Dansuqi:

I dont understand you honestly.

fergie001:

Section 187
“(1) In any election to which the foregoing provisions of this part of this Chapter relate, a candidate for the office of Governor of a State shall not be deemed to have been validly nominated for such office unless he nominates another candidate as his associate for his running for the office of Governor, who is to occupy the office of Deputy Governor; and that candidate shall be deemed to have been duly elected to the office of Deputy Governor if the candidate who nominated him is duly elected as Governor in accordance with the said provisions.

(2) The provisions of this Part of this Chapter relating to qualification for election, tenure of office, disqualifications, declaration of assets and liabilities and Oath of Governor shall apply in relation to the office of Deputy Governor as if references to Governor were references to Deputy Governor

Dansuqi:

Thank you.i know this already.now when he's not duly nominated,what does it say that the civil court should do

fergie001:

Kahal has never made any statement on the Bayelsa issue.....I have followed him very well..he only comments on Imo. Ejimatic the other day said it the way it was and you were not alright....hahaha.
Hope you haven't forgotten?

fergie001:

The case didn't come as a civil case.

The one against Lawrence came as a civil case.

fergie001:

I thought Kekere-Ekun read the lead judgement for Imo

Kai

Please lostz ChristianNorth mushystuff, who read the lead judgement for Imo at the SC?

Dansuqi:

I prefer ejimatic,he's objective and consistent right from ekiti.we agree to disagree

Leo3333:



***Yawns***
Someone tap me please when "Fadina" says something about Imo.

Lostz:



Justice Kudirat Kekere-Ekun

Fasindo:

Because this his statement doesn't favour ur friends











Mtchew!!!


Falana should focus on how to win El Zakyzaky case that he abandoned nd leave bayelsa election matter, he is not vast in law more than d 5 supreme court justices that delivered the case.

Just because he manage to win Sowore case he now thinks he is more vast than anybody in law

Fasindo:


Because this his statement doesn't favour ur friends











Mtchew!!!


Falana should focus on how to win El Zakyzaky case that he abandoned nd leave bayelsa election matter, he is not vast in law more than d 5 supreme court justices that delivered the case.

Just because he manage to win Sowore case he now thinks he is more vast than anybody in law

Dansuqi:

What does the law states in a pre election matter where someone is disqualified? Please quote the statue directly

Dansuqi:

We are getting somewhere but you are contradicting yourself.after punishing and disqualifying a candidate for any offend civil or election,what does the law specify next

fergie001:

I know where his pendulum always swing.
This Bayelsa case made him a bit transigent though.

I remember him opening a thread why Diri won't be sworn in a day before, but that is his opinion...we must not agree on everything.

Will tag him next time, but kahal hasn't said a word on Bayelsa surprisingly.

Lostz:
which section of the law? you should quote it here to argue your case.

there is no electoral law or legal precedent that said supreme Court should order for a rerun in an election that was never in dispute because one candidate is not qualified.

Lostz:
which section of the law? you should quote it here to argue your case.

there is no electoral law or legal precedent that said supreme Court should order for a rerun in an election that was never in dispute because one candidate is not qualified.

Dansuqi:

Seems kahal is from imo and has vested interest there.i think sarrki opened that thread.but nobody has a better record than ejimstic

fergie001:

File another case then....
Pdp didn't.

That's why Adah of the CoA ruled against them for. That the case should have come as a civil or criminal case.

The PDP didn't ask for that. If you are not satisfied, you can also file a criminal case against him.

fergie001:

I have told him severally,
The SC has no power to nullify an election or rule for a re-run unless it has originated from a lower court.

Dansuqi:

The kogi,anambra and niger cases i mentioned nko

Dansuqi:

You are missing the point.after disqualifying apc,does the law says you conduct fresh elections or swear in the runner up?

Dansuqi:

But all cases must originate from lower court.if they dont have powers to call for a fresh elections,then they do not also have power to declare a winner.its legally safer and better to order a rerun and allow the electorate choose

Dansuqi:

But all cases must originate from lower court.if they dont have powers to call for a fresh elections,then they do not also have power to declare a winner.its legally safer and better to order a rerun and allow the electorate choose

fergie001:

In the lower court, was the nullification or re-run of the election a subject matter?

Lostz:
they did not declare a winner. they only removed a candidate that was not qualified and ask inec to declare a winner (the candidate that meet necessary legal requirements?

fergie001:

Following SC precedents, you swear in the runner up who participated in all stages of the election.
Tanko Muhammed CJN....decided in a similar case in the Zamfara issue.

Dansuqi:


Does any law states that a 1st runner up takes over? No such law exists.

Dansuqi:

Is a precedent superior to an existing law?

fergie001:

That means the CJN was wrong on Zamfara then....

fergie001:

And where there is NONE?