deadie:

slowpoke, if you work out the probabilities of all the particles in the universe interacting, you will know that it is such a big deal. By the way, DNA isn't perfect. If it were, there would be no mutations, diseases, etc. Or couldn't your God just make it better?

sexkillz:

[size=19pt]DO MUTATIONS OR NATURAL SELECTION PRODUCE NEW SPECIES? [/size]

globexl:

sorry deadie

deadie:

Theory of the survival of the fittest has more to do with changing environment (diseases) and competition for scarce resources. But as higher beings with resources, [size=15pt]emotions and reason,[/size] we can make collective sacrifice. I don't know if that could be said of you. And, would you attribute altruism to God?

[size=19pt]IS THINKING A SENSE FOUND IN NATURE? SHOULD YOU USE IT AS A BASIS FOR THOUGHT OR LOGIC?? [/size]

[b]The National Aeronautics and Space Administration is developing a multilegged robot that walks like a scorpion, and engineers in Finland have already developed a six-legged tractor that can climb over obstacles the way a giant insect would. Other researchers have designed fabric with small flaps that imitate the way pinecones open and close. A car manufacturer is developing a vehicle that imitates the surprisingly low-drag design of the boxfish. And other researchers are probing the shock-absorbing properties of abalone shells, with the intention of making lighter, stronger body armor.
So many good ideas have come from nature that researchers have established a database that already catalogs thousands of different biological systems. Scientists can search this database to find “natural solutions to their design problems,” says The Economist. The natural systems held in this database are known as “biological patents.” Normally, a patent holder is the person or company that legally registers a new idea or machine. Discussing this biological patent database, The Economist says: “By calling biomimetic tricks ‘biological patents’, the researchers are just emphasising that nature is, in effect, the patent holder.”
How did nature come up with all these brilliant ideas? Many researchers would attribute the seemingly ingenious designs evident in nature to millions of years of evolutionary trial and error. Other researchers, though, arrive at a different conclusion. Microbiologist Michael Behe wrote in The New York Times in 2005: “The strong appearance of design [in nature] allows a disarmingly simple argument: if it looks, walks and quacks like a duck, then, absent compelling evidence to the contrary, we have warrant to conclude it’s a duck.” His conclusion? “Design should not be overlooked simply because it’s so obvious.”
Surely, the engineer who designs a safer, more efficient aircraft wing would deserve to receive credit for his design. Likewise, the inventor who devises a more versatile bandage—or a more comfortable clothing material or a more efficient motor vehicle—deserves credit for his or her design. In fact, a manufacturer who copies someone else’s design but fails to acknowledge or credit the designer may be viewed as a criminal.
[size=13pt]Does it seem logical to you, then, for highly trained researchers who crudely mimic systems in nature to solve difficult engineering problems to attribute the genius of devising the original idea to unintelligent evolution? If the copy requires an intelligent designer, what about the original? Really, who deserves more credit, the master artist or the student who imitates his technique?[/size]
[/b]

sexkillz:

[size=15pt]HOW DID NATURE COME UP WITH SO MANY GOOD IDEAS?

HOW COME THE SUN IS AT THE PERFECT POSITION TO SUPPORT LIFE ON EARTH?

HOW COME THE EARTH IS AT THE PERFECT DISTANCE FROM THE SUN?[/size]

[size=19pt]WHICH CAME FIRST?. . . . . . . . . . . THE CHICKEN OR THE EGG? [/size]


[size=15pt]NO INTELLIGENT REPLIES YET!!! IT ALLLLL POINTS TO A VERY INTELLIGENT DESIGNER & CREATOR:[/size] [size=29pt]GOD!!!!![/size] DEAL WITH IT!!!

Kenyy:

Atheist are ethical thinkers, religious people are rarely thinkers at all.

harakiri:

You're an embarrassment. Do you know that? You can't even type a single sentence that makes sense and the best you can do is dig up trash all over the net and spam nairaland with copy and paste unsolicited quotes. Just hope the moderators haven't seen this yet.

harakiri:

You're an embarrassment. Do you know that? You can't even type a single sentence that makes sense and the best you can do is dig up trash all over the net and spam nairaland with copy and paste unsolicited quotes. Just hope the moderators haven't seen this yet.

deadie:

You took over from me. I got tired of the du.mb 4ck. My cousin once said: "Do not argue with a fo.ol. He will bring you down to his level and beat you with experience."

manmustwac:

[size=24pt]@SEXKILLZ[/size]
[size=24pt]WHO CREATED GOD? OR WHO CREATED THE CREATOR THAT CREATED GOD? IF GOD SOMEHOW MANAGED TO CREATED HIMSELF HOW DID HE MANAGE TO DO SO FROM ABSOLUTELY NOTHING? HOW DID HE MANAGE TO EDUCATE HIMSELF WITHOUT ANY FORMAL EDUCATION? BECAUSE WITHOUT ANY FORMAL EDUCATION HOW COULD HE CREATE THE DINOSAURS OR DNA?[/size]

I EAGARLY AWAIT YOUR ANSWERS.

sexkillz:

LOL!!! I'M A KIND OF CHRISTIAN THAT DOESNT BELIEVE IN HELL FIRE!, TRINITY!, AND SO MANY BELIEFS ABOUT CHRISTIANITY!!! I ALSO BELIEVE THAT RELIGION IS TO BLAME FOR MANKIND'S WOES! YOU GUYS ARE SOOO INSULTING! I CANT SEE MY SELF TRYING TO REASON WITH ANY OF YOU! YOU DONT BELIEVE IN THE BIBLE!!!! SO? HOW WOULD YOU BELIEVE A WORD I SAY FROM THE BIBLE?

sexkillz:

LOL!!! I'M A KIND OF CHRISTIAN THAT DOESNT BELIEVE IN HELL FIRE!, TRINITY!, AND SO MANY BELIEFS ABOUT CHRISTIANITY!!! [/b]I ALSO BELIEVE THAT RELIGION IS TO BLAME FOR MANKIND'S WOES! YOU GUYS ARE SOOO INSULTING! I CANT SEE MY SELF TRYING TO [b]REASON WITH ANY OF YOU! YOU DONT BELIEVE IN THE BIBLE!!!! SO? HOW WOULD YOU BELIEVE A WORD I SAY FROM THE BIBLE?

deadie:

I decided not to respond to you any more, but you raised two issues (bolded) which I will like to address.
1. So you do not believe in some aspects of the bible doubt your 'holy' book? That's says so much about it then. If you doubt some portion, why do you believe in other parts? Do you get to choose which part to believe in?
2. Like you reason?

globexl:

Very interesting. You dont believe in the key articles of your faith. HHHHMMMM. So you have have long realized that its all a fraud? Thank you very much for validating all we have been trying to say.

deadie:

Do not argue with fo.ols and religious nut jobs.They will bring you down to their level and beat you with experience.

PLS TRY NOT TO GET ON MY BAD SIDE!!! I COULD BE VERY INSULTING TOO! 3 THREADS WERE LOCKED IN 3 DAYS BECAUSE OF MY INSULTS!!! KINDLY DONT TOW THAT LINE IF I MUST TAKE YOU SERIOUS!

Kenyy:

. . .but for good people to do bad things, it takes religion.

sexkillz:

PLS TRY NOT TO GET ON MY BAD SIDE!!! I COULD BE VERY INSULTING TOO! 3 THREADS WERE LOCKED IN 3 DAYS BECAUSE OF MY INSULTS!!! KINDLY DONT TOW THAT LINE IF I MUST TAKE YOU SERIOUS!

big_sean:

i'm sorry to say, but i have been enjoying this debate until this "sexkillz" of a guy came in and started polluting it with his huge emptiness.
If u don't have a constructive argument to make, why don't u sit on your hands and let your eyes read and learn from people from opposing sides enlighten us on the topic.
U're just a shame

sexkillz:

[size=19pt]IS THINKING A SENSE FOUND IN NATURE? SHOULD YOU USE IT AS A BASIS FOR THOUGHT OR LOGIC?? [/size]

sexkillz:

[size=15pt]HOW DID NATURE COME UP WITH SO MANY GOOD IDEAS?

HOW COME THE SUN IS AT THE PERFECT POSITION TO SUPPORT LIFE ON EARTH?

HOW COME THE EARTH IS AT THE PERFECT DISTANCE FROM THE SUN?[/size]

[size=19pt]WHICH CAME FIRST?. . . . . . . . . . . THE CHICKEN OR THE EGG? [/size]


[size=15pt]NO INTELLIGENT REPLIES YET!!! IT ALLLLL POINTS TO A VERY INTELLIGENT DESIGNER & CREATOR:[/size] [size=29pt]GOD!!!!![/size] DEAL WITH IT!!!