₦airaland Forum

adaperry25:
Yes I know it's good to get a partner who aligns with same faith but aside that one has to look at personality of whom you're marrying.

She's Catholic and I'm not and she's a good lady. The condition she gave was that she can't leave her faith.

I've searched and she's the only one that ticked all the boxes aside the faith issue.

I got no choice

Love is blind.......marriage will cure you of the blindness.

BRATISLAVA:
He's not up to 66.

The lies some of you perpetuate to feel like you're at the top of other humans is pathetic.

Lol....It's not my fault you have lost the ability to spot humor .....this one that you are foaming in the mouth over internet cruise.....I'm not the source of your PTSD
......carry your bad energy go another place

These things are not black and white sometimes... Some pple are ethically upright but not morally upright and vise versa...

honesttalk21:
Your argument seems to draw a direct line between Islam as a religion and the actions of extremists throughout history, but that’s not quite accurate, either historically or theologically.

The laws surrounding blasphemy and apostasy can differ significantly from one Islamic state to another, and the Qur'an doesn’t call for mob executions anywhere. The enforcement of these laws is largely handled by the state and often gets tangled up in political agendas, rather than being a universal divine command. The concept of lesser jihad is rooted in historical contexts of defense or state-led warfare, not a free pass for individuals to take lives. Groups like ISIS and Boko Haram, along with other terrorists around the world, are examples of political extremism that misuse religion as a justification, rather than reflecting a religious obligation.

When it comes to Hadith and practices such as early marriage, it’s crucial to interpret these texts within their historical, cultural, and legal frameworks. In most Muslim countries today, modern legal systems set clear minimum ages for marriage that align with contemporary ethics. To link terrorism, child marriage, or individual acts of violence to the faith of the average Muslim is a sweeping generalization. Millions of Muslims live peacefully and denounce violence, just like followers of any other faith.

History teaches us that it’s the enforcement by the state, political dynamics, and societal norms that lead to these abuses, not merely a straightforward reading of religious texts. Terrorism and child marriage are societal issues as much as they are misinterpretations of religion. Extremists tend to cherry-pick religious texts; Islam, like any major faith, doesn’t inherently drive individuals to commit acts of violence. Mixing up religious doctrine with state failures, cultural practices, or terrorism is a logical misstep.

Lol....dont get me wrong I know there are bad pple in all spheres of life....but as u constantly try to exclude Islamic doctrine as one of the drives of these evil acts among you Muslims....

..have u asked urself why Buddha worshippers, sango or Ogun worshippers, or krishna worshippers in india, or dragon worshippers in China or Japan or Christians, are not rampantly producing individuals who attach bombs to their under wear or kill pple for blasphemy, or as u claim, are politically used to cause mass killings in the name of their God or prophet..??

Uve mentioned extremist among u which you were at least truthful enough to acknowledge.

..but Have u ever wondered why your Islamic group have more of these extremist trying to uphold Islamic and Hadith doctrines weda for personal or political reasons??

Have u ever wondered ...Why its not a Buddhist blowing up the world trade center , or a sango worshipper next week killing someone for blasphemy, or a Christian stabbing and beheading someone in the street for offended Jesus just like the art teacher was beheaded on the street by a muslim in France because of a cartoon drawn by another artist.....??

Permit me to add...there was a massive outcry calling for the killing of that man(Samuel paty) on social media by millions if muslims before he was beheaded on the street....so I ask...how muslims from different locations around the world have the same opinion on blasphemy and killings but isn't driven by Islamic/Hadith doctrines??

honesttalk21:
You don’t combat injustice by turning it into tribal hatred. You fight it by demanding arrests, trials, and convictions for everyone. That’s the crucial difference between justice and chaos.

Enjoy your choice.

with all due respect...

If Islam doesn't have death penalty for blasphemy or for leaving islam...do u think we will have countless killings pple for being offended by what others say??

If Islam doesn't have what is called lesser jihad to begin with, with your prophet has first initiator ....please answer truthfully..do u think we will have different sets of Islamic bodies from after your prophet trying to use these same strategy to enforce Islam from Ottoman caliphate stopped at the gates of Vienna in Europe in 1683 to Usman dan fodio's jihad in Africa, and now Alqaeda, ISIS, ISWAP, Bokoharam..etc..??

.if Islam doesn't have all these kill for Allah teaching and enter heaven to get 72 wives with power to have sex...do u think we will ja e have pple like Abdul mutalab strapping bomb on his underwear.....??

Have u opened the Hadith?? because I have...??

The average Muslims thinks nothing is fundamentally wrong with Islam/Hadith or Quran .......but tell me why anyone is still marrying a 9 year old in 2025...??

.I will allow u ponder in this points....

SamuraiXXX:
Stop peddling lies here, no reputable bank would do that

All banks are reputable.....but the staffs are not always reputable.....and many times...the bankers can do this unlawful enforcement when loan goes bad out of desperation to recover funds

oluwatomiwa:
How can bank take property for collateral when the name on document says otherwise? More to this

Bankers act desperate sometimes when a loan goes bad........I've seen bankers enforce loan recovery through the son .of the borrower...

If u check well...the bank itself may not be aware....but the Relationship manager who approved the loan may be the one going beast mode after the bank placed them on loan recovery suspension

honesttalk21:
You can't shout justice while backing mob violence. That’s not bravery; it’s hypocrisy.
Section 277 of the Nigerian Constitution is clear. Sharia courts don’t have the authority to handle criminal cases. They’re only meant to deal with personal matters like marriage, inheritance, and guardianship, and only when both parties are Muslims. They have no right to kill, burn, or punish anyone.

So when mobs set a woman on fire or behead a teacher, that’s not Islamic law, it’s not Nigerian law, and it sure isn’t justice. It’s pure criminal brutality.

And here’s the hard truth. When you defend or legitimise mob violence, you’re not standing up for victims you’re endorsing chaos.

If you genuinely cared about Deborah or any other victim, you wouldn’t just be chanting slogans. You’d be calling for arrests, prosecutions, and life sentences.

No court? Then it’s murder.
No trial? Then it’s murder.
No judge? Then it’s murder.

There’s no religion on this planet that allows street mobs to act as judge, jury, and executioner.

You don’t need hate. You don’t need propaganda. What you need is law enforcement.

If you believe in justice, stop the shouting and start demanding arrests, courtrooms, and convictions. Call your government to action!

Your hypocrisy, and pretence that your Islam isnt responsible for all these killings is high to the heavens ......
..When ur shariah police wants to arrest pple for:
unislamic haircut,
For wearing rave jeans,
for not using hijab,
To arrest and destroy of bottle of beer,
To arrest girls for having boyfriend in hostel,

then, your shariah knows how to make arrest..........

When they wanted to arrest and and put in jail the northern musician who was later sentenced to death by your shariah court for blasphemy for his music .....your Islamic shariah police was very active and know how to enforce what u tag as wrong doing

.......but when Deborah and other Christians were killed , suddenly your courts dont have jurisdiction....ur imams and Emir go silent

......so.. I ask u how did the shariah court carry out such enforcement and arrests they have no jurisdiction for ?? Which jail did they put the musician before the shariah courts sentence him to death for blasphemy...??

U have shariah, u have shariah court, u have shariah police when it's convenient alone

See ehn....uve lied all day, trying to water down the role of Islam and ur Islamic community in all this evils.....u try to pretend majority of you are peaceful that only criminals that are not Muslims do these evil among you

But the truth is clear .....it's the everyday Muslims we all live with you are trying to paint as peaceful that do these violence in the name of Allah and upholding Islamic doctrines..

Bokoharam are our neighbors being forgiven, pardoned, called freedom, lesser jihad fighters, reintegrated into society and army....

The killers of Deborah are regular everyday Muslims classmates that live next door.

You all are the same...you are never really peaceful...and worse u silently support each other...because every where across the world is the same news which never ends

.....from killing of your teachers to your classmates to wearing of underwear bomb into a plane full of 328 passengers ......it's the everyday Muslims we live with that commits these evil......Shame in your sir

honesttalk21:
The usual error of faulty generalisations.
Very hasty generalization fallacy that takes crimes by individuals and makes them Islamic doctrine. Islam does not allow vigilante killings; only courts under due process can judge crimes.

this is another deception from you Muslims.....ur Islamic court permits killing someone for offending you roght??
So what's the difference?? When the killing happen without the courts and you all don't arrest the perpetrators.....
When Deborah was killed many of you faulted her for committing blasphemy.....without trial you all suddenly agreed saying blood of Jesus on a Whatsapp chat is blasphemy...but you want to come here and hide under court when deep down you support her death.m

because if you dont......how many pple do you arrest when these so called blasphemy killings happen?? because when a mob does jungle justice .nigerian police arrest pple because it's wrong...

..u don't arrest anyone...because deep down you muslims support it........u all accept it ....u have these laws to force the public into fear of your religion...the same Bokoharam is doing ..


U complain of generalizing...be truthful for once...can u begin to quantify the amount of deaths and violence cause by the few Muslims in the name of allah
This is not few anymore.....more than half of you are radicals indoctrinated see pple who are not Muslims as Kufir or enemies of allah

honesttalk21:
Taqiyya is a minority survival concept, not a global Muslim strategy...

Taqiyaa is not a global Muslims strategy.??..but u don't deny its an islamic practice.....
U claim it's not a global ...yet its what y'all are doing all over Europe. .....pretend u need immigration...always running to developed non Muslims democratic nations ....u don't run to Saudi, or Dubai, or Kuwait, or Oman or even sokoto in Nigeria...

..u leave Afghanistan, Syria, where u claim extreme Islam is troubling you.....then you start calling and agitating for the same extreme Islam practice in the national that accepted you...sir..u lie...Taqiyya is a global deceptive practice...

honesttalk21:
Extremists like Boko Haram are rejected by mainstream Islamic scholarship. Confusing criminal behavior with religious teaching is dishonest reasoning, not serious debate.

You lie sir.... Main stream...?? Please list who these main stream are...?? because it doesn't include any of you everyday Muslims...Ur emirs, imams, Islamic leaders and Muslim senators in the north all defend these bokoharam, calling them freedom fighter and not terrorist....your former president Buharí..openly said attack on Bokoharam is an attack against Islam and the north...

But u come here quoting non-existing main stream scholars....

Sir...all your scholars do is go online to pull down Christianity,....calling other pples faith and religious books corrupted....you all never condemn the so called extreme amongst you...

honesttalk21:
You are unable to call your government governing bodies to do their work appropriately so you hide behind lazy lies.

..your govt of full of Muslims, who are jihad apologist, supporters of Bokoharam who call them freedom fighters .....but you want to blame us the victims...?? Shame on your sir...

You Muslims hide behind those Bokoharam and ISWAP your call your freedom fighters to fight the lesser jihad on your behalf ...waiting for them to take over democratic resident govt, like you prophet did in mecca, like the Islamic revolution did in Iran.....
..u pretend like they are not a part of you... But when they succeed and turn a nation to Afghanistan, Iran, and the likes...y'all will come and shout Allah Akbar........sir...your are a hypocrite....we know about all your deception call taqiyya....and it's a global Muslims strategy

Angelfrost:
Okay... There are just safer and smarter means to make money and/or get laid.


...Just saying.

Taking risks just for few minutes of pleasure makes no sense whatsoever.

what the thrill in eating your own burgers..try breaking into McDonalds eat their quarter pound burger and go Scots free..

It's risky...but hey.....it's fun if you are an adrenaline junkie

Angelfrost:
As a man or woman, why have affairs with married women or men?!! What exactly is the point?!!

...married or single ...penis na penis ....money na money

Helinuse:
Funny how I come to have s3x with you and then Inhave to sacrifice my lyfe for the preservation of a marriage you never respected.

Some people just don’t value their lives. L

She dey sacrifice her life or she dey save her life from the werey wife

Timoleon:
The real Muslims you know one on one, not from tv, news etc. the real Muslims s you know and interact with on a first name basis, I can bet they are mostly peaceful and regarding their faith. As individuals however people might have different temperaments.

As usual...u have come to play the same script of hiding under media........

if you will answer truthfully ......The class mates of Deborah who was set her ablaze for saying blood of Jesus cover her on a class group chat, are they not everyday Muslims she goes to class with at the higher institution?? Is it media that set her ablaze??

Again I ask you.....The teacher that was set beheaded for seizing the Quran a student wanted to take to the exam hall back in 2012, are they not everyday Muslims students she sees and teaches in the school??

Please explain....How is it peaceful that u muslims get to a location and suddenly want to cancel and suppress other pple's liberty and laws with your own shariah?? The same liberty that allowed you to grow freely and practice your islam?

Go and take a look at your extremism all over Europe....u keep giving media as an excuse, but you know u muslim always get to pples country and start agitating for laws against your host's laws and culture.....how is that peaceful??

Poland had to make a law that they won't allow Muslims immigrants into their country because they now realize u pple take advantage of friendly immigration laws to enter pples land only to turn round and wanting to subdue your host with laws antagonistic to their land..

The truth is that, ...u Muslims never show ur true colors when you are not majority or haven't increased significantly in an area which is the situation in the south...and it is called Taqiyya
.... But Once u become majority or have significant numbers, u are never peaceful to others that are not Muslims.......ur religion doesn't remain a personal thing anymore ...u start looking for how to cancel pple's law and culture to replace it with shariah... How is this peaceful??

When your fellow Muslims brother start doing their Islamic extremism , u call them criminals, but the truth is these violence and killings are permitted in Islamic states......and you all know it is permitted...

Lesser jihad which Bokoharam is doing is an Islamic practice...
Killing who leaves islam is allowed in islam..
Killing for wateva reason u tag as blasphemy is allowed in islam

.... But the issue is many of u want to practice these extreme practice anyway weda u are in Afghanistan or UK..u don't see it as extreme marrying a nine year old or killing someone who rejects Islam because even though ur Islam says no compulsion, you still consider the person a kufir and therefore qualified to be killed as a service you your God....

It's religion of peace only becos they say so......its just a sayin....like a slogan a company uses for marketing

It's the same way they say there is no compulsion in Islam...but you will be killed if you leave Islam in an Islamic state where shariah is applicable.......

It's the same way they say "killing a man is like killing a while generation"....but hey! they behead you anyway when they feel offended and hide it under blasphemy especially if you Christian, jew or what dey like to call infidel ....as long as they all chant Allah Akbar.....its all good....

200 ?? Did she actually count from 1-to 200 eagles in the air??

Election has come and gone...we are all facing the consequences..weda u voted or ddnt vote...
But somehow ....we have entered another level of blaming our poor choice of leadership on another group that also did not want to vote for the same weréy leadership??


I'm not getting it ...

Kukutente23:
I don't know what you mean by I'm carnally minded. I assume we're having an adult conversation on sex and sexuality.

u are carnally minded means u are only viewing this issue from an animal point of view .. we are humans..... that's why we have rules of inappropriateness, ethics, morals, and of course legality about such matters

Kukutente23:
You need to carry out proper research on this subject. The age of consent and maturity are social and legal construct not based on research.

lol... u are the one that needs proper research.....social and legal constructs are also research driven to begin with...

Kukutente23:
It was once fixed at 12 even in Western countries. ....

so how did u think they arrived at 18?? U think they just did so because they felt like protecting kids...?? How did they arrive at kids needing protection after u have established they are mature .....Baba, please go and read clinical psychology journal on this issue and see how they are used to established law in the west....

.......It's research that is used in other spheres of society... For example..a chemical used in preservation and coloring thats classified as food grade many years ago may now be classed as illegal this year with new research outcomes.....

Kukutente23:
A 12 year old child is sexually mature in the physical sense. The fear there is that they shouldn't be taken advantage of since they do not have full gasp of the social and potential physiological implications..

This is funny....so why are u looking at the issue from an animalistic POV alone, when maturity should be viewed from mental and bodily maturity altogether....??

U keep trying to justify sex btw a boy and and an adult woman as just sex btw animals and therefore no biggie....... Yet u agree laws are made because pple can take advantage of them....
So I ask?? Is it not just sex the two wants?? What do u now agree that one can take advantage of the other when u also feel both a matured for sex??
Why is the fear that they can be taken advantage of still there??

Baba...It's because these children only appear bodily mature but are in many ways still a minor in the mind which is what makes us who we are........they are not mentally matured enough to under the full implication of their actions....
For example....research shows that Children that learn sex from movies or porn0graphy are only driven by impulse to act out what they've seen....but because movies never portray the use of protection, hardly ever show pple get pregnant or have herpes or HIv, and other negative outcomes from reckless sex engagement ....these children are never experienced enough to consent .....

Kukutente23:
In this case, the debate is not about the social and physiological implications since it's obvious the young man is not doing it under duress..

that's the thing...u don't even have knowledge on how pple can be a willing participant in sex yet be under duress....u are claiming obvious from a video....
If this happened btw the teacher and a 9 year old u will still see the same thing in the video ...because sex is a pleasure act that most pple need discipline to resist even as adult.....so it makes the matter worse that an over 30 year old adult is doing such with a boy.....
U can't conclude there anything including from the video u watched....

Kukutente23:
Minus the age of consent, this will definitely qualify as consensual.

it will not fly as consensual because power imbalance is involved in this case and that's what pple like u with only animalistic view of sex don't see

Kukutente23:
The age factor is just used as a baseline to protect the younger ones.

it is not just a baseline....it is arrived at considering both mental and bodily maturity which cannot be separated and functions together in a person....

Kukutente23:
There's no human knowledge that has ever put the age of puberty at 9

The muslims and Arabs beg to differ....just as u are trying to carnally present maturity to be a matter of what u see........the Muslims also put theirs at 9 since many children start growing pubic hair and even start menstruating around that age ...
.infact...a 6 year old has gotten pregnant and delivered a child before....

Baba...I notice u keep trying to down play the reason behind establishment consent age at 18. U keep making it look like something that's done just for protection if these minors but it doesn't mean they are not ready to be fvcked..

but I ask u again....why do these children need to be protected if they are ready for sex and sex is what the adults want from them..??

If u see your 15 year son doing this same thing to a gay man of 33 years....I'm sure u will scream that the man must manipulated and groomed him.....

Kukutente23:
So how come there are people at 30s and 40s that are not good in bed.

first...sir what do u mean by "not good in bed?" Is it until pple behave like porn0graphy actors that they are good in bed??
See ehn...One of problem with the last two generation is media driven standard ...u find 8 and 9 year olds who have seen vagin@, breasts and even raw sex their parents have never seen..... And when these sexually derailed children act out their derailed mind....you the equally lustful, carnally minded adults praise and them as matured and experience...that's not maturity sir...

Kukutente23:
It's obvious this is not his first sexual encounter but I doubt you can pin that on the lady in question since the story is that she came from the US to Zimbabwe and decided to take up a temp teaching job.

she's an educator sir.....we can pin everything on her because shes guilty of abuse of student, abuse of office, and power manipulation because power imbalance is involved in this issue......I don't know why you all only see sex btw two humans from the animalistic point of view of sex.....we are humans for a reason and not a dogs ....
...that a person's p€nis can rise doesn't mean it can enter any hole.....i mean......that's how we arrived at all the madness of sexual corruption we have in the world today

Kukutente23:
Besides, it seems you're making it as if all sexual encounters that people labelled minor have is basically predatory.

how did I label all sex minors have as predatory... We are talking about a 33 year old and a 16 year old boy.....how did u arrive at all ??

Kukutente23:
Most minors engage in sexual activity out of their own volition either with their peers or in the case of males especially with prostitutes.

which they shouldn't be doing in the first place because they lack the mind frame to handle the outcomes involved......
...a pr0stitute is a morally bankrupt person and shouldn't be sleeping with a minor in the first place..

The problem is ...You are looking at the issue from a carnal and basic biological point of view however....there is a legal, ethical and moral side of it wrapped together....see......if for example a 17 year old boy sleeps with your 13 year old daughter.. u won't say all your are saying

Kukutente23:
You didn't get my point though. I'm saying the age of consent is purely mechanical not biological

I get ur point...ur problem is ..u want us to view sex btw a 16 year old boy and his 33 year old teacher purely from only the angle of p£nis can rise and there is a v@gina that can gladly collect

But the truth is age consent it is not pure mechanical ...research is poured into these things before establishing law....for example if u approach a 9 year old for sex which Muslims consider as old enough...
There's is a greater chances the child won't say no, perhaps because they've been exposed to sex online or tv they shouldn't have and therefore assume they shouldn't be doing same , or they trust who is trying to molest them, or they fear the person....altogether such a child has not developed nor under the implications of saying no or yes...

.... A human being must fully understand the implication of what they are engaging in before they are tagged legally matured to give consent......and that's what research and legal consent age brings to the table...

Most children, early & mid teenagers are driven by only impulse only with no sense of responsibility or implication and should not be considered matured to give consent to anything that involves pleasure l, from sex to drugs to alcohol etc....

Kukutente23:
If you claim that most 16 year olds make stupid decisions why then do we allow them choose what they want to become in life and which universities to attend?

lol... u are becoming desperate just to prove a point.....even a 6 year old can sometimes decide they want or dont want in some context/situations.....Comparing sex to continuing study from secindary school after most are expected to be 18 shows how desperate u are to prove a point.....i get ur desperation shaaa....u are carnally driven in the issue...

Kukutente23:
We have 16 year olds that have made serious scientific discoveries.

u are only shooting ur argument in the leg.....give me 5 examples of such sixteen year olds that have made serious scientific discoveries and I will show you the positive impact of if not being exposed to sexual corruption in developmental years especially by predatory adults......

Kukutente23:
Like I said, ageing or growing up is a biological process not mechanical so pinning sexual activity on a particular age is subjective and not based on reality

U are too carnally driven...that's why u dont think sexual activity should start at a mentally ready stage and not only a biological ready stage...
When Muslims start to tell u 9 year old are ready to be sexually taken...y'all tackle them .... Yet y'all turn round and say contradictory...

Kukutente23:
The video brings to the fore the obvious conflict between age of consent and age of sexual maturity
Sex is a biological act and having sex has to do with physical development and hormones and not age. Age factor was brought in to protect young ones from predators. The fact is looking at that boy, he's every bit matured for sex just as most 16 year old girls are also. The point I'm making is that sex is basically biological and in biology, there's no mechanical set time for testosterone or adrenaline to start pumping. The time they start differ for each person because it's simply biological. Two babies born same day will not grow teeth, sit, crawl, walk, speak the same day. Thus, while the lady's behaviour is irresponsible, the boy's demeanor shows this is not rape in the classical sense. In the legal sense, which is not something that biology respect, it is statutory rape though

So maturity is about how he handled the sexual activity.?? If anyone is introduced to sex early they will handle it well even at 12 or 13....what u pple are failing to see is that boy ddnt start today .....that woman or someone else started abusing that boy earlier than now

Y'all Are just trying to explain what's wrong as right......when u see most 16 year olds take decisions in life that's when u know they are stvpid and the pple that established them minors know what they are doing.......

kingthreat:
Hmmm, so before 2024 Zimbabwe government no get sense abi? Morally yeah it is wrong but on a legal ground, it is a young adult enjoying himself. At 16, I had so much sexual energy and some of my mates were already exploring themselves. Accusing them of being abused when they did it with ladies older than them is crap.

in Iran ...someone woke up and updated the a marriageable age for girls to 9 years old......see ehn, we humans know the right thing...we just want to do evil....

Some pple sat down and did research about on the impact of early sexual exposure which made them establish 18 years as legal age of consent....
There was a time alcohol drinking age was 18, later it was moved to 21..na research

...some pple are exposed to drinking as early as 5 ears old....because the effect is not immediately visible doesn't mean this things doesn't impact the mind and body in some way
.... But una too dey carnally and lustful driven ..... So Na only physical outlook una dey see

erniok2:
Why not just call it statutory rape instead of throwing the word rape around.

Ur point is??
Is statutory rape not rape??

We4all:
I find the emboldened very funny and couldn't help laughing. Don't blame me for what aunt Jumoke did to you as a teenager. But I'm sure you must have enjoyed it.

Lol....Another classic rapist and rape apologist defence .....telling the victim they must have enjoyed it.......these are the same things men say when women get raped for going to the house of the rapist.....


Again ...u just a Rape apologist justifying sexual abuse, abuse of trust, abuse of office, just to mention a few of the teachers offense.

I would have told you again to go online to educate yourself on academic research of impact on rape on boys/ men......but Sadly... shameless pple like you cannot be shamed and are too carnally minded to see admit wrong doing

kingthreat:
Is Nigeria better than Italy where the age of consent is 16?
Also, just checked that in Zimbabwe where it happened, age of consent is 16. So what's your case actually?

First ...Zimbabwe updated age of consent to 18 years old on Monday 15 January 2024.

Even if consent age is 10 years old or even worse ....The teacher will still be found guilty for abuse of trust, abuse of office, because power imbalance will always be established in cases like this btw teacher and student

Haven't you heard of cases btw senior and junior staffs in work places?? That's even btw two adults ...despite sex started with consent .it has been established over and again that the power imbalance makes consent technically under threat, fear or duress, either for loss of their job, poor appraisals, etc

We4all:
If the boy were my son and I see him in such an explicit video, I won't consider it rape. I would rather be disappointed for raising such a promiscuous son. I might even consider donating him to charity because a son like that is a menace to the society.

On a normal day...that's one of the classic rape apologist defence...They paint the victim as an enabler of the crime that happened....its the same defence the perpetrator of the rape use to justify their act.....

U know what's funny? ur desperation in justifying this ......i mean.....there should be potential sex offenders list for women like you to protect boys since you see nothing wrong with fvcking a minor because he's a boy......

.. And yes...i noticed you repeatedly called him a boy, which is what he still is...a boy!! In every measure ....yet your carnal, dlrty rape apologist mind couldn't establish what is wrong.....

If you care to know.... there are enough clinical journals on line on psychological impacts of rape on boys and even men

Angelfrost:
You are either confused or just trying to be smart by half.

Laws regarding rape and sexual abuse are age-based, not gender-based.


The teacher above is guilty of Statutory Rape (look this up)! Period!

He's not even smart in anyway.....he's just judging the issue by his lustful/carnal mind....

kingthreat:
In many countries, 15-16 is an age of consent.

Which country??

frank317:
he is no rape apologist... the boy did not rate the teacher, infact, he could have even been the one who raped the teacher.... yes we will say a different thing when the table turn because men and women aint simply the same... a 33 years old man sleeping with 17 years old girl is rape given conditions that result in sex among both genders

U can try to justify rape by how it looks, who seduced who, and any condition you can find..
But those who established that minors cannot give consent to rape irrespective of their gender are not stvpid because at child or under age brain level boys and girls and similar....

...when it happens to your son buy him a play station and throw a party

If u care to know, there are hundreds of clinical psychology journals on the long term psychological impact of rape on boys/men

We4all:
Lol... Don't allow emotions to blind your judgement. It was the boy that seduced the teacher, and not the other way.

Lol...Emotions?? See u justifying rape with all vocabulary u can find...
what has emotions gotta do with established law ..u think those that established that under 18 are minors and cannot consent to sex are stupid??
...16,17 year old girls seduce their fine older teacher all the time....doesnt change the fact that it's statutory rape ..... U are a rape apologist and u should be ashamed of urself because u won't say the same if ur son was involved..

Tueshh!!

We4all:
A 16 year old boy is old enough to reject the advances of his teacher. Physically, he is even stronger and from the video, he wasn't rape.

However, people tend to raise alarm if an older man sleeps with a teenage girl because they mostly do it forcefully; even threating them with death. So, comparing both scenarios is absurd!

U are just a rape apologist....justifying an adult and a minor sexual intercourse ..

U won't say the same if it were your own son involved ... At the end of the day u are same with men who say dirty stuff when the tables turn and a they say a 17 year old girl is old enough

We4all:
The wife reported him for rape and all he got was a sack. No arrest, no charges brought against him, no prison term, and no deportation. It seems the UK government have started embracing rapists with open arms.

work places don't wait till investigation is concluded before sacking the accused....even footballers get suspended immediately....

Chetas81:
HHHHHMMMMM BUT WHY?

Corrupt leaders.....

Chetas81:
neocolonial era is here,but the black Africans refuse to see the sign, Russian and emirates in the east Africa ) the united states and the united kingdom are here in the west,controlling our affairs🥱

They gave u independence but u never stood on your own.....
They help u play salary, give u malaria, HIV tuberculosis drugs, they help u with water, dash u money every 3 months in foreign aid..
Cancel some of your debt .....
Y'all literally can't survive without the west...

They should officially come back and colonize Nigeria because there's nothing sovereign about y'all Nigeria