₦airaland Forum

SAMBARRY:
lol osiwin

So those ones that go to court without any evidence and said Mr xyz r@ped her and the court followed mouth say and actually arrested the person nko?

SAMBARRY:
In your mind now you think oyinbo law court na naija. If you verbally promise you go sign document in the presence of lawyer,if you like lie,you go prove say your signature and voice recording na lie.

SAMBARRY:
and I like as dorris throwaway shame expose Chris. Who has the last laugh now

SAMBARRY:
you dey mind the jesters.

I think this 2026 all these online Feminist should push for a law where if a man verbally promises to marry you,they will sign a legal agreement so if he breach the agreement he will go and collect fresh air and stony beans in prison since there's an influx of demonic men all over the place.

I don't mind you fvking a woman if that's your priority but no use marriage format off her pants .na there una blokos dey enter social media and you will still have the audacity complain that women are complaining. If na fvk you want, tell her that's what you want, if she wants she go stay,if she no want she go go.women never finish for nig.surplus pickmeshas dey wey go dey beg for s3x but una no go meet the ones wey dey carry brez nack you for face na the ones wey want marriage you go dey deceive

We will see how the lies will affect una.

simpleseyi:
.
The time you use to post this should be used to do meaningful things for yourself. Go and get a job

FreeIgboho:
Because it is very annoying, people hugely favored by nature, then again hugely favored by a system set up by men, are the ones always complainning!

Mention systems set up in this society that favour women

Wotowotoman:
Two people don join me for the beer parlor. But these ones dey support Tanzania o. When Tanzania score see as them shout gooiaaal. Which kind unpatriotic Nigerians be this na?

FreeIgboho:
See your conditions for the female to get what should be naturally hers - "Many educated wealthy men now have wills". How about no education, no wills? How about traditionally?
Check the villages. A woman can't be seen with a man for years after her husband dies, while a man can be sleeping with his second wife same night! In the old days the alive wife actually gets buried alive with her husband!
Just admit things are unfair to women because it is men that set it up!

Love800:
This tax is confusing me.

What about those physical agents(council) that comes to to offices to collect levies!

Tayorshd87:
Tax are only meant for people that earn up to 800k and above so if you earn less then why are u disturbing yourself

Emir01:
Pay your tax, it is a civil responsibility.

PlayerMeji:
Time for fifa to ban all forms of celebrations.. After a goal!

We4all:
I won't be surprised that she billed them 150K for an asoebi that was bought for 30K each. Their refusal to buy is justified since she has turned her wedding into a business venture.

Wealthyonos:
Make one bank touch my money in the name of tax deductions, wahala go dey o

Codes151:
stfu
That’s why you run a scan and why they do pre natal tests.


Coming here to defend thrash.

SmartPolician:
But I don't think it's fair to get everything you need to succeed from Country A while flying the flag of Country B. That person is just a user.

honesttalk21:
You're not sticking to one standard; instead, you're shifting categories to defend your conclusion.

When violence is committed by Muslims, you label it as Islam. But when Christians are involved, you break down Christianity into Catholics, militias, nationalists, or political groups, as if they’re no longer part of the faith.

That distinction is pretty artificial. Here are some examples you either overlook or reclassify:
- The Lord’s Resistance Army in Uganda: They’re explicitly Christian-apocalyptic, quoting the Bible and enforcing the Ten Commandments, yet they’re rarely labeled as Christian terrorists.
- The Anti-Balaka militias in the Central African Republic: Mostly Christian, attacking Muslims and mosques, but they’re called sectarian militias, not Christian extremists.

Then there’s the KKK in the USA: They openly use Christian symbols, have pastors, and cite the Bible, but their actions are never framed as terrorism driven by Christianity.

Buddhist militias in Myanmar and Sri Lanka are labeled as nationalists, not Buddhist terrorists.

And Jewish religious extremists are referred to as settlers or radicals, not as representatives of Judaism.

But when Muslims commit acts of violence, there’s no such nuance. Sunnis, Shias, terrorists, other group names in the world and Nigeria, civilians; they all get lumped together under Islam.

What’s even more revealing is your willingness to say that abuses by the Catholic Church don’t represent Christianity, yet you refuse to apply the same logic when Muslims argue that terror groups don’t represent Islam. That’s a double standard, not a valid argument.

Regarding doctrine, your claim still falls short: The Bible does prescribe death for apostasy and blasphemy (Deuteronomy 13, Leviticus 24). Christianity has stopped enforcing these laws through reinterpretation and the establishment of secular states, not because they never existed.

Today, Islam is grappling with extremist distortions in areas plagued by state collapse, war, poverty, and arms proliferation. That context explains where the violence occurs—not what the religion itself teaches.

If Islam truly mandated terror, then 1.8 billion Muslims living in numerous peaceful societies would be violent. But they’re not.

So, no, this isn’t denial or desperation. What’s truly desperate is the tendency to rename everyone else’s religious violence while insisting that only one religion must take responsibility for its extremists.

Condemn the killers, reject the ideology.
But stop pretending the rules change depending on which religion is on trial.

Codes151:
why should a woman die after delivery if not for all these incompetent doctors everywhere.
Ask the useless lekki hospital to show their bill.

LordIsaac:
No...you'll always downplay the role of the man running up and down. I just hate ungrateful lots!

honesttalk21:
How exactly please?

honesttalk21:
The truth is in Islam, we acknowledge that interpretation plays a role in understanding law and history.

honesttalk21:
However, the belief that earlier scriptures have been altered isn’t just a modern excuse or an emotional response; it’s actually a core tenet of the Qur’an itself (2:79, 5:13).

honesttalk21:
The Qur’an tells us that God sent earlier revelations, but some communities later changed or misunderstood them. This isn’t about hostility; it’s a theological stance, much like how every major faith asserts its own ultimate authority.

honesttalk21:
The Qur’an doesn’t dismiss previous prophets or revelations; instead, it affirms them and refers to itself as the final confirmation (5:48). So, Islam’s position is one of continuity rather than superiority through denial.

honesttalk21:
When it comes to violence, those who commit acts of murder, arson, or terror in the name of Islam aren’t truly interpreting scripture they’re going against it.

honesttalk21:
The Qur’an explicitly forbids killing the innocent (5:32) and emphasizes mercy and justice.

honesttalk21:
Extremists overlook centuries of Islamic scholarship that denounces vigilantism and mob justice.

honesttalk21:
As for discussions about early history or Aisha’s age, the academic debates reflect different historical methodologies rather than deceit..

honesttalk21:
Islam’s teachings on compassion and consent are clear; any political or cultural abuses stem from human failures, not divine directives.

honesttalk21:
Islam doesn’t require other religions to be false in order to stand firm. It simply asserts that revelation reached its completion with the Qur’an, while still honoring the truths and prophets that came before.

honesttalk21:
. Labeling extremism as “Islamic” while ignoring the Qur’an’s moral teachings is a distortion, not a valid argument.

honesttalk21:
No one is claiming that every religion engages in violence in the same manner.

honesttalk21:
The key takeaway here is that violence isn't exclusive to Islam,

honesttalk21:
nor is it something that's dictated by the Qur’an

honesttalk21:
. Acts like suicide bombings, hijackings, and the actions of terror groups are modern political strategies, not religious practices

honesttalk21:
Other faiths have also resorted to violence over issues of blasphemy or religious purity
Christians have executed heretics .

honesttalk21:
Different times have their own methods. Just because bomb vests weren't around in earlier centuries doesn't mean that religiously justified violence was absent.

honesttalk21:
. In parts of West Africa, militant cult groups invoking Ogun and other traditional deities have committed killings and enforced violence under the guise of spiritual justification without implicating all traditional worshippers.
.

honesttalk21:
It's absolutely right to condemn terrorism. However, to suggest that it uniquely characterizes Islam while ignoring or downplaying similar actions by others is a form of selective outrage, not a genuine analysis.

honesttalk21:
What has varied throughout history are the translations and interpretations, which are inevitable when rendering any ancient text into modern languages.

honesttalk21:
Citing groups such as ISIS, al-Qaeda, Boko Haram, or Dan Fodio does not establish that Islamic doctrine commands violence. None of these organizations have produced a binding Qur’anic directive that mandates acts such as beheading civilians, burning captives, or enforcing conversion by force. Instead, they selectively quote scripture, disregard established boundaries, and override classical interpretations.

honesttalk21:
This constitutes a misuse of religious texts, not a revelation of new doctrine. Atrocities committed by individuals or groups in the name of a religion do not redefine that religion’s sacred texts

honesttalk21:
just as violence by Christians or secular actors does not alter the meaning of the Bible or Enlightenment principles.

honesttalk21:
Regarding claims about marriage age, it is important to note that there has never been a single, uncontested historical account. Ibn Saʿd (around 784–845 CE) compiled early chronological reports in his work, Kitab al-Tabaqat al-Kubra, which were created within about 200 years of Muhammad pbuh's time. Interestingly, he doesn't mention 6 or 9 when it comes to Aʾisha;

honesttalk21:
instead, he focuses on significant life events, like her participation in the Battle of Uhud and the age difference with Asma. When historians piece together these dates, many suggest that she was likely in her mid-to-late teens at the time of her marriage.

honesttalk21:
Scholars themselves debated the chronology, social norms, and reliability of various reports. Revisiting historical sources with improved scholarly methods is not an act of rewriting history; rather, it is a commitment to rigorous scholarship.

honesttalk21:
The assertion that only Islam produces violent extremists is demonstrably false.

Okechinwadike:
This is the highest level of 419

honesttalk21:
Between me and you. You know what disprove your cherry picking and read Quran 8:36–38, 8:40, and 8:61

honesttalk21:
You cannot address the transliteration provided to you of the verse. Can't accept your mistake? 🤔

honesttalk21:
Rather than continued unsubstantiated talk show where Islam is in this transliteration of Quran 8:39 unless you also choose to lie that this is another deception.

Wa qaatiloohum hattaa laa takoona fitnatunw wa yakoonaddeenu kulluhoo lillaah; fainin tahaw fa innallaaha bimaa ya'maloona Baseer