₦airaland Forum

By the way, Trump did not make the slide.

They are just giving examples of common disinfectants. I do not encourage anyone to drink Isopropyl Alcohol. But other types of alcohol can be used to facilitate interactions and minglings.

I definitely encourage that.

IjeBos:
Yes, you are a supposed science person who understands what chemicals can do to the human body defending someone who said people should ingest Disinfectants, where the first disinfectant listed in the slide he was referring to was Bleach.

Do you understand the nuttery that is coming out of your mouth?

Tequila is a chemical too. And I encourage women to try it. Hehe

Anything that can remove (DIS) an infection (virus, parasites etc) is a dis--infectant. Hence the name. LOL

bemeruca:
He was asking a question old man. 52 years old man 🤣

Yes they should test. If it is possible why not?

The video you posted makes you look desperate 😂

Sunlight is a disinfectant too.

They don't know.

IjeBos:
He was not wrong that Scientists should test injecting disinfectants inside the body?
That you say you are a "Chemical Engineer" defending this is insane.
Where did you get this degree?

Our minds have a tremendous ability to forget trauma.
I think people forget how batshit crazy this press conference was.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zicGxU5MfwE

Do you understand the post of mine you quoted?

IjeBos:
And for the record.
This was the slide that was shown to the public and Trump was responding there.
You see the first disinfectant listed there?

Did you understand the post you quoted? LOL

IjeBos:
Yes, you noticed that I posted a discussion on that.
And you were wrong about Trump's constitutional ability to impound or stop Congressional allocated money just like you are wrong about this.

Post the ruling.

And you may have contracted the same hallucinatory bug that comes with TDS. Make sure I've had that conversation with you. LOL

bemeruca:
I think alcohol could be categorized as disinfectant right?

But these people lie all the time especially cococandy.

Yup. Alcohol is a disinfectant.

That's why methylated or Isopropyl Alcohol (spirits) are used to clean (disinfect) open wounds/injuries.

bemeruca:
You sound stupid as usual. Ask yourself why senators go to hearing with excerpts of tweets and from books of the person they are scrutinizing?

Trump wrote about how he makes deals, we are seeing it in real life. Some of you who don't do anything but cry is asked to read the book to understand and you posted this nonsense 😂

You are not a serious person. Always emotional

Trump never asked anyone to inject bleach. Another lie from you and the media has bleached your head

They're ignoring this. By the way, I'm a chemical engineer 😎. I can list 3 disinfectants that can be ingested, absorbed, swallowed, drank etc. That can be used for viral infections.

All bleach = disinfectant
NOT all disinfectants = bleach.

Trump said 'disinfectant'. He is not a scientist so obviously he got that from his intel sources at the time. And he was not wrong.

IjeBos:
Of course you didn't.

We are living in the dumbest timeline filled with the dumbest people who try to pretend they aren't.
https://letmegooglethat.com/?q=supreme+court+biden+student+loan+ruling+pdf

Post it and highlight it like you did with the Impoundment Act from Abby Philip on CNN 😉.

I want this thread to juxtapose my analysis of the SCOTUS' ruling vs yours. Simple sturveZz.

nateevs:
Mr SHEEP is back. Let's go back to where you started. You weren't just making an observation. You were stating that Trump and Elon have no need to enrich themselves because for instance, as P45, Trump's Networth reduced.

TDS makes liars out of men. Post my comment from the beginning. Shouldn't be hard for an honest person, right?

You were Infact, trying to make a statement that he made a sacrifice on behalf of his country. I have heard this shit from thousands of MAGAnuts before. You know they are trying to do that shiit again, when they mention that he did not get paid as well. So don't try to dodge your intentions now.

Now "intentions". What do those intentions matter if they are true? You won't even let Trump have the fact that he isn't a thief like gay Obama & Slow Biden. You have to paint them with the same brush to justify your support for evil people. Nateevs, you're a fool.

Therefore I must step in and ask you as I do all SHEEP, how do know? Because Trump said so?

Post where I quoted Trump. An honest person will do that, right?

Did you see his payslips? Did you read his financial publication? The world's accepted arbiter of financial estimation say verbatim that he overvalued himself by 100%. The moment that happens, sane folks invalidate any talks in between.

Read how substandard this reasoning is. In one breath you call Forbes an accepted arbiter ( ) in another, you won't accept their estimate of Trump. Is that not madness? Forbes said his networth reduced between 2016-20. You're arguing with Forbes but calling Trump a liar. Is that not madness? Have you started picking litter from the ground as food? Do you use a tree's branch to scratch your back? You're so stupid, Nateevs. Really incredibly unimaginably stupid.

But now you want to accept half way that it doesn't matter, but at the same time intend to say that it Infact reduced. How can we say the start point doesn't matter but it definitely reduced at the end? SHEEP?

Half way? Do you know what the expression "being agnostic to the actual value" means? It means, just use Y as Trump's Networth in 2016.

- if he did not receive $400K/yr for 4 years
- and his networth contracted from Y in 2016, to (Y-$600m) in 2020

How would a rational person say Trump used that position to enrich himself? That's exactly what Obama and Biden did. They both got wealthier between their time in office.

Again, the actual value of the networth has never mattered because it is useless in proving the delta of the networth in the intervening years. The only counter argument a rational person can make, is to prove Trump got wealthier. If you cannot do it, your suggestion that him & EM are using the office to enrich themselves is conspiracy nonsense nateevs.

You are indeed the nutjob. That's you. I told you, you've been reduced to nothing man. You're a disgrace. I mean it. Your mum should be ashamed of you.

nateevs:
Engage brain SHEEP. "...yet by 2021 he is now worth XXXXX....." is the koko. Forbes historical documentation of Trump's self worth is based on falsehood from Trump

Because Forbes can only go by what he says he has, he can overvalue for one reason today (obtaining loans), and undervalue for another reason tomorrow (obtaining votes). Therefore, talks about Trump's net worth should be avoided altogether, let alone trying to paint a picture that he lost money because he served. There is no verifiable fact.

But you are a SHEEP. You cannot think this.

Do you see how stupid you sound? Does this sound like the post of a rational person?

You're clearly goal-seeking. You've made your conclusions about Trump so you're imagining the evidence that will justify those conclusions. If that were not the case, explain to us how:

- a man using the office to enrich himself, did not receive the salary to that very office?
- lost money while in that office?

Your retort that nobody can prove his networth before his presidency therefore we don't know bla bla, should have been used to stop you, the Abject Apehead, who was spewing dumb conspiracies about him enriching himself.

How would you then know he enriched himself if you don't know his payslips and nobody can verify his wealth?

Do you see that you're not making rational arguments? That common sense has been ignoring you for days? That your sawdust filled brain can't reason past its own double-standards? That you're another wailer, irrelevant and irreverent scumbag plus a dumb mastu-bator.

Your reputation is in flames. TDS has successfully created a fool out of you and there's no going back. What a pity.

basilico:
Be warned you are dealing with an slowpoke eager to prove his worth.
When all fails , you don't live in America, if you live there are a broke arse, you have not understood the constitution.
Don't lose your temper, just treat him like a child.

His reputation precedes him. The only person really disappointing me is Nateevs because he used to be reasonable. That's why I know TDS is a real mental disorder.

IjeBos:
Off tangent and mindless drivel has been most of your posts.
You should teach a course called "Gaslighting, Mindless Repetitive posts, and Intellectual Dishonesty: How not to Argue".
I think Raumdeuter took it at the "Harvard Extension School".

You are asking me to 'post the thing you should have read' before you started this argument so you can compare the argument you've been making based on 'the thing you should have read' with what I am claiming is in 'the thing you should have read' but still haven't.
Does that make sense even to you?

And the time it took you to write this post is the same time it would have taken you to google the ruling aka 'the thing you should have read'.
I mean it didn't take you long to find Biden's twitter remarks, right?
But of course, the right wing media would post those but not the actual text of the ruling. As facts tend to destroy most of their propaganda.
But ey, better to pretend than actually do, innit?

But you remind me of another chap who used to post here. He would always write "I'm not reading this post", but then either quote the post or somehow know exactly the post says.
What does it gain you to waste time saying something like that?
Just more intellectual dishonesty I guess.

Post the ruling. Nothing else matters. I didn't read past "off-tangent. . ."

IjeBos:
What kind of nonsense is this?
You can google the ruling.

I'm not reading past this. Post the ruling here so we'll compare what I said vs what you are claiming. Should be that simple to an honest person.

I told you people: I don't engage in off-tangent and mindless drivel. If you're interested in having an honest conversation, simply post the ruling.

Period.

IjeBos:
Imma start calling you the sesquipedalian MAGA.

You're getting close but your question still belies a lack of understanding as to what the Supreme Court said.
They Supreme Court was arguing with Biden's mechanism for the Student Loan relief, not student loan relief.
He then chose another mechanism that didn't allow him to target as many people, but offered some relief to some people, that was legal.

And Biden decided he wanted to be seen "fighting" the Supreme Court. At that point they had lurched to the right with some of their decisions (Roe, etc), creating law instead of interpreting it. The posts were worded that way to show that he was fighting the Supreme Court. Do I agree with his choice to word it that way. Not sure. Does the wording mean he was disobeying the Supreme Court ruling, absolutely not. It was a well lawyered tweet.

But you seem to be solely focussed on a 160 character(think that's the size) tweet that reads as purposefully vague, that is discounted by everything else on the record, rather than taking the time to understand what really happened.
It seems a wholly intellectually dishonest way to argue anything. innit?

Post the SCOTUS' ruling here.

The emboldened is rich coming from you. Did I not see you pining over Trump's Canada comment? Don't change the rules of the game in-between.

basilico:
You need to be born there to understand America. Implies Ijebos.

Exactly. Now I'm reading non-sequitur bla bla. When I was seeing another spambot post hogwash about Biden's presidency, minions and what not.

I just dey laugh. I avoided this thread during Biden's presidency because I knew 2025 was loading. I straight up predicted it.

I hate it to break it to some of you, but you will soon find out how USAID was the funding source for engineering COVID-19.

And no, if some virus "accidentally leaks" from a lab where it is being engineered, the natural response is not to lie, hide it, censor people except you have ulterior motives. Then arrogate to yourself, the culprit and brain box behind it, the task of handling its response. Where you lied, and lied and lied and lied and continued to lie.

You do that if it is INTENTIONAL.

Then you go on and ban alternative drugs like Ivermectin and HCQ that could have been instrumental by insisting the only fix is an untested medical procedure. You have to be evil to do that.

That's part of why you'd require a pardon. An unconstitutionally curated preemptive one no less.

Facts are Facts. Fvck your feelings with a long d!ck.

IjeBos:
This is what's called a non-sequitur.
You could have been a US citizen for 50 years and still not have read the constitution.

You're posts here are indicative you haven't.
You often seem confused on basic things, like the separation of power.


When you're ready, you'd go back to the questions I asked you. Until you respond to those, meaningfully, I won't be wasting my precious time on you.

Fyi, I see that same nonsense repetitive posts from Raumdeuter all the time.
The way you both respond when you get caught Gaslighting or pretending you know something is similar.
Repeat and Gaslight.
Rinse Repeat.

You like to claim so and so does not live in the US or has no business with US news, so I wanted to disclose that part upfront.

It's like the government [SCOTUS] preventing me [FG] from building a house with toothpicks, and I then decide to build it with bricks which is the Government [SCOTUS]preferred method.
And you say, woah he pushed through on building his house with bricks even though he was told he couldn't build it with toothpicks.
So, he disobeyed the government!!
And then you tell me that it will now be precedence that people will build their houses with bricks after being told they couldn't build them with toothpicks.
That is how asinine what you are trying to say is but you don't know enough to know it.

I'm sorry but for someone who kept poking me on the constitution, this is rather abject and reductive.

In your analogy, building with toothpicks was a MODIFICATION of an existing law (which required people to build only with bricks).

Biden claimed, emergencies gave him rights to waive or modify student loans plans. SCOTUS negated his argument by pointing out that the waiver or modification, had to be minor or modest, not a dramatic change to the existing plan or basically creating a new one.

If Biden went back to the drawing board, and re-implemented the subsisting student loans plan in a better, more efficient manner such that somehow he could forgive more loans, will he make this comment below?

Again, it says:

- SCOTUS tried to BLOCK him [from relieving student debt] instead of saying they told him to FOLLOW the law without changing it in the guise of modifying it.
- SCOTUS did not STOP him [which means he went on to do what he wanted to do].

I don't know how to respond to hypocrites who in one breath want to pretend words matter for Trump, but when I put Biden's words back at them, I start reading all sorts of brainless excuses.

If you say, it was fair for Biden to be told he couldn't make those modifications, but he went on to do it, you should better be ready to accept it, if Trump does same.

If it is good for a Goose. It should be good for Uganda🇺🇬 .

I already know your talking points from Abby Philip.

Which means, I know the counter narrative.

Stop watching CNN.

basilico:
Trump secured the release of 6 Americans held in Venezuela a few days ago .
Yesterday he secured the release of Mark Fogel jailed 14 years since 2021 in Russia for possession of medical marijuana.

Everything Truml does makes Joe Biden look like an incompetent nincompoop. If not a traitor

Biden will die and go to hell, this year.

2025 won't escape him. I'm surprised he is still alive.

An evil and wicked man.

IjeBos:
Serious question, have you ever read the US Constitution?
Honestly, most of your posts sound like you really don't understand the US system of government.

When you're ready, you'd go back to the questions I asked you. Until you respond to those, meaningfully, I won't be wasting my precious time on you.

If you were wondering, I've been an American since 199■. Make of that what you will.

Thank God. Another one to keep in the safe.

bemeruca:
Democrats are not using stupid judges so they can say there is a constitutional crisis.

How can a judge deside what the federal government puts on their website, what they can remove and cannot remove?

They know it's flimsy but they needed a narrative for "constitutional crisis" that bozos just repeat like coached parrots on here.

Leyqute:
Salah has done fvck all game but he’s ended up with a goal and an assist.

Not my GOAT. A top 5 player though.

And he has 1 EPL title. He's been carrying LFC to "titles" is even going to be a bit of a stretch for Mr. Fantastic.

nateevs:
There is none! Zilch! Nada! ..... that will be acceptable as a truth-o-meter. Absolutely none. .

The only reason you sheepishly continued this debate is because you never knew that he never published his true net worth. He always lied about it, and by a factor of 100% in many cases.

Some of those around him say he was worth like 2bn max and even they could not be sure.

But you want me to believe first his true self worth as published by whom? And then that said self worth reduced? What was it? 8bn? 6bn? 3bn? 2bn? And what did it reduce by..... and to what?

But he said it, so it must be true. Alakori eranko.


You come dey invoke my dead mother on top matter wey you no even sabi. If I take her memory curse your head ehn?

I hope you can read yourself. Nothing will be truthful enough to you because you're going to believe what you want to believe about Trump - regardless of facts.

How you have convinced yourself that you're not a mindless botted zombie will confound even Solomon.

Continue. TDS has made Nobel Prize winners sound like Oafs. What would I expect it to do to a Quasi-intellectual that uses fine speech to hide his rank olodoism and TDS to boot.

Shift jare. Let me not use my disappointment to bring an innocent woman whose only mistake in life was refusing to terminate the vacuously-skulled baby they had to drag out of her during its unfortunate birth.

E-DIOT. They quoted the Forbes you tried to quote. If Trump was worth N50 in 2016, was to be receiving a salary of $400K/yr for 4 years, yet by 2021 he is now worth N30. It will take a blind and deranged fool to spew dumb conspiracies about enriching himself using his office.

Reserve that for Obummer and Biden that you fellate for social acceptance. Bum.

nateevs:
Hehehe THE SHEEP is back. I specifically asked you for a reference point in 2016 for Forbes, you think I don't know what I am saying. If you were not a cultist sheep, you would have sidestepped this argument because even Forbes enlists Trump as a perennial fraudulent self worth estimator. But you wouldn't know this, because are a dick-sucking sheep.

For years, those who know Trump know that he overvalues his self worth every time, depending on the deal he's chasing. And so for years, Forbes have disagreed about what Trump is worth. They have to always use estimates, because he never publishes his real worth. This is straight from Forbes.

But you want me to believe that his self worth reduced "because he became President" or because he said so? You don lost your mind nuccah.

At least we know the others like Basilico and Dayo come with half knowledge to this shit. The phuck are you coming here with no knowledge at all and trying to form intelligentsia with megede fegede?

Go and educate yourself on what you support before you come and debate me SHEEP.

I curse the day I mentioned you as rational. You're nothing but a self-indulged alarmist suffering from the worst case of TDS. Look at this moribund mastu-bator. I spit on you.

Don't you see that your irrational hatred for Trump has made you deranged? What will it matter if Trump was worth $1 bln if it contracted by the time he left office in 2021? That's why I redirected you to the fact that the actual figure was immaterial. Nevermind that the article from CNN quoted Forbes and even listed a figure lower than what you have there.

You're a special type of stupid. The one senile boomers will recognize because it becomes indelible after one crosses 40. You're pushing 50 so if you mistakenly procreate, the baby will be born a fool.

You're the proverbial fool at your big old age. An ugly one. Notice none of your screengrabs speaks to what his networth was before and after his presidency. Doing that type of research will damage your dull brain enclosed in that abnormally shaped apehead of yours.

Did I quote Trump for you when I said his networth reduced during his presidency? But you found a way to blame it on him.

Did I quote Trump concerning the presidential salaries he never received? No, but this bellend found a way to attribute it to Trump.

Trump. Trump. Trump. You probably mastur-bate to the sound of his name. Nairaland's version of Jeffrey Toobin.

GloriousGbola:
True true true


However indigenous oil companies have done all they can to kill union. No indigenous oil company built from scratch has union. Those that were acquired - they have done their best to kill union.

Indigenous companies and nepotism, toxic work culture, back-biting, being run like a sole proprietorship.

Also, I agree that IOCs are easier to penetrate as entry level. It is 100% super competitive to get in etc at the more experienced levels and even that still favors largely Engineers.

Ibime:
Even the wedding was used to collect plenty gratuity from Godswill Akpabio in the form of wedding gifts

Exactly.

Politicians give him handouts. He will always have money to populate the world with children, hide mistresses, change cars, do vacations etc.

He just does not need the whole of his family living off him.

Ibime:
He is doing well. That lack of money story was probably a lamba to keep his village people off his back.

When I last saw 2Face, he was staying at a suite at Manchester Hilton. Don't ask me what I was doing there.

That former Senate President from Oturkpo dashed him $50K in December. And I know Asari and co give him money.

I also know one Vice-Admiral's son that kpanshed Annie when she was still with 2Face. Before their location wedding in Dubai sef.

But I digress.

And no, it's not me. Some ex-MILADs were my neighbors so I know some tea. Hehe.

Ibime:
Does 2Face look like someone who will even stay 1 day a year in his village where he didn't grow up and which is not far from herdsmen

2Face has 4 kids outside marriage, most of whom are abroad. Where do you think he will spend his precious 2 to 4 weeks downtime in a year. He will spend it close to where his kids are abroad, not in the village.

That 2 weeks a year does not even apply to 2Face. Make it 0 weeks per year. He just built that house cos they wouldn't let him bury his dad without it.

That's 100% true.

But I don't think Tuface is broke at all. He is not seeing Burna, Davido, Wizkid money but he is doing well.