EyeHateGod:

Spiritual nature

This your meme is getting boring. Maybe you should search and download new ones!

raphieMontella:
5 pages and not even 1 refutation!

Because it is so empty to be refuted.

promise10:

What a wonderful delusion!

Wow!

So, for something to be intelligently designed, it must be perfect??

Hmm, I would like to know the atheistic bishop that taught you that!

what is wrong with you. Is atheism a religion. Must you spew your dihorrea of ignorance everywhere
Most people who lack beliefs in a God are not shutting out the existence of a creator they just say religious Gods are not the answer. I personally feel that you have to knew everything to say there is no God but I don't know everything so I can't make that kind of claim
if you believe in the Jewish myth that says Adam named all the animals, a woman was made from a rib, they were deceived by a talking snake, then the associated in so much inbreeding that they populated the planet only for the planet to be destroyed and then Noah and his family continued in the inbreeding then that is your problem. Or the fact that humanity needed to be redeemed by a human sacrifice rather than just be forgiven then that is still your problem. Iono if a God exists or not but the Abrahamic God is not the creator of the universe. He sounds like he was made for man and not the other way round. He is an insult to the idea of a God and a perfect being
Agnostism is the best stand

promise10:


Because it is so empty to be refuted.

And yet you can't even support your creationism with evidence. Why defend what you can't prove.

dalaman:


I dey ooo. Hope you are good?

I'm good bro . God dey ooo

Wetin dey happen?

Omo , na Chelsea Man U . Today na Man U Man City

Choi !!!

KingEbukasBlog:


I'm good bro . God dey ooo

Ok nice. Allah and Brahma dey too. Dem just dey look you dey laugh

Omo , na Chelsea Man U . Today na Man U Man City

Choi !!!

Pogba is useless.

Lennycool:
When you think of the human body, what mostly comes to mind is its complexity and sometimes perfection, theist have used this as undeniable proof of Gods existence, as only an intelligent creator could create something as perfect as the human body.
But study of the human anatomy will show you just how imperfect the human body really is, yes its complex but its more like 'duct tape, super glue and chewing gum' than it is pure perfection. The reason for this is that evolution only wants you to function well enough, so you can possibly reproduce and continue the specie. Its not done with human comfort in mind.
Here are the largest flaws in the human body, that shows why the human body could not have been created by intelligent design.

-The eye: Considered one of the most complex parts of the human body and definite proof of intelligent design, the human eye is far from perfect. The photo recepting cells are at the back of the eye, forcing light to travel through blood and tissue until it reaches them(its like a microphone faced backwards), this is the main reason why humans can't see in dim light, and also a leading cause of blindness, the octopus on the other hand has it's photoreceptors the right way.

The design simultaneously allows blood nourish the photoreceptor cells while limiting the amount of light they get as too much light is toxic to the cells.

Lennycool:

-A multipurpose larynx: Another flaw of the human body, we use the same anatomical pathway for both ingestion and breathing, this is a major cause of death in humans as it can result in choking. An intelligent creator would have done something better.

But it works. And your claim that choking is a major cause of death in humans is outrageous.

Lennycool:

-An inefficient spine: The spine is already inefficient as it is, with all the pressure it has to endure thanks to our ability to walk upright, but as we get older part of the spine starts to degenerate, causing lower back pains that hinders movement, they can range from mild to extreme. There would be no reason for such an inefficient spine if humans had been created but if they evolved the explanation would be because the spine wasn't designed for upright movement we only got that ability a few million years ago and it still need some tweaks.

If it is inefficient as you claim how come it works ?

Lennycool:

-Overly complicated foot; The foot alone has 26 bones, this is too much for just the simply act of giving us the ability to stand and walk, the 26 bones gave flexibility to earlier human ancestors that used their feets to grab hold of branches, much like modern primates, but as humans left the trees the feet instead was restructured for walking, leaving us with still too many bones, that constantly lead to injury. Again there would be no need for 26 bones if we were created.

And how do you know this ?

Lennycool:

-Exposed male testicles: The sole life giving organ of the male is exposed to the outside world, were it is prone to damage by external forces. Again there is no sufficient reason why males would be intelligently created like this but the evolutionary answer is simple, the male testicles will most likely be used before the death of the male, so there isn't any pressure to change it, as it will still serve the function of reproduction, which is the evolutionary aim.

Sperm requires a cooler environment to be motile so exposed testicles are a good design trade-off.

Lennycool:

-The appendix; Also known as the killer organ, if the appendix were a family member, it would be the useless third cousin that sleeps in your house all day and eats your food and also possessed murderous tendencies. The appendix has no known use whatsoever but can still kill the human. it once had a function as it used by rabbits to digest wood, but it is now a vestigial organ because evolution hasn't had time to remove it. There is no need for an intelligent creator to add this to the human body.

The appendix is vital to the immune systems of young children and it stores bacteria that aid digestion.

Lennycool:

Like I always say, believe in God but don't let it cloud your reason, you can believe in God and evolution.

Clearly, evolution is clouding your reasoning.

UyiIredia:


The design simultaneously allows blood nourish the photoreceptor cells while limiting the amount of light they get as too much light is toxic to the cells

Wow, were did you get your research from, cause if this was the case the octopus would have really poor eye sight. And even get blind as too much light is toxic to cells.

But it works. And your claim that choking is a major cause of death in humans is outrageous.

Just because it works doesn't mean its perfect, and yes choking is a major killer.

If it is inefficient as you claim how come it works ?

Just because it works doesn't mean its perfect

And how do you know this ?

I research

Sperm requires a cooler environment to be motile so exposed testicles are a good design trade-off.

No its not, crocodiles and elephants have a better system, that doesn't involve harm to testicles

The appendix is vital to the immune systems of young children and it stores bacteria that aid digestion.

Again too much harm to justify its presence, would you put a fireplace next to your bed, just because it warms you at night.

Clearly, evolution is clouding your reasoning.

Nope my reason is clear.

Lennycool:

Wow, were did you get your research from, cause if this was the case the octopus would have really poor eye sight. And even get blind as too much light is toxic to cells.

Google is your friend. Various creationist websites have thoroughly debunked the argument of bad design in the eye. I won't expect octopus to have the same photoreceptor cells as humans. Besides the ocean diffuses the light so octopus don't get as much light.

Lennycool:

Just because it works doesn't mean its perfect, and yes choking is a major killer.

No design can be perfect because it works within the constraints of natural laws. It just has to work well.

Lennycool:

Just because it works doesn't mean its perfect

As I said, it can't be perfect and doesn't have to be. Light bulbs are imperfect, most of the electrical energy gets converted to heat with a small faction generating light. Does that mean light bulbs spontaneously generated ?

Lennycool:

I research

Do it better.

Lennycool:

No its not, crocodiles and elephants have a better system, that doesn't involve harm to testicles

Crocodiles and elephants have different anatomies. Maybe that's why they have a better system. And how are u sure their system would work in humans ?

Lennycool:

Again too much harm to justify its presence, would you put a fireplace next to your bed, just because it warms you at night.

What do you mean tok much harm ? I just told you a function of the appendix debunking your claim it has none.

Lennycool:

Nope my reason is clear.

It is not.

Evolution cannot be proven

Kalatium:
Evolution cannot be proven

Evolution has been Proven times without number But can that Be said for Creationism?

This is an unintelligent post by someone trying to disprove the existence of GOD,the imperfections of the human body does not diminish it's complexity at all and does not make its supposed designer unintelligent.
Your argument is that if there is an intelligent GOD ,he would have made human perfect,so the perfect human is enough proof of his existence because anything that can create a perfect human is so intelligent that he could pass for a GOD

But seriously your argument is stupid

(1)There are a 1001 reason why if there is a GOD,he might not want to make us perfect
(2)The fact that you created something and that's not perfect does not disprove your existence.
(3)even if creating human are the greatest of his abilities,is still proof that he is intelligent beyond imagination


The human brain is so complex that we can boast of knowing up to 5% of how it works,so going by your logic then anything that can create even the the most imperfect human being can then pass for a GOD
because only something that is unimaginable intelligent can create the most imperfect person

Can you see the irrationality of your post? and how self defeating it is

Kalatium:
Evolution cannot be proven

To those who stubbornly hold dogmatic beliefs ...yes.

Evolution provides a more intelligent and researched answer, than the lazy 'god' did it argument.