Welcome, Guest: Register On Nairaland / LOGIN! / Trending / Recent / New
Stats: 3,152,120 members, 7,814,934 topics. Date: Thursday, 02 May 2024 at 12:02 AM

Dialectics Of Violence And Morality - Religion (10) - Nairaland

Nairaland Forum / Nairaland / General / Religion / Dialectics Of Violence And Morality (32259 Views)

Atheists And Morality. A Question! / Atheism And Morality; Do Atheists Have A Foundation For Morality / Dialectics Or How To Debate (very Important For Both Theists And Non-theist) (2) (3) (4)

(1) (2) (3) ... (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) (12) (13) ... (20) (Reply) (Go Down)

Re: Dialectics Of Violence And Morality by KingEbukasBlog(m): 6:40pm On Apr 05, 2016
Joshthefirst:
My bloda wahala dey for plaettons head o. grin

grin grin grin cheesy

1 Like

Re: Dialectics Of Violence And Morality by KingEbukasBlog(m): 6:41pm On Apr 05, 2016
Joshthefirst:
Lolol

I prove and prove tire for that thread angry angry grin
Re: Dialectics Of Violence And Morality by plaetton: 6:42pm On Apr 05, 2016
Joshthefirst:
grin

Proof of this is humans of course, we are the only species that have this psyco-social selfless evolution working, and we are the only proof that psyco-social selfless evolution exists.

We obviously observed this evolution throughout the ages abi?

I thank you for your genius circular reasoning.

We see social evolution in nearly every species, some more than others.

It's not something I would have expected you to learn in Sunday school.
Re: Dialectics Of Violence And Morality by plaetton: 6:46pm On Apr 05, 2016
KingEbukasBlog:


I prove and prove tire for that thread angry angry grin

Big laugh.

Prove and keep proving to yourself only.
That's the part you don't ever get. Most of your posts are for your own personal validation.
It's only to you that they make any sense.

Seriously.

If only we could honestly tell you what we think of your posts, we might your feelings.
grin
Re: Dialectics Of Violence And Morality by Kay17: 6:48pm On Apr 05, 2016
KingEbukasBlog:


God is an embodiment of moral good and is not subject to his law . His acts are justified .

Finally the answer.
Re: Dialectics Of Violence And Morality by KingEbukasBlog(m): 6:55pm On Apr 05, 2016
Kay17:


Finally the answer.

This is like the 10th time I said that
Re: Dialectics Of Violence And Morality by KingEbukasBlog(m): 7:07pm On Apr 05, 2016
plaetton:


Big laugh.

Prove and keep proving to yourself only.
That's the part you don't ever get. Most of your posts are for your own personal validation.
It's only to you that they make any sense.

Seriously.

If only we could honestly tell you what we think of your posts, we might your feelings.
grin

You wish wink , If you think I am wrong you provide a rebuttal. As simple as ABC .

Most of your posts are not worth rebutting . Ever brought forth a tenable argument in the religion section . No sir you haven't .

Here let me show you just one . I responded because I had little doing at that time . A few bible texts did the job actually

Re: Dialectics Of Violence And Morality by Logicbwoy: 8:42pm On Apr 05, 2016
grin grin grin

Newsflash for Plaetton!

Joshthelast is the only person in the history of nairaland to frustrate Mr. Troll.
Mr. Troll was one of the best trolls on nairaland. He never got angry and was always calm in dishing out sarcastic and funny replies....

......until he met our dear Joshthelast. Mr. Troll made the mistake of using wit and logic to address Joshthelast but little did he know that logic doesn't work against the bible. Just when Mr. Troll had thrown some logical comments at Josh and it seemed as if they were in agreement, Josh pulled out a bible quote and blasted Mr. Troll with it. Mr. Troll tried to repeat the logical points he made so that they could discuss on common grounds but Josh only blasted him with more bible quotes and christian apologetics.

Mr. Troll seeing the futility of the argument tried to end the discussion. Only for Josh to tell Mr. Troll that he (Mr. Troll) was irrational and was running away because he (Mr. Troll) had weak arguments. Mr. Troll went mad- can you imagine after trying to use logic for over 3 pages of arguments to get to a common ground with someone, the person then tells you that you are irrational!


-----------------------------------------------------------


I hope Plaetton can learn from this and realise that explaining deep philosophical concepts such as the evolution of human morality and empathy to one who is not ready to listen to logic is a waste of time.

1 Like

Re: Dialectics Of Violence And Morality by thehomer: 9:15pm On Apr 05, 2016
Joshthefirst:
Your question still remains invalid, both from your context of moral relativity, and from the fact that I have never supported rape and genocide, and neither has my God commanded them.

How can you say this? How can you tell such tales? I posted the quotes from the Bible. Your God commanded them. When you justify what your God commanded, then you're supporting rape and genocide.

Joshthefirst:

And it doesn't matter, your constant contradiction of your moral position and plaetton's confession of the self-evident nature of evil has pacified my argument.

Please can you quote my contradiction?
Re: Dialectics Of Violence And Morality by thehomer: 9:18pm On Apr 05, 2016
KingEbukasBlog:


God is an embodiment of moral good and is not subject to his law . His acts are justified .

Was Jesus' death necessary? Yes or No.

Is the execution of someone who is not guilty of a felony something evil? Yes or No.
Re: Dialectics Of Violence And Morality by thehomer: 9:22pm On Apr 05, 2016
KingEbukasBlog:


Interesting .

Mao Zedong is a Chinese communist and founding father of the People's Republic of China . As we all know he led and saw through the Great Leap Forward - a social and economic campaign whose goal was to transform the country from an agrarian economy into a socialist society through rapid industrialization and collectivization. An Agrarian economy is based on the country's agricultural system - producing and maintaining crops. Funny enough Ethiopia is already adopting this system as they plan to stay ahead as Africa's fastest growing economy . This campaign lasted for three years 1958-1961 .

Mao's intentions translate to the benefits of socialism .

1. The system eliminates greed

2. The Needs of Everyone are met

3. Goods are easily mobilized especially in times of disasters in order to ensure the safety and well being of every citizen affected .

4. There are monopolistic practices . We all know how disadvantageous such practice is .

5. There are no business fluctuations . No discrimination between investment and savings and resources are readily available

So the above or more were Mao's intention and it would put Mao's China in the forefront of civilization and development . Notably , Albeit Einstein - one of the world's greatest minds - was a supporter of socialism .

Effects of His Intentions

1. Great Chinese Famine which ended the lives of millions of people plus the torture given to millions who were not complying to Mao's vision .

2. It was estimated that 1 to 3 million people committed suicide

3. China actually did experience economic growth at some point

4. The Chinese praise Mao for the efforts he made . Without His efforts , there wouldn't have been a new China

So I ask ... Is Mao Zendong a good or evil man ?

I don't know. Was he an evil man to you?

KingEbukasBlog:

Which other God And you boldly claim you understand Christianity . That's how you were asking me to make all sorts of proofs in UyiIredia 's Three Arguments for God's existence thread and later ran away when you couldn't answer my question . You and uncle plaetton are the same .

Jesus the other God. I couldn't have run from you. The ways the discussion could have ended are that I may not have seen your response or you were demonstrating a level of reasoning too poor for me to tolerate in that discussion. You're welcome to resurrect that thread and I'll assess whether or not it would be useful for me to respond.
Re: Dialectics Of Violence And Morality by KingEbukasBlog(m): 10:02pm On Apr 05, 2016
thehomer:


I don't know. Was he an evil man to you?
.

....
Re: Dialectics Of Violence And Morality by KingEbukasBlog(m): 10:02pm On Apr 05, 2016
thehomer:


I don't know. Was he an evil man to you?
.

..
Re: Dialectics Of Violence And Morality by KingEbukasBlog(m): 10:07pm On Apr 05, 2016
thehomer:


I don't know. Was he an evil man to you?
.

You ask the dumbest questions and give the stupi-dest explanations . You dont know . You are not worth my time . You are shiit . Mention me when you upgrade
Re: Dialectics Of Violence And Morality by KingEbukasBlog(m): 10:21pm On Apr 05, 2016
Logicbwoy:
grin grin grin

Newsflash for Plaetton!

Joshthelast is the only person in the history of nairaland to frustrate Mr. Troll.
Mr. Troll was one of the best trolls on nairaland. He never got angry and was always calm in dishing out sarcastic and funny replies....

......until he met our dear Joshthelast. Mr. Troll made the mistake of using wit and logic to address Joshthelast but little did he know that logic doesn't work against the bible. Just when Mr. Troll had thrown some logical comments at Josh and it seemed as if they were in agreement, Josh pulled out a bible quote and blasted Mr. Troll with it. Mr. Troll tried to repeat the logical points he made so that they could discuss on common grounds but Josh only blasted him with more bible quotes and christian apologetics.

Mr. Troll seeing the futility of the argument tried to end the discussion. Only for Josh to tell Mr. Troll that he (Mr. Troll) was irrational and was running away because he (Mr. Troll) had weak arguments. Mr. Troll went mad- can you imagine after trying to use logic for over 3 pages of arguments to get to a common ground with someone, the person then tells you that you are irrational!


-----------------------------------------------------------


I hope Plaetton can learn from this and realise that explaining deep philosophical concepts such as the evolution of human morality and empathy to one who is not ready to listen to logic is a waste of time.

No atheist makes any logical argument so you just told lies . If this story ever happened then JosthTheFirst was right to call him irrational . MrTroll I haven't seen any of your arguments , and I dont care but they are very irrational .

TrojansKong - MrTroll wannabe your sarcasm is dry and unwitty . You make the worst form of arguments after thehomer
Re: Dialectics Of Violence And Morality by PastorAIO: 10:27pm On Apr 05, 2016
UyiIredia:


I thought you were something of a deist as per that thread. For you not to believe any concept of a God would make you an atheist. Why the change of heart ?

Are you saying that God can only exist as an concept?
Re: Dialectics Of Violence And Morality by DeepSight(m): 10:27pm On Apr 05, 2016
plaetton:


Deepsight,
On the issue of self evident evil quoted above, I have clarified twice on the context in which I wrote that. I am surprised that you still refer to it.

I was merely reminding Josh of the self-evident evi of Yahweh, that is , the clearly evident evil acts of Yahweh as recorded in the Bible.

You can't remind anyone of self evident evil if you hold that morality is subjective.

Aside from this, you didn't say anything at all on your more damning statement that "there must always be a benchmark when making comparisons."
Re: Dialectics Of Violence And Morality by PastorAIO: 10:29pm On Apr 05, 2016
I can make comparison of hot and cold.

Hmm… should I use the fahrenheit scale as a benchmark?

Or perhaps I should use the celsius scale?
Re: Dialectics Of Violence And Morality by DeepSight(m): 10:39pm On Apr 05, 2016
KingEbukasBlog:


From someone who gives vague definitions . You lack proper understanding of what you mock or ridicule . There is no such thing as 'necessary evil'

There is.
Re: Dialectics Of Violence And Morality by DeepSight(m): 10:40pm On Apr 05, 2016
PastorAIO:
I can make comparison of hot and cold.

Hmm… should I use the fahrenheit scale as a benchmark?

Or perhaps I should use the celsius scale?

You dis man how you dey? Long time. Trust well. I see you have not changed your ways. May the Holy Spirit descend on you cheesy
Anyhow, your statement indicates the possibility of diverse benchmarks, I dont have anything against this really, but it does stand in distinction against Plaetton's for which he is yet to account.

One day you will all come to understand me more properly on this morality issue.
Re: Dialectics Of Violence And Morality by DeepSight(m): 10:51pm On Apr 05, 2016
PastorAIO:
I can make comparison of hot and cold.

Hmm… should I use the fahrenheit scale as a benchmark?

Or perhaps I should use the celsius scale?

In fact, just another thought.
And this just shows how futilistic your thinking is, has been, and always remains.

When we speak about moral comparisons and you divert to the Celsius or Fahrenheit scale as per comparisons in temperature - this is only a figuristic measurement of temperature only and not a measurement of the state of the thing in question as felt or noted by the human being.

Because the same human being would feel the same thing at the same temperature if he touched it regardless the numeric scale used for scientific notation.

Because further, no human being would touch a thing that is - 10 Degrees Celsius and describe it in terms of how hot it is. No human being would touch a thing that is + 100 degrees celsius and describe it in terms of how cold it is.

Likewise, as humans have a sensing of hot and cold (parameters for numeric notation regardless), they have a sensing of good and evil.

This alone, shows how futulistic, wasteful and shallow your thinking is.
It was a long time ago that I advised you, and I still advise you - that whilst you are an intelligent and knowledgeable man, your approach to issues contributes nothing to any issue. I am yet to see a post of yours that actually contributes substance to a thread. You spend most f your posts chasing an invisible and meaningless tail. Futile.

3 Likes 1 Share

Re: Dialectics Of Violence And Morality by thehomer: 11:09pm On Apr 05, 2016
KingEbukasBlog:


You ask the dumbest questions and give the stupi-dest explanations . You dont know . You are not worth my time . You are shiit . Mention me when you upgrade

grin grin grin

Why are you so angry? If you have the answer, why don't you give it? Or have you finally seen the foolishness of your ways?

grin grin wink
Re: Dialectics Of Violence And Morality by KingEbukasBlog(m): 11:09pm On Apr 05, 2016
DeepSight:


There is.

An example sir
Re: Dialectics Of Violence And Morality by thehomer: 11:11pm On Apr 05, 2016
KingEbukasBlog:


An example sir

thehomer:


Was Jesus' death necessary? Yes or No.

Is the execution of someone who is not guilty of a felony something evil? Yes or No.

1 Like

Re: Dialectics Of Violence And Morality by DeepSight(m): 11:13pm On Apr 05, 2016
thehomer:


How do you think it is assessed in law? You're a lawyer why don't you enlighten me?

Stop playing the fisherman where you have the fish already.
You know very well that the reasonable man principle is assessed objectively and never subjectively.

It's not bad to be a poor thinker such as you are, however its sad to be an incorrigible liar.
Re: Dialectics Of Violence And Morality by DeepSight(m): 11:14pm On Apr 05, 2016
KingEbukasBlog:


An example sir

Women! grin grin grin grin
Re: Dialectics Of Violence And Morality by KingEbukasBlog(m): 11:15pm On Apr 05, 2016
thehomer:



I dont know . Was Jesus death necessary ?

I dont know . Is the execution of someone who is not guilty of a felony something evil?
Re: Dialectics Of Violence And Morality by thehomer: 11:20pm On Apr 05, 2016
DeepSight:


Stop playing the fisherman where you have the fish already.
You know very well that the reasonable man principle is assessed objectively and never subjectively.

It's not bad to be a poor thinker such as you are, however its sad to be an incorrigible liar.

If that is assessed objectively, then what is your complaint again?
Re: Dialectics Of Violence And Morality by thehomer: 11:23pm On Apr 05, 2016
KingEbukasBlog:


I dont know . Was Jesus death necessary ?

According to Christianity, yes it was.

KingEbukasBlog:

I dont know . Is the execution of someone who is not guilty of a felony something evil?


According to Christianity, it usually is.

Having such ignorance of your own religious beliefs is sorry state to be in.

1 Like

Re: Dialectics Of Violence And Morality by KingEbukasBlog(m): 11:26pm On Apr 05, 2016
thehomer:


grin grin grin

Why are you so angry? If you have the answer, why don't you give it? Or have you finally seen the foolishness of your ways?

grin grin wink

I asked you : "What is evil and what makes what you see as evil evil" . You said :

thehomer:


The intentions and effects of actions.

I gave you this piece and asked you if Mao was evil or good - this excellently relates to your definition

KingEbukasBlog:


Interesting .

Mao Zedong is a Chinese communist and founding father of the People's Republic of China . As we all know he led and saw through the Great Leap Forward - a social and economic campaign whose goal was to transform the country from an agrarian economy into a socialist society through rapid industrialization and collectivization. An Agrarian economy is based on the country's agricultural system - producing and maintaining crops. Funny enough Ethiopia is already adopting this system as they plan to stay ahead as Africa's fastest growing economy . This campaign lasted for three years 1958-1961 .

Mao's intentions translate to the benefits of socialism .

1. The system eliminates greed

2. The Needs of Everyone are met

3. Goods are easily mobilized especially in times of disasters in order to ensure the safety and well being of every citizen affected .

4. There are no monopolistic practices . We all know how disadvantageous such practice is .

5. There are no business fluctuations . No discrimination between investment and savings and resources are readily available

So the above or more were Mao's intentions and it would put Mao's China in the forefront of civilization and development . Notably , Albeit Einstein - one of the world's greatest minds - was a supporter of socialism .

Effects of His Intentions

1. Great Chinese Famine which ended the lives of millions of people plus the torture given to millions who were not complying to Mao's vision .

2. It was estimated that 1 to 3 million people committed suicide

3. China actually did experience economic growth at some point

4. The Chinese praise Mao for the efforts he made . Without His efforts , there wouldn't have been a new China

So I ask ... Is Mao Zendong a good or evil man ?

For someone who has been calling me a poor thinker after responding to so many of your puerile questions . I expected at least an answer to prove you had brains that process your thoughts before you type them .

And you ended up posting this

thehomer:


I don't know. Was he an evil man to you?
.

And all you did was throw the question back at me But somehow just somehow The King is the poor thinker undecided

Gerrahia mehn grin grin cool . I thought you've something mysteriously good off ya sleeves . You are just like the rest .

PastorAIO ... that's how I leave the atheist in a quagmire
Re: Dialectics Of Violence And Morality by DeepSight(m): 11:26pm On Apr 05, 2016
KingEbukasBlog:


I dont know . Was Jesus death necessary ?

I really don't know why Dr. Homer inveigled that question into the question of necessary evils. Perhaps on account of his opposition of the propitiatory sacrificial death of the lamb which carries away the sins of men. If that is the case, I wholly support him on that score. The murder of Jesus of Nazareth by a jealous and sadistic mob and establishment could never form an atonement for the sins of men before God. If anything, it heaps on, and increases the sins of men. Be ye not deceived for God is not mocked: whatever a man sows, the same shall he reap. If Jesus' death was destined as a sacrifice for sins, his words on the cross (and also at Gethsemane) would be illogical. Father forgive them for they know not what they do. Eli Eli. . . why hast thou forsaken me? If it be possible, let this cross pass over my head.

Having said all that, yes, Jesus' death was necessary to the extent that he was always going to die anyhow. The manner and timing, and the import given to the event, is what is at issue.

I dont know . Is the execution of someone who is not guilty of a felony something evil?


It is very evil.
By the way, I hope you know that I verily agree with Messrs Homer & Co on the lamentable evil nature of Yahweh of the Old Testament. Do not subscribe to imported religion blindly my brother - to such an extent that you attempt to justify the patently barbaric.

It sounds to me as though you would have justified the atlantic slave trade as well, seeing as the white man came bearing a gun in one hand and the bible in the other.

3 Likes 1 Share

Re: Dialectics Of Violence And Morality by plaetton: 11:27pm On Apr 05, 2016
DeepSight:


You can't remind anyone of self evident evil if you hold that morality is subjective.

Aside from this, you didn't say anything at all on your more damning statement that "there must always be a benchmark when making comparisons."

The issue of from whence comes morality has extensively debated on this forum. We don't need new arguments for it. We should just revisit old arguments from several years back.

Josh and kingebukasblog, and perhaps yourself hold that Yahweh defines morality, as expressed vin the ten commandments and other parts of the Bible.

So, should we not hold Yahweh accountable to his own moral standards ?
That is my argument here., that Yahweh, even by his own benchmarks, did commit plenty of evil and immoral acts.

The issue of moral relativism is immaterial in my argument ,because, I am not the one on trial here.
Yahweh is.

The very fact that Josh and kingebukasblog feel compelled to defend, justify and exonerate Yahweh is evidence that they themselves find the allegations against Yahweh morally reprehensible and embarrassing.

We can talk about moral relativism in another thread.

1 Like 1 Share

(1) (2) (3) ... (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) (12) (13) ... (20) (Reply)

Christainity Is The Largest Religion In Nigeria- 2014 Statistics / Bishop Oyedepo Asks Buhari To Resign, Get Out Of Office Over Herdsmen Killings / Pastor Iginla Donates House To A Woman Living Under Tree (PIC)

(Go Up)

Sections: politics (1) business autos (1) jobs (1) career education (1) romance computers phones travel sports fashion health
religion celebs tv-movies music-radio literature webmasters programming techmarket

Links: (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10)

Nairaland - Copyright © 2005 - 2024 Oluwaseun Osewa. All rights reserved. See How To Advertise. 80
Disclaimer: Every Nairaland member is solely responsible for anything that he/she posts or uploads on Nairaland.