Welcome, Guest: Register On Nairaland / LOGIN! / Trending / Recent / New
Stats: 3,158,001 members, 7,835,380 topics. Date: Tuesday, 21 May 2024 at 09:28 AM

WadeFTW's Posts

Nairaland Forum / WadeFTW's Profile / WadeFTW's Posts

(1) (2) (3) (of 3 pages)

Sports / Re: Nba Season '08/09 by WadeFTW: 12:22am On Dec 11, 2008
doyin13:

The long posts tire me to read sef

una remember the '01 Sixers sha.

shuwo

I can only remember Mutombo, Iverson, Mckie and Snow. Can't remember the other members in their rotation.
And they beat a pretty good Bucks team of Allen, Cassell and Big Dog. An offensive beast at the time.

Wade WTF. . . . that sixers team were no offensive slouches.

I am not too sure but i bet they averaged close to 100 pts a game that season
to go with their staunch defense.

They were decent. Sigh. They're defense was much better. that is the point.
Sports / Re: Nba Season '08/09 by WadeFTW: 12:20am On Dec 11, 2008
doyin13:

The long posts tire me to read sef

una remember the '01 Sixers sha.

shuwo

I can only remember Mutombo, Iverson, Mckie and Snow. Can't remember the other members in their rotation.
And they beat a pretty good Bucks team of Allen, Cassell and Big Dog. An offensive beast at the time.

Wade WTF. . . . that sixers team were no offensive slouches.

I am not too sure but i bet they averaged close to 100 pts a game that season
to go with their staunch defense.

Their offense was decent, but nothing to write home about. They had a great scorer w/ a bunch of role players that were clutch shooters, kinda like Olajuwons team in 94.

Show me where I said their offense was terrible. I just said it was worse than the Cavs
Sports / Re: Nba Season '08/09 by WadeFTW: 12:14am On Dec 11, 2008
A-40:

@lai-lai
I think this dead horse has been flogged enough lets move on to more productive things

@doyin
Pardon me cheesy cheesy

Oh no. Your posts is too easy for the taking

I've argued against people much more knowledgable about the game.

I will get back to it after studying. Finals week.
Sports / Re: Nba Season '08/09 by WadeFTW: 11:43pm On Dec 10, 2008
lai-lai:

. . .i caught u red-handed contradicting yourself and you still managed to pull this
wdf is this explanation. . . . yeah its masked so we can't see them knocking down shots because of their defensive skills,if there is no offence, there is no offence, period
see wadeftw/thugsru, if u can weave that despite being contradictory, i see this argument has no point , . . . .so peace and good luck to your defensive basketball
i wonder if every team focused on defence like u want, who will be watchin basketball, every sport has to have variety, dude

[b]You still haven't gave a concise explanation on how I contradicted myself. I never criticized the Cavs offense. In fact, I gave statistical evidence on how the Cavs offense is decent. Instead, I've blamed LeBron the whole time for not developing a jumpshot.

Are you catching on? In Cleveland, their defense reigned superior and still do. During the championship run, the Cavs ranked fourth in defensive efficiency. All I did what back my argument up w/ facts, and I'm getting criticized for it.

In contract, no one here has gave facts to back up their statement. All arguements have either been off speculation and opinion.

You need at least have a decent offense to become a championship contending team. There is no doubt about it. However, it is more value for a team w/ a superstar wing/guard to have defensive team around him, then an offensive one. Because, great defense on the low block is always much more value than perimeter defense since one can alter shots, roaming around on the low/high post and help out on the weak side. Its also much more intimidating to have a low post defensive big than a ball hawk on the perimeter.

Look at Iverson in 2001 when he led his team to the Finals. His supporting cast offensively wasn't nearly as good as the 2007 Cavs (thopugh they hit their shots), but they were such a great defensive team, that they were able to steal one victory from the three peat Lakers.

No big man on the Sixers was as offensively skilled as Big Z or Drew Gooden. Their second best player was Dikembe Mutombo! No guard on Sixers could shoot like Gibson. And the Cavs also had better depth (offensively).[/b]
Sports / Re: Nba Season '08/09 by WadeFTW: 1:02am On Dec 10, 2008
lai-lai:

with all d celts defence focused on him(top defenders in the game) leaving all his other teamates open(and they did almost nothing), he should still find a way to get the offense going on his own. . . , shit, even MJ didnt have that much burden. . . . .is he a superman that he should take care of the offense while the rest of the team just worry about defence, i don't think you know much about offense, even the best players of all time needs help on offence all the time if u don't know
a team consisting of a perimeter superstar with only defensive role players around him is rubbish

Do you understand that LeBron doesn't have a jumpshot? I hope you do. If LeBron had a jumpshot then he wouldv'e won that Celts series easily. That Cavs defense gave LeBron many opportunities and took a great Celts team to 7 games. The Celtics didn't swarm their defense on LeBron (as you claim). Only teams w/o enough big bodies do that (teams thatplay gimmick defense and gamble). They held everyone back and had only Pierce (for the most part) guard him one-on-one. Then the Celtics clogged up the lane to initiate LeBron greatest weakness (jumpshooting) and to rid of him getting into the lane. Same thing the Celtics did w/ Kobe. Please watch basketball. Brilliant stategy by Doc.

lai-lai:

ur post also interpretes that lebron is rubbish. . , . now thats a new one though u previously said kobe is over-rated, self-centered and stuf
but dnt worry, i'm not interested in arguing witchu. . . . u can state your points for the others

How is Kobe not self-centered? He wanted the spotlight, so he ran Shaq out of town. Did you not get the memo? I'm not blasting Kobes game (as you're making it out to be), rather is character.
Sports / Re: Nba Season '08/09 by WadeFTW: 12:39am On Dec 10, 2008
lai-lai:

@A-40
this wadeftw guy has over-contradicted himself that i don't even know what he's saying again
i guess you understand what he's sayin, so proceed to increase the amount of pages this thread's got , . . .lol

@wadeftw
defence is 50%, offense is 50%
so ur rants are irrelevant

How did I overcontradicted myself? Explain.

And of course offense & defense is 50/50. Did you catch the jist of the arguement.

If you have a superstar perimeter player, it is better to surround him w/ defensive role players w/ subpar offense than vice versa. That way, your superstar wing can get more opportunties on offense and get back into games. Of course it's always better to have BOTH offense & defense, which is NOT what I'm arguing against here.

In this case, A-40 is arguing that its the lack of help from Cavs offense is what caused the Cavs defeat in the Finals.

I'm arguing that it is moreso LeBrons fault himself and his terrible jumpshooting. The Spurs took away LeBrons penetrating game (greatest strength) and turned him into a jumpshooter (greatest weakness). The Spurs would then proceed to capitalize and start fastbreaks off LeBrons brickfest. LeBrons bad passing/playmaking also led to the Cavs downfall b/c LeBron would often make stupid decisions w/ the ball which led him to having the highest turnovers in NBA Finals history.

It was more of the LeBron inept offense (jumpshooting especially) than the Cavs offense that caused the defeat. He shot a dismall .336 eFG% off jumpshots in the playoffs that year (again his weakness). Great wings/guards (Kobe, Wade, Jordan, etc, ) that have to face tough defenses like the Spurs in the Finals would ALWAYS have both attributes (jumpshooting and penetration). Great players take over in pressure situations and deliever when it most matters. LeBrons jumpshot and decision-making didn't.

LeBrons team did what they were supposed to do in the Finals. LeBron himself didn't. . .or in this case, couldn't. He needs to develop a jumpshot. That is his only ticket to championship, unless if his team is STACKED. Guys like Wade won championship w/ subpar offenses. Why can't LeBron? Because he doesn't have a jumpshot
Sports / Re: Nba Season '08/09 by WadeFTW: 12:26am On Dec 10, 2008
A-40:

A.I's Sixers had homecourt advantage sef and a better roster they where the best team in the East that season comparing them to underdogs like the Cavs says a lot about your basketball knowledge

[b]Sixers had a better roster? Really? What a waste of my keystroke proving a dumb arguement.

The Sixers team that year featured Aaron McKie, Dikembe Mutombo, Theo Ratliff, Eric Snow, Tyrone Hill, Vernon Maxwell, Toni Kukoc & Nazr Muhammed They were all solid contributers in the past and only Mutombo, Snow & McKie were defensive specialists that were at the short end of their prime. Everyone else on that roster were either inexperienced, or past their prime. ALL of Iversons supporting cast were no more than role players and there was no such things as a second option. The offense was basically: Hand Iverson the rock and move the f*** out the way, basically similiar to the Cavs offense last season. LeBron at least had big Z to feed the ball to down low. None of the Sizer low post bigs were known for their offense. They still managed to make the Finals due to great defense & rebounding (that was their specialty, and still managed to take a game from one of the greatest dynasties of all time. LeBron couldn't even will a win from a lesser team.

But LeBrons supporting cast was better. He had Pavlocic, Damon Jones, Daniel Gibson, Donyell Marshall & Ira Newble who were all 3-PT specialists back in the 2006-07 season. LeBron had better shooters on his team. The only respectable outside shooter the Sixers had that year was Vernon Maxwell & Aaron McKie, and they didn't shoot all that well during the season. In fact, they shot worse %s than 6 Cavaliers players comparing the roster

And Larry Hughes, Drew Gooden & Big Z were better than anyone on that Sixers roster.

Not to mention the Sixers were the fifth highest defensive rated team in the league in 2001. LeBrons 2007 team was fourth.

So, no, Iverson roster was certainly not better. Any knowledgable basketball fan would laugh at you for making such a pathetic statement.[/b]    

A-40:

Besides don't you get simple english Mr Man their rebounding and defensive stats where inconsequential because they had no offense Lebron was shut down for most of the Series and no one else stepped up even the so-called fantastic defensive and rebounding team became useless because they could not take advantage of turnover's from San Antonio they had arguably the worst points average in NBA Finals history

LeBron was shutdown b/c he couldn't shoot the ball. The Spurs took his greatest strength away from him, which was penetrating by clogging the lane. Don't even come w/ that bull b/c LeBron had at least 5 guys on the team that shot the ball well from behind the arc. It was just that LeBron was reckless w/ the ball and couldn't find open teammates. Moreover, LeBron couldn't hit a jumpshot to save his life and that what ended up hurting the team. Not to mention that LeBron averaged almost 6 turnovers and had one of the worst Finals performances of all time. The Spurs took advantage of the reckless turnovers and long bricks by LeBron and started fastbreaks, b/c if you had any pint of knowledge about the game, you'd know that most long missed jumpshots usually begin fastbreaks at the other end, and LeBron was having a brickfest.

A-40:

Every other thing you are speaking is just grammar even a superstar with a good defensive and rebounding oriented supporting cast equally needs an offense in equal measure the Spurs always get hyped about their defense but with players like Parker and Ginobili the offensive side to their game is grossly under-rated  

That is an exception. The SPURS had BOTH. However, having a superstar w/ a great defensive SP around you is way better than having a superstar w/ a great offensive SP around you, and I stand corrected (esp. if you're a perimeter player which LeBron is).

A-40:

How old is Lebron?he is only a year older and was about same age if not younger than Dwight when he dragged the Cavs to the Finals but thats not the issue how can you possibly compare a supporting cast of Hedo Turkoglu,Rashad Lewis,Jameer Nelson? to an ageing Ilgauskas,Ben Wallace an inconsistent Varejao and Pavlovic? you must be high on mushrooms your excuses for Dwight Howard are not working for me as there are no guarantees that he would be as good as you are hyping him up to be in years to come.

Why are you comparing LeBron to D12? Did I ever compare LeBron to D12. Show me in my post were I did, besides comparing their depth (not head-to-head like you are implying). You obviously have an infatuation w/ not having comprehension skills. I said the Cavs had a better depth, which means the whole roster, not just the starters. Quick to jump the gun, as always.

A-40:

Now back to your comparison to him and Dirk! Dwight is panya on offense and despite his centaur-like body structure he still got pounded in the paint by a Jason Maxiell who was amazingly 5 inches shorter and i am sure a few pound s lighter too  it is only shyte Centers and defenders like Kwame Brown,Diop and Erick Dampier that would be scared to guard Dwight! D12 has been doing pretty good but if he does not deliver in post-season your theory of him being the perfect and best big man in the league does not count for squat

[b]WOW, your grammar really needs work. What school did you attend? (LOL) I would have to file a lawsuit against the legimacy of the curriculum. D12 is a pansy on offense that averages over 21 points a game. Tell me how is he a pansy on offense. Yes, he isn't as skilled as Dirk, but he is more dominant (like a poor mans Shaq w/ minimal post moves, albeit still crazy dominant). When he gets the ball in the paint, he is so difficult to defend b/c not only is he strong, but insanely athletic, and you cannot help, but foul him when he goes up strong for a dunk, a hook, scoop shot, etc,

And why does D12 have to deliver in the postseason for you to be a believe. Not every superstar can lead win a championship. Not even LeBron (yet). There is some holes in Howards game (not disputing that), but what makes him more effective than Dirk is that he plays more of a big mans game. You have a better chance of winning a championship w/ a low post big like D12 than a jumpshooting big like Dirk. And history AGREES w/ me.[/b]      

A-40:

Dirk has never been a post-player in the first place me i don't know where you get your figures from but D12 is a Center and Dirk is a power forward their styles are pretty contrasting i have never been a big fan of regular season stats though and by the time the playoff season comes along you would see why! Marcus Camby has won defensive player of the year a few times too so has Ron Artest so why are you ranting about being DPOY? his stats are very impressive but whether it would count come playoff time when it matters is a different story

I cringe anytime I read the grammatical errors on your post. It's like eating paste off the wall. LMAO at bringing Cambys name up. Camby is an overrated defender! Most of his defense consists of weakside blocks and usually get overpowered by his man as he's not a good man defender. Thats why Camby doesn't perform as well, b/c he isn't nearly good as advertised. D12 on the other hand, is a good man defender who can also help out on the low block/weak side and alter shots. Please watch the games. You'll sound inferior in debates.  

A-40:

Now talking about defense Dirk is number 4 in defensive rebounds in the league per game he might not be the best defender but he is not as soft as you haters paint him to be

LOL! If you adjust the the minutes into equal platform, you'll notice that Dirk doesn't even crack the top 10. In other words, Dirk is only fourth in defensive rebounds b/c he sees more minutes than your average everyday big    

A-40:

Dwight might have the better stats but till he proves his worth in the playoffs  you guys should just tape it shut and stop over-hyping that is my point

And one last thing ESPN polls don't count for squat an ageing TD still managed the Western Conference Finals how far did Mr Superman go?

You're an idiot. Thats was a poll based on on who you'd take ON YOUR TEAM to be in the low post for ONE season. Why comparing two different teams?  Duncans supporting cast was marginally better than D12 and has had more experience playing w/ them, so of course Duncan would have more success. Take out of the box next time. It helps

Oh wait. . .
Sports / Re: Nba Season '08/09 by WadeFTW: 8:31pm On Dec 09, 2008
A-40:

Are you talking about the Lakers or the Cavs because that series ended in 6

As for that series even if Lebron did have a stinker can you name one player in the entire

Cavs roster that stepped up at any end of the floor throughout that series sweep?they

where all shyte from Big Z to Larry Hughes,Drew Gooden,Donyell Marshall Lebron should

be given credit for dragging arguably the most untalented roster to the NBA Finals the

Spurs have conquered better teams in the Knicks,Nets and Pistons in the past
The Cavs meltdown was down to the fact that no one stepped up i repeat no one!!

Again, regarding LeBrons supporting cast. That team was one of the best defensive and rebounding teams in the league. It just shows how much more a great rebounding and defense is important. Allen Iverson took a similiar team to the Finals in 2001, so what exactly is your point? As a matter of fact: Iverson team actually won a game in the Finals, unlike LeBrons team. This, again, is yet another example of defense + rebounding is more pivitol to a teams success than offense

A superstar w/ defensive and rebounding oriented supporting cast & limited offense >>>>> A superstar w/ offensive oriented supporting cast & limited defense
 

A-40:

Yeah D12's team went further but lost to an ageing Pistons team in 5 games and thats the

same team which Lebron's average Cavs beat in six games abeg i am not buying into

Dwight' Howard's hype yet comparing him to Lebron is an insult are you talking of

someone that averaged 35 points in his debut playoff season  shocked shocked.Howard still has a mighty

long way to go you guys should not over hype this kid just yet
Back to Dirk i would believe the Mavs and Avery Johnson where star-struck when they

came across their former master in Don Nelson we lost 3-0 in the regular season to them so i

am sure it must have played in their heads somewhat but thats not the issue
Granted low-post players tend to make more impact but thats not always the case there

are exceptions and Dirk is one of them
And today's game has changed with the rules offensive fouls and everything it is more inclined to the

guards and smaller guys if you doubt that look at the last 5 NBA Finals MVP list TD is the only big man you would find in the list so as a big man you have to develop and outside shot either from 18feet,15 or 10 this is what Dirk does expertly Dwight Howard is still a work in progress and is in no wise better than Dirk

[b]Lets not forget that D12 was 22 years old then and has yet to reach his prime. LeBron supporting cast was deeper than D12s last year, although I'm not saying that D12 is the better player. But I wasn't comparing D12 to LeBron anyway. I was comparing him to Dirk, to give a prime example of what I mean by a REAL low post big.

They had a poll on ESPN today asking who would you rather have on the post for the rest of the season, comparing Duncan and D12. A whopping 71% chose D12. Imagine if they'd replaced Duncans name w/ Nowitzki. Thats just how much more lopsided the polls would be. And anyone who would choose Nowitzki over D12 would either be a blind homer or officially be considered dumber than a sack of rocks.

Read my posts carefully. I'm comparing D12 to Nowitzki b/c they virtually play the same position, but their styles are different.

I'm not also disputing the fact that Nowitzki is impactful, rather that a guy ike D12 is 3X more impactful. The defensive disparity is a BIGGGG boost. D12 is the leading DPOY candidate as we speak. He grabbs rebounds like a madman and averages over 4 blocks a game. Oppossing team guards are so afraid to penetrate into the lane b/c of D12s big frame and intimidating athletic abilities, so they resort to taking low percentage shots (jumpshots). THATS impact. Once D12 gets the ball in the post, hes too big and athletic to control and oppossing bigs just watch him take high % shots (shots closer to the rim) and dunk the ball w/ ferocity.
THATS impact. D12 leads the leads in offensive rebounds, meaning he gives his team alot of second chance points. THATS impact. Nowitzki doesn't do any of that and is a liability on defense. All he basically does better than D12 is shoot. And that is only for the guards to do. NOT BIG MEN!!!

And those handcheck rules you bring up doesn't affect guys like D12. He actually LEADS the league in free-throw attempts. That means he gets alot of calls in the post. Prime Shaq was a big and he led the league in FTAs. Handcheck rules doesn't necessarily apply to guards as you claim. As long as you're willing to ATTACK the rim, you'd be fine. If you look at all the guards/wings that attack the rim like Dwyane Wade, Devin Harris or LeBron James. Is it a coincidence those same guys top the league in free throw attempts? But then you're contradicting yourself, b/c since free-throw attempts are a by-product of attacking the rim and drawing fouls (due to handcheck), then generally jumpshooters like Dirk aren't proned to getting those calls b/c they don't attack enough. Remember 83% of Dirks attempts are off jumpers, so there was no reason for you to bring up handchecking, esp. if you were looking to support your arguement. 

Your statements hold no water. And I can barely understand your grammar/sentence structures.[/b]
Sports / Re: Nba Season '08/09 by WadeFTW: 7:17pm On Dec 09, 2008
A-40:

You can choose to care or not care but you cannot tell me thats not a factor unless you don't know your ball.Stop mentioning D12 he has not done squat in the post-season yet D.Wade did that in his 3rd season the fact is today's game has shifted from just relying on a big man to having good PG and Shooting guards who can either control traffic or take the game by the scruff of its neck Miami and Detroit are good examples even Shaq did not win his three rings without good backup from Kobe
Back to Dirk if you compare Dallas of old to what the Mavs have achieved in the last 4 or 5 years you would appreciate the goodness of Dirk i have told you defense is not a strong trait of European players if you don't get that then i am sorry i can't help you his array of moves driving to the hoop,shooting and handling the rock so good is the envy of all big men across the league Dirk is marquee a ring is all that would stop this hate and even if he does not win one i would name countless greats like Karl Malone and Reggie Miller that where not so lucky either

[b]Last I checked, D12 team went farther than Nowitzkis team last year in the postseason. Not to mention that Nowitzkis team have been regressing horribly ever since the Finals. In 2006-07, they had no business losing to an eigth-seeded team like Golden State in the first round. But now I could understand why that happened: b/c they lacked a low post threat and a defensive anchor in the middle and just allowed GSW high-octane offense to run up the score. Instead of looking to defend, they were busy trying to match the offensive skills of the Warriors, which was a terrible philosophy by Avery Johnson.

I can care less if Dirk is a skilled big w/ a jumpshot: GET THE THEORY THAT A GREAT LOW POST BIG GENERALLY HAS MORE OF AN IMPACT ON THE GAME THAN A GREAT JUMPSHOOTING BIG

So what if the NBA has gotten more sissier w/ big men facing up moreso than posting up. It doesn't change any my theory. The great low post players that I mentioned in my prior post: Do you know what they would do in this league today?!?! LOL. Inexplicable. They would eat these sissy, so-called big men for lunch. In fact, Prime Shaq and Duncan are great examples[/b]   

A-40:

Get this clear!! Lebron is the heart and soul of the Cavs no Lebron and the Cavs go straight back to the potential D-league team they where before King James came along if Cleveland had someone half as good as Lebron on their roster they would have won a ring
Defense is good but when you have anaemic offense you can only go so far as the Cavs found out against the Spurs when you miss open jumpers,layups and free throws what good is your defense?

Defense and Rebounding gives more scoring opportunites and attempts. I think it was LeBron that was the problem, not that second option that we're all waiting for. Every year in his playoff career he has shot terrible when teams would just clog the lane and have him shoot all day. It works! He had good serviceable role players like Big Z, Varejao & Gooden to feed the ball to in the post, and Gibson to kick out to. But the real truth, the real downfall of the 2006-07 Finals was LeBrons jumpshot and his inability to drive through the lane, which was his greatest strength. You take LeBrons greatest strength away from him, and he is incredibly limited offensively. No post game then (despite his big frame), and no jumpshot
Sports / Re: Nba Season '08/09 by WadeFTW: 6:52pm On Dec 09, 2008
A-40:

Defense and rebounding is important i agree but of what use is all that if you can't get any offense go and watch the 07 NBA Finals again you would realize the importance of offense my brother they where probably the lowest scoring team in NBA Final history their support cast is not supporting enough on offense Game 7 at Boston is another example

[b]Its funny you brought up the 2007 Finals. Again, It wasn't the Cavs offense that was nearly the problem as Spurs defense. In that series they basically turned LeBron into a jumpshooter b/c they knew how to DEFEND the low post very well w/ Duncan anchoring and altering shots while CLOGGING THE LANE to keep LeBron from penetrating to the rim.

As we all know, LeBron has always had a deplorable jumpshot w/ terrible shooting mechanics you wouldn't dare teach your kids. Who the f*** in this day and age do you see shooting with their elbows out. It became very apparent, esp. when LeBron airballed alot of shots, including FREETHROWS, during the series.

The thing was LeBron (at that time wasn't used to excellent lane clogging defenses like the Spurs) and just got exposed. Oh, and the stats back that up.

LeBron shot .336 eFG% off jumpshots in that playoff season.

That is just flat-out terrible.

And Game 7 against Boston was just the icing on the cake. Rondo defended Kobe very well and just exposed Kobe as an erratic, overrated, self-centered shooter he is (or was)[/b]
Sports / Re: Nba Season '08/09 by WadeFTW: 6:21pm On Dec 09, 2008
A-40:

He is European!! how does the typical European big man play? where do you watch your basketball sef?Dirk still has game he still puts up 20 + points 9 rebounds and 3 assists per night he is still Mr Maverick and still has game what we need to do is get rid of Jason Kidd he has been producing stinker after stinker
I just hope they can make 1st seed although with the way the Celts are playing thats unlikely to happen and now that they have established that they have the pistons like defense of old the question now is can they get some offense from Pavlovic,Gibson,Ilgauskas,West,Szcerbiak,Wallace and the other loafers

I can care less how a European big man plays. History has shown traditional big men have had a far more impact on the game as far back as Mikan (Russell, Wilt, Kareem, Moses Malone, McHale, Dream, Prime Shaq, Admiral, Duncan, and now D12). Nowitzki is an adequate first option on a contending team, but doesn't have nearly the impact as those guys I just mentioned. Especially on defense where he can't even guard a door.

Dirk is not the best big man in the game. I don't even considered Dirk a big man. A whopping 83% of all his shot attempts are off jumpshots. Yeah, hes great at what he does, but he doesn't have big man moves. Replace Dirk with a low ppost threat like D12 or Duncan and I'll GUARANTEE the Mavs have a better record. KG doesn't play like a big neither, but at least hes intimidating on the defensive end and doesn't hover around the perimeter 95% of the time. I think guards like Kobe and Billups even have more of a post up game than Dirk (LOL)
Sports / Re: Nba Season '08/09 by WadeFTW: 6:10pm On Dec 09, 2008
lai-lai:

@wafeftw
are u saying that cavs were still more likely to lose last year even if they had homecourt advantage?

and your second point is like announcing on a microphone that 1 + 1 = 2

W/O LeBrons supporting cast, LeBron wouldn't stand a chance against the upper echelon powers. If LeBron doesn't have the necessary players built around him (gritty defenders that have a nose for the ball and/or are great rebounders), then I don't care where LeBron plays. Hes not getting it done. And LeBrons terrible jumpshot in the playoffs wouldn't help neither.

Most of y'all don't strike me as guys that puts enough emphasis on defense. All I hear is blame on Celts bench offense and LeBron James. Defense is half the game, and if not developed, then your team has no chance. I'm a really young kid, but I have more of an old school mentality. I value defense more than offense. Most of championship teams we've witnessed the past few years were defense oriented. Detroit, Spurs, Boston, and Miami to a lesser extent. Conversely, we've seen run-n-gun teams like Phoenix Suns that don't even make it to the conference Finals.
Sports / Re: Nba Season '08/09 by WadeFTW: 12:18am On Dec 09, 2008
lai-lai:

cavs are definitely more than just lebron now and last year, it was d home court advantage as A-40 said
i expect a closer, grittier series if they happen to hav a matchup this season

LeBrons supporting cast had much more to do w/ their success, than home court advantage.

God, do any of you guys ever take defense and rebounding into consideration? Its not all about offense in the NBA, you know.
Sports / Re: Nba Season '08/09 by WadeFTW: 11:55pm On Dec 08, 2008
JeSoul:

  Wade, you're funny, the way you consistently read more into my posts that I state. my goodness you're a piece of work. When one says lack of offense does that = zero offense?    whether na inconsistent or lack of offense, it equals the same thing in that the bench needs help.
  Even if you wanted to be nitpicky about my words, did I not break it down further to individual players? that Powe was good, Allen and House needed to step it up, but Davis & Scal are the real offensive liabilities?

Exactly. Stating that one has lack of offense is simply expressing the fact that they are a total liability and cannot be looked upon at any time as a viable option.

Stating inconsistency is expressing the fact the Celts have a tendency to show great spurts offensively, showing flashes of potential and promise, but not necessarily in perfect harmony.

All in all, to sum up my points

- The defense/rebounding and Doc substitutions may play more into the reserves woes than their offense (stats back it up)
- lack of something does not equal inconsistency
Sports / Re: Nba Season '08/09 by WadeFTW: 11:31pm On Dec 08, 2008
omi tutu:

hehehehe. . .

Jesoul and WadeFTW .

Bo, I bet there are more pertinent issues in the NBA season than the Celts bench angry angry angry

Like. . . .Is Dirk the best big man in the NBA? grin grin grin grin

LLLOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOLLLLLLLLLLLLL!!!!!!!!!! Dirk doesn't even PLAY like a traditional big man. He is a poor man & help defender, and his team has REGRESSED over the last few years. He is an afterthought.
Sports / Re: Nba Season '08/09 by WadeFTW: 10:56pm On Dec 08, 2008
WadeFTW said:

b/c you said they had a "lack of offense from the bench". Those were your words. Then, you went on to say they were inconsistent?
Which one is it?

Jesoul said:

It is both


I think thats all we need to know. Your POSTS are inconsistent and contradictory.

This is what you said on post #514:

The Celtics have a huge weakness though: lack of offense from our bench. Ainge needs to trade for someone before the deadline or sign someone or else repeating will be a tall order with the current reserves.

Now you claim the Celts have this lack of offense. But somehow this Celts "lack of offense" ranks amongst the upper echelon of teams in the NBA (stat-wise).
Saying the Celts are inconsistent is one thing, but claiming they have absolutely no offense whatsoever is absurd.

Here is the definition of "lack" in the dictionary:

lack   /læk/ Show Spelled Pronunciation  [lak] Show IPA Pronunciation 

–noun 1. deficiency or absence of something needed, desirable, or customary: lack of money; lack of skill. 
2. something missing or needed: After he left, they really felt the lack. 
–verb (used with object) 3. to be without or deficient in: to lack ability; to lack the necessities of life. 
4. to fall short in respect of: He lacks three votes to win. 
–verb (used without object) 5. to be absent or missing, as something needed or desirable: Three votes are lacking to make a majority. 
—Verb phrase6. lack in, to be short of or deficient in: What he lacks in brains, he makes up for in brawn. 


So, you see. Please choose your words carefully next time.

One last thing. If they're giving up leads before first unit returns, it doesn't necessarily have to do w/ their "lack of offense". It could be their poor rotations on defense, being unable to read passing lanes, meagar rebounding/positioning and/ or Docs subsitution patterns, which is a legit arguement. Thats what coaches are there for: to give good rotations. In fact, Boston reserves are one of the worst rebounding teams in the NBA, while their starters are one of the best: an implication of DEFENSE.

This just goes to show how basketball is just so much more than how much your team can put up in a game.
Sports / Re: Nba Season '08/09 by WadeFTW: 8:30pm On Dec 08, 2008
JeSoul:

  Oga Wade you're not listening to me, I did not say our bench is garbage, I said the bench is good, but it is not championship level yet!
  Obviously both the starters & the bench must be doing something very right with a 20-2 record  undecided  I did not say either the Celtic bench does not outplay other teams on different nights, I said they are inconsistent! Drop 60 today and 10 tomorrow so obviously the averages will not show these inconsistent numbers.
 
  My simple point is this: the bench is good, but not ready to repeat. Kapish.

    you were just quoting stats for me how the bench doesn't play long enough . . . now the story is if perhaps Doc is leaving them in too long? 
  who is complaining?  we are 20-2! I simply said the Celtics one weakness is getting consistent offense from their bench. Shikena.

The facts still remains that the Celts have one of the best benches in the NBA, inconsistent or not. It's apparent Doc doesn't make the right substitutions and he ends up getting outcoached on most occasions, yet Boston gets by b/c of the talent disparity. If Doc was consistent in his rotations then the reserves wouldn't show inconsistency to begin w/. Statistically, I proved the Celts reserves have no problem scoring, b/c you said they had a "lack of offense from the bench". Those were your words. Then, you went on to say they were inconsistent?

Which one is it?

I criticized your post b/c you blatantly declared the Celts as being an utter liability from the bench (offensively), which isn't nearly true.
Sports / Re: NFL 11-12 Season Is Here: Where Are All The NFL Fans? by WadeFTW: 7:10pm On Dec 08, 2008
I'M CALLING MY DOLPHINS CHAMPIONSHIP SEASON (AND I'LL MAKE SURE TO BOOKMARK THIS THREAD)

FROM WORST TO FIRST

ONE OF, IF NOT, THE GREATEST TURNAROUND IN NFL HISTORY.

MIAMI CONTROLS THEIR OWN DESTINY RIGHT NOW. IF THEY WIN OUT, THEN THEY AUTOMATICALLY MAKE THE PLAYOFFS.

I LOL AT ALL THE HATERS THAT USED TO RIDICULE THE DOLPHINS ON THIS THREAD AT THE START OF THE SEASON.

NOW WHO HAS THE LAST LAUGH?
Sports / Re: Nba Season '08/09 by WadeFTW: 6:52pm On Dec 08, 2008
JeSoul:

lol . . . the reason Doc Rivers doesn't play them more is because they don't produce offense! They lose huge double digit leads and Doc has to quickly bring back the starters to stop the bleeding.

Did you watch the last 2 games? esp last night? Jim O'brien's strategy worked to a T because he brought in his starters against the Celtics bench, and quickly the 1Q double digit lead evaporated.

I'm not saying the bench is a complete wash out, Powe is great, and like I said House and Tony Allen are very good, they just need to be consistent every night. We're not trying to be an average team, but a repeat championship team. And you cannot do that with a half-baked, average bench.

[b]If the Celts bench is not inconsistent, then no bench in the NBA is consistent b/c the Celts reserves are one of the better teams statistically in the league, and they have an advantage on other teams oppossing reserves on most nights. If the Celts bench are not good offensively, then explain why they are above average in scoring per 100 possessions. If the Celts are losing leads like that, then the blame can only be put on Doc (he doesn't exactly have a good track record other than the championship season), b/c it clearly shows thats hes not adept w/ his substitutions. Perhaps he is leaving his second units to play w/ oppossing teams first units FOR TOO LONG. Hence why they lose leads. Simple. 

I would gladly trade Yakouba FREAKING Diawara and Chris Quinn for that Celts bench anyday. I believe most of your low post bench are much better options than the Heats STARTING center, who averages a whopping 1 point and 3 rebounds a game. So yes, I would take Big Baby (even if he is a crybaby) over our undersized PF PLAYING C anyday.

Celts fans are in no condition to complain.[/b]
Sports / Re: Nba Season '08/09 by WadeFTW: 6:35pm On Dec 08, 2008
JeSoul:

   shocked for where?  grin I love Glen Davis but he's an offensively liability and so is the red head Scalabrine. House is great but inconsistent and so is Tony Allen. It's only Powe that I have confidence in to bring it every night. Nah depth is not a word I'd associate with the Celtics bench.
  You certainly got that right. I think if they can somehow snag a proven veteran to help on reserve scoring, it'll go a long way.

Scalabrine doesn't get that much PT. He plays 14% of the Celtics minutes according to 82games.com. Way to throw his name in there. Nice try, but it won't work.

Bostons reserves offensively as a whole are very good. They don't log alot of minutes (bottom 10 in minutes per game) but they do average more points than most teams per game and are above average in scoring. Imagine if you gave the Celts reserves more minutes. I guarentee, they'll top the league in scoring. They average more points-per-minute than any other team in the league aside from Houston and Detroit I believe.

http://www.82games.com/0809/STSORT10.HTM

I rest my case.
Sports / Re: Nba Season '08/09 by WadeFTW: 6:19pm On Dec 08, 2008
A-40:

@Jesoul
I am not sure the Cavs are as one-man as they where in 07 when they lost to the Spurs although i still agree the rest of the team is shyte but looking at last season's playoff series you and i know that homecourt was what saw you through against ATL and Cleveland y'all are still favorites though but not unbeatable

WRONG. You are really underrating LeBrons supporting cast. LeBron having no help is a bygone myth. They are one of the best defensive and rebounding teams in the league. Verejao (sp?) and Big Z are serviceable rebounders and very adept on their defensive rotations. Mo Williams is a decent PG w/ a good offensive game. Gibson isn't too shabby either.
Sports / Re: Nba Season '08/09 by WadeFTW: 6:14pm On Dec 08, 2008
Uh oh. Yet another coach got fired today

http://www.insidehoops.com

The Minnesota Timberwolves today announced that the team has relieved head coach Randy Wittman of his coaching duties. Kevin McHale will take over the head coaching responsibilities of the team on a full-time basis from this point forward. McHale, who has served as vice president of basketball operations since May 11, 1995, will step down from that role with the team in order to concentrate on his coaching duties.
Sports / Re: Nba Season '08/09 by WadeFTW: 6:11pm On Dec 08, 2008
JeSoul:

The Cavs are a 1-man team. Using the Lakers template, find a way to neutralize or contain or at best limit the damage from Lebron, and shut everyone else down, Lebron cannot win by himself. Remember the stinker of a 'series' in the finals?

The Celtics have a huge weakness though: lack of offense from our bench. Ainge needs to trade for someone before the deadline or sign someone or else repeating will be a tall order with the current reserves.

I would trade the Heat bench for the Celtics bench anyway. And that INCLUDES Michael Beasley

Celtics have perhaps the best bench in the NBA. The Celtics are the epitome of depth
Sports / Re: NFL 11-12 Season Is Here: Where Are All The NFL Fans? by WadeFTW: 6:05pm On Dec 08, 2008
Sports / Re: Nba Season '08/09 by WadeFTW: 6:04pm On Dec 08, 2008
On offense, Cavs are a one man show w/ solid contributors like Mo Williams, but on defense and rebounding, its completely different.

The Cavs are one of the best defensive and rebounding teams in the league. And thats a MAJOR part of their victories. If LeBron didn't have such a great rebounding team, he wouldn't get nearly as many opportunites on offense and the Cavs wouldn't be 17-3.

Quit underrating LeBrons supporting cast. He has help.
Sports / Re: Nba Season '08/09 by WadeFTW: 4:25pm On Dec 08, 2008
DWYANE WADE AND DWIGHT HOWARD ARE MOST VALUABLE PLAYER AND DEFENSIVE PLAYER OF THE YEAR CANDIDATES

http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/awards?page=awards-081202
Celebrities / Deepika Padukone VS Aishwarya Rai. . .who would you rather bone by WadeFTW: 3:32am On Jan 18, 2008
Deepika Padukone



Aishwarya Rai

[img]http://imagecache2.allposters.com/images/pic/MMPH/C56540~Aishwarya-Rai-Posters.jpg[/img]

Tough choice, but Ima have to go w/ my girl Deepika. She just does it for me
Sports / Re: Miami Heat Should Tank The Season And Get Derrick Rose by WadeFTW: 4:56am On Jan 10, 2008
made.n.Nigeria:

WadeFTW, 
The reason why I say Miami is better off picking Beasley (or any other quality front court player ) is because I believe their problem is at the front court,  They lost(cause Wade got hurt in the series) in the conf. finals years back when Shaq was effective and they even won it all when Shaq was somewhat effective,  And remember who did they have as their PG when they got to conf. finals??,  Damon Jones,
Who did they have when they won? JWill, Teams don't really need to true PG to go all the way, above average will do, long as there's an allworld SG and centre or PF

The fact of the matter is: Beasley is a tweener. . .meaning scouts do not know whether he will play 3 or the 4 in the league. If he wants to play the 4, he needs to add some weight and bulk up, as well as establish some defense. You have to understand that Haslem is more of a Riley guy: A goon that could rebound and play defense. I don't know if Beasley's stats will translate well considering he's played against much inferior competition, and played subpar (6 points 1-6 FG) against the only quality team he faced thus far in Xavier. Moreover, I don't like Beasley because of his selfish play. He's not a team-oriented player IMO.  He reminds me alot of Derrick Coleman. . .just tad more athletic version.

If I had to pick a post presence in the draft, I would go with DeAndre Jordan. Very good defensively. He knows how box out well, and knows how to position himself well for a dunk. Might I add that he can also jump out of the gym with his 7 foot frame? Could have another Dwight Howard in the making. The only problem I have with him is the rawness of his offense. He needs to develop more go-to moves and different repertoires. It's not good to have one tendency as your game can become very predictable in the short run and defenses would know how to adjust. I guess another year in college would help. Hibbert from Georgetown would be another good choice.
Sports / Re: Nba Starts For Heat Haters Only by WadeFTW: 2:37pm On Jan 08, 2008
made.n.Nigeria:

Man I think even if Miami had the first pick, they'd pick Beasley, they already have Dwade, why choose another player similar to him,

Wit Wade in the backcourt any other PG will do, (they won the with Jwill at the PG spot), just like any team will Kobe can make do with any PG,

I always say that Miami biggest issue is the front court, No knock against Haslem, but he's a role player at best( gives u 15-18pts, 10 reb any given night), they need a more dominant post presence,

A similar example is the nets, they possibly the best PG in the game at Jkidd, they've 2 quality, 2 star wing players in Carter and Jefferson, but they're still struggling, why because, they absolutely NO presence in the post,

Let me hear your thoughts,

Beasely is overrated. He can score, but he plays no defense, has no passing skills and scouts cannot decide whether he's a future SF or PF. On top of it all, he's arrogant and lazy.

Rose is the complete opposite.

Not to mention that Beasely would most likely play SF if he went to Miami, and that means he won't be in the post. It's apparent that Beasely needs to bulk up and he isn't as ripped as Haslem. If Beasely wants to be in the post, he needs to bulk up. Plus, unlike Beasely, Haslem is a lockdown defender. Do you homework next time before talking to me.

Dang, that only took 30 secs.

DESTROYED ON ALL FRONTS
Sports / Re: Miami Heat Should Tank The Season And Get Derrick Rose by WadeFTW: 2:18pm On Jan 08, 2008
made.n.Nigeria:

WadeFTW, Please why do u think u're ALWAYS right and does your opinion HAVE to be the correct one,

If I'm right, You said so u'reself that u're the most knowledgeable person on hoops in the forum, Not that I care or anything, but that's not so necessary, to say such a thing,

Anyways, about your argument, A team doesn't always have to go with a pure point guard, Check the rosters of the last few NBA championship teams, and tell me if the starting PG is a "true PG", Lakers won 3 straight crowns without one, Tony Parker sure as hell isn't one and I don't know if I'd call Billups one (he's naturally is scorer, he's just transformed into a PG),
So it doesn't really matter, whether Rose is a "true PG",

And for what it's worth, I'd take Mayo over Rose in a heartbeat, Mayo is a better all around player, even at the guard spot, And Mayo is a better defender, even the scouts say this, And their head to head matchup proved it, go look at the box score,

And yes i know the Tigers won the game, that's just because they've the better, more experienced team,

And I think Miami's biggest problem is at the front court, not the backcourt, Dwade has shown that he can more than fill it up at the backcourt when he's healthy, So Rose will not be a solution to their ocean of problems, They need a Mike Beasley, heck everyone does,

And I think Riles has overstayed his welcome as a coach, they should get another one, He did nothing in the offseason as far as getting new players, Smush parker, please, Ricky davis, not too bad,

Miami's problem is at point guard as well as backcourt. Since Jason Williams contract is expiring, the Heat will need a solid point guard. To me, I feel that Rose is the best player in the draft. Why? Because Mayo is a little undersized for a shooting guard and has not developed a point guard's game. Now why would the Heat want to go for a guy that doesn't know how to run a team when Wade has already said he doesn't want to play point-guard? Wade is a defacto PG that doesn't have a great assist-to-turnover ratio either. Beasely would be a plus for the Heat, but he's regarded as being lethargic at times and has a  lack of feel for the game, plus I don't feel that Beasely's game will translate as well as Rose's in the NBA since Beasely doesn't know whether he'll play SF or PF, whereas Rose is a surefire PG. Guys like Kurt Thomas led the NCAA in points and rebounds, but look how he translates in the NBA. Rose is all about winning, has a great work ethic, doesn't care about stats, and has all the potential in the world. And, Mayo isn't half the defender Rose is. On NBADraft.net, they rate Rose's defense higher than Mayo.

Rose is a better slasher, far better passer, better on-ball defender (Mayo is not a lockdown type), and better rebounder. In addition, Rose is very coachable whereas Mayo can get out of hand. It's not even close IMO. Mayo just gets the hype.

About Mayo and Rose's head-to-head matchup. Neither showed up so your arguement about Mayo being better in regards to the game is a moot point.

I would agree with you on the sense that it is better to build a championship-caliber team around a big man than a point-guard. However, there are no franchaise big man in the draft. Rose (IMO) is the only franchise player in the draft, and I believe the role of a typical point-guard is much more important than that of a wing player, or a combo/shooting guard.
Sports / Re: Nba Starts For Heat Haters Only by WadeFTW: 5:32am On Jan 07, 2008
lai-lai:

just stating the obvious

OUTSIDE JUMPSHOT. THAT'S IT. OTHER THAN THAT, HE'S FINE.

HE HAS THE SKILLS. . .

THE POTENTIAL. . .

THE WORK ETHIC. . .

AND THE HUMILITY. . .

HIS TOTAL PACKAGE IS UNRIVALED

DISCUSS
Sports / Re: Nba Starts For Heat Haters Only by WadeFTW: 5:12am On Jan 07, 2008
lai-lai:

derrick rose stil has things to learn

WHAT IS YOUR POINT (OR POSSIBLE LACK THEREOF)?

(1) (2) (3) (of 3 pages)

(Go Up)

Sections: politics (1) business autos (1) jobs (1) career education (1) romance computers phones travel sports fashion health
religion celebs tv-movies music-radio literature webmasters programming techmarket

Links: (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10)

Nairaland - Copyright © 2005 - 2024 Oluwaseun Osewa. All rights reserved. See How To Advertise. 181
Disclaimer: Every Nairaland member is solely responsible for anything that he/she posts or uploads on Nairaland.