Am deeply disappointed in d supreme court 4 reviewing a case dey finalised. This shows d incompetence of our judicial system

wwwihy:

Supreme court is reversing the judgement

Based on what argument?

frowland:


Did he forge any certificate? Thought it's a case of misspelling.
Oluchukwu and Oluchi is same thing but in legal terms..?
Chukwudi and Chidi is same thing.
Nkiruka and Nkiru
OluwaSeyi and Seyi
Chukwuma and Chima
Anayo & Anayochukwu.
I have also heard of Muhammad and Muhammed and Muhammadu
Etc etc etc.. the list and names are endless.
So if Supreme accepted Buhari names as it is, why did they then reject the other.
Well, they may have their reasons.
Look, we shouldn't copy paste white man's constitution without looking at our culture and traditions first.
This copy and paste constitution is the biggest problem we have as a diverse nation.

Hahahahaha you should be his lawyer. Lyon is history. The case PDP have against his deputy is a slam dunk

Have you guys heard latest news regarding bayelsa state? The deputy of incumbent governor is also having forgery of certificate. The case is in court

Liposure:
Am deeply disappointed in d supreme court 4 reviewing a case dey finalised. This shows d incompetence of our judicial system

Judges are human and they are not infallible. The review of the case filed by Ihedioha was backed up by some relevant sections of the constitution.

blasted12:
On the bayelsa case I'm afraid there's no appeal. The law is clear you forge any document you get automatically disqualified

No document was forged. The judgement read that it was because the names did not match his submitted documents. This does not mean it was forged.

All he has to do is prove beyond reasonable doubt that the names are his

blasted12:
Hahahahaha you should be his lawyer. Lyon is history. The case PDP have against his deputy is a slam dunk

I don't care who wins or lose as it is none of my business. I am just concerned about how the western constitution is messing with our culture and local names. It's as simple as that. You can go and die for them for all I care.

ursullalinda:
Ihedioha's case was daylight robbery.....but Appeal after supreme verdict......that sounds odd.

I don't understand too
I thought supreme court verdict is final?
Do people also appeal it?

Enimoney3:
Have you guys heard latest news regarding bayelsa state? The deputy of incumbent governor is also having forgery of certificate. The case is in court

.. Source please

millionboi2:
u can't undstand simple qtn?

There was no question mark to indicate that it was a question.
The man has false affidavits.

Enimoney3:
Have you guys heard latest news regarding bayelsa state? The deputy of incumbent governor is also having forgery of certificate. The case is in court

If the court finds him guilty, then he and his boss should step aside. But my fear is that immunity already covers them, my opinion though because I don’t really know the legal implication.

[s]

blasted12:
Hahahahaha you should be his lawyer. Lyon is history. The case PDP have against his deputy is a slam dunk

[/s]

Aremolekunowo:
I pray David Lyon be returned has he won the election.....the deputy should be removed and returned Lyon back as the candidate.

You are so naive

I'll give up on this country if Supreme Court
fails to reverse that IMO ruling

CyberWolf:
Based on what argument?

Presentation of affidavits and confirmation from the schools that he is indeed the one that attended and obtained those certificates ...

Omokiri1:
I thought the decision of the supreme court is final and irrevocable?

I m confused too

Blindersoff:


No document was forged. The judgement read that it was because the names did not match his submitted documents. This does not mean it was forged.

All he has to do is prove beyond reasonable doubt that the names are his

Which he couldn’t prove, that’s why he lost at the high court and Supreme Court.

wwwihy:

Presentation of affidavits and confirmation from the schools that he is indeed the one that attended and obtain those certificates ...

But he couldn’t do that during the trial, why?

Give Ihedioha and Lyon their mandates

CyberWolf:
But he couldn’t do that during the trial, why?

Negligence

NigeriaIsDoomed:
Ihedioha is coming back but as for Lyon he has no case simple.
Next time he should not associate with someone who forges certificate.

None of them are coming back

wwwihy:

Negligence

Exactly and that’s why his ass was nailed. So there is nothing he can do now.

hisgrace090:
Crashing his victory do to his deputy's iregularities is unfair.

Very fair judgment,they have a joint ticket and are inseparable.

hisgrace090:
Crashing his victory do to his deputy's iregularities is unfair.

What do you know about the law or you re just saying it's unfair?

NigeriaIsDoomed:
There was no question mark to indicate that it was a question.
The man has false affidavits.

dia was no complete affidavit to back up all d changes...ok

So thy is nothin wrong changing ur name with a legal document

sorom4:
Give Ihedioha and Lyon their mandates

Ihedioha yes but Lyon has lost it, he has no case

CyberWolf:
Which he couldn’t prove, that’s why he lost at the high court and Supreme Court.

Who said he could not prove it. Perhaps he was not given ample time to get the documents required for proof or was just lackadaisical about the whole thing so felt it did not matter since it was no forgery.

Now that he has seen the seriousness all required documents for proof may have been gotten now.

Anyway the court will review

millionboi2:
dia was no complete affidavit to back up all d changes...ok

So thy is nothin wrong changing ur name with a legal document

yes of course

CyberWolf:
Exactly and that’s why his ass was nailed. So there is nothing he can do now.

If there is nothing, Supreme Court will not even entertain review in the first place. They will look at the substance of the appeal for review and not the form of it.

ThiagoKid:
Who do you think should come bak? Like for ihedioha, Share for Lyon FC

You (and the SC) are making it look like the two cases are comparable by lumping them together. They are not! Disqualification is common in politics per Bayelsa. In Imo nobody was disqualified instead it is a case of the SC aiding and abetting clear fraud and rigging

NigeriaIsDoomed:
There was no question mark to indicate that it was a question.
The man has false affidavits.

How can someone have a legal document such as a sworn and notarized affidavit and you say it is false affidavit. You well so?

Immunity does not cover electoral fraud.. They will be removed immediately.