₦airaland Forum

SultanOfAbia:
The Sad Truth is That There are Cures For
Cancer
HIV/Aids
But Big Pharma will not make any money from the masses if there is no longer disease.
Think about the trillions made from pharmaceutical companies over decades and you think They want the world to be FREE FROM DISEASE Market go spoil for them..
They will go so far as to create disease in labs and produce drugs that will cure that disease then they target a 3rd world country and infest them with the disease and in turn make billions from selling drugs that will SUBDUE the disease but will not cure you completely.
So the patient will depend on the drugs and the vicious cycle begins.
The Super Elites are hiding the cures of these deadly illnesses. If they release the cure then 6 billion ppl on earth will no longer spend a dime on pharmaceutical drugs thereby making these Super Elites Wealth and Control to Decline..

If the Elites won't release their cure why don't you come up with yours, release it and make money codedly. Abi must the Elites do everything for you?

Because Africa is merely a graveyard for the rich.

Awe4luv:
exactly bro, if u have seen the farming, a movie that portray the popular Hollywood actor akinnuoye agbaje's true life story then u can understand your point better....I cried for we citizens of this country when I saw that movies, the whites have been wise a very long time go

I cried for us, citizens of this country, when...

TheGoodJoe:
At least read the bolded of the article and look at the pictures to understand the point.

I saw the game live, so I dont need to read any crap from the article. The fact remains: the ball came of bernado's arm before hitting Arnold's. If that wasn't a foul then it's play on.

complexBoss12:
why is everyone ignoring the fact that the ball came off Silva's arm

Na you dey mind them.

JayPeeOham:
I don't know why nobody is talking about this part

Don't mind hypocrites, joo. All of them blind den no the hand ball against bernado.

TheGoodJoe:
You are just evading the truth. The above article clearly highlights the corrupt decision and lies made by the EPL officials.

The VAR officials knew it was a penalty and clearly denied City it. This is why I like VAR, now we know the agenda is clear.

What corruption are you talking about? How come all of you are seeing faults where there is non. Abi you wan tell me you no see the ball came straight from silva's arm to hit Arnold's.
English media and there sensationalism, I hail.

Imagine what humans have descended to. Those who've never faced real hardship in their pathetic overly-mollycoddled lives are already on here spilling jive, littering everywhere with their harrowing typical gobledegoooks. See comments fa: "you still have smartphone", "you have Internet", "I know you are here to beg" and other sickening, hard-hearted horseshit from cold-hearted numpties. My gorge rises to the revolting comments on show here, haba!!

Abi because your hustle don pay you come dey see your fellow man as lazy? Abi because dem born you privileged means say those not so fortunate to be are sub-humans? Abi una think say na everybody go fit lift himself without help? If you won't help the OP why not rather help humanity by keeping your callous, heart-wrenching and utterly peevish comments consigned to your empty breasts.

Ogeebaebie:
Arnold Schwarzenegger plays commando kind of roles in all his movies, does it mean he is a bad actor too?

Most not all.

LordReed:
Nope, we are not burying our heads in the sand. We are quite content to live in the reality we see before us without constructing mythologies to explain the vagaries of life. Its infernal being summoning people like you that need to have a story filter on reality for it to be more palatable for you.

Some planets can be seen with a decent telescope so that's not hard to prove at all. Even the planet Venus appears as the morning star the second brightest celestial body after the moon at night.




That's only your perception which I am telling you plainly is wrong.

Some planets can be seen with a decent telescope? Let's just leave it at that, though unsatisfactory, I don't wanna go into another endless loop of back-and-forth.

Mayhap my perception is wrong, perhaps not. I will eat my humble pie if I discover I'm wrong.

LordReed:
You who have a non incongruous method of verification still fail to show us any proof so you also must be naive and indolent.

Oneof the problems with you lot is your approach to life seems abjectly theoretical , which is like burying your head in the sand.
If I asked you to provide a proof of the existence of other planets, would you show them to me?

No but a person claiming to have seen big foot is not the same as a person claiming to have seen a goat.

Bitter is your interpretation of my language that is strident and shocking to your god sensibilities. I would only be bitter if I believed there was a god somewhere that wronged me which I obviously don't.

It's not about the tone of your language on a particular thread; it's about the crystallisation of your emotions on all God-related subjects.

Kylekent59:
He just got bit by a snake is correct. Bitten can be use only if it just happened now. It is correct to use bit especially with edited story.

Since the incident happened in the past and not now, then bit is correct.


I think he is correct.

Ok, but it's ungrammatical.

"I just got bit by a snake"? SMH

Blakjewelry:
[s]
people like you shouldn't be discussing science, i told you before there millions of Christian and Muslim in the science community if they all agree to these fact after all many of them are involved in the process, what is the opinion of a nobody. your opinion begin and end no body stops you from arguing about a god but coming to show your ignorance about issue you know nothing about is insulting.

op raised a scientific question that is the only reason i chose to make input, i dont spent my time rubbing myself in mud with guys like you probably a kid who think he knows enough. i was once a Christian when your mama still dey watch your yansh but unlike you dumb ass i question all, i bet my little finger you dont know 25% of bible, you have never spent your time to on.

unlike you i always seek knowledge, i seek knowledge and discover more i and settle for the better one, atheism is not for infact religion is very important to keep people like you in check for without religion, guys like you will be hopeless finding no meaning in like which kind make you a danger to yourself or to others. bye i only spend precious time on those with a active brain cell not who seek the easy way out, you are getting no more mention from me[/s]

.


I don't read your bullshit any longer

Blakjewelry:
i actually thought i was talking to a human not knowing i am talking to a phone bot. i told you there are hard evidence even visual evidence to proof are still talking what i dont know, as if you can make head or tail if i should present you with raw data and if i should provide you with Link nothing will still get into a mind that has been made numb by religion

Typical jive and jiggery-pokery being disgorged from the brains of a self-deluded, half-witted non-expert on pathetic speculative science. Horseflippingshit!!!

LordReed:
Yes if you cannot prove your assertions then you are illogical. Being irrational or illogical is not always the bad thing you people seem to think, or is merely a frank assessment of what ever position you occupy that fits that quality. I have an irrational assertion that chocolate is the best flavour of icecream. I argue with anyone about it but I know it's an irrational one because there is no proof.



BTW this is not antagonistic. It is merely uncomprisingly insistent that you provide proof of your assertions. If we dismiss your claim then there'd be nothing further to talk about. However, we continue to insist that you provide proof for your claims as much as you continue to assert your god claims.

Calling an assertion illogical after careful assessment and application of fitting verification method is not issue but doing so by virtue of the incongruity of the chosen method of verification to the said assertion does not only demonstrate faulty reasoning but naivety and indolence.

It was you who said an infernal being can be summoned, why are you now passing the buck? Yes, you made the claim so you should substantiate it.

If I said your broken car could be fixed, does it mean I have to do the fixing?

Your god did nothing to me, which is exactly the point.

Then why are you always so bitter? I know of 2 atheists on here, one of whom now a theist, who never sound like they're on a revenge mission like you do

Slawormir:
My niggar
I understand you are trying to say Joshua is overrated

Anyway

Common Joshua be a real niggarrr

Kick the shit of this fat fool

Kick his asss Joshua

He's a fat fool for beating your Joshua? Na wa oo.

LordReed:
Wrong on all counts. Science says no such thing. The obvious one being there is no one thing called Science that dictates what you can or cannot do. Science very simply is the methodical investigation of phenomena. If you insist that a phenomena cannot be investigated by scientific methods then science cannot give an answer and makes no further proclamations on the matter.
Secondly who told you my faith was shaky? Up until I asked the question that revealed the unsubstantiated nature of god claims, I did not doubt the existence of a god. Nor is everyone that becomes an atheist someone who had shaky faith.

Your antagonism to God's/spiritism existence is hinged largely on the facts that they are devoid of physical orientations and cannot be quantified mathematically. And any phenomenon or occurrence that defies your scientific validation methods are usually consigned to the scale of illogicality, but you may choose to lie still in utter denial.

I am not interested in practicing spiritism but you who practice it already, fail to meet up with any level of evidence for your claims. You usual goto is we need to go to some hidden forest or the other to obtain it. If your gods are so hidden, then they might as well be useless. I have no need for a being that neither affects my life nor is willing to be a part of it. Take your infernal being for example, it was you who claimed one can be summoned. When I ask you to do so now, you balk and pass the buck. Its just one excuse or another for something you claim is real.

If your god is forming big boy, it can stay were it is, I don't need it.

Of course you're not interested in practicing it but want to wine and dine with entities of another realities. You don't seem to know what you want.

So for the mere fact that my statement implied an infernal being can be summoned means I'm to do the summoning. Oga, go out there and seek what want or you think everything is done on the Internet.

I really don't know what God who created you did to or didn't do for you that you cavort this forum spitting bile and comtemp against him.

Truth will ever remain truth, whether you know it or not.

nwabekeyi:
Answer the question if you can. Your ignorance will be exposed

You don't want to discuss origin of life from the angle of evolution mumbo jumbo and you wan make I listen? Abegii

YorubaPrince:
Not until these fools are regarded and treated like Terrorists will they be taken serious.

The Mexican government are just similar to 9ja government in terms of corruption. The global community needs to really intervene and curb these Bast.ards!

Best comment. Not like all those nonsense up there trying to indirectly glorify those bastards.

Godhatesodomy:
Established science is controlled by social authority and order. People are indoctrinated through approved education and taught since childhood what to think and believe. Anyone not in cooperation gets ostrazised and slandered by the social order and those people so depended upon the system they became hostile to protect it. This is all called the matrix and it has survived because the speed of data was extremely slow and this benefited the enforcers because they could deter any truth uprising, the most dangerous revolt, by a vast control system of citizen spies and persecution. They would stop at nothing to kill any truth that would dispel their lies this included crucifixion, inquistions, torture and assassinations.

What is data?

Unlike most social exchanges of information where only revelant information is considered data includes both revelant and irrelevant information bits. The more bits of information one has enables one to see a bigger picture of the end puzzle. So even if you don't have all the revelant clues you have enough of the irrelevant clues to form a picture of what the complete puzzle might look like. This is the age we live in where high speed data in the form of the internet which is based upon binary bits of information has increased the speed in which we aquire knowledge. Imagine how long a news story happening in 16th century West Africa took to reach East Africa. Then across oceans and mountains into Northern China. By the time the story got to China it was no longer news yet history. Today that same story travels in less than a minute and when 5g happens mere seconds.

We are definitely living in a new age so take advantage of it. Challenge everything you've been told to not question because it's supposed to established facts they say. The notion we live not on a ball flying in space and rather a domed world with a closed ecological system aught to make you reexamine it all.

Wake up out your slumber

Their 100% faith is Science stems from the erroneous belief that Science cannot be corrupted or controlled by some fiendish elements.
Every bloody endeavour of our lives has been tampered with, and some naive lot think Science is an exception.

Wake up out of your slumber

Blakjewelry:
you see why it is not advisable you to engage in discussion you have know knowledge of. though black hole is invisible to the naked eyes but their behavior affect the region close to them which give out there location and can be capture via infra red or ultraviolet spectrum. or you are telling you are wiser than those organizations who spent billions of dollars building such special equipments, or you are smarter than those religious people involved in the process.

i kinda like these jw guys than you folks because if you read their book the awake, you will see they do alot of research and they know these scientific results are fact though they give the glory to their wonderful god, but they are not hypocrite like you guys who deny the truth just to satisfy your self.

I knew you couldn't answer any of those questions 'cos you're just a bloody believer like the theists who you think are dumb.
You want God to come to pay you a visit before believing in him, fine. And I ask you to show me your imaginary black hole—but what did I get other than your blethering on? Zilch.

We're all believers, but just don't believe in the same thing.

nwabekeyi:
Then you are special pleading...
I still insist you don’t know what evolution is.

I strongly believe you are arguing ignorantly, if not then answer the question.

Most people who argue against evolution don’t know how it works.

You no serious joor.

LordReed:
If it is not Hollywood then who is programming me to ask you for evidence? And why is it inimical to your belief in a god?

Did you not read what I wrote about Science telling you to jettison any concept it can't explain or tag it irrational?

It’s not 'cos of my belief but for people with shaky belief, like you once were, or those who are seeking.



I am saying when a patient or their relatives ask a surgeon to explain what the surgery entails and likely outcomes, the surgeon does not go on some long rant about how they can't understand because they didn't go to medical school to study the deep mysteries of the human body. He does not answer them with condescending non-answers like "You won't understand" or "You are programmed to ask me stupid questions".

Very simply, summon the infernal being let's test if I can ask it questions or not. That is the kind of evidence you should provide, not all this long talk that shows nothing. Summon an infernal being and send it to me, I am very willing to sit down with it and have a discussion.

If your God is not transparent then why are you denying that there is a veil? That's contradictory as hell.[/quote]A handful of theists on here have tried several times to explain to you, atheists, but you're iinvariably inclined to set the parameters for their explanations to you. Unlike the patient/rrelative, atheists wanna have a first-hand experience of spirtism in the comfort of their living room, which is the reason for the "you won't understand..." that you find so upsetting.

At the first emboldened, you see you really wanna participate, and it is why we always say you won't understand.
You don't just summon such an entity to this reality and start sending it upandan, you're only able to do that if it's bent to your will. However; if you really wanna meet an otherworldly entity go out of comfort zone and consult a spiritualist to help you. I'm not one to lead you to your possible destruction.

On the veil ish, I must have misconstrued. I thought you meant I was the one setting up a veil around God
If God decides to veil himself, he's free to do so and more for he's not amenable to you or anyone else for that matter.

nwabekeyi:
what do you understand by evolution?

I'm not gonna indulge you in your petty evolution discuss. I dunno if you just came across this silly theory 'cos from all indications it appears you just did. Just so you know, I was thought evolution in jss 3, 20 odd years ago. I hated it then and I still do today.

The fact you don't know the 3 phenomena, including evolution, share a common ground is big enough reason not to indulge you. Goan read up.