christinie:
let me give you some legal lectures. Pick up your pen and paper and write. Am gonna try to type as simple as possible.
The existence of an offence can be proved through eye witness account, confessional statement and circumstantial evidence. See the case of Nguma V. A.G. Imo State (2014) 233 LRCN 41 @ 51 H.9.
Eye witness account is when a person who was at the scene of crime identifies the accused as the one who committed the offence in question.
Confessional statement of the accused: in the case of Uche V The State (2014) 10 ACLR 184 H.7 it was held that a free and voluntary confession which is direct and positive is sufficient to sustain a conviction.
The Supreme Court in the case of Okeke V. State (2003) 15 NWLR (PT 814) P. 25 @ 41 stated that:
"Confession of an accused person to the commission of the offence plays a major part in the determination of his guilt and a court of law is entitled to convict on the confession if it comes to the conclusion that the confession is voluntary."
"Also it is trite that a man or a woman may be convicted on his own confession alone and there is certainly no evidence stronger than a person's own admission or confession as such is admissible." See the case of Agboola V. State (2013) Vol. 225 LRCN (pt 1) 159 @ 169 R. 11 & 12.
Circumstantial evidence: it is settled that for circumstantial evidence to support a conviction in a criminal trial it must be cogent, complete and unequivocal. It must be compelling and must be such that leads to only an irresistible conclusion that it is the accused and no one else who committed the crime.
It is trite law that for circumstantial evidence to ground and sustain conviction it must meet the following conditions:
A. It must be irresistible and unequivocally lead to guilt of the appellant.
2. No other reasonable inference could be drawn from it, and
3. There must no other co-existing article which could weaken the inference.
See the cases of Idowu V. State (1998) 11 NWLR (PT 574) 554 @ 370. Alfred Aigbadion V. State (2000) 7 NWLR (PT 666) and Ogedengbe V. State (2014) ALL FWLR (PT 752) P. 1724 @ 1751.

Hold on a sec!

Are u a lawyer or judge?!!

Madam, I don't want to argue with my gf's name sake; wey even fine like her too the joke arguements I have with her is enuf for me.

BTW.....

rafaelloteli:

........Most stupid utterance of the century!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

pls Y did u say dis? Can u pls xlpain?