Vooks's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Vooks's Profile › Vooks's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 (of 212 pages)
EVarn:Men are also children of God, sons of you will. So, are they angels or are angels men? |
manojin:Low iq Neanderthals should abstain from weed and psychedelic murshrooms |
[quote author=EVarn post=39319860]I have made these points before,but let me reiterate them,Make my day (1) In the book of Daniel,Michael was referred to as the "great prince of isreal"; however,Isaiah called Jesus{in his prophesy} the "prince of israel".Can Israel have two princes?Quote the verses (2) Revelation referred to "Michael and his angels",however God is called the "Lord of host".Can the heavenly host have two commanders?Silly and plain nonsensical. Jesus is Lord of Lords and King of Kings. So if an angel is in charge of the angels, they'd still be UNDER Jesus. I was looking forward to an intelligent debate not silly semantics (3) Daniel called Michael "one of the chief princes" and illustrated Michael liberating an angel of God from a deadlock with the "prince of the kingdom of persia"(satan) who had withstood the angel for 21 days.Who or what told you Prince of Persia is Satan? Besides, so what? What conclusion do you draw from this? Why do you draw them? Bear with me as I teach you how to think scripturally (4) Jude called Michael "the archangel",meaning; chief(ruler) of angels.However,Jesus was described as being worshipped by angels in the book of Hebrew.A chief angel is still an angel. (5) Satan challenged Jesus to throw himself down from a tall mountain "if he was truly the son of God",why would satan doubt the position of christ in the celestial arrangement?Who told you Satan doubted? Satan was tempting Jesus to sin. The devil knew who Jesus was. Why do you think he was tempting him in the first place and not John the Baptist? And even if the devil doubted, how does that make Jesus an angel? Please young man, spend time in scripture and discard the trash you are consuming |
[quote author=EVarn post=39311450]Where did the bible say satan is himself an angel?,give me the scriptural reference: its theological deduction. God is the 'lord of host',is God an angel?[/quote You are digressing needlessly. What makes Jesus Michael? 1. We know Michael is an angel 2. We know Jesus is not an angel |
trapQ:Was John the Baptist a prophet? |
trapQ:trapQ my good friend, So John the Baptist was not a prophet? ![]() Luke 7:28 (KJV) For I say unto you, Among those that are born of women there is not a greater prophet than John the Baptist: but he that is least in the kingdom of God is greater than he John 10:41 (KJV) And many resorted unto him, and said, John did no miracle: but all things that John spake of this man were true. Apart from watching women give birth, pee and defacate at SCOAN, try and use your free time to study scriptures. |
EVarn:Young man, read your bible. Job 1:6 (KJV) Now there was a day when the sons of God came to present themselves before the Lord, and Satan came also among them. Satan with sons of God Revelation 12:9 (KJV) And the great dragon was cast out, that old serpent, called the Devil, and Satan, which deceiveth the whole world: he was cast out into the earth, and his angels were cast out with him. '....and his angels...' Matthew 25:41 (KJV) Then shall he say also unto them on the left hand, Depart from me, ye cursed, into everlasting fire, prepared for the devil and his angels: '...the devil and his angels...' You want it written in Yoruba for you? ![]() We have clear evidence Jesus is not an angel We have evidence Michael is a chief angel We use our brains to conclude that Jesus is not Michael |
Image123:I have a problem with amateur expositors who invoke 'mystery' when their incoherent ramblings are called out. ![]() Not to mention some doctrine that are sealed/shut up until the end. Like i initially said, no need to be afraid or worried, understanding or knowledge is of little profit in the grand scheme as it were.[Nonsense. Give me example of one hidden doctrine. And while at it, remember Joseph Smith taught this and claimed the Book of Mormon is among what was to be revealed in these last days The rapture involves resurrection and is a part of the FIRST resurrection. However, it happens before the events of Revelation 20.Fertile imagination. Where is rapture in Revelation? Is this event so insignificant that it does not get any mention yet Paul and Jesus dwelt on it at length? Paul tells us the man of sin will be destroyed at Jesus' coming and John in Revelation 19 captures this! Peter tells us of the earth melting and the heaven rolling away and we have this in Revelation. So, where do we find Rapture since your indoctrinated brains can't accept a simple truth that rapture which follows resurrection is found in Rev 20:4? Jesus is Lord, and it is so.Amen As you can read, Revelations 4 to chapter 19 show saints in Heaven who have being resurrected, different from the souls under the altar who have to wait for chapter 20 before being resurrected.And what's the difference between the saints under the altar and the resurrected saints? Ever thought through this, the beast rises in chapter 13 but the saints under the altar show up 5 chapters before in chapter 6? Rev 19:10 And I fell at his feet to worship him. And he said unto me, See thou do it not: I am thy fellow servant, and of thy brethren that have the testimony of Jesus: worship God: for the testimony of Jesus is the spirit of prophecy.The angel is a FELLOW SERVANT. Their fellowship/similarity is in SERVITUDE, in serving God not humanity. Are you accusing John of necromancy? You need to burn all the junk you have been regurgitating on Revelation ![]() Contrast the apostles when MEN attempted to worship them, Acts 14:14-15 (KJV) Which when the apostles, Barnabas and Paul, heard of, they rent their clothes, and ran in among the people, crying out, 15 And saying, Sirs, why do ye these things? We also are men of like passions with you, and preach unto you that ye should turn from these vanities unto the living God, which made heaven, and earth, and the sea, and all things that are therein: He is an angel because Bible says so.Jesus sent his angel. So all the talking is either from Jesus or an angel. Since this particular voice would not suffer worship, it was not Jesus but the angel. See Revelation 1:1 (KJV) The Revelation of Jesus Christ, which God gave unto him, to shew unto his servants things which must shortly come to pass; and he sent and signified it by his angel unto his servant John: Revelation 22:16 (KJV) I Jesus have sent mine angel to testify unto you these things in the churches. I am the root and the offspring of David, and the bright and morning star. Is this clear? Yes that's what the Bible says, what do you say.Quote it. This appears to be where you miss it. Saints in Heaven are ASLEEP in Jesus as it were. They are in a kind of limbo, like the souls under the altar. Like Lazarus who could barely do much or actively participate, entered into rest. The rapture resurrection gives saints resurrected bodies, it makes them complete, like Jesus, seeing Him as He is, worshipping, forever with Him.Epic confusion. Walk me through Rev 4-20 and distinguish between resurrected and unresurrected saints because frankly speaking here is NONE even remotely hinted at. Sleep is a METAPHOR for death, a very apt one physically because; 1. The physical inactivity of the dead 2. The appearance of the dead as if they are sleeping. Spiritually, they are very much alive and fully conscious. What in Image123 imagination is 'ASLEEP in Jesus as it were'? Stephen and James do not partake in the Great Tribulation. The souls partake in it and have to wait till the end of the Tribulation before they receive resurrected bodies.Great scriptures but NONE serve your vain heresy of multiple resurrection of the saints i already did, and every Bible student knows. The coming of the Lord spans events over a thousand years; the millenial reign, the Judgement, the battles, the marriage supper of the Lamb, the rapture. These are not 24hour events or simultaneous happenings. Yet, all over scriptures, these events are described in relation to the coming of the Lord, the Day of the Lord, the Last day etcEvery thinking believer knows this is nonsense and the coming of Jesus is a one time event so quick that Christians look forward to. How do I look forward to something spanning 1000 years? Again, all I need are scriptures not fantasies. Quote any reference to coming of Jesus that suggests a span of 1000 years. Matthew 24:29-31 (KJV) Immediately after the tribulation of those days shall the sun be darkened, and the moon shall not give her light, and the stars shall fall from heaven, and the powers of the heavens shall be shaken: 30 And then shall appear the sign of the Son of man in heaven: and then shall all the tribes of the earth mourn, and they shall see the Son of man coming in the clouds of heaven with power and great glory. 31And he shall send his angels with a great sound of a trumpet, and they shall gather together his elect from the four winds, from one end of heaven to the other. Note; 1. It happens after the tribulation 2. ALL shall weep which obviously mean they will see him, else how would they weep over some magical coming? 3. He comes with the great sound of a trumpet 4. He shall gather his Elect at His coming. This is how Jesus COMES; with power and glory. If you imagine a different coming other than this, you ought to be a shamed of yourself and repent. Holistic means the whole, complete, total study of the Bible. Not shifting goalposts as you have been doing, claiming that we should stick to Revelations, then quoting other scriptures at will.Does holistic mean conjuring a rapture out of Revelation 4:1. Then holistic to you is a synonym of hallucination Of course, He brings them WITH Him. When? After they have being caught up to meet Him. We will not prevent them which are asleep. You need to understand the ORDER of events. There will be a CATCHING UP first before the armies return WITH HIM.It happens at Jesus coming, returning. Not before, not after. Revelation 20:4 is clear on his. They live and then reign. Again, the rapture happens rapidly, the second coming does not. i cannot open your head and put that in.If you had scriptures and not fantasy tales, I'd respect you. You don't and are exasparated that I don't flinch . I can't possibly ground you in the word my broda, I can only encourage you like Paul to be so you are not carried away by every wind of stupidity and rank heresy. The Scripture is not a figment of deluded minds and totally baseless .Reading rapture in Rev 4:1 is delusion, May be the strong delusion God sends the unbelievers. i'm sure the Bible did not forget to write all these additions.Multiple resurrection of the saints remains a rank heresy that has zero scriptural basis. Resurrection of the saints is found immediately after the beast has been slain in Revelation 20:4 Fixing resurrection in 4:1 is ADDING to scriptures. You are in danger of hellfire |
Image123:You engage in that 247 if you see resurrection in 4:1. You must be thoroughly amused at you My exact point. The Bible does not call it a second resurrection but a second death.Either you are dumb on purpose or unschooled. Sorry for strong words but here is why. SECOND DEATH is not coming to life of the dead but casting into the lake of fire. As I have always done, I quote scriptures just like Jesus. Study this. Revelation 20:14-15King James Version (KJV) 14 And death and hell were cast into the lake of fire. This is the second death. 15 And whosoever was not found written in the book of life was cast into the lake of fire. Now, why is it a resurrection? Revelation 20:4-5King James Version (KJV) 4 And I saw thrones, and they sat upon them, and judgment was given unto them: and I saw the souls of them that were beheaded...... and they lived and reigned with Christ a thousand years. 5 But the rest of the dead lived not again until the thousand years were finished. This is the first resurrection. Here is how one can use their brains; Resurrection is coming to life of the dead. 1. The righteous- AND THEY LIVED- First resurrection 2. The unrighteous- The rest LIVED not again UNTIL - second resurrection The first and second are relating one another, not relating the number of resurrections.Fertile imagination overworking All resurrections in the order of Christ's are under the FIRST resurrectionDo the dead in sin resurrect? Can you call this resurrection? . i gave the example of the Nigerian government earlier. The President's ministers will all form his cabinet. Whatever name they call them, 8th Federal Executive Council or whatever, they are all termed together. Even though they were not screened together or confirmed at the same time. their names were sent to the Senate in batches etc but they are together.I have little time for asinine examples, give me scriptures. Show me the two resurrection of the saints and get done with it Spare me the details, i know what you are talking about already. i was only pulling your legs like you were having issues over a concept(church age) simply because you did not find the exact phrase in your BibleI don't resist the theory because the term is absent from scriptures but because the CONCEPT is your hallucination without ANY scriptural basis . i know there is a mass/global resurrection just like i know that we are living in the church age.Resurrection Jesus , apostles and even old testament saints taught and believed it, so it's 101% scriptural. CHURCH AGE nonsense on the other hand had no basis. So you mix truth with error. ![]() And i know there is a Bible and a rapture. The concept is clear, i don't need King James to write it in the English Bible for me to know.I can tell you are imagining things when you can't SUBSTANTIATE the same from scriptures ![]() This is the ONLY passage in the whole of Scriptures that refers to a "First resurrection". Obviously, they are related to the SECOND death.A few things you can glean 1. Not ALL go through first resurrection 2. Those who do don't suffer SECOND DEATH 3. FIRST DEATH is inconsequential You keep making reference to a 'second resurrection' that is not directly stated but inferred, yet when others do same, you do not accept.It is not INFERRED but expressly REVEALED by Holy Spirit in Rev 20:4-5 The 'and they lived' is called FIRST RESURRECTION. The rest of the dead 'lived not again until'. So at this point we are prepared for a yet future living of the remainder. Because scriptures were written for thinking men not goats, the only point where you find the dead living AFTER this MUST be the resurrection of the remainder. We find it in 13-15. Rev 20:11 And I saw a great white throne, and him that sat on it, from whose face the earth and the heaven fled away; and there was found no place for them.My point is scripturally solid. Yours ain't. So I will simply not return favor and agree with nonsense and conjecture so we are even. The first resurrection is a phase that encompasses all saints' resurrection.Revelation chronicles future events including resurrection of the sinners but is TOTALLY silent on your imagined prior 'first phase' resurrection of the saints. The reason Holy Spirit skipped such is simple; He is not your partner in imagination. Apparently,One, all saints do not resurrect at once, else they would be no different from dead believers souls in Heaven under the altar, in some kind of limbo. But we see that some saints are actively involved in the activities of Heaven compared to the souls that died in tribulation.Revelation has symbols and image. Two, a one time global resurrection alludes that all living believers will partake in the Great Tribulation, making void and useless the promises of the Lord.You are quoting scriptures like Satan when tempting Jesus 1. What has Jeremiah got to do with anything? 2. Those were words directed to a SPECIFIC church in Asia. If they are global, so then are everything else in 2-3. Are they all applicable to you Image123? ![]() 3.The beheaded, were they kept from temptation? i don't remember mentioning anything about 7ages, don't be distracted.Ok but with or without church ages, church age is a figment of your imagination. Here is God's word. CHURCH ends with Jesus return when he slays the beast and resurrects the saints. Rev 20:4 It's in scriptures.Quote them i don't hope to do a Revelations commentary. Anyone with a fair understanding of the book knows that these sayings are true. Revelations is basically divided into three.You are terribly inconsistent. Rev 3:10 Because thou hast kept the word of my patience, I also will keep thee from the hour of temptation, which shall come upon all the world, to try them that dwell upon the earth. This is found in chapter 3 do it must be part of 'past and present' from John 's vantage in 96AD. But you shamelessly invoke it to 'prove' a futuristic Jacob's trouble.. i gave around thirty lines straight reply including scripture passageS. It is not my fault that you decided to pick a phrase and say what you like. Revelations 4v1 is the rapture time and the rapture occurs before the Beast.Shouting and repetition don't make a truth. WHERE in 4:1 do I find rapture? It's clear in Revelations as shown already. It is also clear in Thessalonians.What is clear is that scriptures don't back up you multiple resurrection of he saints nonsense. ![]() Maybe we can also conclude on the same vein that anything after ALL EYES will see Him is not the coming. The event in which "ALL EYES will see Him"is a very small and short part of Christ's second coming.We can conclude by saying what had no scriptural basis is of lesser value than used toilet paper. Jesus first advent was not in phases and nor is his second Advent. There are clear and specific events called coming and they span moments not thousands of years The book of Revelation is SYMBOLIZED, it says so itself.True there are symbols but this is no license to make up ADDITIONAL symbols and then throw fits when called out. If John's literal beckoning and moving to heaven is rapture, so is his command to write, to measure the temple and EVERYTHING he did. In fact being in Patmos is also a symbol. This is mega-stupid There are two other 'come hither' moments. Let's look at them; Revelation 17:1-3 (KJV) And there came one of the seven angels which had the seven vials, and talked with me, saying unto me, Come hither; I will shew unto thee the judgment of the great LovePeddler that sitteth upon many waters: 2 With whom the kings of the earth have committed fornication, and the inhabitants of the earth have been made drunk with the wine of her fornication. 3 So he carried me away in the spirit into the wilderness: and I saw a woman sit upon a scarlet coloured beast, full of names of blasphemy, having seven heads and ten horns Revelation 21:9-10 (KJV) And there came unto me one of the seven angels which had the seven vials full of the seven last plagues, and talked with me, saying, Come hither, I will shew thee the bride, the Lamb's wife. 10 And he carried me away in the spirit to a great and high mountain, and shewed me that great city, the holy Jerusalem, descending out of heaven from God Can you see that the three come hither moments are ACTUAL literal activities John experiences? How do you make one of them a symbol of rapture? Theories of men. This is called Eisegesis or reading your fantasies into a text. Do exegesis for once, that is allowing the text to speak to you ![]() There is another 'come up hither' moment in Revelation but this time, John is witnessing it and not undergoing it. This is probably the closest one can get to rapture in Revelation 1-19. Let's look at it; Revelation 11:11-12 (KJV) And after three days and an half the Spirit of life from God entered into them, and they stood upon their feet; and great fear fell upon them which saw them. 12 And they heard a great voice from heaven saying unto them, Come up hither. And they ascended up to heaven in a cloud; and their enemies beheld them. So why won't Image123 and his handlers invoke this? It's simple; the two witnesses were slain by the Beast! Revelation 11:7 (KJV) And when they shall have finished their testimony, the beast that ascendeth out of the bottomless pit shall make war against them, and shall overcome them, and kill them The problem with 'seeing' rapture here is, it means the church is raptured AFTER the Beast has shown up. But this is precisely what they are desperately trying to avoid. In their fickle theories, rapture happens BEFORE the Beast shows up |
[quote author=Image123 post=39295512] Like i've said before, the Resurrection is not a one time eventYou don't need to insist on a truism. There are 2 resurections one for the righteous and another for the unrighteous . Like you agree for instance, there is a all different resurrection for sinners that seems to occur about 1000years AFTER what is termed the first resurrection.Not 'seems', this is EXACTLY what happens unless you got a problem with that Otherwise, one can easily think that all resurrection will occur at once.Nobody but utter ignoramuses would settle on this. Outside Revelation, we have resurrection of the just and he unjust mentioned. For instance, Acts 24:15King James Version (KJV) 15 And have hope toward God, which they themselves also allow, that there shall be a resurrection of the dead, both of the just and unjust. That is why a holistic view of all Scripture is important in doctrine, so that you don't just run meaninglessly with one verse or one book, when the whole Scripture has been given and nothing to be taken away or added againI don't know why you preach water and knock yourself with rum. Let's look at us. Who is unholistic? The one who conjures a resurrection and rapture out of Revelation 4:1 and when pressed by common sense and logic appeals to mystery, while at the same time DENYING a SECOND RESURRECTION in Rev 20:10-11? What happens at 20:11? Resurrection is not a mystery, it is more like you said "an important event that captivated the apostles and which Jesus spent a better part of his public and private ministry teaching". What however is a mystery is what we call the Rapture; the sudden catching away of saintsResurrection is part of what Paul calls mystery. Anyway, even if rapture is a mystery, this is no artistic licence for mindless imagination that places an event NOWHERE God placed it I've said it before and i say it again, that the Coming of the Lord Jesus is a long event spanning centuries. Everything that happens during that period is at the coming of the Lord.I have said before, this is utter nonsense you can't substantiate save in yapping hat it must be so because you said so. . In fact, even the disciples did not know and understand that there will be a Second Coming. As there were many events during Christ's first coming(if we can call it that), much more, there will be many events during the Lord's second coming. One of such will be the rapture in which will be a resurrection.You have wasted so much space saying so little; Jesus COMES at rapture. This is true. That is the ONLY coming He spoke of, he only Paul spoke of, and at this coming there is resurrection and the slaying of the beast. It is very clear in all but indoctrinated minds that there is NO OTHER coming before this. And just like we are saved and chosen in Him from the foundation of the world, He was slain from the foundation of the world, and the kingdom prepared from the foundation of the world. So, our resurrection is reckoned in Scriptures. The rapture, the tribulation, the rewards, the marriage supper of the Lamb, the defeat of satan and of death, the millenial reign, the second death are all at the Coming of the Lord. However, they are not all events that happen in 24hours.Here is what we know about the coming 1. There is resurrection at his coming 2. The Beast is slain at his coming 3. Indoctrinated minds without REASON deny this |
WinsomeX:Unfortunately most won't being scared that their churches may match the criteria . They Wil give it a wide berth |
trapQ:Miracles don't vindicate men. Don't you know that baby Christian? |
EVarn:Because we are told Jesus is not an angel and because NOWHERE is Jesus called Michael except in your imagination. Fortunately we follow scriptures not hallucinations |
ifeness:You can also rest assured your crap certainty means nothing to nobody |
trapQ:You are stalking me Negro, what do you want? |
4C2215131:Did anybody suggest the business is unprofitable? |
trapQ:You are judging me already. Who Wil judge me on the last day? ![]() |
EVarn:What are you smoking Negro? Archangel is chief angel Who told you Michael is the Son of God is Jesus ? |
Adanna28:Read the book. It is wiser sharing patterns or characteristics of abuse so you can be on guard. This is not an encyclopaedia of abusive churches but a manual for identifying them |
trapQ:We are discussing churches not primitive Negro religions |
Jeromejnr:Am for Christ, for the truth not for/against nobody |
A masked man with a sword attacks a school in Sweden http://edition.cnn.com/2015/10/22/europe/sweden-sword-attack/ Wait till TB Joshua minions release a 'prophecy fulfilment' video and remind you that God is still speaking |
Why are Christians being attracted to nontraditional groups? In addition to the reasons just cited — greater freedom in worship, acceptance, fellowship, and a sense of family — there is the appeal and excitement of experience, the desire for something new, something more, |
Abusive churches are not, for the most part, promoting rank heresy. But their human leaders seem ever willing to make pronouncements in the name of God, thus "mistaking what God is saying in Scripture for their own particular brand of interpretation of Scripture." 10 This sets the stage for the possibility of outright heresy being introduced, as well as the kind of abusive practices we have discussed. |
Pastoral abuse can be spotted quite easily, at least in its advanced stages. Abusive religion substitutes human power for true freedom in Christ. Unquestioning obedience and blind loyalty are its hallmarks. Leaders who practice spiritual abuse exceed the bounds of legitimate authority and "lord it over the flock," often intruding into the personal lives of members. God's will is something that they determine for you rather than something you individually seek to know. Abusive leaders are self-centered and adversarial rather than reconciling and restorative. |
As we have seen, another sign of impending trouble in a church is an obsession with discipline and excommunication. Beware of churches that warn of certain doom if you leave their "covering," or if you "break covenant." Once banished from the group, little compassion is shown the wayward one. And overwhelming majority of the ex-members I have interviewed expressed the opinion that abusive leaders are cold, almost cruel, in their treatment of people who leave — whether that departure was voluntary or involuntary. Almost without exception they report that the leadership made no attempt at reconciliation and made no effort to heal the wounds inflicted. Instead, defectors are held up to the congregation as warnings to potential "sowers of discord." |
It is my opinion, based on extensive research and informal observation, that authoritarian leaders are ecclesiastical loners. That is, they do not function well or willingly in the context of systematic checks and balances. They are fiercely independent and refuse to be part of a structure of accountability. To put it crudely, they operate a one-man (or one-woman) spiritual show. And God help the person who gets in the way or makes waves. Yes, sometimes they will point to a board of elders or its equivalent, but more likely than not, this turns out to be a faithful inner circle of clones that implicitly accepts all that the leader sets forth. |
Another quality that can lead to abusive behavior in a church is the tendency toward isolationism, a conscious effort to limit input from outside the church — in other words, information control. Beware of the church where outside speakers are consistently denied access to the pulpit, and where other Christian churches are regularly denounced, belittled, or ridiculed. Competing authority figures, whether from within or without the church walls, are rarely welcomed in abusive churches. No one can measure up to their exalted standards. In the words of Marie Kolasinski (see chapter 6), "Ninety-nine percent of the people who profess to be Christians are really enemies of the cross." |
The discerning Christian must also beware of the trap of legalism. We have seen numerous examples throughout this book of how life-style rigidity and the keeping of a set of rules can stifle spiritual liberty and encourage abuse. Preoccupation with keeping Christian rules enhances guilt feelings in members, and it acts as an effective control mechanism for power abusers. "Legalism is never corrective church discipline. For legalism pulls us away from following Christ toward another gospel, another gospel that says the cross is not enough."8 |
A key element of discernment, then, is the recognition that potentially abusive churches foster an unhealthy form of dependency, spiritually and otherwise, by focusing on themes of submission and obedience to those in authority. They create the impression that people just aren't going to find their way through life's maze without a lot of firm directives from those at the top. They promote what MacDonald calls a form of "learned helplessness." |
As Bruce indicated, the membership of authoritarian churches is frequently comprised of young, spiritually immature Christians. This kind of church is successful because it is meeting basic human needs — the need to belong, the need to be affirmed, to be accepted, and to be part of a family. It is not unusual for the leaders to assume the role of surrogate parents, especially for those young adults who come from dysfunctional-family backgrounds. |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 (of 212 pages)


