MissWrite:
It's the hypocrisy of patriarchal culture again; and this view (that women are naturally inclined to be lesbians) is just as skewed as believing men are biological inclined to be promiscuous while women are monogamous in nature. society hangs women for promiscuity but not the men; it's really no wonder that men have no desire (and therefore no muscle) to discipline themselves.

MissWrite:

Most men get turned on by watching two women kiss, or perform sexual acts on one another. The more popular mix for a heterosexual man's 3-some is two women and one man (and not two men and one woman). In the end, even though they're only catering to the man's needs, those women are going to be lesbians for one night. And it's okay in that context: it's a 3-some, and no one would think of chanting "14years". Even if the Special Anti-Homosexual Squad arrived at the crime scene, the presence of the man would amount to an "extenuating circumstance".

MissWrite:

It's clear that men aren't disgusted by lesbianism. And since society (men, patriarchy) condones lesbianism and not ma-man gay sex, it's become bolder in public spaces (the same way that male promiscuity has become bold) . And now they want to say that all women are biologically disposed to be gay? I don't think so. There are gay women and straight women; just like there are gay men and straight men. And there are men who are promiscuous and men who are not; just like there are women who are promiscuous and women who are not.

MissWrite:

By the way, that thing in the picture doesn't show lesbian activity; a kiss on the cheek That's just affectionate behavior; it's nothing sexual. Don't get it confused just because you're growing over it. Have you not seen football players plant aggressive kisses on a team mates cheek while celebrating a goal? Or slap each other's butts? Do you want to call that homosexual activity?

MissWrite:
It's the hypocrisy of patriarchal culture again; and this view (that women are naturally inclined to be lesbians) is just as skewed as believing men are biological inclined to be promiscuous while women are monogamous in nature. Society hangs women for promiscuity but not the men; it's really no wonder that men have no desire (and therefore no muscle) to discipline themselves.

Most men get turned on by watching two women kiss, or perform sexual acts on one another. The more popular mix for a heterosexual man's 3-some is two women and one man (and not two men and one woman). In the end, even though they're only catering to the man's needs, those women are going to be lesbians for one night. And it's okay in that context: it's a 3-some, and no one would think of chanting "14years". Even if the Special Anti-Homosexual Squad arrived at the crime scene, the presence of the man would amount to an "extenuating circumstance".

It's clear that men aren't disgusted by lesbianism. And since society (men, patriarchy) condones lesbianism and not ma-man gay sex, it's become bolder in public spaces (the same way that male promiscuity has become bold) . And now they want to say that all women are biologically disposed to be gay? I don't think so. There are gay women and straight women; just like there are gay men and straight men. And there are men who are promiscuous and men who are not; just like there are women who are promiscuous and women who are not.

By the way, that thing in the picture doesn't show lesbian activity; a kiss on the cheek That's just being affectionate; it's nothing sexual. Don't get it confused just because you're growing over it. Have you not seen football players plant aggressive kisses on a team mates cheek while celebrating a goal? Or slap each other's butts? Do you want to call that homosexual activity?

donstan18:


Before I oppose, do you believe that men are promiscuous in nature?

3-some mustn't be 1:2 ladies, reverse could be the case.

You said football players, but all class of ladies does the same, whether football or not.

MensCabal:


3somes go beyond 1 man and 2 women, it can be 2 men and 1 woman.. I think you should look at your points over again.

MissWrite:

I don't believe that all men are promiscuous. But those who are promiscuous are naturally so. I also don't believe that all women are not promiscuous. And those who are promiscuous are naturally so. And if promiscuity were a crime, then people would have to exercise self discipline to regulate their actions. Every human being (of sound mind) has the ability to refrain from action; it's on this premise that laws are even possible. We have the ability to suppress our urges. The fact that you're hungry does not justify stealing food from someone else. The fact that you're aroused by a girl does not justify raping her. And if an angry belly or blue balls would keep us out of jail, we do it.

MissWrite:

Sorry. This has now become a conversation about promiscuity instead of homosexuality, as per OP. Anyway, there are parallels: people who are naturally gay are compelled to deny their urges because, unlike promiscuity, homosexuality is a crime here. But, like with promiscuity, there are no victims (or are there? If someone's upset stomach counts )

MissWrite:


Yes. I said earlier, "the more popular mix..." . This implies that there is a comparison between two items. And then I said, "for a heterosexual man". Which do you think is more popular amongst straight guys, doing it with two girls or a guy and a girl?

MissWrite:



Okay, I'll try to give you a more comprehensive list...
1. Football players
2. Basket ball players
3. Hockey players
4. In fact, any team sport
5. Or team sport supporter
6. Or a team sport coach
7. Indians
8. Guys who have been through an ordeal together
9. Guys who haven't seen each other in ages
10. Guys who have been saved by their co-worker from getting fired
11. .............I'm tired.

donstan18:



Lol, Most of your instances are just revolving around sports, likewise the ways of women

Most kinds of ladies publicly show lesbian attitude, even when they don't fall in the classes of the above listed instances of yours.

MissWrite:



Lol! Yes.

It's not "lesbian attitude"; it's affectionate attitude. Look at that picture up there and tell me if it would be awkward if those were two sisters, or a mother and a daughter? But that's the point, isn't it?

MissWrite:

Men don't feel comfortable being affectionate with each other because society judges it

MissWrite:

Someone up there was blaming feminism for that Society isn't even a feminist's ally (at the moment); it's unquestionably male (not female) and chauvinistic (not liberal). When we talk about it being a "man's world", it just puts men at the top of the food-chain (or social cadre); they've got full expression. So if you're looking for someone to blame, look to yourselves. When you're ready to endorse hand-holding amongst yourselves, we'll learn to accept it too. If you want to call your paddy boo, then let's fight that male chauvinist pig, that is society, together.

Neurotika:
I have noticed this since. There are actually more bisexual women than there are gays. I am indifferent to both sexual predilections as everyone has fundamental human rights to do whatever. It's just the hypocrisy that irritates me. A bro hugging a bro will be deemed weird, yet women can kiss each other on the cheeks/lips, call each other boo, sweet and all that crap. These same motherf.uckers will hang feminism around their neck when it's time to criticize the men. I actually have no respect for any man that takes women serious. Most of them are Forkas

donstan18:


Oh fvck!

Did you just call that "Affectionate attitude" ? you seems to forget that there's much similarity between "Affection" and "Sexual fonds" especially when the two same gender parties aren't bloodly related

Get me, i'm not against women publicly showing affections to each other, i'm just trying to let you know that there's a point in the Op's thread if only you view it in a different angle or African societal pleasing angle.



I really don't think the society judges it, any prove of that?, I just feel it's a natural sh*t with men, they just feel disgusted with it.



A man should call me "Boo" and watch me punch his nose

donstan18:

A man should call me "Boo" and watch me punch his nose

MissWrite:

you guys are putting a lot of pressure on some emotional guys who would want to be affectionate with each other, and send each other the kiss emoji.

IamLEGEND1:
A bro has neither the permission nor the right to display any sort of emotion when he is with another bro.
In the event that a bro takes an action that pleases another bro deeply, they simply share a quick look & nod at each other like a couple of douche bags.
it's either that or a first bump. So there you have it- the full range of emotions allowed to be shared between two bros.

Any bro who is comfortable crying in front of his bros or giving his bros kisses on the cheek is considered an anomaly & is removed from the circle of bros and the friendship terminated with extreme prejudice.
And before you say anything about society influencing this unspoken rule of brotherhood, know that this is one of those instances where nature wins over nurture.
We were not made to be so by external forces, we were born this way.

IamLEGEND1:
A bro has neither the permission nor the right to display any sort of emotion when he is with another bro.
In the event that a bro takes an action that pleases another bro deeply, they simply share a quick look & nod at each other like a couple of douche bags.
it's either that or a first bump. So there you have it- the full range of emotions allowed to be shared between two bros.

Any bro who is comfortable crying in front of his bros or giving his bros kisses on the cheek is considered an anomaly & is removed from the circle of bros and the friendship terminated with extreme prejudice.
And before you say anything about society influencing this unspoken rule of brotherhood, know that this is one of those instances where nature wins over nurture.
We were not made to be so by external forces, we were born this way.

MissWrite:



Anomaly.........you mean freak of nature? Regardless, those are still products of nature even if they are in the barest minority. And if they are products of nature (and not manufactured in a lab), then they're not "unnatural"; it only means that nature makes all kinds of people. They should be allowed to be themselves without fearing that someone would "remove" them from "the circle". If nature hasn't dealt with you by killing you off, what gives anyone the right to try to change you just because they think you're fruity? I'm just thinking out loud.

Well, men aren't so uptight anymore. I've seen guys send this: , to fellow guys on this forum (it takes some getting used to, but in the meantime it's amusing). But hey, it's no worse than this passionate kiss between Gary and Paul.....

You say they aren't bros anymore .

princfred:
Scholes was pushing him off he didnt see it coming.

MissWrite:

Anomaly.........you mean freak of nature? Regardless, those are still products of nature even if they are in the barest minority. And if they are products of nature (and not manufactured in a lab), then they're not "unnatural"; it only means that nature makes all kinds of people. They should be allowed to be themselves without fearing that someone would "remove" them from "the circle". If nature hasn't dealt with you by killing you off, what gives anyone the right to try to change you just because they think you're fruity? I'm just thinking out loud.
Well, men aren't so uptight anymore. I've seen guys send this: , to fellow guys on this forum (it takes some getting used to, but in the meantime it's amusing). But hey, it's no worse than this passionate kiss between Gary and Paul.....

You say they aren't bros anymore .

MissWrite:
It's the hypocrisy of patriarchal culture again; and this view (that women are naturally inclined to be lesbians) is just as skewed as believing men are biological inclined to be promiscuous while women are monogamous in nature. Society hangs women for promiscuity but not the men; it's really no wonder that men have no desire (and therefore no muscle) to discipline themselves.

Most men get turned on by watching two women kiss, or perform sexual acts on one another. The more popular mix for a heterosexual man's 3-some is two women and one man (and not two men and one woman). In the end, even though they're only catering to the man's needs, those women are going to be lesbians for one night. And it's okay in that context: it's a 3-some, and no one would think of chanting "14years". Even if the Special Anti-Homosexual Squad arrived at the crime scene, the presence of the man would amount to an "extenuating circumstance".

It's clear that men aren't disgusted by lesbianism. And since society (men, patriarchy) condones lesbianism and not ma-man gay sex, it's become bolder in public spaces (the same way that male promiscuity has become bold) . And now they want to say that all women are biologically disposed to be gay? I don't think so. There are gay women and straight women; just like there are gay men and straight men. And there are men who are promiscuous and men who are not; just like there are women who are promiscuous and women who are not.

By the way, that thing in the picture doesn't show lesbian activity; a kiss on the cheek That's just being affectionate; it's nothing sexual. Don't get it confused just because you're growing over it. Have you not seen football players plant aggressive kisses on a team mates cheek while celebrating a goal? Or slap each other's butts? Do you want to call that homosexual activity?

MissWrite:

[/b]


Lmao! , that's exactly what I'm talking about. Yeah, maybe I shouldn't have said society "judges it" rather society is "disgusted by it". But you guys are putting a lot of pressure on some emotional guys who would want to be affectionate with each other, and send each other the kiss emoji with no strings attached.

MissWrite:

I know the Op has a point: society condones lesbianism. I agreed to that in my post. But I don't agree that all women have lesbian tendencies . Like I said: women just find it okay to be affectionate with each other in public because society is not disgusted by it. We don't have to hide it or suppress it. Whereas you feel the need to bloody a guy's nose over calling you "boo".

Tallesty1:
I am skeptical about engaging you in this debate because you type/talk too much. You mustn't write a novel to air your opinion. Haba, are you related to Adichie?

Sentiments aside, most women are bisexual and I am not saying this for fun. You can can carry out your own research if you doubt me. Get 10 straight ladies in a room, get them drunk then sit back and enjoy. It is that simple.

Alternatively you can read this from BBC, The outcome of a study that was carried out by the University of Essex. They carried out a research and their findings were that no woman is "totally straight".


http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-34744903


Hey, and that thing you said about enjoying lesbian sex, it's not the sex we watch, it is the organs that arouse us, same gay porn arouse women.

Tallesty1:
I am skeptical about engaging you in this debate because you type/talk too much. You mustn't write a novel to air your opinion. Haba, are you related to Adichie?

Sentiments aside, most women are bisexual and I am not saying this for fun. You can can carry out your own research if you doubt me. Get 10 straight ladies in a room, get them drunk then sit back and enjoy. It is that simple.

Alternatively you can read this from BBC, The outcome of a study that was carried out by the University of Essex. They carried out a research and their findings were that no woman is "totally straight".


http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-34744903


Hey, and that thing you said about enjoying lesbian sex, it's not the sex we watch, it is the organs that arouse us, same gay porn arouse women.