fellis: ^ I was wondering the same thing. I couldn't watch the video; am browsing on my phone.
@pleep, what the hell does your graph have to do with the topic?
And how can you boldly and shamelessly advocate the treatment of women like slaves? I don't understand you. That you are 19 years old does not justify your rëtarded way of thinking, I know people that are younger than you but way smarter and logical.
Do you have a mother or sister? Can you boldly tell them to their faces that they do not deserve freedom and they must be regarded as immature children all their lives?
Stop wasting my time with your meaningless posts and go fly a kite or something.

"Also researches have been carried out that showed that women are happier and function better when there is no gender discrimination against them.
Read more on the subject if you can. Peace"

wiegraf:

Not that I'm fully reading the link, but from what I can tell how does this help your case pleep-kun?

pleep: Shimexx, physics and all the other smart posters out there... do you see why i call these ppl dumb?

Fellis you stupid wench, you just made a post that said

That graph shows that is the complete opposite of the truth. Can you dumbasses stop talking air and admit that i have disproven almost every single thing you have posted on this topic?

pleep: Shimexx, physics and all the other smart posters out there...

pleep: Shimexx, physics and all the other smart posters out there... do you see why i call these ppl dumb?

Fellis you stupid wench, you just made a post that said

That graph and the CNN report shows that what you said is the complete opposite of the truth, women were actually happier before feminism. Can you dumbasses stop talking air and admit that i have disproven almost every single thing you have posted on this topic?

Fellis: Also researches have been carried out that showed that women are happier and function better when there is no gender discrimination against them.
Read more on the subject if you can. Peace

pleep: ^ I'm not going to argue circles with you little man. Is she wrong or not? Arguing with me is one thing, but you going to argue with a government happiness census?

.... about a subject you clearly know nothing about?

"Also researches have been carried out that showed that women are happier and function better when there is no gender discrimination against them.
Read more on the subject if you can. Peace"

pleep: Grasping at straws monkeyboy03

1. The recession happened 2 years ago... women's happiness began to drop in the 70's.

2. Women were not hit harder in the recession, that could not be further from the truth. The 08 recession was caused by a housing bubble and thus most of the jobs lost were in construction, home repair and other overwhelmingly male dominated sectors

3. divorce and out of wedlock births have more than tripled since feminism, is that "stable romance" to you?

4. Domestic violence was higher in the 70's than it is now.

5. You are a dumbass and everything you posted in BS.

According to economists, since 1854, the U.S. has encountered 32 cycles of expansions and contractions, with an average of 17 months of contraction and 38 months of expansion.[5] However, since 1980 there have been only eight periods of negative economic growth over one fiscal quarter or more,[48] and four periods considered recessions:
July 1981 – November 1982: 14 months
July 1990 – March 1991: 8 months
March 2001 – November 2001: 8 months
December 2007 – June 2009: 18 months[49][50]

pleep: ^listen monkeyboy number 2, this is not about "my case". I have been proving my case for the last 3 pages.

This is about the blatantly false allegation from fellis

Under the impression that there was "oppression" of women before feminism, what she said is the polar opposite of the truth. Im still laughing at how all you dudes popped up to defend her. Over-protective much?

fellis:

Are you high? How is my statement the opposite of the truth? And how does your graph prove that feminism is responsible for the drop in happiness? Google up the effect of gender discrimination in the workplace and on female psyche and read.

pleep: Monkeyboy did you even read the title of your article?

[size=20pt]"Women hit hardest in US economic recovery as jobs growth slows"[/size]

Pay attention to the bolded


It says recovery fool. Men lost more jobs, because it was a HOUSING BUBBLE, women gained less jobs during the recovery because they didnt loose as much. the stimulus was directed to the sectors most affected, these were typically male dominated sectors like contruction work.

Common sense dude.

Logicboy03:


1) Recession did not start in 2007



2) Women were hit harder in the recession. Fact
http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2012/apr/06/women-hit-hard-us-economic-recession
http://femalebreadwinners.com/working-women-l/

Keep arguing like a fool against facts

3) Yes, blame divorce and bastards on feminism like a fool


4) Domestic violence has risen in the past years
http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/news/nation/story/2012-04-29/domestic-violence-police-survey/54633282/1


5) You are the dumbass and I have backed up everything that I said.





How you can put happiness solely on feminism is beyond me. Your arrogance in ignorance is exceptional

*Kails*:



HIGH FIVE!!
*gimmie sum!!*

Logicboy03:

pleep: Lol at kalis cowering in the shadows while her glorious manginas do battle with the evil pleep.

pleep: Omg dude, the article is about the recovery not the recession itself. Haha ok though, lets say that the current happiness gap is because of the recession in 2007.

That does not explain the decrease in female happiness that occured since the 70's. If you are saying that females become unhappy because of recessions that occur every 10 years, (and men are magically unnafected) that looks to me like a direct consequence of entering the work force. Essentially "enjoying" the privileges that have been denied them for so long. Your argument is circular, it has nothing to do with the big picture.

Feminism is still to blame for decreasing female happiness


Lol at kalis cowering in the shadows while her glorious manginas do battle with the evil pleep.

"Women are more likely to work in government positions, especially as teachers or clerical workers, areas that have been cut heavily since the beginning of the recession. They are also more likely to work in retail, a sector that cut jobs in March"

pleep: ^listen monkeyboy number 2, this is not about "my case". I have been proving my case for the last 3 pages.

This is about the blatantly false allegation from fellis

Under the impression that there was "oppression" of women before feminism, what she said is the polar opposite of the truth. Im still laughing at how all you dudes popped up to defend her. Over-protective much?

Viewing this topic: mondi_cheeks(f), *Kails*, fellis(f), Logicboy03(m), pleep(m), Flytefalls(f), wiegraf

pleep: Men have never oppressed women in the west, what you see in history is restriction not oppression. It was balanced out via protection and provision.

Logicboy03:

You should read more;


The above quote is from the same link.







You have not proven how feminism is to blame for dip in women's happiness. Also, I have explained to you that happiness is a foolish measure. A drunk is happier than a sober man.

Furthermore, feminism has been linked to stable relationships so sharaap.

"Also researches have been carried out that showed that women are happier and function better when there is no gender discrimination against them.
Read more on the subject if you can. Peace"

pleep: If recessions make women unhappy its because of entering the workforce, and that is because of feminism. You are back at square one dude.

Like i said a million times, the graph was in direct contraction to a post by fellis that said:

So weather or not you think happiness is a good measure of anything, the fact of the matter is your goddess was wrong, femnism did not make women happier.

Logicboy03:



The graph had nothing to do with it.


Happiness is a bad measure. End of story

wiegraf:

Yes I know you don't think it "oppression", you think of it as a "restriction". How stoopid can you be? Wtf is wrong with you? Hitler called jews "the final problem", you know that, yes? You m.oron

Now, since you're apparently logical, don't dodge the issue, and show us your superior logical powah. How does this help your case?

It doesn't? So what have you been doing all day? Roasting ants with a magnifying glass while thinking about how you can get one over those damned manginas on the internets?

You may have some issues

To top it up, this is the best you could come up it..

pleep:
[size=100pt] ?[/size] dafuq do jews have to do with aything. So I want to exterminate all women now? You are one crazy mangina