kandiikane:


Really? That will be great. Have you studied international law?

kandiikane:


Lol, I actually wanted to open a law thread where we can discuss problems and such but no point because I want to learn too and I haven't met anyone who has studied or is studying that knows the law well.

pickabeau1:


Open it... it will be a good idea

Mondisweets:


Because i do not agree with your point of view does not make my point of view irrelevant. You believe he was right and the other people were wrong and i still believe all of them were wrong. So if something gives you great satisfaction, then it stops being a crime?

so it stops being public violence if "a man" is the one who gets a beat down. So men require no equal protection before the law?

kandiikane:


And the person with long hair and skinny jeans was a man?

wonlasewonimi:


I studied international law and UK law. I'm conversant with intellectual property laws as well. Can I have your details, we can bounce ideas off each other's chests if you get my drift.

1stCitizen:


You see people wey their head dey there dey try collabo to do sumfin intellectual. Unlike dat mondimumusweets girl wey dem install firewall wey dey block common sense inside her head

waywardpikin:


Lol...wait! You didn't know that the second person was a man too? He looked girly anyway so I'm not exactly surprised hahaha... I wonder what possessed him to attack a man of that size who was already on edge.

If the defendant attacked a woman that way then it would be like killing an ant with a hammer. He would have lost any advantage he had in that situation. Advantage or otherwise, it's wrong to use such level of force from a guy to a woman. Even the defendant be like say he get sense pass like that.

The slap was just right

An effective tool for manual hard reset

kandiikane:

lol alright. At the moment, international law is my weakness. With property law I know it's easy once you get your head round it but I guess i have been procrastinating in getting my head round it. I will probably be opening a thread soon and maybe you can help me. I am starting a project tomorrow on international law, will email you once I start.

Mondisweets:
why are u focusing on what he attempted and failed to do? Defend himself to what extent? And what stops him for being criminally liable as well?

goofyone:
Update:

The guy and lady have been arrested by the the New York Police. The girl's two friends also arrested for involvement in the fights. The guy and the girl's friends were all charged with misdemeanor assault and disorderly conduct, while the girl got the most severe charge of felony assault for using a shoe as a weapon in the assault.

Mondisweets:
Verbally abusing or physically abusing someone never resolves anything. If someone does something that pisses you off, its best you walk away and then express your opinion when you are back in your right state of mind. I honestly don't know what made that girl grow wings and cause a public scene like that, it was wrong and immature. If she had anything to say to the guy it could have been said when she wasn't so angry. They were wrong and both of them can be face charges of public violence and assault because of this.

ileobatojo:


I'm sorry o, but doesn't this support Mondisweets' point?

ileobatojo:


I'm sorry o, but doesn't this support Mondisweets' point?

Dheartless:

give it up , u can't help her .
when I arguued that the charges against the guy would be minimal, she argued, trying to proove that the guys actions was way beyound minor charges.
I also said it would be difficult to even proove he his guilty of any charge laid against him.
this is just a charge and he is not yet guilty of anything, moreover the charges against him is only a minor compared to what the girl was charged with.
this prooves that the girl was the main offender as everybody has been trying to point out.
the guy got charged for same crime as the friends of the girl (in which some of them didn't even raise a finger), so they might come out not guilty, same as the guy.
mondisweet has been unreasonable with her arguements

Dheartless:

give it up , u can't help her .
when I arguued that the charges against the guy would be minimal, she argued, trying to proove that the guys actions was way beyound minor charges.

I also said it would be difficult to even proove he his guilty of any charge laid against him.
[quote] this is just a charge and he is not yet guilty of anything, moreover the charges against him is only a minor compared to what the girl was charged with.

this prooves that the girl was the main offender as everybody has been trying to point out.
the guy got charged for same crime as the friends of the girl (in which some of them didn't even raise a finger), so they might come out not guilty, same as the guy.
mondisweet has been unreasonable with her arguements

ileobatojo:


I'm sorry o, but doesn't this support Mondisweets' point?

donnypool:


but george zimmermen was discharged after killing a harmless man though. He said he was attacked, and he had to do what he had to do. why wasn't found guilty for possessing and illegal gun? or follow an innocent kid around? what stops him for being criminally liable as well
NB: dont scream racism

waywardpikin:


First of all acknowledge that you didn't know that the second person that was engaged in the fight with the defendant was a man, and then we can move forward. That's the way it's done.

wonlasewonimi:


Sweet..this is consensus ad idem. Can we do this in the buff. I'm in my element without clothes. I can cite cases that would give you orgasmiic feelings beyond your imagination.

Dheartless:

give it up , u can't help her .
when I arguued that the charges against the guy would be minimal, she argued, trying to proove that the guys actions was way beyound minor charges.
I also said it would be difficult to even proove he his guilty of any charge laid against him.
this is just a charge and he is not yet guilty of anything, moreover the charges against him is only a minor compared to what the girl was charged with.
this prooves that the girl was the main offender as everybody has been trying to point out.
the guy got charged for same crime as the friends of the girl (in which some of them didn't even raise a finger), so they might come out not guilty, same as the guy.
mondisweet has been unreasonable with her arguements

Mondisweets:
google the case and read other facts that were presented in that case.
Also look for the reason for the decision given by the judge, that will give u the answer you are looking for

donnypool:


there were no other fact apart for self defense and Trevor used the 'ground as a weapon'. i followed the case from starting till verdict.

or what are the other facts?

Mondisweets:
if u read the facts, decision and the reason for the decision why are you still asking me?

donnypool:


you didn't know nothing. just shut up

BananaBender:


LML! Nooooooooo!

Did you?

SirShymex:

BananaBender:


Dude, have u heard about the Jaden and Willow Smith interview??