder for later spooled delivery to Earth, though I don’t know that this was actually done with lunar EVA data.

The VHF transceivers had two channels, and communications between the LEM and suited crewmen were “duplex,” meaning each could transmit simultaneously to the other. Ground transmissions, on the other hand, were “simplex,” and the characteristic Quindar tones were used to simplify single-channel (you talk, then I talk) communication.

Communication between the LEM and astronauts performing EVA was facilitated by a small VHF antenna deployed by the first crewman down the ladder. On the surface, the crew deployed a large, umbrella like S-band antenna for beaming voice and data directly back to Earth without having to relay through the CSM and its high-gain antenna array.

On later missions, of course, a somewhat smaller deployable S-band antenna was carried by the Lunar Roving Vehicle.




Reference:
https : // www.forbes. com /sites/quora/2018/02/20/how-did-neil-armstrong-communicate-with-earth-from-the-surface-of-the-moon/?sh=50e0c35e5979

stevonics:
Bro, I love how civil you are. He was actually referring to me as a business registration agent, "the band wagon factor". I would not like to boast here. I have a book called The Boundary of Science. But non scientists believe any thing is possible with the likes of United States. The moon gravity is one sixth that of earth. You need refuelling and moon station to propel out. After using a space craft the walls gets weaker due to Ablative defects. The craft must have spent fuel to get to space first. To manoeuvre close to moon requires just electric/solar powered propulsion, moons gravity can trap you to its orbit if you don't have enough propelling force to escape back to your space station. Now if you intend to move into moon and land, you force your craft through moons centrifugal forces and get pulled by its gravity, the only safe landing will involve balloons (as simulated for mars). Getting to moon surface, you must have cruised your craft to Ablative defect, which either renders it useless or requires repairs. I remember when Challenger burst into flames due to this phenomenon during reentry to earth. Just imagine experiencing that into moon and you are not yet done (coming back)
I love this your topic. We have brains in Nigeria. Some are not where they should be.

yen yen yen...

He tries to lend credence to his mouthwash by saying "i have a book called Boundary of Science"....as if he published a book on this very subject. Why should manoeuvres close to the moon require only electric or solar? Electric how? Lightning?

Why do you need refuelling if you have enough fuel to take you to and fro?

Ablative defects happen by design and occur on entry into earth's atmosphere. Is our learned business registration engineer now saying the moon as an atmosphere?

Do you even know how rockets work in space?

Anyone interested in reading in simple english how it was done can visit this link (just remove the spaces) https : // newatlas. com /apollo-11-moon-landing/59108/

stevonics:
Bros Futo made me. Engineering for a decade

You are a disgrace to FUTO then.

Engineering for a decade and you dont know that radio can communicate from the moon to the earth?

You think GPS is actually needed to go to the moon? Do you even know how GPS works?

Do you even know that the first computer to use silicon chips in the whole world was the Apollo guidance computer in the 60s.

Do you even know that the computer technology of the 70s was fuelled by secret US Defence and NASA prototypes of the 50s and 60s?

You open your half-trained mouth waaaaaaaa and dump rubbish online.

Train yourself or shut up.

ekineme:
Please I am open to learning, I would appreciate if you can through more light in some areas.
I understand that launching Objects to space and manned mission to the Moon are different, Austranauts still travel to space till this day, launching satellite to space just like the James Webb Telescope recently launched to the Lagrange point are part of man recent space exploit but when we talk about Manned space mission to moon is the bone of contention here.
There are so many discrepancies from account of Neil Armstrong, Collins and account of some Austranauts today like Don pettit. In one of the interviews I posted the link above, Collins admitted on never being in d moon.
Launching Objects into space is easier and if with all the available technologies today there are still concern on safety of bringing man back from the moon then the question of if really the trip of 1969 was a fact.
Pardon my curiosity, kindly enlighten me more.

I saw some of the Twitter links you shared.

The first one showed practice runs by astronauts. If you read through the comments, you would see it clearly debunked as practice runs to test equipment.

Don Petit is a new kid on the block. His first space expedition was in 2002. He could never have said the moon landing was fake. You can prove me wrong by sharing anywhere he said such.

Of course, Collins never set foot on the moon. He was in orbit controlling their shuttle whilst Aldrin and Armstrong were 69 miles below him. If you have any link that proves Collins called Aldrin and Armstrong as liars, please share.

There are 6 landings on the moon. Details in the public domain.

PS: Dont share twitter link as facts. Anybody drunk on pig vomit can make a twitter post.

stevonics:
Bro, any successful manned moon landing will have a
multiple benefits to humanity. United States NASA have spent more on exploring universe with unmanned voyagers and Rovers. They are spending more to explore mars.
So money is not the problem but reentry.
Just assume it was successful, we would have heard and updated our chemistry by adding composition of moon rooks, we would have heard of moon station. Bro any good engineer knows the the stages of technology. Space station-yes, Universe explorers-yes. But no such thing as moon station to enable refuelling, propulsion, Ablative check correction, super computer speed, communication, earth GPS synchronising.

You want to sound like you know something so you added many jargons as support.

What other thing is a hoax to you?

Messi1:
Two ladies rejected me in different occasions simply because I'm naturally dreaded.


I wanted to cut it but people say if I cut it I will die.

Free yourself. Your dad who forced you to keep it is dead.

It is actually dirty with a lot of dead skin cells forming a breeding ground for all forms of bacteria and flea.

Get clean.

Questions like this should be asked in job interviews to know the dumb ones.

Morons who cannot take their time to review historical evidences on space travel would sit down in their cockroach infested rooms and spew jargons.

Whilst you are there, add flat earth and UFO invasions to the mix and your Phd in Conspiracy Science is complete.

One business name registration agent even said he is an expert in electronics and since GPS was invented in the 70s, then it was not possible to have travelled before then. He also doubted long distance communication was possible in the 60s. Radio should have been strange to him.

NASA got on the moon. They left a laser mirror there and you can confirm this yourself if you have the equipment and skills to bounce beams off it.

America spent billions to US dollars to go to the moon because it was a competition with USSR. If they needed to go today, they can.

There is an international space station orbiting the world and there are many satellites overhead us at any moment. Even our Nigeria launched our own satellite.

NASA employs only the brightest. There is a saying that 'smart' is not a scarce resource in NASA. If your brain cannot fathom the fact that humans have walked the moon, then you are simply not smart enough. It is not the moon's fault.

Ovaltine:
Yes, I followed it meticulously. I tried DFU 3 times.
The second mac detected it. Both revive and restore failed. The error failure speaks of abortion in DFU in step 4.
E0006. Same error for restore.

Meanwhile, an Engineer in the village already tried it also before I decided to try it myself.
It couldn;t have been heat. My work desk is very close to a 2HP Air conditional, plug the mac always sit on a desk fan.


No way. If it is, then it should have died those times it used to hang.



I am not sure. This may be. My XR is always plugged into the thunderbolt and it was connected when the thing shut down.
My power source is Clean and Stable inverter power though.





Basic is not enough for what I do. Except I want to deliberately kill productivity.
I am going back to windows.
I had the keyboard issue as well because of the butterfly.
No display issues.

I wont be surprised if:
A. The laptop actually has a user-induced damage to the logic board, thermal damage from persistent operation in dusty environments (per OP statements), or even some cables not being seated properly 
B. It is actually a soft-brick and the exact restore process has not been followed.

I changed my environment this April. My current environment has been dust 'free' (low dust). Though I met a lot of dust in the fan.
With all these in view, I was still unable to repair the thing.

Going online and seeing thousands of people having the same problem speaks volumes. In beta countries, they simply walk into Apple for a replacement or free repair. So, they wouldn;t talk too much about it. But here in 9ja. That is hard to get.

Error 6 is most likely an SSD NAND failure. You can visit this site for more insight (remove spaces). https : // logi.wiki /index.php/DFU_Mode_Restore_(Macs)

An excerpt from the same site reads thus:

"
Rule out parts or any other board issue that is possible before DFU restoring the unit. There are many things that can cause a DFU restore to fail. The problem is, if you fail a DFU restore, you may end up in a different error state than your original issue. For example:

If you have a board that comes in, with no power. You plug it into another unit, to check if its in DFU mode. It's not. Let's say PP3v3_G3H is shorted. Let's call this Failure State A.

Now you're in Failure State A, and you decided to force the unit into DFU, and attempt a restore. At this point, it would fail, and you would be stuck in recovery, let's call this Failure State B. Now you're at Failure State B, it makes it 10x harder to diagnose Failure State A, simply because you can't follow the power structure anymore. At this point, if you find you're short on PP3v3_G3H and remove it, you would have to restore again and PRAY that it works. It does not always. There have been many cases, where the unit came in with liquid damage, clearly a Failure State A type of situation, but the client attempted to restore before sending it, making it into a Failure State B. It seems half the time, after I fix Failure A, that I am able to get out of Failure B after restore. The half that is unsuccessful, is, I'm sure because of a damaged trace or something like that - however, with it being in recovery, or Failure State B, it's much harder to diagnose."

Irrespective of the balloon goodwill, computer village is not what it seems any more. It is now more of a collection of phone sellers and half-baked hustlers. Computer repair has gone beyond swapping out defective hard disks. What you experienced with your macbook would be experienced on most modern high end Windows laptop too.

Ovaltine:
Hmm,, I think Apple really want people to buy their newer devices . I am not going to do that.
The Surface Book 3 I am considering is more expensive than this MacBook pro. I am 100% sure the performance can't be matched.

Hmm,, I think Apple really want people to buy their newer devices . I am not going to do that.
The Surface Book 3 I am considering is more expensive than this MacBook pro. I am 100% sure the performance can't be matched.[/quote]There have been many tests.

The M processors are little wizards dressed in Apple cloaks. Intel has got nothing on them. Power and thermal efficiency and they just float through the heaviest of tasks.

You can get the Surface if you want but you would be getting the smaller witch from the colony.

Stabliz:
Hi guys,

MY username say my introduction if you don't mind. But am Caleb by name.

I learned that I can get help from nairalanders to archive my goal of starting the Stabliz.com.ng project. My goal is simply to make it a recognized public and private discussion platform in Africa.

I have few friends who are assisting me in getting members to register on Stabliz via different campaigns. But I haven't launched an advert officially yet.

Recently, I observed that the newly registered members aren't finding the site interesting because they've not been engaging enough in the public postings. About 30% still uses the private messaging to interact with people but they don't post publicly. I have been chatting with a lot of new members via the PM.

I want to solve the problem that is preventing new members from participating in posting or interacting publicly.

I have worked on the design and added more features with few suggestions I have received so far. To me, the site look good, but am open to suggestions still. I don't know about you.

So please, I want to get tips, suggestions and advice on what to do to make the platform more interesting for visitors and newly registered members.

Anyone who is interested in working with me to achieve this goal is warmly welcomed.

Thanks in advance.

Did you use your phone to build the website?

Chnbanc:
I hate free domains.
Y not get a .com.ng domain for 1k
And hosting for 700hundred naira monthly.

Why pay for hosting when you can do so for free?