₦airaland Forum

The authors of Abrahamic text invent many of their characters by combining Greek Hellenistic with elements of other religious concepts from around the globe.

Hellenistic + Israeli/Palestinian mythology.

Hellenistic + Ancient Egyptian mythology.

Hellenistic + other African religious concepts

Hellenistic + Roman mythology.

Hellenistic + other aspects of Greek mythology

The Roman inventors of Christianity manufactured their religion by following the trends found in Hellenistic religions. i.e Cosmopolitanism, Individualism , Monotheism and Syncretism.

All the Abrahamic religions are fake, false and counterintuitive.

Who wrote the bible?

Great question!


Different peope from various timelines wrote the bible.

There are various authors and numerous editors.

The bible has had various editors from the first century to present times.

Yet, the question is who wrote the bible?

Theres is proof that would lead anyone to conclude that certain Roman aristocrats of the first century are considered as the ones who wrote the bible.

Flavius Josephus wrote the bible.

The reason most historians say Josephus wrote the bible is due to the fact that he authored the Jesus story.

Although it isnt completely accurate to say that Josephus was the only aristocrat that authored the bible.

These are the names of some of the authors of the bible:

Flavius Josephus
Flavius Josephus grandfather
Pliny
Flavius Julianus
Flavius Julius
Flavius Arrianus also known as Appian
Emperor Vespasian and his son Emperor Titus Flavius both play their roles in the writing of the book.
various individuals of the Ptolemy family.

Apart from the supernatural type of miracles, there are the everyday person's version of miracle.

It can be said that anyone who excells in their chosen fields, or makes somone glad, performs or are themselves a miracle.

For example, the bus driver that has never experienced an accident is a miracle to themselves aswell as all of their passengers.

A tutor that gets the best out of their students are themselves a miracle.

A leader who serves their people honestly and patriotically performs a miracle to the general public.

Miracles are awesome.

Yet, let's all strive to discover or become the miracle that makes the world a better place.

.....

nervorum:
...Religion is....

Not really, Jesus is a fictitious character that the Romans invented out of the plagerising of various older religious concepts from around the globe. i.e Apis, Buddha, Dionysus, Ela, Horus, Krishna, Romulus e.t.c

The truth is that they are all being conned by first century Roman aristocrats and highly educated Ancient Islamic scholars into believing ficticious characters from inside their chosen and personal biblographies.

Abrahamic religious text are not what they claims to be, instead they are biblographies, a compilation of various stories and typologies from accross the globe, the contents which have been re-packaged, sexed-up or outrightly fabricated.

Now is the time to STOP and THINK.

The authors of Abrahamic text invent many of their characters by combining Greek Hellenistic with elements of other religious concepts from around the globe.

Most of the characters in Abrahamic text are the inventions of first century Romans aristocrats that plagerised various religious concepts from around the globe. i.e Ancient Greece

Abrahamic religious text are based on ficticious characters.

Abrahamic text are not genuine historical documents.

There is not one character in Abrahamic text that can claim to being original, if they wasnt stolen, they was plagerized or fabricated.

All Abrahamic religions are false, fake and counterintuitive.

Eventually, Africans will realise that its all a massive charade and rid the continent of these liars and fakers.

Op is absolutely correct, the Romans that invented Christianity stole various Hellenistic concepts of the Greeks.

Eventually, Africans will realise that its all a massive charade and rid the continent of these liars and fakers.

Christianity is a Roman invention.

All the characters inside of Abrahamic text are fake.

All Abrahamic religions are false, fake and counterintuitive

I agree that our leaders are greedy and unfit for purpose, yet they are merely the symptoms.

The main problem is foreign languages and the Abrahamic religions.

All Abrahamic religions are based on lies, theft, violence and false conceptions.

Manufactured history, and the reason it was forced upon Africans was due to an ancient Eurocentric project known as the "World Order".

That project began by the Romans hundred of thousands of years ago.

Initially all of Europe and parts of Asia abide by the laws and moral code of Africa.

Then one Roman Emperor deviced a plan that would enable Europe to dominate the globe both militarily and spiritualy.

His plan was dubbed "The World Order", it was during these times that Libya was invaded as the first post-pharaonic military campaign ever launched by Europe on African soil under the stewerdship of Portugal and Spain with the so-called blessing of the then Pope.

Its important to note that Rome was never stationary, Rome moved its administrative capital on various occasions, the most commonly talked about being Constantinople that is the modern day Istanbul in Turkey.

Rome is actually a Eurocentric political concept. One that only allows for European and or their descendants domination of the world.

The "World Order" and the so-called "New World Order" are one and the same.

The adherents of the "World Order" spend hundred and thousands of years trying to nail down their unwitty claims of superiority over everyone else.

What happened was that the Romans use all the intellectual tools available to their Emperor and political class to lay their foundation of world domination.

They use psychological, sociological and military inteligence to reach their goals and objectives.

The Asians also caused havoc. Its argued that if the Asian war mongerers hadnt launched their crazy holy wars inside the continent, the Eurocentric Crusaders would never have made the military progress they achieved on the continent.

Neither the trans Atlantic slave trade nor Colonisation would never had taken place.

The argument that the Europeans won most of their crazy battles because of internal conflict is false.

Most of the internal conflicts at the time was created or exacerbated by the adherents of the "World Order"

The reason they made in roads was due to the earlier Arab wars and military campaigns combined with the Christian missionaries and Jewish missionaries that precede the crazy dash for African treasure. There was also some local traitors. They, the missionaries and traitors, were emmisaries and spies to Europe's political class and they reported much of the situation on the ground.

The scramble for Africa was a calculated campaign that involved the political classes from all over Europe, Eurocentric Royalists of the entire continent of Europe, Christian and Jewish adherents; multiple meetings and various conferences.

All Abrahamic religions are false, fake and counterintuitive

Gobekli Tepe is not the birth place of civilisation, that is a false conception.

Civilisation began in Africa.

Olu317:
1) Yes it was a former Roman's administrative base at one time.

2 ) But Greek ruled Turkey earlier than Roman.

3) Infact The Levant and southern Anatolia (modern Turkey, where Antioch was situated) was a thoroughly international which were all controlled by Greeks.

4. The Assyrians,Persians,Egyptians, Babylonians, ruled Messapotamia~ Nineveh earlier than Greeks.

5) The point is that Roman Empire was not in existence when Göbekli Tepe existed.

Kindly dont misconscrue what is being said.

Nobody said Roman Empire was in existence then.

The point is that Turkey is classed as both a European and Asian country.

Gobekli Tepe is situated within the region they class as Europe.

There are various sites that are older within Africa.

Hence,

Amujale:
.. the greatest significance of "Gobekli Tepe" is shroud in the myth that it supposedly the birth place of civilisation, however untrue that may seem, it's sacred significance however, is in the fact that the people who built "Gobekli Tepe" are rightfully deemed the first religious gathering to come out of Europe.

Gobekli Tepe is known as the oldest sacred site in all of Europe. Africa predates Europe.

Olu317:
How Göbekli Tepe in Europe?

Göbekli Tepe is a sanctuary built on a hilltop in southeastern Turkey,which is 11000+ years ago. ( Near East)

Turkey is a transcontinental country, one of the few that are partially located in both Europe and Asia. The others are Russia, Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan, and Georgia.

Turkey's history connects them to Greek, Persian, Roman, Byzantine and Ottoman empires.

According to history, mondern day Istanbul was formerly Eastern Roman Empire's (Byzantium) capital city known as Constantinople.

Ilamina:
But before the white men came

We still had tribal wars and border issues

The white just made it advances it..

Not really.

They exacebated feuds and created wars and conflicts.

Most of the wars and conflicts that occured in Africa during the late 1500 was as a direct result of Arabian and European intervention. They created conflict through their spies and diplomats, sold them weapons to war against themselves.

Before the early Islamic and Christian crusaders came to Africa, most communities was living in relative peace.

CodeTemplar:
Most African didn't have number system beyond 100. So be specific and stop attributing exaggerated feat of one small group.

You are wrong.

Most Africans have elaborate literacy and number systems. Eventhough the Eurocentric war mongers tried to destroy as much proof as they possibly could, still, African historians are able to determine the truth.

The truth is that Africans invented literacy

Mathematics is an African invention.

Amujale:
Apart from the "Wheel" and "Gunpowder", there isnt another invention of great global significance that originates outside of Africa.

Civilisation began in Africa before it proceeded to trickle out to the rest of the world.

YoungLionken:
You're just trying to act intelligent, but you're actually not. It's total waste of time with you.

You can continue in your unnecessary hatred and unjustifiable bitterness against them, as it is fruitless.

No more mentions, ciao!

You are completely and utterly wrong here.

Anyone that understands history will agree with me that the main perpertuators of Colonisation and the Trans Atlantic campaign was:

(a) European war mongers
(b) Christians missionaries
(c) Jewish missionaries
(d) Christian and Jewish crusaders
(e) Arabian crusaders
(f) Traitors and defectors

CodeTemplar:
It also died in Africa I guess? or what is holding your civilized minds back from even catching up? Oya invent something now..... Mr civilized race.

Amujale:
Apart from the "Wheel" and "Gunpowder", there isnt another invention of great global significance that originates outside of Africa.

Civilisation began in Africa before it proceeded to trickle out to the rest of the world.

Africans invented paper and they invented the ink pen.

Africans discovered the concepts of literacy.

Africans discovered the concepts of numeracy.

Civilization began in Africa and then it proceeded to trickle out to the rest of the world.

CodeTemplar:
The Israelites are the real father of civilization and they Abrahamic religion.

The is no historical records of the Israelites.

The only place you can find them is inside the pages of the Christian bible.

YoungLionken:
Talking about war, none is innocent, the Benin kingdom, Ife, Oyo empire and a host of other African nations conquered as well, they pillaged the spoils of war which include livestock, human and other resources. Having the fellow African humans as slaves for odd jobs, just like what the Europeans did too(the Egyptians had the Israelites as slave for years before their liberation). So let's not see it as an evil masterminded by the Europeans alone. How do we know that we are originally from where we claim to hail from? My brother, we can't really tell.

Are you trying to justify the Colonisation and the Trans Atlantic campaign?

You ignorance knows no bound.

There is no one that can successfully justify those evils.

YoungLionken:
You can't blame another man for your failures.

Firstly, i dont consider myself a failure.

Furthermore, i am correctly blaming other people for their failures.

I am correctly laying the blame on the early Asian and Eurocentric Crusaders for the evil they took part in on the continent.

CodeTemplar:
Japan and China copied what has been advanced by Christians.

That is proper nonsense.

China and Japan retained their technology because they held onto to their cultural identity.

They held onto to their language and all of their cultural identities.

As a matter of fact, the Europeans stole from the Eastern Asians on technology relating to gunpowder and war mongery.

Its from China that they came accross the ancient military Chinese documents written by "Sun Tzu"

It has nothing to does with Christianity.

The only thing the early Christians missionaries were good at was lying, spying, stealing, looting, and murder of the innocent.

All Abrahamic religions are fake, false and counterintuitive.

CodeTemplar:
Truth is we never advanced before the whites came and have remained stagnant ever since.

Apart from the "Wheel" and "Gunpowder", there isnt another invention of great global significance that originates outside of Africa.

Civilisation began in Africa before it proceeded to trickle out to the rest of the world.

CTPlayer:
No I am right. And historical accuracy is important. No way in hell every European country was involved in the slave trade at that time.

You are completely misinformed.

Name one European country that you think didnt take part in that evil campaign and allow me prove how misinformed you really are.

CTPlayer:
There were instances where a country/government rounded up people and sent them to plantations like the British government did with street urchins and Irish.

Again can you cease from bringing the Irish into the debate. Are the Irish African?

What relevance is the history of Australia got to does with the evil perpetuated by Arabs and Europeans in the African continent?

It certainly cannot be used to try and justify their greedy, cazy and evil actions at the time.


Cheers.

CTPlayer:
And the country really doesn't matter per se, as slave trading was largely done by private companies.

Again you view is an altogether warped one.

Who benefitted from those evils?

The private companies that you refer to all operated under the direct orders of their individual rulers, the State.

Ultimately, it was the state that took full responsibility of the campaign and took full advantage of the spoils at the time.

The Arabs was the ones that started the whole thing.

Its argued that if the Arabs hadnt carried out those horrific raids under the pretex of their crazy "holy wars', the Eurocentric Crusaders would easily be defeated and would have left empty handed.

Yet, the Eurocentric crudaders fed off the left overs of the Arab Crusaders, despatched them, and took their campaign to another level of evil.

CTPlayer:
Slavery was global. But how come nobody talks about who captured and sold slaves for centuries. All the Euros had to do was dock their ships and they found willing trading partners. What about the Arabs, what happened to diaspora there? They castrated all males that is what happened. Death rates in the Caribbean and S. America were much higher than N. America.

You are wrong.

The history of slavery isnt the subject being discussed here.

Its the vile behaviour of the ancient Arabs and Eurocentric Crusaders that lost all their sense at the sight of precious metals, and began to fight themselves over limitless treasures.

Its no good hating all Europeans, the actions of the ones that participated in those evil campaign and their supporters are the ones that one should rightfully hate.

When people try to make aware that those people that implemened the Trans Atlantic campaign was evil, someone of your type will come here trying to quote the history of slavery. That is not the point.

The point is what they did was purely evil and was calculated.

Every single country currently listed as European took part in that evil campaign.

CTPlayer:
Depending on how you want to slice it slavery existed from 1777 or 1786 to 1865. That isn't 400 years

One second, one minute, one hour, one day, one week, one month, one year, 100 years, 200 years or 400 years it was a great evil, the greatest evil ever perpertuated in the history of humankind.

You are ignorant enough to try and compare colonisation and slavery with misogyny and the vile discrimination of women in the Western world.