shymexx:

Lmao @ France. And you want me to take you seriously after citing France, no?

You mean the same France that would surrender after one week? - you're definitely a joker!!

We're talking about countries that can bite in the EU, not the delusional french neo-liberal president.

Go to bed, mate!

Symphony007: the E.U wants no part in syria but [size=20pt]france is america's biggest backer[/size] in military strike, so who is the EU speaking for? Do you watch news at all?

The EU can speak for countries like belgium and romania who don't have a single machine gun but france has pledged it's full backing. Plus the british have pledged intelligence support since parliament voted against military involvement.

Mr. I hiy google and there was nothing like mccain apologising to puttin. Maybe you can put up a link for me.

Ola one:
From the same guy who said Russia is not a Christian country

Symphony007: when did i say that? Are you okay upstairs?

Symphony007: i'm so loving this arguemet because as it goes futhur. Your ignorance becomes more glaring.

You are talking of france who has the 5th largest military on earth, the country that has the third largest stockpile of nuclear weapons on earth, the country that bombed libya? The country that rid northern mali of toureg rebels in weeks, the country that ended the ivory coast civil war and arrested gbagbo in weeks? The country that subdued algerian independence...wow! I can go on forever. You want to define the 5th most powerfull country in the world by their surrendering in world war 2 over 60 years ago? How pathetic.

shymexx:

Blah blah blah.

Perhaps, someone needs to explain the difference between fighting RPGs and AK47s carrying rag-headed militants in Mali and fighting a country where tons on countries and groups have vested interests.

The French will never regain their reputation having surrendered during world war 2, and subsequently getting disgraced out of Egypt during the Suez crisis by Russia. Tell them to shut it!! When the dons are talking - the French need to take the back-seat and listen!

Didn't the Vietcong also chased the French out of Vietnam? - classic french and always running like kangaroos!

Symphony007: ...that's the best you've got? Invoking world war 2? Was libya's gadaffi a rag head that the french bombarded? Only three countries have sorphisticated aircraft carriers and that's the u.s(11), russia(1) and france(1). So what are you saying? Even bush asked for french help in iraq, they refused but aggreed to afganistan. Please. Speak about what you know.

50calibre:

What? Russia is probably the most religious country in Europe, a place where Christianity places a big role in policy making.

The orthodox and catholic churches are deeply rooted there.

Omexonomy: According to the last sentence When did russians started believing in God?
My kwestion is who will call all those wicked leaders or president to order. Is it the toothless bulldog call the UN or what. As a contrast to what putin is saying cheack my signature.

shymexx:

You definitely hit your head on a brick as a kid. The more I correct you, the more you come back with retar.ded retorts!

Is France now NATO? And what military assets did the French provide during the Libyan intervention apart from a few dassault rafales, special forces and a few warships for blockade? Even tiny Sweden/Denmark provided almost the same military assets as France during the Libyan intervention and it took NATO more than 6 months to fight little Libya with no air defense and poor military. Heck, Sarkozy was already bored of the war before Gadaffi was killed and he was asking for negotiations.

The Americans provided most of NATO's assets and the UK did more heavy bombing than the french. Heck, the UK did fire more than a dozen tomahawk cruise missiles from its submarines. Even the Germans who didn't participate directly arguably did more than the French because they provided the intelligence that killed gadaffi.

Symphony007: you keep talking rubbish and i keep giving facts. France has more nuclear weapons than the u.k, france has the third largest airforce in the world behind the u.s and russia. France has the only aircraft carrier in western europe. And you are telling me that france combined with the most powerfull nation on earth can't humble the russians? You're either insane or in denial.

naijaspeak: The major blame about this crisis should go to the United states. This is because they were at the forefront of supporting the Syrian opposition when they began the initial uprising and call for President Bashir Al Asad to stepdown from power. The United state Government is in a position to arrest the situation and bring about peace by advising the opposition to embrace peace and dialogue but the United states in their quest to achieve their interest in the region started empowering the Syrian opposition with weapon and other humanitarian facilities. The United states that destroy Iraq, Libya, Afganistan is now escalating the crisis in Syria while pretending that they are spreading democracy round the world. The United Kingdom (Britain) that was supporting the United states on the Syrian issue have step aside refusing to support President Barack Obama airstrike policy towards the Asad regime on its alleged use of chemical and biological weapon on its citizen. This situation has left President Obama without it closest ally Britain. But as a consolation, France another western ally of the United states decided to support President Obama to carry out the airstrike.

shymexx:

Ok, I'm bored - let me indulge you. Tell me why any country in the EU or NATO would want to engage the Russians in a conventional war? Just look at the proximity and bear in mind that none of them has the capabilities to counter Russian missiles. Even the American patriot missiles won't save them.

As for France, its military has always looked good on paper but that didn't stop it from surrendering when the nazis came calling; when the Vietcong chased them; and when the Russians told them to get out of Egypt or say aurevoir to Paris.

shymexx:

Ok, I'm bored - let me indulge you. Tell me why any country in the EU or NATO would want to engage the Russians in a conventional war? Just look at the proximity and bear in mind that none of them has the capabilities to counter Russian missiles. Even the American patriot missiles won't save them.

As for France, its military has always looked good on paper but that didn't stop it from surrendering when the nazis came calling; when the Vietcong chased them; and when the Russians told them to get out of Egypt or say aurevoir to Paris.

Prof Corruption: What's happening now is an unmistakable announcement of an end to a unipolar world. There is a message out there that once you're in good book of Russians, you're covered.

50calibre:

What? Russia is probably the most religious country in Europe, a place where Christianity places a big role in policy making.

The orthodox and catholic churches are deeply rooted there.

kaze4blues: I just like this putin.

He understands the game more than obama when it comes to international politics.

Some people here claim Putin is scared of the american might. That's arrant bullshit.

Even in ordinary local politics, u don't display all ur cards at a single for time for opponents to see.
It makes u vulnerable.

Putin already has a hidden agenda inside of him.

But he still appeals to obama to take things easy.

So eventually if usa tries to strike syria, Putin will boldly stand against that and will openly come in to assist syria.
Many countries will support him considering the fact that he gave out diplomacy as an option to resolve the crisis which obama rejected.

No country will then critize him for supporting syria.

He is making obama/usa look like the oppressor...but only few people can see this.

Already, most countries at the G-20 are opposed to military intervention.
UN is yet to pass a resolution about the crisis.

But usa is even claiming they will strike syria without UN orders.

Russia is only pleading with usa to make most foreign countries see putin as anti-war.
Russia will actively oppose military intervention against syria. Same with Iran and who knows, china.

Germany also opposed intervention.

Usa need to watch their back.
UK/canada/france and their other lies can't face alliance of Russia/china, iran and eventually if germany joins( if they know that it will wrestle world power away from the usa)

Down to memory lane, Germany already took control of France in the 2nd world war.
It took the intervention of the allies to reclaim it back.

So eventually if another axis should be formed by russia, china,germany, iran...then the west are in form a doom.

Usa need to thread gently at this point in time.
Most countries oppose intervention, even south africa.

It is only their western allies and few middle east countries who are proponents of intervention.

Most people here on NL are not politicians so they really don't understand most of the tactics been employed in politics.

kaze4blues: I just like this putin.

He understands the game more than obama when it comes to international politics.

Some people here claim Putin is scared of the american might. That's arrant bullshit.

Even in ordinary local politics, u don't display all ur cards at a single for time for opponents to see.
It makes u vulnerable.

Putin already has a hidden agenda inside of him.

But he still appeals to obama to take things easy.

So eventually if usa tries to strike syria, Putin will boldly stand against that and will openly come in to assist syria.
Many countries will support him considering the fact that he gave out diplomacy as an option to resolve the crisis which obama rejected.

No country will then critize him for supporting syria.

He is making obama/usa look like the oppressor...but only few people can see this.

Already, most countries at the G-20 are opposed to military intervention.
UN is yet to pass a resolution about the crisis.

But usa is even claiming they will strike syria without UN orders.

Russia is only pleading with usa to make most foreign countries see putin as anti-war.
Russia will actively oppose military intervention against syria. Same with Iran and who knows, china.

Germany also opposed intervention.

Usa need to watch their back.
UK/canada/france and their other lies can't face alliance of Russia/china, iran and eventually if germany joins( if they know that it will wrestle world power away from the usa)

Down to memory lane, Germany already took control of France in the 2nd world war.
It took the intervention of the allies to reclaim it back.

So eventually if another axis should be formed by russia, china,germany, iran...then the west are in form a doom.

Usa need to thread gently at this point in time.
Most countries oppose intervention, even south africa.

It is only their western allies and few middle east countries who are proponents of intervention.

Most people here on NL are not politicians so they really don't understand most of the tactics been employed in politics.