lol ok. No need to respond, two people have done me the honours. If you refuse to take corrections, at least others reading on this thread will.

crackhaus:


Both of you seem not to understand the sentimental power the British public holds regarding members of the royal family.

Camilla will become Princess Consort when Charles becomes king. It's all over the damn internet if you're looking for proof, I won't spoon-feed you.
All that talk of becoming Queen consort legally or presently being Princess of Wales legally is only talk because you just want to argue.

Cheers...

baby124:

You are still arguing this ascension! You are wrong! 3 people have told you already and you are still so ignorant and arrogant . This your ego doesn’t have part 2.

sassysure:


Crackhous has an ego of balloon.
Puncture and it will deflect zììììììm

Have mercy on his poor soul.

He has actually repented.

He is in love now. One of my sis don hook am so he sees things from.the prism of love now. Forget all this his online gragra.

Forget ego in this matter, this is about what is actually true.

Among the three people baby124 is using as back up, no one is actually saying anything I don't already know.
This conversation did not start on NL, it's something that has been raging for a very long time in British society. It's why Camilla does not use the title Princess of Wales, same reason why she won't use the title of Queen consort.

It's like you people just joined the conversation recently.

midnighter:


We already told you that the princess consort stuff is just to cover up for their unpopularity but you don't want to listen..

If they feel that the British public will support it then they will give her the queen consort title. Princess consort is only for the wife of a prince, which she won't be. She will be the wife of a king so her rightful title is queen consort.

And she's already the princess of Wales, you can check it anywhere

Yet you're saying that we the ones who just want to argue

What an incorrigible fellow...

Baby124
Lolamusique

This midnighter seems to be the only one amongst you three that knows a little something. She just confirmed what I've been saying and shot down her own argument. Lmao

Vyolet:
You alone can have your woman's back, you alone can give her respect and have others respect her.
The most important thing is if she is truly changed and remorseful, is she also ready to be loyal?
There are men that married retired sex workers and things work Perfectly, Marriage is like a black-market, you never know what you will meet until you get in there.
Since those people are no longer in your circle even long before you met your fiance, then you may go ahead with her, In the end though, follow whatever your heart tells you.

Ladies and their deception!!! You are stylishly telling him to accept her back. How many of those people who married prostitutes do you know of? Do you know what they are facing in their marriages?
Haba, please let's fear God!!!

crackhaus:

Forget it, there's a reason I asked her about Prince Philip.
Every learns person knows he can't be king, I was only nudging her in a certain direction which she didn't notice.

She was talking about laws being changed to accommodate a marriage and you tried to bring in an instance where the law wasn't changed, yet your premise was wrong

midnighter:


She was talking about laws being changed to accommodate a marriage and you tried to bring in an instance where the law wasn't changed, yet your premise was wrong

SMH

crackhaus:



Baby124
Lolamusique

This midnighter seems to be the only one amongst you three that knows a little something. She just confirmed what I've been saying and shot down her own argument. Lmao

I've modified, it was an error.

crackhaus:


Forget ego in this matter, this is about what is actually true.

Among the three people baby124 is using as back up, no one is actually saying anything I don't already know.
This conversation did not start on NL, it's something that has been raging for a very long time in British society. It's why Camilla does not use the title Princess of Wales, same reason why she won't use the title of Queen consort.

It's like you people just joined the conversation recently.

I don't actually know this Camilla thing u guys are debating about

My own na to attack u.

My first 3 posts covered what I wanted to say about this topic. The rest is play
Thought u noticed that.

I also thought that baby124 at a time started playing along too. Unless I was wrong.

Make una take am easy na

crackhaus:


Forget ego in this matter, this is about what is actually true.

Among the three people baby124 is using as back up, no one is actually saying anything I don't already know.
This conversation did not start on NL, it's something that has been raging for a very long time in British society. It's why Camilla does not use the title Princess of Wales, same reason why she won't use the title of Queen consort.

It's like you people just joined the conversation recently.

I thought you said she was not the princess of Wales..

What are you saying lol

midnighter:


I've modified, it was an error.

Swear down, I dont know which of you three characters is more of comedian.

midnighter:


I thought you said she was not the princess of Wales..

What are you saying lol

Come, you sef. I noticed you always want to show yourself.

Someone that does not use a title publicly, is she the owner of that title? Na wah o

crackhaus:

Come, you sef. I noticed you always want to show yourself.

Someone that does not use a title publicly, is she the owner of that title? Na wah o

Of course you're the owner...

Not using a title in public doesn't have anything to do with ownership of that title..

You may have been given several names at birth but choose to go by just 1 or 2. It doesn't mean you no longer have your other names...

Trumpcheek:


You are moving the goal post because you've been proven wrong. If you had said she might not be a given the title because of the public perception of her, no-one will argue with you. But you said in about 3-4 posts that she can NEVER be a queen consort because she is not "Princess of Wales" or "Duchess of York" that statement of yours is very wrong.

I don't know why people find it hard to accept they're wrong to strangers on a faceless forum.

You mean I should have explained to you knuckleheads exactly why she will not be Queen Consort?

I thought you and your crew knew everything. Lmao.

pocohantas:


Same way married men still pursue their single exes upandan. Yet you don't see women bragging about it, like it is the cure to HIV/AIDS.

I don't know what it is it with men and sex. Maybe I might consider owning a penis for just a day. Let me see if fcking plenty women and running my mouth about some gadamn law has some effect on my account balance.

It's in a man's nature to brag about sex, but that doesn't make okafor's logic any less true.

lol you must be insufferable in real life. So because you've been exposed to be ignorant, your ego will not allow you to accept you were wrong. Your statement that "Only a princess of Wales or Duchess of York can be a Queen Consort" is very wrong and ignorant. The wife of a reigning King by the British common law is a Queen Consort, end of.

You are now changing your argument to save face. Your posts are still on this thread, I am sure people can read it. Dude, this is an anonymous forum no need to prove what you're not, nobody cares. Jesus!

crackhaus:



Baby124
Lolamusique

This midnighter seems to be the only one amongst you three that knows a little something. She just confirmed what I've been saying and shot down her own argument. Lmao

mysticgal:


For real, I have just heard of it once or twice, i mean the okafors law and I thought it was just the movie that made people do that.

Eitherways, laws are dynamic, which means that....from person to person, it differs and whatever this law is.....these people just want to cheat

I've never seen the movie and I only heard about the 'law' a few years back. But Okafor's law is a logic and a fact that is as old as time.

midnighter:


Of course you're the owner...

Not using a title in public doesn't have anything to do with ownership of that title..

You may have been given several names at birth but choose to go by just 1 or 2. It doesn't mean you no longer have your other names...

Madam, answer yourself.
What is she styled as by the Queen of England, and introduced as to the general public in GB?

Stop talking to me about she's supposed to be, and tell me what she actually is as recognized by the sovereign kingdoms of Great Britain.

Preetychina22:

It's in a man's nature to brag about sex, but that doesn't make okafor's logic any less true.

Yea, a law to make pricks feel good about themselves. Not anything to be taken very serious. People fck everyday- get over yourselves.

sassysure:




I don't actually know this Camilla thing u guys are debating about

My own na to attack u.

My first 3 posts covered what I wanted to say about this topic. The rest is play
Thought u noticed that.

I also thought that baby124 at a time started playing along too. Unless I was wrong.

Make una take am easy na

Lol. I say what I want to say and move o! No time! I don’t have time for all the bitterness. You attack me, I attack you

lolamusique:
[s]lol you must be insufferable in real life. So because you've been exposed to be ignorant, your ego will not allow you to accept you were wrong. Your statement that "Only a princess of Wales or Duchess of York can be a Queen Consort" is very wrong and ignorant. The wife of a reigning King by the British common law is a Queen Consort, end of.

You are now changing your argument to save face. Your posts are still on this thread, I am sure people can read it. Dude, this is an anonymous forum no need to prove what you're not, nobody cares. Jesus! [/s]

I just realized this is an alternate

You will die soon because of me, I promise you.

Mr man abeg go and sleep. How old are you? this childish change of argument to avoid admitting our friends beat us, is what we did when we were kids. Just admit you were wrong and move on, stop derailing the thread with your foolishness.

crackhaus:

You mean I should have explained to you knuckleheads exactly why she will not be Queen Consort?

I thought you and your crew knew everything. Lmao.

Trumpcheek:
[s]Mr man abeg go and sleep. How old are you? this childish change of argument to avoid admitting our friends beat us, is what we did when we were kids. Just admit you were wrong and move on, stop derailing the thread with your foolishness. [/s]

Another alternate from the same person, your only two posts on NL are on this thread and directed at me.

You will run mad because of me, I promise you.

Pafoma:


What if i have detached from these circles even before i met her, we had met and started dating when i found out about them.

I mean, what will their respect do for me because we dont belong to the same circle any longer. If she can prove that i will not regret my decision then maybe i might be willing to risk it

From your post and with this response, it shows you're not willing to let go the way you go about defending her and saying you don't belong to the circle any longer. So, why are you still disturbing everyone seeking their opinion? What do you want us to do? Continue wasting our saliva when your mind is already made up?

Op, go ahead. Anything you see, you take am like that. Since after all these warning signs, youre still covering her.
Wise up!

You can cancel my post but it doesn't change the fact that people have tried to tell you on this thread that you were wrong but you decide to be rude and arrogant about it. May God help you.

crackhaus:

I just realized this is an alternate

You will die soon because of me, I promise you.

baby124:

Humiliated by who? You? You must really be delusional. Hahahahahaha. Not only are you ignorant, you are also arrogant.

Kill yourself.
From the beginning of the thread, people have been dragging you left, right, and center for embarrassing your husband...and you're still blabbing.

Is my arrogance your arrogance? Leave am for me biko

crackhaus:

Another alternate from the same person, your only two posts on NL are on this thread and directed at me.

You will run mad because of me, I promise you.

Bro, bone these guys go sleep abeg. Work dey tomorrow.

crackhaus:

Another alternate from the same person, your only two posts on NL are on this thread and directed at me.

You will run mad because of me, I promise you.

You actually think I have time to be following you up and down with alternates? You are becoming delusional

KevinDein:

Bro, bone these guys go sleep abeg. Work dey tomorrow.

Lol, I don't like what I hate jor.

Pafoma:


I found out about the guys when i found out she was speaking to one guy that they were involved but hiding it from me after we started dating. The rest of the guys, she told me herself.

About 7 guys i know but not all of them i was close to but some are friends of friends.

7 guys you know ?? ...That's a lot bro. I didn't even want to comment earlier but please for your peace of mind and sanity. Please let her go abeg.
Imagine if this was a woman and the groom to be has slept with 7 people she knows , who go come be on the bridal train biko

crackhaus:

Kill yourself.
From the beginning of the thread, people have been dragging you left, right, and center for embarrassing your husband...and you're still blabbing.

Is my arrogance your arrogance? Leave am for me biko

Embarrassing my husband? I love my husband, he chose me and I chose him! What is there to be embarrassed about? You are completely delusional! Who dragged me? You? I swear you get problem. LMAO.

You really are immature and highly disturbed by what people think about you. Even people online. Hahahahaha haha. Embarrassed you say? LMAO! If it was something to be embarrassed by, I won’t share it now.

You are the one who was dumped for a friend and you are all over this thread talking about G code. E pain you wella.

baby124:

You actually think I have time to be following you up and down with alternates? You are becoming delusional

I did not even mention your name as the culprit.
So you are the one? Lmao

LordKO:
It's obvious that her weakness emanates from innate emotional vulnerableness, and not from greed - this means that she's not consciously expedient, despite being susceptible to promiscuity. Her condition isn't curable, but it's very manageable subject to circumstances and provided that she isn't conceited.

This your oyinbo too much sir