Don't Submit To Any Man Because Of Marriage

You know what ? just ignore all this talk about submission and subordination. all of this is irrelevant when it comes to a happy union. You have to remember one thing, it is one thing to have a happy union based on respect and it is another thing to have a happy union based on commandering /dictatorship. The happy union based on respect will will always prosper while the one based on commandering/dictatorship will be filled with troubles.

All i am saying is that, look for a person whom you are both on each others level, you laugh together, you are like buddys, you joke together, you act silly together, you are best friends, you are like 2 peas in a pod, you feel extremely comfortable in each others company because once you have that ? issues like 'submission' will never arise. You dont have to submit to any human being.
No matter how you try to put it, being submissive is the same thing as being subservient (submission will always lead to subservience). Why should you be subservient to another human being in the name of marriage?
If you feel like you have to submit to your husband, then you are in the wrong marriage.

Stupidity sometimes looks like death.

When one is stupid, he/she won't feel the pain and embarrassment of sounding stupid, but those who care will be the ones feeling it.


But it's quite unfortunate that I care not, so ride on, OP

The Bible say him own, you say your own.
From where did you get this authority?

All i am saying is that, look for a person whom you are both on each others level, you laugh together, you are like buddys, you joke together, you act silly together, you are best friends, you are like 2 peas in a pod, you feel extremely comfortable in each others company because once you have that ? issues like 'submission' will never arise

Truer words have never been spoken.

Equal right

lol they'll submit to a man either way. be it their Pastor at church or Boss at work. women were created to submit niggah. hate it or love it.

Hanseel1:
Don't Submit To Any Man Because Of Marriage

You know what ? just ignore all this talk about submission and subordination. all of this is irrelevant when it comes to a happy union. You have to remember one thing, it is one thing to have a happy union based on respect and it is another thing to have a happy union based on commandering /dictatorship. The happy union based on respect will will always prosper while the one based on commandering/dictatorship will be filled with troubles.

All i am saying is that, look for a person whom you are both on each others level, you laugh together, you are like buddys, you joke together, you act silly together, you are best friends, you are like 2 peas in a pod, you feel extremely comfortable in each others company because once you have that ? issues like 'submission' will never arise. You dont have to submit to any human being.
No matter how you try to put it, being submissive is the same thing as being subservient (submission will always lead to subservience). Why should you be subservient to another human being in the name of marriage?
If you feel like you have to submit to your husband, then you are in the wrong marriage.

Let women start paying groom price. After all marriage benefits them

super story

Listen to mumu op and you'll definitely become a Shiloh candidate

How can a man deal with a woman who isn't submissive to him.


Submissive also means one compromising for the other, so what are you saying in essence? Op

MISEDUCATIONS:
lol they'll submit to a man either way. be it their Pastor at church or Boss at work. women were created to submit niggah. hate it or love it.

Regardless of gender, you have to submit to your boss at your place of work.

at the sound of marriage,pants begin to drop...

Lol... Ass lickers everywhere. submission comes into play naturally without being forced. when you marry the right man that love, care and provide for your needs... you will naturally submit to him without you knowing it

Husband scarce u con add another poo lol

MhisTahrah:
Regardless of gender, you have to submit to your boss at your place of work.

then you dont know the meaning of the word submit.

donstan18:
Stupidity sometimes looks like death.

When one is stupid, he/she won't feel the pain and embarrassment of sounding stupid, but those who care will be the ones feeling it.


But it's quite unfortunate that I care not, so ride on, OP

But how now? what he said is kind of true, or you want someone that will kneel down to greet you every morning, you want someone that will say yes to everything you do and say abi?

I really wish the bible gave specific kind of submission it meant so that men wont use that opportunity to ride on us

This is not my business.

Only a petty man (person) will expect/demand for submission in its formalness - submissiveness is good and expected, and those who expect it knows that it is earned not given - from a woman (person) outside formal settings (work environment where totalitarian rather than civility is required to achieve efficiency). Yes, there's a distinction/difference between submissiveness and submission - euphemism. The importance of euphemism can never be overemphasized. Show me a proponent of submission and I will point to you a subjugator. Unfortunately, subjugation knows no gender.

Mutual healthy and happy union only take place where both parties involved are liberators (not where one of the parties is a subjugator) - liberalism doesn't mean absence of conscientiousness.

Sincerity begets submissiveness. A sincere head doesn't need immunity to reign supreme towards his follower(s), however, an insincere head can only reign supreme towards his follower(s) if and only he has immunity, this is so because he's full of impunity - so, an insincere head will expect submission rather than submissiveness from his follower. The former in this regard is a leader - leaders liberate - while the latter is a dictator - dictators subjugate. Those of the diplomatic ethical leanings liberate, while those of the manipulative ethical leanings subjugate.

well if she can't submit. need i remind her that she is just an option not a neccessity.

When you grow older, you'll understand why the Bible said women should be submissive in marriage. For now, keep swimming in your own ocean of wisdom.

Small boy with small empty brain.
You said I created a thread that women should learn to cook, is it wrong?

Op, I remember now, you were the guy that a lady was giving everything. You said she's older than you and is more buoyant. Why won't you be submissive to your husband (wife)? You better wash her menstral pant before she throw you out of her house I see why you argue blindly

milemimi93:


Let women start paying groom price. After all marriage benefits them

I know sey I go see you, donstan18 and miseducations here

Oyindidi:
I know sey I go see you, donstan18 and miseducations here

you know when niggahs wanna simp we are on the ground distributing sense.

MISEDUCATIONS:
you know when niggahs wanna simp we are on the ground distributing sense.

You are right on this

I see nothing wrong in bn subservient in marriage, even in relationships.

In my female to female relationships, we are subservient to each other. I have female friends of early 20s, mid 40s . It's the same. We respect each other And submissive as well. Likewise between me and my man, we are both subservient to each other. But seriously he's the first ever have seen like that in a man. We are of the same age, he earns more than me. And am amazed such men still exist.

So on, it's not a big deal To be submissive. If u love your friends or partner, submission is not a thing to argue about.. It comes willingly. That's if u truly love your friends and companion.

I see nothing wrong in bn subservient in marriage, even in relationships.

In my female to female relationships, we are subservient to each other. I have female friends of early 20s, mid 40s . It's the same. We respect each other And submissive as well. Likewise between me and my man, we are both subservient to each other. But seriously he's the first ever have seen like that in a man. We are of the same age, he earns more than me. And am amazed such men still exist.

So op, it's not a big deal To be submissive. If u love your friends or partner, submission is not a thing to argue about.. It comes willingly. That's if u truly love your friends and companion.

milemimi93:


Let women start paying groom price. After all marriage benefits them

Oyindidi:
I know sey I go see you, donstan18 and miseducations here

Very true, OP. What you described up there is how people in happy marriages are. Others just like to complicate marriage for themselves and end up being miserable. Main thing is just to find someone you're compatible with.

LordKO:
Only a petty man (person) will expect/demand for submission - submissiveness is good and expected, and those who expects it knows that its earned not given - from a woman (person) outside formal settings (work environment where totalitarian rather than civility is required to achieve efficiency). Yes, there's a distinction/difference between submissiveness and submission - euphemism. The importance of euphemism can never be overemphasized. Show me a proponent of submission and I will point to you a subjugator. Unfortunately, subjugation knows no gender.

Mutual healthy and happy union only takes place where both parties involved are liberators (not where one of the parties is a subjugator) - liberalism doesn't mean absence of conscientiousness.

Sincerity begets submissiveness. A sincere head doesn't need immunity to reign supreme towards his follower(s), however, an insincere head can only reign supreme towards his follower(s) if and only he has immunity, this is so because he's full of impunity - so, an insincere head will expect submission rather than submissiveness from his follower. The former in this regard is a leader - leaders liberates - while the latter is a dictator - dictators subjugates. Those of the diplomatic ethical leanings liberates, while those of the manipulative ethical leanings subjugates.

Awesome post. A bottle of beer for you!

MISEDUCATIONS:

then you dont know the meaning of the word submit.

Has the meaning of the word changed then?

In as much as your post seem pleasing and acceptable to We women folks, I can't help but correct your command :' Don't submit to any Man in Marriage'. It is all shades of wrong.

What is Marriage without submission? What is Marriage without listening, accepting,and yielding to your partner's words, wants, desires ? What is Marriage if only your wills and thoughts matter most? Mister I see you advising women to live alone.

True, there are some men who are control freak. Men who wants slaves and no wives, Men that command and control in place of Request and Guide. But the sane question is why marry such man when you aren't ready to comply to their terms?

Finally, Love begets Submission. If your marriage is based on Love, you won't have problems accepting your partner's Will.

LordKO:
Only a petty man (person) will expect/demand for submission - submissiveness is good and expected, and those who expects it knows that its earned not given - from a woman (person) outside formal settings (work environment where totalitarian rather than civility is required to achieve efficiency). Yes, there's a distinction/difference between submissiveness and submission - euphemism. The importance of euphemism can never be overemphasized. Show me a proponent of submission and I will point to you a subjugator. Unfortunately, subjugation knows no gender.

Mutual healthy and happy union only takes place where both parties involved are liberators (not where one of the parties is a subjugator) - liberalism doesn't mean absence of conscientiousness.

Sincerity begets submissiveness. A sincere head doesn't need immunity to reign supreme towards his follower(s), however, an insincere head can only reign supreme towards his follower(s) if and only he has immunity, this is so because he's full of impunity - so, an insincere head will expect submission rather than submissiveness from his follower. The former in this regard is a leader - leaders liberates - while the latter is a dictator - dictators subjugates. Those of the diplomatic ethical leanings liberates, while those of the manipulative ethical leanings subjugates.

Nice.

@OP
Lol honestly don’t think a lot of women would have a problem being submissive if it was for a man who actually deserved it, i.e. had his shit together, provided love, was trustworthy etc. It will come naturally and women will be more willing when you’ve actually earned it. But you’ll see the dustiest of negroes demanding for it ‘just because’ and this is what will be asking you to 'submit':





Just do what you’re comfortable with to be honest, as long as you and your partner are on the same wavelength

MhisTahrah:
Has the meaning of the word changed then?

quote it from your dictionary then ask yourself if its even proper to grant it to your boss..