Chedarking:

I only posted to register my disbelief at the utter stupidity displayed by one of the most intellectually-bankrupt confusionists ever to inflict himself on the good people of this forum...

Logicboy03:

When you are ready to acknowledge that the article was saying that natural selection didnt cause the height, get back to me.

Logicboy03:


lol......I know that I butthurt you and you are looking for revenge.


You will fail

Chedarking:

LMAO

Are you saying the article confirms evolution didn't cause increase in height?

Is that what you are saying now?

Chedarking:

LMAO

LMAO

ROTFLMAO

Logicboy03:



Reetarded question.

Try again. Rephrase

Logicboy03: This is serious.


People laughing at their own ignorance.

Frosbel, you live in the UK, you can go to the museums and look at the armours that the warriors were supposed to wear. Very small, and would fit an average 16 year old.

You can also go to your dentist and get him to explain why our wisdom teeth are giving us problems while many dont even grow wisdom teeth.


Examples of microevolution in humans
Funny how people laugh at their own ignorance.

Bélla3: SUCH LOGIC ! TUFIAKWA!
Even my younger sister knows english people are relatively smaller compared to americans, africans,etc

Logicboy03:


lol....according to the house of Bella.


You sure that your full name isnt Frosbella

frosbel: I start with mine :

1. Using logic, reason and scientific evidence, kindly trace back to the beginning , the origin of MAN.

2. In your own words, describe how you think human reproductive organs evolved into what it is today

3. If we came from monkeys , how come we still have monkeys around today


Thanks,

Bélla3: Is that all you can say after being caught red handed playing 'logic'? Kai.
Btw the name sounds nice.

Bélla3: SUCH LOGIC ! TUFIAKWA!
Even my younger sister knows english people are relatively smaller compared to americans, africans,etc

wiegraf:

1. Dunno
2. Dunno
3. Dunno. Actually, not sure we came from monkeys. We are rather different from them.

How did this reach 4 pages?

davidylan:

one atheist who is at least honest enough to state the truth... much of the foundation for atheism is based on blind faith.

davidylan:

one atheist who is at least honest enough to state the truth... much of the foundation for atheism is based on blind faith.

Bélla3: Is that all you can say after being caught red handed playing 'logic'? Kai.
Btw the name sounds nice.

frosbel: I start with mine :

1. Using logic, reason and scientific evidence, kindly trace back to the beginning , the origin of MAN.

2. In your own words, describe how you think human reproductive organs evolved into what it is today

3. If we came from monkeys , how come we still have monkeys around today


Thanks,

frosbel: I start with mine :

1. Using logic, reason and scientific evidence, kindly trace back to the beginning , the origin of MAN.

2. In your own words, describe how you think human reproductive organs evolved into what it is today

3. If we came from monkeys , how come we still have monkeys around today


Thanks,

davidylan:

one atheist who is at least honest enough to state the truth... much of the foundation for atheism is based on blind faith.

frosbel: I start with mine :

1. Using logic, reason and scientific evidence, kindly trace back to the beginning , the origin of MAN.

2. In your own words, describe how you think human reproductive organs evolved into what it is today

3. If we came from monkeys , how come we still have monkeys around today


Thanks,

[quote author=Area_boy]

I dont get you guys!

An atheists starting point from every information or quest for information is "I don't know". Then he works he way up the ladder to get compelling evidence to provide the best fit explanation for the initial quest.

Yours on the other hand Is "I do know and its god". Yet you groom your massive pair of hairy balls just point fingers and cry out "Blind faith"?

ezme:
Putting faith and atheism in one sentence really got me confused. Do atheists have a common belief system or they just reject the existence of a supreme being as many religion tend to project? What is the basis for the atheist's argument? Is it logic or faith?

2good:

Atheism is different from evolution theory. Not every Atheist have absolute believe in evolution. Just want to clarify that so ask more reasonable questions next time

Kay 17:

Why?!

Because the next conclusion is God did it??

frosbel: Some more questions for our atheists in Nairaland :


1. Does the universe have a beginning that requires a cause? If so, what was this cause?

2. Is materialistic determinism compatible with the intrinsically probabilistic nature of quantum mechanics?

3. How do you account for the physical parameters of the universe (the gravitational constant, the strong nuclear force, the mass and charge of a proton, etc.) being finely tuned for the existence of stars, planets, and life?

4. Why is the human mind naturally fluent in the language of mathematics, and how do you explain the eerie, seemingly unreasonable effectiveness of mathematics in describing the laws of nature?

5. Do you believe that DNA repair mechanisms, catalytically perfect enzymes, and phenomena such as substrate channeling are best explained by naturalism? If so, why are rational human scientists and engineers so woefully incapable of imitating the precision and complexity of cellular machinery that (presumably) arose via strictly irrational processes?

Source

frosbel: Some more questions for our atheists in Nairaland :


1. Does the universe have a beginning that requires a cause? If so, what was this cause?

2. Is materialistic determinism compatible with the intrinsically probabilistic nature of quantum mechanics?

3. How do you account for the physical parameters of the universe (the gravitational constant, the strong nuclear force, the mass and charge of a proton, etc.) being finely tuned for the existence of stars, planets, and life?

4. Why is the human mind naturally fluent in the language of mathematics, and how do you explain the eerie, seemingly unreasonable effectiveness of mathematics in describing the laws of nature?

5. Do you believe that DNA repair mechanisms, catalytically perfect enzymes, and phenomena such as substrate channeling are best explained by naturalism? If so, why are rational human scientists and engineers so woefully incapable of imitating the precision and complexity of cellular machinery that (presumably) arose via strictly irrational processes?

Source

Reyginus: I'm daring any atheist in this forum to answer the above questions.

frosbel: Some more questions for our atheists in Nairaland :


1. Does the universe have a beginning that requires a cause? If so, what was this cause?

2. Is materialistic determinism compatible with the intrinsically probabilistic nature of quantum mechanics?

3. How do you account for the physical parameters of the universe (the gravitational constant, the strong nuclear force, the mass and charge of a proton, etc.) being finely tuned for the existence of stars, planets, and life?

4. Why is the human mind naturally fluent in the language of mathematics, and how do you explain the eerie, seemingly unreasonable effectiveness of mathematics in describing the laws of nature?

5. Do you believe that DNA repair mechanisms, catalytically perfect enzymes, and phenomena such as substrate channeling are best explained by naturalism? If so, why are rational human scientists and engineers so woefully incapable of imitating the precision and complexity of cellular machinery that (presumably) arose via strictly irrational processes?

Source

cyrexx:


Okay,

we accept that intelligent design wins, now stand by for details here below...

http://www.youtube.com/#/watch?v=6arhd4Kq1cI&desktop_uri=%2Fwatch%3Fv%3D6arhd4Kq1cI

cyrexx:


Okay,

we accept that intelligent design wins, now stand by for details here below...

http://www.youtube.com/#/watch?v=6arhd4Kq1cI&desktop_uri=%2Fwatch%3Fv%3D6arhd4Kq1cI