₦airaland Forum

debosky:
Instead of using his energy to help Derby he's inventing new ways to cavort with a married woman?

I dont blame him, Derby have been doomed since October. What miracle did you expect him to work?

debosky:
Speaking about Oba - he seems to be going the way of Aghahowa with this drop in form - he has had a lot of time to establish himself at Newcastle but has failed to do so - Maybe he should move to a smaller club and try to regain his form there. Unlike him, Aiyegbeni has shown he is not just a Portsmouth Champion by doing the business for Everton as well - its a pity he doesn't do as well for the green white green though.

Oba is about an average player made to look good because of speed and a deadly left foot.

DRANOEL:
seems you are now derailing,the whole point i have been trying to make is that the arabs at certain point in history were the ones on ground in that area,the jews now coming back to forcibly take it back is just not right!

I doubt if i'm derailing but more like you want to force-fit the arab propaganda u've swallowed hook, line and sinker.

Look back at the history books you posted earlier (even though u've deceitfully edited out the most important parts prior to 1400 AD) . . . the arabs led by sallahdin attacked Jerusalem in 638 AD, if you are honest with your history you would know that Jews remained an integral part of Jerusalem and Israel even during the moslem rule.
The arabs were sacked from Israel by the crusaders in 1099 AD . . .

The Ottoman TURKS finally took over until their empire was dismantled by the British during/after world war 1.

Several things are pertinent to note . . .
- Where were the arabs you claim were on ground at that point in time? Perhaps you want to read a bit about the arab migration that started around 1917 when the Brits took over the mandate of Palestine.
- The TURKS were moslems but not arabs. So i don't get were you erroneously assume that arabs were always in control of Israel.
- Several historical accounts of Israel prior to the early 1900s indicate it was a wasteland (please read Mark Twain's write up in the middle 1800s that i posted earlier but you people prefered to ignore) . . . where were the arabs?
- Census figures taken by Ottoman turks indicate Jews remained the majority ethnic group in Jerusalem (again i made reference to this in an earlier post which you chose to ignore since it does not jive with arab propaganda).
- Jordan is today controlled by the hashemite descendant of the Emir of Mecca, Saudi Arabia . . . i don't hear you asking him to go back so the "palestinian" arabs can have back 85% of the British mandate of Palestine that is today the nation of Jordan.

- Israel sits on a mere 15% of the mandate . . . why is that tiny sliver of land so important to moslems and arabs?

- Final conclusion . . . it has NOTHING to do with land (Jordan and Egypt had these lands from 1948-1967 and no one cried for a palestinian nation) but more to do with a deep seated evil desire to remove the Jewish nation of Israel.

DRANOEL, we know the history already. you seem to be cherry picking what points of history u want to start from.

Let us take a hypothetical approach, if the Jews must leave the 15% portion of the former mandate of palestine (all of which has always been historically theirs), do we also demand that the King of Jordan and all his subjects move back to Mecca from whence they came from?
Afterall no one seems to be bugging the Jordanians who never even existed prior to 1922 and occupy a whopping 85% of the former mandate of Palestine.

Oh bah humbug, lets just worry the poor little jews.

Oh but wait . . . i remember a certain black semptember in the 1970s when the Jordanians kicked out the "palestinian" arabs . . . they dont seem to be interested in demanding a right of return back to jordan now are they?

Oh well, Arafat himself was Egyptian so God knows his descendants will be more interested in barging Egypt for a right of return.

Ah its the jewish lands we all want, it doesnt matter if we turn history upside down.

DRANOEL:
@4him

for your information jordan itself was part of palestine and this arabs you talk about have always been there,when the jews started planning on coming back it was this same arabs who actually sold lands to them and as for the name palestine been attributed to a jew please read following and help me out,mind you this again is from a jewish site

Here is something you should know:
1. Jordan was never part of palestine as it never existed prior to 1922 anywhere in history but is merely a creation of the British empire.
2. Jordan refers to the river and valley west of Israel which is mentioned several times in the bible and has NO arab connection (95% of the kingdom of jordan today is arab).
3. The king of Jordan (Abdulla II) is a direct descendant of Al Hussein, the eastwhile Emir of Mecca Saudi Arabia . . . with NO connections whatsoever to land west of Israel.

DRANOEL:
From the fifth century BC, following the historian Herodotus, Greeks called the eastern coast of the Mediterranean "the Philistine Syria" using the Greek language form of the name. In AD 135, after putting down the Bar Kochba revolt, the second major Jewish revolt against Rome, the Emperor Hadrian wanted to blot out the name of the Roman "Provincia Judaea" and so renamed it "Provincia Syria Palaestina", the Latin version of the Greek name and the first use of the name as an administrative unit. The name "Provincia Syria Palaestina" was later shortened to Palaestina, from which the modern, anglicized "Palestine" is derived.

This is the only relevant portion that you need to understand. As at AD 135 the phillistines had long ceased to exist. History records that well before Christ was born they had been completely destroyed.

Now fast forward to AD 135, the term "palestinian" refered to a jew living in the land of Israel that had been renamed "palestine" by the conquering Roman army.
Not a single connection to arabs.

So back to my question . . . how did arabs suddenly become palestinians?

How did Saudi Arabian royals become custodians of land in Palestine?

morenike09:
ibukunnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn ^{lovely name!!!!!!!}

babygirl, is this ur chemistry assignment?

dont8:
@olabode,good write up,if he has converted to judaism,we'll not hear any noise,even great ones belief in jusus christ and jews does not,and christian will not condemn them but they will go to jerusalem for pilgrimage,double standard.

those christians trooping to jerusalem are going for tourism purposes. The bible tells us expressely that it is were 2 or 3 are gathered together in His name that He will be there in their midst. You dont have to go to jerusalem to seek anything except of course for sight seeing.

Your mom is making a smart choice for you.
Law will definitely narrow ur choices when it comes to working in Nigeria, it is very time consuming and not something you'd be looking forward to doing as a woman.
My aunt read law too and worked for a couple of yrs in a young law firm working almost 14 hrs straight a day.
She's switched to an oil service company now and works as the head of personnel after taking a few courses abroad.

Perhaps on this issue your mom is dead on point . . . that is if you must read law.

We lost fair and square and do not deserve to be EPL champions.
Wenger has ruined the season, we cant keep selling top players only to blood people like Eboue who are just a red card waiting to happen.
Adebayor has shown us the limits of his talent . . . we need and deserve better.
Get rid of Bendtner and Walcott . . . both of them are vastly over-rated.
We had the opportunity to sign Anelka, why didnt we?

Chelsea played a great game, hats off to them. They replace Lampard with another world class center midfield and they'll be unbeatable.
Chelsea is going to win this season.

The Plateau girl is fine too.

The Osun girl i consider the finest.

I don't see any one that looks really striking. They are just okay.

Most of them are from the east . . .

Why did she get a visa there in the first place?

That Man U team is just a monster.

smile4kenn:
a word is enough for d wise

Open your bible and show me where Paul or Peter observed Easter and refused to eat meat.
Dont come here and impose ur unbiblical catholic doctrines on us.

Stuff and nonsense. I had good chicken wings today.

No where in the bible do we see any prohibition on meat.

stillwater:
I'm happy you acknowledge the fact you use them as tools. I don't blame you I blame the girls for not having good tastes in men and settle for nonsense. *Hisses*

urgh. i admitted nothing of the sort, you gripe a lot.

Fauxhawk looks great. Nice to see women experimenting with their hair . . .

I didnt destroy the lives of any females so i'd be happy to have just daughters.
Train them well, give them Godly examples, allow them to be totally open to you about their secrets, feelings and choices; be patient with them, teach them to value themselves as a lot more than being a tool for guys to use . . .

When they are old enough and married, u'd be proud of them.

danity u've been hitting us with low pot belly blows all evening.  
Take it like a lady.

I know that hair texture differs for black sistas, all we ask however is that you pay a lot more attention to it.
For a white chic all she needs is shampooing once a day and she's good to go . . . the black sista needs to do a lot more than that.
I used to see chics who came to college with braids and carried them for 4 good months!   Haba!
Any romantic ideas the guy ever had evaporates the minute he sniffs that hair.

Stillwater, i personally like braids on a girl especially the tiny braids that you can run ur fingers through. Just let it be neat, that's not too hard to ask.

And pls stop with all these chung hao yu wigs you people fix as weave ons. Its so fake i can almost imagine ur white colleagues are probably laughing at u in the coffee room.

There are 4 things i look for in a woman physically first:
Face
Boobs
Hips
Hair

The typical black sista thinks that once she has humongous boobs and good hips she's good to go.
Too much make-up is a red flag that the face (in the morning) is perhaps not a pleasant sight to behold).
Hair? Dont get me started . . . even those who pretend to go natural, the hair is stiff and sometimes stringy. You touch them and u cringe.

I will admit, one thing i like most about white females is running ur fingers through their hair . . . dont try it with a black sista, u'll have all the glue on ur fingers.

Will anyone of the ladies here please help me out with this pet peeve of mine.
Why do black sisters wear unwieldy wigs in a bid to have long hair?

I see blond weave-ons, blue weaves, stiff horse hair, matted braids . . . why?
Sometimes the roots are visible, you can see the points were the false hair was glued on, for some it looks almost like a wig . . .

And they expect a brother to be romantic?

stillwater:
What are you guys saying? Is it not the naija man that starts grooming pot bellies competing with the wife on who's belly grows larger as if they did not eat in their mother's house before marrying the woman.

how many men develop a potbelly? very few.

danity:
@4him, did you just say the black man has no time for deception? They take time out to deceive the white men and con them out of their money but they don't have time to deceive their women?

Stillwater . . . when you people stop grouping us as above we will stop stereotyping too.

spoilt:
@4him
we want to be deceived.
we'll enjoy it while it lasts jare.

the blackman is pragmatic . . . no time to waste decieving you.

danity:
Excuse you Mr. Chacal.
I love my skin color to death. I'm not bleaching for nobody. I like my nose too. I don't want all those witchy noses.

Could this be because you just have no other choice?

danity:
You know what?
Tell me what romance is in the black culture.

You're a black woman, kindly define black romance or us in ur culture.

danity:
After 20 years of marriage, a white man will still attempt to renew his vows. How many black men do that? _{Only Damon Wayans on that episode of my wife and kids.} Some even try to arrange cruises or go somewhere romantic.

What you forgot to tell us is that divorce among whites is over 50% in the first 2yrs alone.
Have you been to all black homes and discovered that the men dont renew their vows?
Could the reason whites are more likely to go on cruises that blacks be more to do economics than romance?

danity:
How many black men consider cruises romantic?

Is a cruise your idea of romance?
Did you know that divorcees also take cruises too?
Can the midde class Naija man afford a cruise? Forget about the issue of visas.

danity:
Black brothers need to reconsider the meaning of romance.

Infact it is black sisters who shld do so. Its hard to be romantic if ur partner is loud, abrasive, overly aggressive and thinks independence is synonymous with being rude.

danity:
Tolerance is not romance for goodness' sake.

Ordinary tolerance sef una no get.

danity:
After 20 years of marriage, do not tell a woman that your idea of romance is staying with her.

Yup, after 2 yrs the white man's idea of romance is divorcing his wife. At least we stay long enough to reach 20yrs. we try.

danity:
That's not even close to my idea of romance. I've met semi-romantic black men but never the full ones. [/color]

search harder.

I don tire for yahoo yahoo boys. Why is Obama mobilising Nigerians? Are we the 51st state of the USA?

danity:
I don't think it's a matter of hate.
Gimme a romantic black guy and i'm keeping him forever and ever.

If you've never met one then most likely u've been looking in the wrong places.
Or perhaps u're idea of romance is a blond haired, 6ft white man with blue eyes giving u a rose on one knee.