Yustash001:
if it's since league started...then you are joking....Everton has won the league 9 times and Aston Villa has won it 7 times.......epl is more competitive than Laliga....

So also has Valencia and Deportivo won the La liga before. I am referring to the past TEN years man, TEN YEARS! How many teams have won the EPL in the last TEN years There was even a time MAN U won it three times consecutively and u call that competition? I have solid facts man.. Did u know that Chelsea won the league last season with some matches still to be played and u call that competition? Next season, we know the clubs that will challenge for the EPL again and u want me to believe such a league is tough?

raumdeuter:


I am seriously weak with this type of argument?

Do you know the meaning of UNFP? This is only for players in the French league, So how would Neymar from Brazilian league or Spanish league win it?

Okay to see how silly this reasoning is, tell me why Hazard never won best Young player in Brazilian league?

Then talk of Neymar not winning Bravo award

Bibleuser:


Then talk of Neymar not winning Bravo award

Which team do you support? Because I know only Chelsea fans can be this ignorant.

A little research would do you some help

The Bravo Award is an annual award which is handed out by the Italian magazine Guerin Sportivo to the most outstanding young European footballer. The first winner of the award was Englishman Jimmy Case. Until 1992 only under-23 players participating in one of the three European club cups (UEFA Champions League, UEFA Cup, UEFA Cup Winners' Cup) were eligible. [size=13pt]Since 1992 any under-21 player from any European League is eligible[/size].

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bravo_Award

Read the part in bold and answer your question yourself

When Neymar was U21 was he playing in a European league? It's like asking why Diego Costa didnt win PFA YOUNG player of the year

raumdeuter:


Which team do you support? Because I know only Chelsea fans can be this ignorant.

A little research would do you some help



Read the part in bold and answer your question yourself

When Neymar was U21 was he playing in a European league?

22 at the world cup. He signed in Barca at the age of either 20 or 21.

Go and browse it

Bibleuser:


22 at the world cup. He signed in Barca at the age of either 20 or 21.

Go and browse it

Please dont embarass yourself further. You are on the internet and it wouldnt cost you anything to google it

What is Neymars Date of birth and when did he sign for Barca.

Now answer: Was Neymar playing in Europe when he was Under 21yrs ?

Answer this

No Neymar, No Brazil

http://www.goal.com/en/news/12/spain/2015/06/28/13112822/neymar-will-be-the-best-in-the-world-forlan?ICID=HP_BN_6

hazard is beta dan neymar bt neymar shines cuz he plays for a beta club

you get 10% on ur first deposit when you get in through this link
it is a new bookie for u https://www.bonanzawin.com/?code=clodd007 : so much inplays and payout is less dan an hr I was so stunned whn I used it : its almost like bet365 its a nigerian bookie

raumdeuter:


Please dont embarass yourself further. You are on the internet and it wouldnt cost you anything to google it

What is Neymars Date of birth and when did he sign for Barca.

Now answer: Was Neymar playing in Europe when he was Under 21yrs ?

Answer this

he signed for Barcelona @ age 21

I still get confused with people's view, sentiment aside, these are my thorough decisions:

I will go for Hazard any day because of the following:

1. Hazard has pace more than Neymar
2. Hazard gave Chelseafc the league after the first half when key players were down.
3. Hazard can always run back and assist his left back
4. Hazard can create better assist for his fellow mate
5. Hazard is a defender breaker
6. Hazard gave cfc vital points when all hope were lost. eg Cfc vs QPR where dey had only one chance on target and one goal from Cesc.
7. Hazard has more strenght than Neymar
8. Without Hazard in cfc game, cfc struggles
9. Without Neymar in barca they can still win any match comfortably
10. Hazard has more personal award than Neymar.
and so it continues....................

Bibleuser:
Hazard is better bc he is playing in a tougher league plus he is the one to create chance in a team that is not all that great but if u look at neymar u will find out that he is being fed with ball from Messi and Suarez and la liga is a simpler and easier league

get knowledge. LA liga is an easy league n dey hv won d champions league 5tyms n Europa 7tyms in 10yrs.u r a clown.hv u forgotten Athletic vs Chelsea 5-0 bilboa vs man u.can Everton or Sunderland ever win Madrid or baca.if u put baca n Madrid in EPL Dey will b 1st n 2nd every year

archiveeng:
I still get confused with people's view, sentiment aside, these are my thorough decisions:

I will go for Hazard any day because of the following:

1. Hazard has pace more than Neymar
2. Hazard gave Chelseafc the league after the first half when key players were down.
3. Hazard can always run back and assist his left back
4. Hazard can create better assist for his fellow mate
5. Hazard is a defender breaker
6. Hazard gave cfc vital points when all hope were lost. eg Cfc vs QPR where dey had only one chance on target and one goal from Cesc.
7. Hazard has more strenght than Neymar
8. Without Hazard in cfc game, cfc struggles
9. Without Neymar in barca they can still win any match comfortably
10. Hazard has more personal award than Neymar.
and so it continues....................

we hv just seen neymar in Europe 4 2 seasons.did u c or heard of him when he was in Santos.hv u sewn him play 4 Brazil where he is the only star.pls hazard is no match 4 him.

Yustash001:
am not disputing the fact the Laliga is best league currently...but the last time I check...the basis of our argument is the league that's more competitive between the two....

simple question
draw a league between Barcelona R.Madrid A.madrid Chelsea man city & Arsenal.who will b 1st 2nd n 3rd

dubylhover:

aguero,silva,yaya,fab, averageguy y now...

yes dey are compare 2 d talent u hv in LA liga.

Hello people

Even Hazard will slap you for comparing him to Neymar

hesben, chelseafan1, mourinholic

raumdeuter:
hesben, chelseafan1, mourinholic

Present sir......Neymar nooni

raumdeuter:
hesben, chelseafan1, mourinholic

Neymar all the way, castrate anybody wey argue am.

Hazard fans already conceding defeat.The debate already ended even before it started.Such a shame.

montedo:

So also has Valencia and Deportivo won the La liga before. I am referring to the past TEN years man, TEN YEARS! How many teams have won the EPL in the last TEN years There was even a time MAN U won it three times consecutively and u call that competition? I have solid facts man.. Did u know that Chelsea won the league last season with some matches still to be played and u call that competition? Next season, we know the clubs that will challenge for the EPL again and u want me to believe such a league is tough?

Ok wast abt la liga check out d winners of d leaguein d last 10 years and check the epl then compaare


2005-barca. 2005-chelsea

2006-barca. 2006-chelsea

2007-barca. 2007-man u


2008-real madrid. 2008-man u


2009-barca. 2009-man u


2010-barca. 2010-chelsea


2011-barca. 2011-man u


2012 real madrid. 2012-man city


2013-barca. 2013-man u


2014-atl madrid. 2014-man city


2015-barca. 2015-chelsea


Now tell me...which one is more competitive

kaycee4one, where are your '5 things we learnt' for this past weekend?

archiveeng:
I still get confused with people's view, sentiment aside, these are my thorough decisions:

I will go for Hazard any day because of the following:

1. Hazard has pace more than Neymar
2. Hazard gave Chelseafc the league after the first half when key players were down.
3. Hazard can always run back and assist his left back
4. Hazard can create better assist for his fellow mate
5. Hazard is a defender breaker
6. Hazard gave cfc vital points when all hope were lost. eg Cfc vs QPR where dey had only one chance on target and one goal from Cesc.
7. Hazard has more strenght than Neymar
8. Without Hazard in cfc game, cfc struggles
9. Without Neymar in barca they can still win any match comfortably
10. Hazard has more personal award than Neymar.
and so it continues....................

would u still say dat nw after 4 unconvicing performances...

archiveeng:
I still get confused with people's view, sentiment aside, these are my thorough decisions:

I will go for Hazard any day because of the following:

1. Hazard has pace more than Neymar
2. Hazard gave Chelseafc the league after the first half when key players were down.
3. Hazard can always run back and assist his left back
4. Hazard can create better assist for his fellow mate
5. Hazard is a defender breaker
6. Hazard gave cfc vital points when all hope were lost. eg Cfc vs QPR where dey had only one chance on target and one goal from Cesc.
7. Hazard has more strenght than Neymar
8. Without Hazard in cfc game, cfc struggles
9. Without Neymar in barca they can still win any match comfortably
10. Hazard has more personal award than Neymar.
and so it continues....................

get knowledge mr...

david37525:
hazard is beta dan neymar bt neymar shines cuz he plays for a beta club

beta club with beta players.mr hazard shines with less club less players,imagine if neymar was in a less club like chelsea this is simple logic.

Bump

wer are d hazard fans
I thought u guys said hazard plays well and Carry d team during d hard time's
well u can now see who is superior, neymar shines without messi and inesta(who u claim to be his benefactor).
neymar is currently barca best player at d moment,he topples laliga goal scoring and assist chart.


I will be waiting for ur useless excuses kus I no u will neva accept d truth

Neymar

archiveeng:
I still get confused with people's view, sentiment aside, these are my thorough decisions:

I will go for Hazard any day because of the following:

1. Hazard has pace more than Neymar
.....

I stopped reading after here..... more pace than neymar?? this guy must be joking

Dem don run?

where are hazard fans?