Sodiq3: The boy's Father Killed is Father. Karma called dudes.

adewaleh: Assuming the guy don do JAMB tire before entering that school, maybe he would have gained some senses.
Too bad for a person brought up by a christian parent to be so wayward, he should face the punishment.. God save us from evil people.
Make no friend with an angry man, with a furious man thou shalt not go..

Nihilist:

Only illiterate backward and unintelligent people like you actually think it's ok to hit your 21 year old son....let alone BITE him

eluquenson: All these private Christian universities are becoming something else, the other day was a covenant student posting unclad video now na Redeemer, Parents thought these schools are a save haven.

The world is changing

Ishilove:
And it is only murderous psychopaths like you that think that hitting one's son is license for the said son to take a cutlass and slaughter his parent.

crusader01:
What is happening has nothing to do with the Private christian unversities. Most of their students attend the school for the purpose of rehabitation. Some are brought in from abroad to those schools for God's divine intervention that is why CU is known for strict rules and regulation to help them shape their lives.

EnterPRO:

life imprisonment, maybe.

she has lost a husband, will she also lose a son?

Nihilist:

I see you keep avoiding the son's claim that the father BIT him....

And who are you to determine how the man in question should respond to being physically abused?

Would you be making this idiotic statements if a girl(or boy for that matter)who was being sexually abused by her father picked up a knife and stabbed her abuser?

If the perp in question is telling the truth about his father assaulting and actually BITING him, then your brain should tell you that this probably was a spontaneous eruption of pent up aggression rover several years of enduring some horrific abuse...

I mean what sane father bites his own offspring? Especially a 21 year old man?

I'm sure you must have been beaten and bitten so hard as a child, and you are consequently suffering from advance Stockholm Syndrome

Ishilove:
You obvioulsy don't have any children. I sincerely hope that when you finally have them, in the course of disciplining those children, one of them will take an axe at you. Don't worry, we shall put it at the doorstep of 'self-defence' and "spontaneous eruption of pent up aggression over several years of enduring some horrific abuse..."

Nihilist:

I see you keep avoiding the son's claim that the father BIT him....

And who are you to determine how the man in question should respond to being physically abused?

Would you be making this idiotic statements if a girl(or boy for that matter)who was being sexually abused by her father picked up a knife and stabbed her abuser?

If the perp in question is telling the truth about his father assaulting and actually BITING him, then your brain should tell you that this probably was a spontaneous eruption of pent up aggression rover several years of enduring some horrific abuse...

I mean what sane father bites his own offspring? Especially a 21 year old man?

I'm sure you must have been beaten and bitten so hard as a child, and you are consequently suffering from advance Stockholm Syndrome

Ishilove:
.

Ishilove: @Op, this story just dey pain my body. I have a friend who has a younger brother with these traits. The boy is full of wickedness and stubborness, and he has even raised a cutlass agains his own elder brother (my friend) and left a scar on his face. The boy's mother has taken him out for several deliverance sessions, but nothing yet. It has gotten so bad that whenever their mother is going out in the morning, she hides all sharp implements in the house so that she wouldn't come back from work to hear stories that leave the eyes misty.

Where do all these demonic children come from sef?

Nihilist:

You obviously have no justification for the father's alleged physical abuse of the son...

Only an idiot would describe BITING as an act of 'discipline'

Nihilist:

You obviously have no justification for the father's alleged physical abuse of the son...

Only an idiot would describe BITING as an act of 'discipline'

Reference:

Why are you so aggressive to the lady my man. Let us be tolerant to each others views and correct without anger. It is a very sad story and everyone is trying hard to understand how it could possibly happen. Good, compassionate ideas and advice could save someone's life tomorrow you know.

As for the boy's report on the bite et al, I would expect him to defend and justify himself with all the allegations he can muster whether true or otherwise. The only other witness is dead, forensic science is lost on our police force so we will never know the absolute truth bt even if the SAN bit him after coming after him with an 'eba stick', I hardly think a 21 year old boy will view that as a threat to life that will necessitate a retaliatory strike with deadly force in self defence.

Ishilove:
And only an idiotic reetard will willfully ignore the parts of the original post quoted where I disagreed with the line the father toed.

I can't believe you are actually justifying what Tolani did. You really are a psychopath. Don't worry, you're gonna get yours.

Reference:

True. No one can justify it and like I said earlier all I can see are the products of failed parenting. People tend to violence when dialogue fails. He obviously couldn't reach his son and his son couldn't reach him. Bad parenting but even if he had no parents at all, this is a crime the whole society, our society considers a taboo. How could this have happened. Kids in Nigeria have no rights, no protection, no liberties whatsoever under the law. Where did he learn this.

Nihilist:

Without understanding the full story, then you are not in a position to determine what is an 'appropriate response' to the father's alleged assault.

If it is true that the father bit him, then I suspect that there is deeper history of abuse that we are not aware of.

That being said, actually hitting a 21 year old man in the name of 'discipline' is enough to trigger an extremely aggressive response especially if recurrent.

Looking at it critically, what right does the father have to hit the son in question? Could the father have hit a random errant 21 year old man in the street in the guise of 'discipline' without fear of retaliation?

The father had no respect for the son and did not consider him an adult, possibly because the son as a student was still dependent on him financially and otherwise.

Imagine a scenario where the son lived alone and was self-reliant. Even if the son defied his father's instructions in this scenario, do you think the father would be as inclined to physically beat his son for disciplinary reasons?

I'm not saying that the son is right for killing him, but it is possible to push people so far, and they end up doing things they regret in the red mist of anger...

Reference:

True. No one can justify it and like I said earlier all I can see are the products of failed parenting. People tend to violence when dialogue fails. He obviously couldn't reach his son and his son couldn't reach him. Bad parenting but even if he had no parents at all, this is a crime the whole society, our society considers a taboo. How could this have happened. Kids in Nigeria have no rights, no protection, no liberties whatsoever under the law. Where did he learn this.

Ishilove:
More bullshit. He is even asking what right the father has to hit his own son. I don't blame you, you have been yonder obodo oyibo for too long hence this nonsense you are spewing.

It's bullshit night. Smh

Nihilist:

Without understanding the full story, then you are not in a position to determine what is an 'appropriate response' to the father's alleged assault.

If it is true that the father bit him, then I suspect that there is deeper history of abuse that we are not aware of.

That being said, actually hitting a 21 year old man in the name of 'discipline' is enough to trigger an extremely aggressive response especially if recurrent.

Looking at it critically, what right does the father have to hit the son in question? Could the father have hit a random errant 21 year old man in the street in the guise of 'discipline' without fear of retaliation?

The father had no respect for the son and did not consider him an adult, possibly because the son as a student was still dependent on him financially and otherwise.

Imagine a scenario where the son lived alone and was self-reliant. Even if the son defied his father's instructions in this scenario, do you think the father would be as inclined to physically beat his son for disciplinary reasons?

I'm not saying that the son is right for killing him, but it is possible to push people so far, and they end up doing things they regret in the red mist of anger...