₦airaland Forum

tartar9:
lol is that not the same name parisbookaddict screams out every night while she's doing her work in Italy? it truly makes knees bow

Funny cos your ho of a sister does the same servicing Arab dicks in Riyadh and Jebba.

Ishilove:
Pass me some

Not sure how that would work. Perhaps I could wire you a generous portion

Rilwayne001:
you are obviously confused.. Are Catholics using the same Bible with the protestants? Are he using the same Bible with the prostestants? Are the Mormons using the same Bible with the prostestants? How many Bible exactly do we have?

I was never a Christian btw and will never be.. Even though I am getting married to a Christian

So yoruba muslims have also started kidnapping 13 year old christian girls? You should be ashamed of yourself. Why can't you kidnap a 13 year old hijabi wearing muslimah and marry her?

Ishilove:
Bia, nwoke, you have time o...

Bia, nwanyi, Even if there is no time, I will create time. I can't allow apostacy to triumph over truth

Rilwayne001:
[b] okay, let's start from here:

New International Version
Jehoiachin was eighteen years old when he
became king, and he reigned in Jerusalem
three months and ten days. He did evil in
the eyes of the LORD.
New Living Translation
Jehoiachin was eighteen years old when he
became king, and he reigned in Jerusalem
three months and ten days. Jehoiachin did
what was evil in the LORD's sight.

English Standard Version
Jehoiachin was eighteen years old when he
became king, and he reigned three months
and ten days in Jerusalem. He did what
was evil in the sight of the LORD.

New American Standard Bible
Jehoiachin was eight years old when he
became king, and he reigned three months
and ten days in Jerusalem, and he did evil
in the sight of the LORD.

King James Bible
Jehoiachin was eight years old when he
began to reign, and he reigned three
months and ten days in Jerusalem: and he
did that which was evil in the sight of the
LORD.

Holman Christian Standard Bible
Jehoiachin was 18 years old when he
became king and reigned three months
and 10 days in Jerusalem. He did what
was evil in the LORD's sight.

International Standard Version
Jehoiachin was eight years old when he
became king, and he reigned for three
months and ten days in Jerusalem, all the
while doing what the LORD considered to
be evil.

NET Bible
Jehoiachin was eighteen years old when he
became king, and he reigned three months
and ten days in Jerusalem. He did evil in
the sight of the LORD.

GOD'S WORD® Translation
Jehoiakin was eight years old when he
began to rule as king. He was king for
three months and ten days in Jerusalem.
He did what the LORD considered evil.

Jubilee Bible 2000
Jehoiachin was eight years old when he
began to reign, and he reigned three
months and ten days in Jerusalem; and he
did that which was evil in the sight of the
LORD.

http://biblehub.com/2_chronicles/36-9.htm

Which do we believe now 18 or 8 .

Meanwhile this is just a tip and not even the bone of contention, and I want a straight answer before I present the bone of contention... [/b]




I am getting married to your daughter by God's grace



If that is your own definition of pollution, well it remains your cup of tea...



I guess you are blind to see the underlined

The answer to your question O Abeed is that Jehoiachin was crowned as King TWO TIMES. Once at the age of 8 and the second time at the age of 18. Let me explain using scripture.


When Jehoiachin's father Jehoiakim became king, his legal wife Nehushta wanted her legal son Jehoiachin to succeed, instead of Zedekiah (Jehoiakim’s firstborn from a concubine).

Apparently she didn’t trust her husband very much and she insisted that Jehoiakim granted their son Jehoiachin the title of ‘King’ when he was 8 years old (without the duties) and she took for herself the title of ‘Mother of the King’ (2 Kings 24:15).

Already in the year of Jehoiakim’s enthronement as King, his young son Jehoiachin – a boy of eight years – got the title ‘King of Judah’. After Jehoiakim died 10 years later, Jehoiachin became king with all the duties at the age of eighteen.

So to summarise, Jehoiachin became King BY TITLE at the age of 8 to prevent his older illegitimate brother from becoming King, then he was effectively crowned as King BY RIGHT ten years later at the age of 18 after his father Jehoiakim passed away.

Rilwayne001:

It just goes to show that MUMUhaMAD or whoever else it was wrote the crookran was confused O abeed rilwayne:

Quran

Quran (2:191-193) - "And kill them wherever you find them, and turn them out from where they have turned you out. And Al-Fitnah [disbelief or unrest] is worse than killing...
but if they desist, then lo! Allah is forgiving and merciful. And fight them until there is no more Fitnah [disbelief and worshipping of others along with Allah] and worship is for Allah alone. But if they cease, let there be no transgression except against Az-Zalimun(the polytheists, and wrong-doers, etc.)" (Translation is from the Noble Quran) The verse prior to this (190) refers to "fighting for the cause of Allah those who fight you" leading some to believe that the entire passage refers to a defensive war in which Muslims are defending their homes and families. The historical context of this passage is not defensive warfare, however, since Muhammad and his Muslims had just relocated to Medina and were not under attack by their Meccan adversaries. In fact, the verses urge offensive warfare, in that Muslims are to drive Meccans out of their own city (which they later did). Verse 190 thus means to fight those who offer resistance to Allah's rule (ie. Muslim conquest). The use of the word "persecution" by some Muslim translators is disingenuous (the actual Arabic words for persecution - "idtihad" - and oppression - a variation of "z-l-m" - do not appear in the verse). The word used instead, "fitna", can mean disbelief, or the disorder that results from unbelief or temptation. This is certainly what is meant in this context since the violence is explicitly commissioned "until religion is for Allah" - ie. unbelievers desist in their unbelief.

Quran (2:244) - "Then fight in the cause of Allah, and know that Allah Heareth and knoweth all things."

Quran (2:216) - "Fighting is prescribed for you, and ye dislike it. But it is possible that ye dislike a thing which is good for you, and that ye love a thing which is bad for you. But Allah knoweth, and ye know not." Not only does this verse establish that violence can be virtuous, but it also contradicts the myth that fighting is intended only in self-defense, since the audience was obviously not under attack at the time. From the Hadith, we know that this verse was narrated at a time that Muhammad was actually trying to motivate his people into raiding merchant caravans for loot.

Quran (3:56) - "As to those who reject faith, I will punish them with terrible agony in this world and in the Hereafter, nor will they have anyone to help."

Quran (3:151) - "Soon shall We cast terror into the hearts of the Unbelievers, for that they joined companions with Allah, for which He had sent no authority". This speaks directly of polytheists, yet it also includes Christians, since they believe in the Trinity (ie. what Muhammad incorrectly believed to be 'joining companions to Allah').

Quran (4:74) - "Let those fight in the way of Allah who sell the life of this world for the other. Whoso fighteth in the way of Allah, be he slain or be he victorious, on him We shall bestow a vast reward." The martyrs of Islam are unlike the early Christians, who were led meekly to the slaughter. These Muslims are killed in battle as they attempt to inflict death and destruction for the cause of Allah. This is the theological basis for today's suicide bombers.

Quran (4:76) - "Those who believe fight in the cause of Allah…"

Quran (4:89) - "They but wish that ye should reject Faith, as they do, and thus be on the same footing (as they): But take not friends from their ranks until they flee in the way of Allah (From what is forbidden). But if they turn renegades, seize them and slay them wherever ye find them; and (in any case) take no friends or helpers from their ranks."

Quran (4:95) - "Not equal are those of the believers who sit (at home), except those who are disabled (by injury or are blind or lame, etc.), and those who strive hard and fight in the Cause of Allah with their wealth and their lives. Allah has preferred in grades those who strive hard and fight with their wealth and their lives above those who sit (at home).Unto each, Allah has promised good (Paradise), but Allah has preferred those who strive hard and fight, above those who sit (at home) by a huge reward " This passage criticizes "peaceful" Muslims who do not join in the violence, letting them know that they are less worthy in Allah's eyes. It also demolishes the modern myth that "Jihad" doesn't mean holy war in the Quran, but rather a spiritual struggle. Not only is this Arabic word (mujahiduna) used in this passage, but it is clearly not referring to anything spiritual, since the physically disabled are given exemption. (The Hadith reveals the context of the passage to be in response to a blind man's protest that he is unable to engage in Jihad, which would not make sense if it meant an internal struggle).

Quran (4:104) - "And be not weak hearted in pursuit of the enemy; if you suffer pain, then surely they (too) suffer pain as you suffer pain..." Is pursuing an injured and retreating enemy really an act of self-defense?

Quran (5:33) - "The punishment of those who wage war against Allah and His messenger and strive to make mischief in the land is only this, that they should be murdered or crucified or their hands and their feet should be cut off on opposite sides or they should be imprisoned; this shall be as a disgrace for them in this world, and in the hereafter they shall have a grievous chastisement"

Quran (8:12) - "I will cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieve. Therefore strike off their heads and strike off every fingertip of them" No reasonable person would interpret this to mean a spiritual struggle.

Quran (8:15) - "O ye who believe! When ye meet those who disbelieve in battle, turn not your backs to them. (16)Whoso on that day turneth his back to them, unless maneuvering for battle or intent to join a company, he truly hath incurred wrath from Allah, and his habitation will be hell, a hapless journey's end."

Quran (8:39) - "And fight with them until there is no more fitna (disorder, unbelief) and religion is all for Allah" Some translations interpret "fitna" as "persecution", but the traditional understanding of this word is not supported by the historical context (See notes for 2:193). The Meccans were simply refusing Muhammad access to their city during Haj. Other Muslims were allowed to travel there - just not as an armed group, since Muhammad had declared war on Mecca prior to his eviction. The Meccans were also acting in defense of their religion, since it was Muhammad's intention to destroy their idols and establish Islam by force (which he later did). Hence the critical part of this verse is to fight until "religion is only for Allah", meaning that the true justification of violence was the unbelief of the opposition. According to the Sira (Ibn Ishaq/Hisham 324) Muhammad further explains that "Allah must have no rivals."

Quran (8:57) - "If thou comest on them in the war, deal with them so as to strike fear in those who are behind them, that haply they may remember."

Quran (8:67) - "It is not for a Prophet that he should have prisoners of war until he had made a great slaughter in the land..."

Quran (8:59-60) - "And let not those who disbelieve suppose that they can outstrip (Allah's Purpose). Lo! they cannot escape. Make ready for them all thou canst of (armed) force and of horses tethered, that thereby ye may dismay the enemy of Allah and your enemy."

Quran (8:65) - "O Prophet, exhort the believers to fight..."

Quran (9:5) - "So when the sacred months have passed away, then slay the idolaters wherever you find them, and take them captive and besiege them and lie in wait for them in every ambush, then if they repent and keep up prayer and pay the poor-rate, leave their way free to them." According to this verse, the best way of staying safe from Muslim violence is to convert to Islam (prayer (salat) and the poor tax (zakat) are among the religion's Five Pillars). This popular claim that the Quran only inspires violence within the context of self-defense is seriously challenged by this passage as well, since the Muslims to whom it was written were obviously not under attack. Had they been, then there would have been no waiting period (earlier verses make it a duty for Muslims to fight in self-defense, even during the sacred months). The historical context is Mecca after the idolaters were subjugated by Muhammad and posed no threat. Once the Muslims had power, they violently evicted those unbelievers who would not convert.

Quran (9:14) - "Fight against them so that Allah will punish them by your hands and disgrace them and give you victory over them and heal the breasts of a believing people." Humiliating and hurting non-believers not only has the blessing of Allah, but it is ordered as a means of carrying out his punishment and even "healing" the hearts of Muslims.

Quran (9:20) - "Those who believe, and have left their homes and striven with their wealth and their lives in Allah's way are of much greater worth in Allah's sight. These are they who are triumphant." The Arabic word interpreted as "striving" in this verse is the same root as "Jihad". The context is obviously holy war.

Quran (9:29) - "Fight those who believe not in Allah nor the Last Day, nor hold that forbidden which hath been forbidden by Allah and His Messenger, nor acknowledge the religion of Truth, (even if they are) of the People of the Book, until they pay the Jizya with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued." "People of the Book" refers to Christians and Jews. According to this verse, they are to be violently subjugated, with the sole justification being their religious status. Verse 9:33 tells Muslims that Allah has charted them to make Islam "superior over all religions." This chapter was one of the final "revelations" from Allah and it set in motion the tenacious military expansion, in which Muhammad's companions managed to conquer two-thirds of the Christian world in the next 100 years. Islam is intended to dominate all other people and faiths.


Quran (9:30) - "And the Jews say: Ezra is the son of Allah; and the Christians say: The Messiah is the son of Allah; these are the words of their mouths; they imitate the saying of those who disbelieved before; may Allah destroy them; how they are turned away!"

Quran (9:38-39) - "O ye who believe! what is the matter with you, that, when ye are asked to go forth in the cause of Allah, ye cling heavily to the earth? Do ye prefer the life of this world to the Hereafter? But little is the comfort of this life, as compared with the Hereafter. Unless ye go forth, He will punish you with a grievous penalty, and put others in your place." This is a warning to those who refuse to fight, that they will be punished with Hell.

Quran (9:41) - "Go forth, light-armed and heavy-armed, and strive with your wealth and your lives in the way of Allah! That is best for you if ye but knew." See also the verse that follows (9:42) - "If there had been immediate gain (in sight), and the journey easy, they would (all) without doubt have followed thee, but the distance was long, (and weighed) on them" This contradicts the myth that Muslims are to fight only in self-defense, since the wording implies that battle will be waged a long distance from home (in another country and on Christian soil, in this case, according to the historians).


Quran (9:73) - "O Prophet! strive hard against the unbelievers and the hypocrites and be unyielding to them; and their abode is hell, and evil is the destination." Dehumanizing those who reject Islam, by reminding Muslims that unbelievers are merely firewood for Hell, makes it easier to justify slaughter. It also explains why today's devout Muslims have little regard for those outside the faith.

Quran (9:88) - "But the Messenger, and those who believe with him, strive and fight with their wealth and their persons: for them are (all) good things: and it is they who will prosper."


Quran (9:111) - "Allah hath purchased of the believers their persons and their goods; for theirs (in return) is the garden (of Paradise): they fight in His cause, and slay and are slain: a promise binding on Him in truth, through the Law, the Gospel, and the Quran: and who is more faithful to his covenant than Allah? then rejoice in the bargain which ye have concluded: that is the achievement supreme." How does the Quran define a true believer?

Quran (9:123) - "O you who believe! fight those of the unbelievers who are near to you and let them find in you hardness."

Quran (17:16) - "And when We wish to destroy a town, We send Our commandment to the people of it who lead easy lives, but they transgress therein; thus the word proves true against it, so We destroy it with utter destruction." Note that the crime is moral transgression, and the punishment is "utter destruction." (Before ordering the 9/11 attacks, Osama bin Laden first issued Americans an invitation to Islam).

Quran (18:65-81) - This parable lays the theological groundwork for honor killings, in which a family member is murdered because they brought shame to the family, either through apostasy or perceived moral indiscretion. The story (which is not found in any Jewish or Christian source) tells of Moses encountering a man with "special knowledge" who does things which don't seem to make sense on the surface, but are then justified according to later explanation. One such action is to murder a youth for no apparent reason (74). However, the wise man later explains that it was feared that the boy would "grieve" his parents by "disobedience and ingratitude." He was killed so that Allah could provide them a 'better' son. (Note: This is one reason why honor killing is sanctioned by Sharia. Reliance of the Traveler (Umdat al-Saliq) says that punishment for murder is not applicable when a parent or grandparent kills their offspring (o.1.1-2).)

Quran (21:44) - "We gave the good things of this life to these men and their fathers until the period grew long for them; See they not that We gradually reduce the land (in their control) from its outlying borders? Is it then they who will win?"

Quran (25:52) - "Therefore listen not to the Unbelievers, but strive against them with the utmost strenuousness..." "Strive against" is Jihad - obviously not in the personal context. It's also significant to point out that this is a Meccan verse.

Quran (33:60-62) - "If the hypocrites, and those in whose hearts is a disease, and the alarmists in the city do not cease, We verily shall urge thee on against them, then they will be your neighbors in it but a little while. Accursed, they will be seized wherever found and slain with a (fierce) slaughter." This passage sanctions the slaughter (rendered "merciless" and "horrible murder" in other translations) against three groups: Hypocrites (Muslims who refuse to "fight in the way of Allah" (3:167) and hence don't act as Muslims should), those with "diseased hearts" (which include Jews and Christians 5:51-52), and "alarmists" or "agitators who include those who merely speak out against Islam, according to Muhammad's biographers. It is worth noting that the victims are to be sought out by Muslims, which is what today's terrorists do. If this passage is meant merely to apply to the city of Medina, then it is unclear why it is included in Allah's eternal word to Muslim generations.

Quran (47:3-4) - "Those who disbelieve follow falsehood, while those who believe follow the truth from their Lord... So, when you meet (in fight Jihad in Allah's Cause), those who disbelieve smite at their necks till when you have killed and wounded many of them, then bind a bond firmly (on them, i.e. take them as captives)... If it had been Allah's Will, He Himself could certainly have punished them (without you). But (He lets you fight), in order to test you, some with others. But those who are killed in the Way of Allah, He will never let their deeds be lost." Those who reject Allah are to be killed in Jihad. The wounded are to be held captive for ransom. The only reason Allah doesn't do the dirty work himself is to to test the faithfulness of Muslims. Those who kill pass the test.

Quran (47:35) - "Be not weary and faint-hearted, crying for peace, when ye should be uppermost (Shakir: "have the upper hand" for Allah is with you,"

Quran (48:17) - "There is no blame for the blind, nor is there blame for the lame, nor is there blame for the sick (that they go not forth to war). And whoso obeyeth Allah and His messenger, He will make him enter Gardens underneath which rivers flow; and whoso turneth back, him will He punish with a painful doom." Contemporary apologists sometimes claim that Jihad means 'spiritual struggle.' Is so, then why are the blind, lame and sick exempted? This verse also says that those who do not fight will suffer torment in hell.

Quran (48:29) - "Muhammad is the messenger of Allah. And those with him are hard (ruthless) against the disbelievers and merciful among themselves" Islam is not about treating everyone equally. This verse tells Muslims that there are two very distinct standards that are applied based on religious status. Also the word used for 'hard' or 'ruthless' in this verse shares the same root as the word translated as 'painful' or severe' to describe Hell in over 25 other verses including 65:10, 40:46 and 50:26..

Quran (61:4) - "Surely Allah loves those who fight in His cause" Religion of Peace, indeed! The verse explicitly refers to "rows" or "battle array," meaning that it is speaking of physical conflict. This is followed by (61:9), which defines the "cause": "He it is who has sent His Messenger (Mohammed) with guidance and the religion of truth (Islam) to make it victorious over all religions even though the infidels may resist." (See next verse, below). Infidels who resist Islamic rule are to be fought.

Quran (61:10-12) - "O You who believe! Shall I guide you to a commerce that will save you from a painful torment. That you believe in Allah and His Messenger (Muhammad), and that you strive hard and fight in the Cause of Allah with your wealth and your lives, that will be better for you, if you but know! (If you do so) He will forgive you your sins, and admit you into Gardens under which rivers flow, and pleasant dwelling in Gardens of'Adn- Eternity ['Adn(Edn) Paradise], that is indeed the great success." This verse refers to physical battle in order to make Islam victorious over other religions (see verse 9). It uses the Arabic root for the word Jihad.

Quran (66:9) - "O Prophet! Strive against the disbelievers and the hypocrites, and be stern with them. Hell will be their home, a hapless journey's end." The root word of "Jihad" is used again here. The context is clearly holy war, and the scope of violence is broadened to include "hypocrites" - those who call themselves Muslims but do not act as such.

idupaul:
is it my eyes or those wounds look photoshopped

Exactly my reaction.

[size=24pt]AFRICAN REFUGEES SAY ARAB MUSLIMS MORE RACIST THAN EUROPEANS

[/size]

Under liberal dogma, the world is divided between the evil European colonialist exploiters of doom and the Oppressed masses of the Third World. In the real world, things are very different.

This is Morocco, one of the few moderate Arab countries, though not for long with the victory of an Islamist party. It's fairly tolerant by Muslim standards, which is still wildly intolerant by European standards.

"Be careful, those blacks might eat you," a Moroccan juice seller in the little border town of Fnideq warned us. They might what? "Yes, really," he replies. "They can do anything."

"Arabs hate black people. And that is not from today, it is in their blood," says Aboubakr, a young man from Senegal who is hoping eventually to cross over into Europe. He spent almost a year in Morocco's capital Rabat before coming to this forest camp near the Spanish border and his experiences there left him feeling bitter.

"Friends of mine were attacked with a knife. Bandits target us because they know we cannot go to the police, even if we are robbed and hurt. Having no papers, we will be caught instead. Blacks have no rights here."

American liberals like to compare the plight of Muslims to the segregation of black people in the United States, in fact it's Muslims who practice segregation of Africans.



Aboubakr is also insulted that Moroccans "cannot believe many of us are Muslims too". According to him, people are surprised when they see him kneeling for prayer. "They don't think a black can be Muslim."

The migrants are reluctant to believe that they might meet more racism in Europe than in Morocco. If they finally manage to cross the border "Black and white people are good together," claims Aboubakr. "In Holland, there are many blacks on the national soccer team. Moroccans are just jealous."

http://www.frontpagemag.com/point/148804/african-refugees-say-arab-muslims-more-racist-daniel-greenfield

Ishilove:
E be like sey you don chop belleful

Bellefull of "common sense"

I can understand Abeed Rilwayne's confusion. Even Allah and Muhammed were confused. They were so confused that they couldn't even depend on their own righteousness.

The God of the Jews and Christians is an omnipotent confident God who swears by himself:

According to God’s true Word, the Holy Bible, Yahweh only swears and takes oaths in his own name. The reason why Yahweh does this is because there is no one, or nothing, greater for him to swear by. Please note carefully the following statements from the Word of God:

"and said, ‘By Myself I have sworn, declares the LORD, because you have done this thing and have not withheld your son, your only son,’" Genesis 22:16

"I have sworn by Myself; the word has gone out of My mouth in righteousness, and shall not return, that to Me every knee shall bow…" Isaiah 45:23

"The LORD has sworn by His right hand and by His strong arm, ‘I will never again give your grain as food for your enemies; Nor will foreigners drink your new wine for which you have labored.’" Isaiah 62:8

"I swear by Myself, says the LORD." Jeremiah 22:5

"But hear the word of the LORD, all Jews living in Egypt: ‘I swear by my great name,’ says the LORD, ‘that no one from Judah living anywhere in Egypt will ever again invoke my name or swear, "As surely as the Sovereign LORD lives."’" Jeremiah 44:26

"For when God made a promise to Abraham, because He could swear by no one greater, He swore by Himself." Hebrews 6:13

"For men indeed swear by the greater, and an oath for confirmation is for them an end of all dispute." Hebrews 6:16


The god of Islam is a petty timid character who swears by the moon, the wind, the sun, the mountains and his followers are no different:

I swear by the wind that scatters far and wide, Surah 51:1

I swear by the heaven full of ways. Surah 51:7

I swear by the Mountain, Surah 52:1

I swear by the star when it goes down. Surah 53:1

But nay! I swear by the falling of stars; Surah 56:75

Noon. I swear by the pen and what the angels write, Surah 68:1

But nay! I swear by that which you see, Surah 69:38

Nay; I swear by the moon, Surah 74:32

The confusion is that muslims think they worship the same God as Jews and Christians. Nothing could be further from the truth.

Ishilove:
Inspired to...?

To follow his example

Ishilove:
I find this hard to believe but the guy is truly a clown.

I'm inspired.

Adaure4ever:
Men beating Women since 110BC.

Not real men.

IndianBwoy:
Thank you Sir. If you can produce a better option, I'll chop off my index finger and present it to you.

You see the fact is that a Hindu can never be an extremist. A Hindu can only be an extremist in self-defence. A Hindu is a Pagan. A Hindu never converts or proselytyzes. A Hindu is not suppose to impose their faith and culture on non-Hindus. A Hindu can only be born in one of the many castes , tribes and their respective Indian religions to be qualified as a Hindu proper. A Hindu can visit any place of worship and worship anyone's God(s).


I'll end this note by saying that "In 1947 , 2 nations separated. 1 is Hindu Majority India. The other was muslim majority pakistan". you can only see their state of affairs today.

One became secular democratic India with no state religion. the other became islamic republic of pakistan.

One landed on the moon and is looking towards Mars. the other landed in the gutter, sheltering the likes of bin ladenm taliban and other jihadists.

Today India has the largest muslim population in the world , whereas pakistan's Hindu remnants are almost exterminated.

see the difference in how minorities are treated. This is the greatness of our Traditional Religion.


communism is a disease.if i start talking it will never end. let me just say it in simplified terms. we had 2 communist states in India. Kerala and West Bengal. both experienced de-industrialization and stagnation.


communist is funded by our enemy China to whom we lost the war in the 60's with the capture of Tibet and the exile of their Ruler His Holiness the Dalai Lama to India, where he still resides along with countless other Tibetan refugees. ( I must admit Tibetans are very patriotic to our nation despite their refugee status on our land).

now China funds communist. communists funds cadet branches of maoist and naxalite. maoist and naxalite recruits poor tribals and children and women to undergo guerilla warfare against our State. they do not let development to take place. they kill policemen and soldiers, blow up trains and indulge in all sorts of shame.

they support the breakage of India and giving away northern India (Kashmir state) and north eastern states of Nagaland, Manipur, Mizoram , Meghalaya and Assam full fledged independence to guerilla rebels. they detest Hindu cultures and religions. they detest our constitution.

No need to chop off your finger. You asked for an alternative, and I ask what was wrong with the Congress Party?
Most of India's progress and economic growth was achieved under the Congress Party. And the Congress Party cares more about India's status as a secular state than the BJP.
You're mistaken when you say it is not possible for a pagan religion to impose itself on non believers. History is full of examples of pagan Romans, Greeks and Persians forcing their beliefs on others.
As for China, I actually think China faces a common enemy with India, which is radical Islam. Furthermore, these days, China is only a communist country in name. It is as capitalist and free market as India.

psucc:
Dress in a workshop outfit and don't forget to put in a spanner, pliers, and a screw driver in the breast pocket.

Or alternatively, Agbada and boxers. Make sure the Agbada is tucked into boxers before making your appearance at the Personnel and Recruitment office. Nothing sells quite like originality. You'll be remembered even if you don't get the job eventually.

IndianBwoy:
Oh yes Rohith Vemula. Im glad you brought up this issue. that case is still on. created quite furore.

Let me give you a taste of dirty Indian caste-politics .


The boy was not a dalit but an OBC belonging to carpenter caste who used a fake dalit (untouchable) paper to gain admission over more competent upper caste candidates, scholarship and fee reduction from his university. its like jumping the queue.

he then used this status to stir up dalits to uphold communist ideals, perform beef-eating parties on university campus , burn down Hindu religious scriptures, call for the destruction Hinduism, supporting hanged islamic terrorists named Yakub Memon etc., who were responsible for terrorist activities and deaths in India (because they belonged to minority community and Indian politics is divided between caste, minority religion majority etc. long story.)

Rohith Vemula: Activist or Puppet
National media channels are running news of suicide by Rohith Vemula to pump adrenaline in their TRP rating. Politician from different parties are busy flying Hyderabad to show sympathy with the family of Rohith Vemula and as expected to secure Dalit votes. Secularist scholars of our country are busy writing blogs, articles and editorials to prove that Rohith Vemula was killed by Right wing Politics. But very few concentrated on educational career and activities of Rohith before his suicide.
I personally visited his facebook profile.
https://web.facebook.com/rohith352
I found Rohith posts related to these Topics.
1. Rohith was protesting against ABVP for preventing screening of Film “Muzaffarnagar Baaqi Hain”.
2. He was active in celebrating Manu Smriti Dahan Divas (Burning Day)
3. He was active in celebrating Babri Masjid demolition day along with Muslims in Campus.
4. He was active in organizing Beef festival in campus.
5. He was seen cheering Owaisi of AIMIM on intolerance issue.
6. He was seen cheering Muslim spokesperson on support to Tipu Sultan
7. Last but not the least he was foremost in speaking against hanging of Yakub Menon (This is not on FB but in News)
There was no Post on any education related activity on the wall of Rohith.
After reading this anyone can easily reach this interpretation that he was pro-Ambedkarite, pro-Muslims, anti-Hindus and against all system and traditions of our country.
Speaking against caste-system is not wrong. Even I am against it. But the motive should be well defined. My motive against caste system is to eradicate the evil and unite Hindus. Consider everyone as equal and son of almighty God.
1. The motive of Pro-Ambedkarite seems to spit venom against all higher caste Hindus (Even if they are not following caste system). This mentality only divides never unites any society.
2. Speaking against Manu Smriti (Even after this fact is established that Manu-Smriti was adulterated with verses supporting caste system in the middle ages. This was done by ignorant class of people. Still people with vested interests are trying milking the barren cow again and again without any success.)
3. Support Muslims appeasement politics (Even by ignoring the Views of Dr Ambedkar in Islam. Read Dr. Ambedkar views on Islam in his book on Pakistan. Dr Ambedkar was offered millions to convert to Islam. He rejected all such offers considering Islam as foreign and impractical in approach. His followers just follow opposite to him. They team-up with Muslims and try to show that they are near to Islam than Hinduism. While it’s my personal opinion that they must collaborate with those Hindus who are against Caste system)
4. Organize Beef festivals to hurt Hindu sentiments. (A step to promote disunity and hatred in society. It’s common sense. Will dalits like to organize Pork Festival in front of Muslim students in University campus?)
5. Support fanatics like Tipu Sultan (Ignoring the fact that he ruined villages after villages of Hindus even belonging to dalits. No lesson learned from history.)
6. Support to movie on Muzaffarnagar (It came as a surprise to me as this man completely ignored the ground reality. This movie depicts Hindus as rioters and Muslims as victims. The ground reality is that in the Muzaffarnagar riot Muslim devastate Dalits from many Villages and the proclaimed savior of dalits in UP ex CM Mayawati did not come for any help. The reason being the main accused among rioters was related to her prestigious party BSP. How come this man ignored such Hard Fact?)
7. Support to Yakub Menon is silliest mistake. Menon was killer of innocent Indians in Mumbai. How come any one supports such anti national terrorist? This is quite mean and unworthy. No wise person will ever support such wrong act. One question always comes in my Mind. Will anyone among these Human Right activists dare to come forward if instead of Yakub Menon any person with Hindu Origin would have been hanged? Answer is a big “No”. This double standard criterion is quite prevalent in our secular country in name of Activism.
In short I consider this Activism as Anti-nation, Anti-humanity, Anti-cultural and Anti-social.
I have no second opinion to consider that these persons are puppets in the hands of Anti National forces.


all this was done on university campus, with his fees paid by tax payer money . He later committed suicide because he felt some personal issue. we are not sure. some people say his co-mates hanged him as a scapegoat. we dont know. but this was after he was rusticated from univeristy i think for being involved in these kind of activities.



after his death, the dirty media called ndtv (branch of us-based CNN) and other anti-HIndu media have been posing him as a victim of caste ,etc., and these media are paid by sickular corrupt congress party (Now thrown out of power) and frustrated commies .

You seem to be quite an intelligent young chap and you certainly know a lot about your country and her politics.
Unfortunately you believe the BJP's indoctrination that they are the only ones who know what is good for India.
In my opinion, if the BJP continues along their present path India runs the risk of becoming a Hindu extremist Country.
I'm curious, what do you have against communists and communism? I can understand your suspicions of Islam and Muslims because of the evils perpetrated by Pakistan, but it seems to me that communism might actually do some good for India.

IndianBwoy:
Its all bullshit. Im not saying this because Im Indian. but because I have never come across such a case personally in my life . and I have travelled to quite many places within India. Hindus are united today.


There were quite many reforms that took place within Hindu society to strengthen and unite us. In todays political scenario, we Hindus cannot afford discrimination because that would make our backward brethren easy pickings for foreign missionaries and commies.

so we have united now. The main backbone is the Hindutva movement under the auspice of the RSS-BJP brigade currently ruling the nation.


Upper-caste, backward caste, lower caste, former untouchable, tribal , everyone now studies together, works together, eats together, play politics together, live next to each other, etc.

Actually today mid-upper castes are clamoring to gain lower caste status by digging up some history or proofs or economic proofs of the caste through modern history, etc.


India is the only country in the world where people are fighting for the right and playing politics for the right to be called backward.

This is the current status in India. read our most recent news. there were riots by the very same upper caste tribe in Haryana state which was quoted in the news article. they are fighting for the right to gain backward status and thus get reservation in jobs/employment and education sector. caste discrimination is almost extinct in the South India where I come from. most people are educated and have either gone to cities or emigrated abroad (mostly to the Gulf) to earn.

Read this story. It didn't happen in some small village somewhere on the margins of society. It happened in a University in Hyderabad:

http://indianexpress.com/article/india/india-news-india/caste-discrimination-invisible-but-omnipresent/

Too late youtube! I downloaded the video on day 1 so I can view it at my own pleasure, although it's quite a below average video (wack dance moves, wack costumes etc) I watch it strictly for laughs. It feels like the kind of satirical thing you might see on ComedyCentral or Saturday Night Live.

IndianBwoy:
Permit me to clarify here. You are coming to conclusions very soon.

India comparitively doesn't lead Nigeria in rape. At the most we can say we are at par with each other. But kindly understand this logical reasoning:





My next point would be the issue of caste. Out of a 100 rape cases in India, I'm sure you would only be able to find 1-2 cases of r.ape with caste undertones. Most r.ape cases happen in urban areas and settlements by some perverted people.

I'd like to go over the caste matter for a bit.

There is a lot of misconception about India (2016) on such matters.


The caste based discrimination has almost ceased to exist in almost all parts of India except in 2 Northern states to some extent mainly: U.P., Haryana and maybe Bihar.


These days we have a reverse discrimination trend known as "Reservation" . According to these, all jobs and educational sectors have reservation for backward castes and tribes in jobs and education sector. Thus even if a forward caste scores above a backward caste pupil, the backward caste is given preference. thus there is a outcry to base reservation on economic status and not ethnic or caste background.


Now the issue in question which you quoted. The Jat tribe members viewed the seduction and elopement of their girl by the other caste man as tantamount to rape of their own. thereby they issued a dictat. this is how these mentalities work. but obviously this is India in 2016 we are talking about. they would never dare carry out such barbarity because they would have to pay dearly by the law.

and such instances are rare. lower or upper caste. such things do not matter in India today once you have a fat bank balance.

and you cannot understand Indian caste and tribe system in terms of upper caste and lower caste only. there is also OBC (other backward classes) a, ST (Scheduled Tribes) , etc., and castes of disputed position. the history of India has been so dynamic that the entire system is complicated. it differs from region to region. you cannot sum up a conclusion for India from 1 news article.




I wish to stress on a finaly point. Rape in India is very rarely due to caste discrimination. It is mostly due to perverted mindset.

There are backward castes who have strong representation in political hegemony and have well -established caste centres. Its not so easy a matter of oppression. You cannot just discriminate against someone like that openly. You may end up getting beaten up by the public. the villages are almost empty especially in South India. most have moved to cities etc.

Interesting. But you will admit that in spite of the existence of anti-discrimination laws, caste prejudice in India is still a problem in 2016.
From what I've read, there really doesn't seem to be a difference between Caste discrimination in the villages and in the cities. Maybe in certain circles people will be respected for their abilities regardless of what their caste background might be.
But such tolerance is actually quite rare. Most so-called upper caste Indians are resentful of affirmative action programs for lower caste Indians.
What this means is that even though discrimination has been supressed in some areas of life in India, it is still very strong in some other areas. For example, most Indians would never vote for a candidate in an election if he or she is lower caste.
The caste system has existed for thousands of years in India and it will not disappear because of a few decades old legal reforms.

KashyBaby:
when this program will gonna start? Lol...men juz make it sure that ul suck it "thoroughly & vigorously" coz that's wat the doctors say...

I volunteer. I won't even charge money.

Adaure4ever:
Okay. He should try and impact his people positively and don't romance with corrupt politicians.
The leaf in his cap, what is it for?

It's for preparing bitter leaf soup

IndianBwoy:
If India's population is 7 times that of Nigeria and Nigeria still has such a high number of r.ape cases despite their small population. Then who is proportionally higher in terms of figures?


If you were to ask me whether an ant is stronger or an Elephant. I'd say its the ant that can lift 10 times its own weight.

That is not the only reason why India's rape epidemic is worse than Nigeria's.

India's rape problems are associated with her caste system. In India lower caste women (Dalits) are usually gang raped as punishment for the indiscretions of male members of their families.

You can read about it here:

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/indian-sisters-fleeing-rape-punishment-appeal-to-supreme-court-for-protection-10476581.html

IndianBwoy:
If India's population is 7 times that of Nigeria and Nigeria still has such a high number of r.ape cases despite their small population. Then who is proportionally higher in terms of figures?


If you were to ask me whether an ant is stronger or an Elephant. I'd say its the ant that can lift 10 times its own weight.

That's not the only reason why India leads nigeria in rape.

In india rape is used as a form of punishment. Especially where India's caste system is concerned. There are several cases in india where female members of lower caste families are raped as punishment for the indiscretions of male members of their family.

You can read about it here:

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/indian-sisters-fleeing-rape-punishment-appeal-to-supreme-court-for-protection-10476581.html

You're hopelessly out of your element. Compared to India, Nigeria is just a beginner as far as rape is concerned.

India's population is 7 times that of Nigeria so India has 7 times more rapists than Nigeria.