TundeBricklayer's Posts
Nairaland Forum › TundeBricklayer's Profile › TundeBricklayer's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 (of 93 pages)
NotJustOkay:Goat. My Business associate of cause, anu mpama. |
NotJustOkay:Ode, their business is threatened now unlike 2015 |
basilo101:Even Tinubu will soon Atikulate his investments both Intels and Oando is at stake
|
NotJustOkay:Some of you are ignorant Their investments in Oando and Intels are having serious problem under PMB administration, politics is about interest
|
NotJustOkay:Both of you should help yourselves by searching 2015 presidential result on Google Below is the result Southeast gave PDP more than what Southwest gave APC, Southwest Votes for PDP is far below, fact is 2019 Southwest vote will favour PDP, 2015 major western Leaders were against GEJ both Obasanjo and Tinubu, now it's different ballgame, Obasanjo just endorsed Atiku, Tinubu is Atiku's business associate both in Intels and Oando, intels is have serious problem because of Buhari, he will have no choice rather secretly support his associate.
|
[s] gidgiddy:[/s] Beautiful nonsense |
The Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) has said that there is no going back on its decision to bar the All Progressives Congress (APC) from fielding candidates for the 2019 general elections in Zamfara State. INEC’s stand came just as the ruling party which appeared ruffled by the likely fate that may befall it in the 2019 elections in Zamfara State is making frantic effort to sort out things. The commission through its Director of Publicity and Voter Education, Mr. Osaze Uzzi, said it had not changed its position despite the protestation by the APC. Speaking to THISDAY on telephone yesterday, Uzzi, who was on his way back to Abuja from a trip, said he could not confirm if the APC’s letter had been received or not. When asked if the commission has changed its position based on the letter from APC, Uzzi said, “I don’t know whether it has been received or not but either, we still stand by our earlier position.” INEC had on Monday declared APC ineligible to field candidates for all elective positions in Zamfara State in the 2019 election on the basis that it did not hold primaries in the state before the expiration of the stipulated deadline. The position of INEC was contained in a leaked letter to the APC National Chairman, Mr. Adams Oshiomhole, on Tuesday. However, the party on Wednesday, replied INEC, claiming that primary elections actually took place in Zamfara State. In the letter dated October 10th and signed by Oshiomhole, the party said INEC did not capture the true situation of the APC primaries in Zamfara State. In the INEC’s letter titled, “Failure to conduct party primaries in Zamfara State within the stipulated time-frame,” the commission said APC failed to conduct its primary elections in Zamfara within the stipulated time-frame”. In its submissions to INEC, APC said, “The contents of your letter seem to conclude that no primaries were conducted by the APC in Zamfara State. We wish to state emphatically that nothing can be farther from the actual situation in Zamfara State”. Meanwhile, APC has intensified efforts to get INEC to reverse its position on the Zamfara State primary elections. THISDAY gathered that apart from its letter to the commission, the party is also hoping to go ahead to submit names of candidates for the state. A party source told THISDAY yesterday that the party is picking holes on the letter, which it said did not emanate from the Chairman’s office or that of Secretary to the commission. It said that the party is insisting that as a political party it reserves the sole right to decide who its candidates for an election will be. https://www.thisdaylive.com/index.php/2018/10/12/apc-cant-field-candidates-for-zamfara-inec-insists/
|
lalasticlala
|
Nigeria is most likely to be ushered into the Atiku era in 2019. Atiku is like an idea whose time has come, which no mortal force can combat. The preceding 16-year military rule, between 1983 and 1999, left Nigeria socially broken and economically dysfunctional. In addition to reckless corruption and state terrorism that was visited upon the Nigerian people, the annulment of the June 12 presidential election, which was won by Chief MKO Abiola, a southerner, by the northern-dominated military junta of Ibrahim Babangida, resulted in a major political crisis in the country. This crisis would boil over and set the Nigerian state on the edge when Abiola, who was jailed by Babangida’s successor, Sani Abacha, eventually died in detention under very mysterious circumstances. The Nigerian state was shaken to its very foundation with prospects of disintegration as a result of massive resistance to the tyranny of the military junta and protests against the injustice of the June 12 annulment, particularly among Nigerians of South-West origin, the home region of Abiola. Consequently, the political process leading to the transition from military to civil democratic rule in 1999 was primarily driven by the prevailing concern for national unity and cohesion, to save Nigeria from imminent collapse. Deliberate steps were taken to evolve a power-sharing agreement that shifted power to the South and particularly to Abiola’s Western corner. Furthermore, that Nigerian of South-West origin that was going to be trusted with the task of pulling the country from the brink of collapse was one who possessed broad nationalistic credentials and enough ingredients of statesmanship to not only unite Nigerians but also resist the temptation of vengeance. Olusegun Obasanjo, who was considered above others to be that Nigerian of South-West origin that was most eligible to lead Nigeria at the time, eventually emerged as President in 1999. Nigeria was thus ushered into the Obasanjo era for the next eight years. The Obasanjo era ushered in a period of unprecedented national unity and cohesion largely as a result of his ability to deploy his rich nationalist credentials to rally Nigerians across all divides around his governmental agenda. From his kitchen cabinet to his Security Council and economic management team, there reflected a pan-Nigerian thread as individuals from all sections of the country were equitably represented. Having successfully achieved a considerably united, stable and relatively peaceful Nigeria, Nigerians now began to contend with another major challenge. This time the issue was corruption and how to tackle it effectively. By 2007, the elite consensus adopting the principles of power-sharing and rotation, which was to ensure equitable distribution of resources to all component parts of Nigeria, had, unfortunately, degenerated into an elite gang-up for the purpose of equitable distribution of loot. The modest gains of the Obasanjo era were threatened by the entrenched culture of corruption that permeated the Nigerian society. Obasanjo rightly identified this scourge of corruption and made considerable efforts towards tackling it through the establishment of anti-corruption agencies like the ICPC and EFCC. As election year 2007 approached, the major concern among Nigerians was the question of personal integrity, incorruptibility and commitment to continue the war on corruption without prejudice to national unity. Consequently, Umaru Musa Yar’Adua would emerge ahead of then Vice President Atiku Abubakar and former military head of state, Muhammadu Buhari, in the 2007 presidential polls. Atiku was reputed to be a nationalist who could sustain the unity of Nigeria but his image was tarred by corruption allegations from Obasanjo, his then estranged boss. Obasanjo, who assumed the role of the father of Fourth Republic Nigeria, with a moral obligation to guide leadership decision, portrayed Atiku as an irredeemably corrupt individual who was part of the ruling elite that was united in looting Nigeria. Buhari, on the other hand, who was reputed for his uprightness and personal integrity, was perceived by most Nigerians as an ethno-regional and religious irredentist whose provincial proclivity would most certainly reverse the modest gains of the Obasanjo era by polarising Nigeria along ethno-regional fault lines. Therefore, Yar’Adua, who was Obasanjo’s preferred candidate, came across as one that possessed Atiku’s nationalist credentials and Buhari’s incorruptibility In 2011, Goodluck Jonathan, who assumed the presidency after the death of Yar’Adua in 2010, was elected because of the popular quest for a breath of fresh air in Nigeria. Jonathan’s defiance of all odds, including his humble beginnings, to acquire higher education and rise to the highest office in the land was inspiring to many long-suffering Nigerians. As one that was considered an outsider to the ruling establishment, most Nigerians mirrored themselves in him and believed he would use the advantage of power to transform their pathetic socio-economic condition for good. However, by 2015, the Jonathan administration became enmeshed in a series of corruption scandals. There was a consensus of opinion among Nigerians that corruption was at the root of Nigeria’s seemingly intractable socio-economic malaise. Once again, corruption became the issue of concern in the build-up to the 2015 elections. Nigerians would characteristically elect Buhari, a man who was considered to be of unimpeachable integrity with the capacity to tackle corruption more effectively than Jonathan. As Nigeria approaches the 2019 elections, the major concern for Nigerians once again is the preservation of Nigeria as a united, stable and cohesive nation state. This concern is as a result of Buhari’s elevation of sectionalism to a near state policy, which has polarised the country in an unprecedented manner. Nigeria is as divided today as ut was in 1966, preceding the civil war. In addition to the issue of national unity, Buhari’s sectionalism has deepened the roots of corruption with its branches spread far and wide. By the same stretch, Buhari’s provincial proclivity in the business of government business has greatly stifled economic growth and undermined national security. Nigerians are poorer, less secure and corruption more entrenched in 2018 than in 2014. The prevailing socio-economic circumstances in Nigeria today projects Atiku Abubakar as the preferred alternative to President Buhari. Nigeria is most likely to be ushered into the Atiku era in 2019. Atiku is like an idea whose time has come, which no mortal force can combat. It is believed by many Nigerians that where Buhari’s sectionalism has divided them, Atiku’s impeccable nationalist credentials will unite them once again and heal the nation’s fault lines. Where Buhari’s lack of economic management skills has stunted Nigeria’s economic development, Atiku’s deep knowledge of economic management will pull the nation out of economic woes. Where Buhari’s provincial proclivity has undermined rule of law and partisan enforcement order, Atiku’s pan-Nigeria agenda will uphold rule of law and enforce order in a fair and just manner to restore national security.Beyond the concerns of national unity, the issue of corruption remains a fundamental albatross to Nigeria’s overall socio-economic development. Atiku is a prime corruption suspect in the court of public opinion, which is largely shaped by unfounded, unsubstantiated and unproven but entrenched allegations of corruption. Atiku will, however, do himself a lot of good in his final push for the presidency, if he articulates his thoughts on the issue of corruption and clearly outlines his strategies to effectively combat the malaise, if elected. http://sunnewsonline.com/enter-the-atiku-era/ Lalasticlala |
BabaRamota1980: 2:07 am there is fire on BMC camp over Atiku at this wee hour you carry Atiku matter for head, no no this is nightmare, talk true bro Atiku is giving you and your members nightmares ![]() |
[[s]quote author=onuebonyi post=71997996]Imolites are Anambra slaves, we have given them Ararume.[/quote][/s] Stop writing rubbish |
celeiyke:You will not see BMC members here they are praying for the thread to go down ![]() Hypocrisy is their middle names, they call Atiku criminal and Adore Tinubu, 2019 will be very interesting, I'm waiting to see how Tinubu will campaign against Atiku |
SarkinYarki:Not just Intels both are business partners in Oando group
|
SarkinYarki: ![]() Yoruba Muslims are now blackmailing Oyedepo ![]() |
basilo101:Obasanjo is the leader of Yoruba Christians Tinubu is the leader of Yoruba Muslims ![]() |
Jokers ![]() |
More Lalasticlala
|
It was another round of book distribution today at Sir Emeka Offor Foundation Office in Oraifite, Anambra state. The foundation distributed books to over 40 tertiary institutions in Nigeria. The founder of the Sir Emeka Offor Foundation, Sir Emeka Offor, has since 2013 though his partnership with Books For Africa (BFA), distributed books worth over $25 million to over 120 tertiary institutions in the country and other 19 African countries. Gracing the 2018 Supplementary Books Distribution which held today the 6th of October were Prof. Joseph Ahaneku, the Vice-chancellor, Nnamdi Azikiwe University, Awka, Anambra State, and the Vice-chancellor, Alex Ekwueme Federal University, Alukwu-Ndufu, Ebonyi state, as well as various other representatives from other tertiary institutions in Nigeria.
|
All politicians in Nigeria are criminals including PMB
|
genternity:You guys are wasting your precious time, the time you suppose market your candidate, you are busy chasing Atiku, so you guys didn't learn from Osun election, with you guys smear campaign against Adeleke he won popular votes, people are hungry and hopeless those smear campaign can't work, US election is another case study, Trump experienced worst media attacks in America history he won the election. Market your candidate stop wasting your time, all politicians in Nigeria are corrupt even Buhari. |
There has been this beautiful argument on why ndigbo should allow the southwest have a double header as VP for both the APC and the PDP. It is the sort of argument that many would dismiss as a beautiful nonsense. Yet, it is gaining traction and should not be denied access to publicity anymore. One must confess, the argument is fairly compelling. But it certainly falls short of some critical benchmarks. After the 2015 Presidential Election, which the PDP lost, the Party (PDP) set up a postmortem and reorganising committee headed by the Deputy Senate president, Senator Ike Ekweremadu. That strategic committee did not only recommend that PDP should zone its presidential slot to the North but also zone the VP to southeast. In line with those reasoned and adopted prescriptions of the Ekweremadu committee, the entire dozen PDP aspirants came from the north. Rather than allow Atiku Abubakar pick his running mate from the southeast, kite fliers are at it, presenting him with alluring reasons he has to jettison the accepted Committee recommendations, which even produced him as the Party’s flag-bearer. The argument on why PDP VP slot is presumed by these permutations to be best from southwest wrongly assumes that the zone is the decider of the 2019 presidential poll and therefore once the zone is divided, a pathway to Atiku's victory would become all the more obvious. Really? This postulation appears incurably defective for many reasons. In 2015, southwest, though contributed fundamentally, contributed just about 2m votes to the APC kitty. Kano alone, as part of the nPDP, contributed almost as much as the entire southwest. The man that made the Kano nPDP give that much to the APC namely Rabiu Musa Kwankwaso is back to the PDP. One does not expect that Kwankwaso of the Kwakwasiyya fame would deliver as many votes as he delivered as an incumbent governor. But the Kwankwaso factor can only be ignored to one's peril. As Kwankwaso himself acknowledged in Port Harcourt during the PDP primaries, the point here is that it was the nPDP that gave Buhari victory and not the southwest as erroneously held in some quarters even though Ahmed Bola Tinubu provided the initial impetus. What’s more, times are changing. The tightening gap between APC and PDP in the election outcomes in Ekiti and Osun clearly show the ruling party does no longer have that dominant hold on southwest. Not only that, APC in its poor imbibing of impunity, wished Ambode away and paved way for veteran Jimi Agbaje who has an overarching reach in Lagos to return to the fray as PDP guber candidate. The Jimi Agbaje factor working mainly in tandem and synergy with non-Yoruba’s, will ensure that Lagos is not a walk in park for the ruling party. Where then is the reason why ndigbo should let go of the VP slot zoned to them ab initio? It's important to also state why Atiku should not let go of his search for his vice in the southeast. There are half a dozen factors why the southeast should not let go also. First, being part of Nigeria and having the right to produce President and Vice, the southeast should not sacrifice such God-given opportunity for the so-called political expediency. Second is the power of the front seat. Since the days of Dr. Alex Ekwueme as Vice President, Southeast never came close to power. Since restructuring is what is uppermost on the mind of the zone, producing a Vice president can ensure the issue is not swept under the carpet like APC did. Third is power of proximity. Every vice president has some right to succeed the President. Be it Osinbajo or another Yoruba, it is only natural that he or she would aspire to succeed the departing President. This inherent desire caused the rift between Atiku and Obasanjo. Fourth, producing Nigeria President of Igbo extraction is closer from a vice president’s position. In other words, distancing the southeast from the office of the Vice president is distancing the zone also from the office of the President of Nigeria. So, those arguing against ndigbo producing the VP for Atiku at this point really argue amiss and do the zone more harm than good. Some have even argued that ndigbo would be better off with Senate president. That argument is neither here nor there. If zoning didn't work in 2015, what's the guarantee that it will work in 2019 with the same actors? In federalism, each federating unit enters the equation from a position of strength. The southeast should not always go on voyage of discoveries of zones in the country to assuage and make happy. It's time the Southeast took care of itself and its people. The zone has sacrificed enough and should demand reciprocal entitlements for its noble and patriotic labour, which has kept Nigeria one. From foundation, it has always been mainly southeasters working and sacrificing to bring and keep the country together. Zik did not become Prime Minister because he thought if he did; the north could leave the union. This tendency has repeated itself over and over. What's more, a southeast producing VP would consolidate the zone's votes. The southwest, middle belt and southwest ought to see it from that perspective. Southwest particularly is divide into Afenifere and Tinubu camps with the former pushing for restructuring along with the rest of the south and middle belt. They cannot insist of producing the VP for Atiku in order to vote for him for the actualization of the restructuring agenda, just like the Tinubu side will not be changed in their inclination to Tinubu, Osinbajo and APC. Again, southeast zone parades great materials to deliver in that office and make the task of rescuing Nigeria from the slide into feudalism only easier and merrier. Let us consider one or two of the great minds from the east. If there is one man the southeast could entrust with its future and representation in contemporary Nigeria, it is Ike Ekweremadu. He is a man who is what every politician wants of an intellectual and what every intellectual would want in a politician. A quiet achiever, like octopus, he has his overarching tentacles all over Nigeria. A choice of a man like Sen. Ike Ekweremadu as VP is but a foremost choice. The problem is that Ekweremadu thinks more of lawmaking than executive functions and has to be seriously persuaded otherwise. Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala has done it before. When she was coordinating, she steadied the nation's economy, freed Nigeria from foreign loans and brought far-reaching reforms that made Nigeria the biggest and fastest growing economy in Africa and, as VP, would repeat the feat and guarantee the votes of the womenfolk. The problem is that It would take quite a lot to convince the great lady to come to the rescue after her rueful experience. Peter Obi as governor of Anambra state restored security and education to the State. He is also unapologetically frugal and can help cure Nigeria of debilitating profligacy. He too is a great choice. The impediment may be the thinking of some that his political horizon is shrinking. Chukwuma Soludo has a similar capacity as Ngozi Okonjo-Iwela and being a homeboy is even an added advantage for him. As VP, the former CBN govenor, who designed NEEDS, can help Atiku banish poverty. His impediment is that he is in APGA. Can PDP turks let him in? Southeast parades more first-class VP candidates to give Atiku and Nigeria choices to make the difference. Ndigbo must not let go and give in to the emotional blackmail. Like Shakespeare said, there's a tide in the affairs of men. When an opportunity comes, seize it with both hands. It comes but once. http://saharareporters.com/2018/10/10/atikus-running-mate-why-southeast-shoud-not-let-go-law-mefor
|
Ngozi Okonjo Iweala to me is the best option for VP. Meanwhile I wonder how BMC Lagos/Ibadan branch will react if bubu change Osibanjo to southeast candidate their lover PMB will change to their worst enemy just like Ambode |
The possibility of the ruling All Progressives Congress (APC) settling for a replacement for Vice President Yemi Osinbajo from the Southeast and intrigues by politicians jostling to be chosen are some of the reasons the Peoples Democratic Party’s (PDP) standard bearer, Alhaji Atiku Abubakar, might delay the announcement of his running mate till the last minute.http://t.guardian.ng/politics/issues-delaying-choice-of-atikus-running-mate/
|
The guy is real definition of Junkie
|
[s] 10Ebisco:[/s] The junkie is not monarch, his father was but late, after his father's death 2014, Awka Etiti crowned another Igwe, the guy is mentally sick, he is the cause of his father's death, he is the one abusing Gov Obiano for issuing Royal certificate of recognition to the new Igwe and also contested governorship election against Obiano, although INEC didn't recognise him, he is from my town, I know him too well. |
[s] Emmytrill:[/s] Sorry |
[s][A author=front4line post=71973891]What is intimidating about a bigoted hate filled Igbo that sacked his fellow Igbo from different Igbo states just to exhibit the chronic irredeemable hate the Igbo herited from their fathers n mothers. [/quote][/s] Show us link to this claim or you are e-goat |
Shuku0kukobambi: ![]() $900 million Volpi+$250 million Alhaji Mangal+ $50 million Atiku=$1.2 billion, Tinubu is owing to Atiku & Co |
Shuku0kukobambi:Oduavanguard Tinubu is in serious debt to Atiku and friends he has no option than to sell you guys again to Atiku & co ![]() |
Shuku0kukobambi:Gabriele Volpi and Atiku are business partner both in Oando PLC and intels he is the biggest shareholder in both |
Shuku0kukobambi:Tinubu no get choice ![]()
|
Shuku0kukobambi:Total money they gave to Tinubu is $1.2billion not $200 million, kindly read the report Oando following a wrecked business move in which the firm acquired oil infrastructures from CONOCO Phillips in Nigeria. The questionable deal cost Oando $1.5 billion. Mr. Volpi reportedly gave Oando’s Wale Tinubu the sum of $900 million to effect the deal. In addition, Mr. Mangal reportedly contributed $250 million while former Vice President Atiku Abubakar contributed $50 million to the purchase which proved a disastrous investment for Oando. |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 (of 93 pages)