serty1: this is the stationary SUV dat lastma said killed its official ..............so pathetic.....no dent , scratch or blood stain

aribisala0: i think the cctv argument is trying to insult our intelligence. How many murder convictions or convictions in general are obtained on the basis of CCTV anywhere?. We are talking about an allegation for which there are several witnesses.Let their testimony be heard and other evidence presented before a court. I believe there is enough material for a competent court to make a determination either way. I wonder why there is all this hysteria

Deedee49:


When sometin similar happens to u someday, may u have someone write dis against u!

wellmax:

Once again, I'll remind you on the need to focus on issues and not personalities.
That said, you believe the woman's story? hmmm, she never ran off with her car, yet the police had to come before the security men at Okota gate open the gate... Is this logical? If you believe one woman, why would you doubt the police, LASTMA and other well meaning Nigerian at the scene. All you saying the woman is innocent are just doing that because some mischievous persons are sending out some BCs to that effect.

gidig: I understand how envious people can get at times when they see a young successful person driving a SUV while they are under the sun, eking out a living. Hating someone because they have what you do not have is a sign that you dont even deserve it in the first place

wellmax:

Once again, I'll remind you on the need to focus on issues and not personalities.
That said, you believe the woman's story? hmmm, she never ran off with her car, yet the police had to come before the security men at Okota gate open the gate... Is this logical? If you believe one woman, why would you doubt the police, LASTMA and other well meaning Nigerian at the scene. All you saying the woman is innocent are just doing that because some mischievous persons are sending out some BCs to that effect.

chiborado: She committed a traffic offence and must be charged for it.
But if its proved beyond reasonable doubt that she did not hit the Lastma James Bond, then she cannot be responsible. Though she may be linked to the complicity leading to the event.
For Christ sake, why would someone here declare her guilty of a crime with 2 versions?
Legally she is innocent till proven guilty in the law court with documentary evidence.
A lot of people here makes biased comments. Its a pity.

I repeat, she should be handed the applicable traffic sentence if actually she went the wrong way.

aribisala0: We can all see a campaign for what it is ! You post a photo telling this is the vehicle in question and go on to say NO DENT NO BLOOD

Must there be a dent?
Did the deceased bleed at all?.
What was the cause of death.
Was he knocked down and trampled under
We do not know any of this so let us calm down.

We are told he was CRUSHED which could mean anything.

There is no way any sensible person can draw conclusions without listening to testimony from witnesses of which there are some. Any accuesed person should have the opportunity to challenge and cross-examine these witnesses.
All this trial by photo convinces no one.How many deaths by collision and vehicles involved have you studied to pronounce on what the forensic signature of a car involved in a killing must look like.
It is a simple matter.Trial is is COURT and NOT the Internet. Of course she remains innocent until proven guilty.

propofol:
THE ABOVE STATEMENT IS JUST EMBARRASSING TO SAY THE LEAST!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!haba.

Redstone: This matter is very simple. Accident investigator should carry out a thorough check to determine if there are signs on the car that will suggest that the bankers car actually hit the lastma official. I think a proper forensic will do the job.

If there is an eye witness account, then it should be followed by a forensic, if proved, the woman only has to face charges on traffic violation only. The deceased lastma official may actually be chasing another traffic offender before the incident happened. lekki/Ajah axis is prone to traffic violation more than any other road in Lagos apparently due to the heavy traffic and no alternative routes.

emmatok:

Traffic offence is a MISDEMEANOR and not FELONY.

People are being killed on that road with or without one-way driving.

And the LATSMA officials lied she ran away with the Jeep, when they LATSMA acctualy towed the Jeep themselves from the crime scene to the Polices station.

LATSMA IS NOT TELL US THE TRUTH HERE.

omosexy1:

Please read the recent traffic law. You might go to jail for breaking some laws.

lanre_front:

Hey, I am focusing on personalities and not issues.

chucky234: Watching as this drama unfold....
LASTMA + Danfo - woman = death
Equation solved

aribisala0:
A bit of contradiction here i am afraid what applies for the traffic offence applies to the killing
For both she is Innocent until proven guilty
Why are you suggesting only punishment for the traffic offence as if you have already found her guilty. you say "SHE COMMITTED". It is an allegation.
She should be charged for both allegations and remains innocent until proven guilty
If found guilty of either offence she must pay the price that is all there is to it

abacus:

Oga lawyer, is driving 1-way an offence or not?

emmatok:

Well, thier is a difference between MISDEMEANOR and FELONY.

Traffic offence can NEVER be a FELONY.

Now the killing of the LATSMA guy by who-ever is not s traffic offence but a FELONY.

Series22: my friend stop being emotional, wat of d official dat died? If she's innocent, allow d jury 2 dcide. Make she stop all dis 3months baby and ceasaran section story.. We d vex. R.I.P OFFICER

gidig: Thank God. One of the occupants of the Danfo bus that actually killed the Lastma officer has come to Panti to confirm that Yinka did not kill the man. Great piece of news. More witnesses are coming. God answers prayers.

aribisala0: We can all see a campaign for what it is ! You post a photo telling this is the vehicle in question and go on to say NO DENT NO BLOOD

Must there be a dent?
Did the deceased bleed at all?.
What was the cause of death.
Was he knocked down and trampled under
We do not know any of this so let us calm down.

We are told he was CRUSHED which could mean anything.

There is no way any sensible person can draw conclusions without listening to testimony from witnesses of which there are some. Any accuesed person should have the opportunity to challenge and cross-examine these witnesses.
All this trial by photo convinces no one.How many deaths by collision and vehicles involved have you studied to pronounce on what the forensic signature of a car involved in a killing must look like.
It is a simple matter.Trial is is COURT and NOT the Internet. Of course she remains innocent until proven guilty.