₦airaland Forum

Ibime:
I know say you sabi with that Masta Ace reference but your timeline is the other way around. Masta Ace copied Eminems 1998 cadence on Disposable Arts in 2001 so it's Masta Ace that borrowed from Eminem's style and not vice versa. Masta Ace previous work in 1995 didn't have those patterns. Eminem took parts of his style from Pace Won when he was with Outsiders in 1996.

I don't really listen to Drake but the rhyme pattern of his that makes me respect him is the Phonte pattern. That let me know his pen is accomplished. And that is his most accomplished flow pattern of which he got mastery. Can't really speak for all those Future/drill patterns cos I don't rate those patterns.

Mehn, you are ahead of me. I always thought Disposable Art was 1995 but I guess I had misremembered it.

Concerning Drake, I'll say when he is trying to rap like a purist, one can hear more of his Phonte influences. But that purist Drake depends on the type of beat or producer. He has Hov's 'Lost One's flows, Lupe Fiasco's etc etc. I'm curious to know what you think of Scary Hours Disk 2 portion of FATD. It has like 6 tracks.

bemeruca:
USAID funded Hamas

And funded some of the celebs like Angelina Jolie, Sean Penn, Ben Stiller, Jessica Chastain etc that went to Ukraine to do photo Ops with Zelensky.

USAID funded ISIS courtesy of Killary and Sullivan.

Ibime:
I'm glad you said Drake got his flow from Phonte cos he did. Phonte is a good rapper.

You're referring to So Far Gone and Thank Me Later, Drake. And even at that, there is like 3 or 4 songs tops that mimics Phonte's flow. Even Joe Budden was one of the earliest influences on Drake's flow.

But Drake uses damn near 40+ flows, on different beats and with different producers. It is beyond criminal for anyone to reduce him to Phonte. It will be like someone saying Eminem jacked Master Ace's flow just because he copied his voice inflections.

Drake's rapping on the Scary Hours Version of FATD sounds nothing like Phonte, for e.g.

basilico:
If there was any wrong doing then in January 2028,Trump will pardon himself and anyone else he fancies.
You should never have voted for democrats .In 2020 Trump would have pardoned himself and anyone else he fancied , he didn't.They jumped on him ,trying to kill him when they couldn't stop him. They screamed that he couldn't issue pardons then
Diversion. How come we knew Kyle Rittenhouse shoe size but we know nothing about the two Trump attempted assassins?

Another instance of democrats fuckups. Harry Reid removed the 60 Senate vote requirement for SCOTUS judges vote thinking a republican would never be president. Ginsburg refused to step down thinking Clinton would have the honours of replacing her.

Democrats are just stupid, crying over spilt milk.
Every president has people who are out to support him in return for something.At least with Trump it won't be USAID money

When Brazil were going at X - they were receiving USAID funds to do so. They've now put an end to their lawfare since the USAID largesse has been discontinued.

budaatum:
Probably hard for you to understand Biden's plan to forgive about $430 billion of the $1.6 trillion in student loans failed because he allowed himself to be restricted by the Supreme Court.

I read the article. Did you? It basically just says Biden had been injucted from continuing with his forgiveness plan in '22 but decided to ram through with it in '24 by claiming that their [FG's] control over the whole gamut of loan forgiveness programs gave them some leeway to forgive some loans that could not be forgiven by the forgiveness plan that was rejected by SCOTUS.

This can be translated, he still did it anyway and the DOJ did not bother with due recourse to holding him accountable. This feels like election inducements but it is immaterial now.

Are you saying, Trump should find workarounds to circumvent Constitutional orders like the one Biden circumvented?

budaatum:
That's what makes his claim worse.

Like his master who got proper care and touted bleach to everyone else, basilico got vaccinated but came here to peddle bleach.

Evil, if you ask me.

Who is his master that touted this? That's crazy. Do you have the evidence for it?

budaatum:
You should not have addendumed a post you hadn't verified, especially not a post by the resident conspiracist and alternative realitist. And if you addendum a lie, you'd need to forgive us for tarnishing you with the same brush we tarnish the liar with.

Basically, perhaps check before you addendum.

I checked this out from his post. When I was trying to verify if he was lying. Did you?

budaatum:
You are showing a trend here of just making stuff up with no evidence.

Dump never declared how much he had before he became president nor after, so I don't quite see where you'd get the above from unless you were his accountant. In which case I must ask, how was jail?

See above.

budaatum:
Ask him. I do not advocate for stupid people.

But he is still alive. I assume people will die if they guzzled Bleach.

budaatum:
You must be new here. Everyone here knows basilico is mr mules2000maga who drank bleach for covid. If basilico says the sky is blue, many here will check for themselves to make sure its not red.

Now, back to your claim. Unless you drank bleach with basilico and just parroted his lies without checking.

Since he is still alive I assume the bleach did not kill him. Do you know why he drank bleach if he did?

nateevs:
Now we should forget your own claim. You don't understand the point of pedigree. Like sheep like Trump.

You didn't research the proof but were quick to jump on it, just because it's in opposition to Trump.

Show the evidence!

Actually, not at all. I saw it as a brazen show of rank hypocrisy that he felt the need to cut out Basilico's post when mine was just a mere addendum to his.

nateevs:
Trump's wealth never shrunk during his first presidency because there was no official declaration of Trump net worth before his first term. But you wouldn't know this because are a sheep, a cultist.

Trump told you he didn't earn $400k/year because he needs a good story to keep the sheep at the base. You don't know this, I don't know this. You only know because yeah "the Fuhrer said so" ...

What he might or might not have earned is a side show for what is actually happening. Check how much he earned from the backdoor via the Trump.org campaign sheep.

It's all about the money sheep.

I completely understand your skepticism. I am citing CNN here. Should resonate within your echo chamber. I assume.

So even CNN agree that his wealth shrunk as the 45th.

Political facts says true on him constantly donating his salaries during his 2016-20 presidency.

https://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/promises/trumpometer/promise/1341/take-no-salary/

You might have another means of verifying his net worth or how much he scrubbed from his campaign donations. I assume you will present irrefutable evidence to validate your disbelief.

budaatum:
Show us some evidence for Biden refusing to comply with a court order please, because I can't find anything to support your claim.

Forget my own claim. What about Basilico's post?

nateevs:
You and Tucker are liars. Tucker said this only because Trump told him. And Trump never proved this. But you are sheep, so must believe it.

Elon Musk is $400bn rich only by equity. Mostly Tesla. Tesla's share are seriously overvalued in P/E ratio when compared for instance, to serious market competition like BYD. This means, sheep, that if Tesla crashes today, Elon could be only $80bn rich tomorrow.

If you have a billionaire mindset, then you never want this to happen to you. So yes you will crave power, buy it, steal it if you must. It's consolidation.

Don't tell me about Elon's lack of love for wealth. That's talk for the sheep. And yes, that's why we are following the money for Elon and Trump.

Hope I'm summarizing adequately. Trump did not earn a penny off his $400K/yr in 2016-2020 and his net worth actually contracted after his presidency. Then, EM is only worth a puny $80 bln so he must steal power to consolidate his wealth. Was he doing this when he was a Democrat? Are there other billionaires who might have done same under the previous Administration? I'm really interested in knowing Trump's secret. How he skips the salaries that Obummer and Biden craved so much and stole so much but lost a good portion of his wealth during his presidency - all at the same time.

basilico:
Trump joining politics in my opinion was mainly because Obama blasted him at a White House correspondent dinner.
He had been saying the same things about America being exploited by Japan and other nations from late eighties .Later he was publicly miffed at fully loaded ships docking at American ports and leaving with empty containers.The so called Panamax and Post Panamax ships. Oprah Winfrey in an interview almost begged him to run.. later when he did she declared, "Donald, I'm with her". The witch.
If he didn't join politics he would be playing golf and having a blast.

On this he ranks top if not the only one who became President to improve America and not self enrichment. His advisors, aides and friends are in it for the money, they have to get their pound of beef for their support to him. Noone joins politics out of philanthropy. Apart from




Trump.

Tucker Carlson said Trump was offered $5 bln not to run for president. He turned it down.

Elon Musk is worth $400 bln and loves money so much he fought Sam Altman for trying to monetize OpenAI.

These fools have one theory or the other for Trump that never pans out. But give them accurate theories (based on irrefutable evidence) that will come to pass almost prophetically, you'll be labeled a conspiracy theorist. In the same thread.

So funny.

They said this was Kbot at the SB.

Cheeks.

A40:
What lies? You're sounding like a broken record atp

You are a Kendrick ex fan. I'm someone who has never rated Drake despite listening to his music. I know enough of Drake to know who he even got his style from. Or what will you say next? That I'm lying about Drake getting his swag from Phonte

This is not a productive argument. You've mostly been waffling about subject matter that does not remotely pique my interest.

The whole world has acknowledged your guy lost the beef. He knows he's lost and that's why he's attacking civilians, hoopers like LeBron and DeRozan and being a Karen all over the place

The rest of your peacocking is not giving what you think it's giving.

I hate to break it to you. Nobody actually cares what you know on banal matters like this

If you're truly convinced, you won't need to keep repeating it. A so-called fact that the world accepts, should be able to translate into real adulation right? The tours are still struggling and they added dates to feign clamor now they'll have to start picking strange sicknesses to cancel dates. His reputation was not made any better by this SB fiasco. The YT comments are BRUTAL.

I feel for you and your man. You went all in for him. It's tough. Be strong.

See if you can squeeze in another post after me so you can have the last word. It means alot to you. Apparently.

basilico:
Where is your post critiquing any of those four areas Biden floured the Supreme Court esp?
Drop a link. Talk the walk.

They won't. I don't know why these people want to start crying too soon? Trump still has like 1440 days left na. Chai.

Plenty wailing to go.

basilico:
Yes it's unheard of a president to defy court orders. I posted this yesterday.

Student Loan Forgiveness:
The Supreme Court ruled that the Biden administration overstepped its authority in attempting to cancel up to $400 billion in student loans. Despite this, Biden's administration has continued to grant forgiveness through existing programs.
Immigration Policies:
The Supreme Court has blocked some of Biden's immigration policies, including attempts to end the "Remain in Mexico" policy. However, the administration has sought to implement alternative measures that may not fully align with the Court's directives.
Vaccine Mandates:
The Court struck down Biden's vaccine mandate for large employers, yet the administration has continued to promote vaccination through other channels and initiatives.
Environmental Regulations:
The Supreme Court has limited the Biden administration's ability to enforce certain environmental regulations, particularly regarding emissions. The administration has pursued other regulatory avenues despite these setbacks.

Another hypocrite. Show me where you complained about this
These are not judges... They are activists - interfering often making ex-parte rulings where they don't listen to the govts views.
Your diagnosis. Selective Amnesia

The Biden Administration refused to comply with court orders forbidding the govt from mandating C-19 mRNA poisons for permanent residency petitions whilst simultaneously refusing to mandate same for illegal immigrants who crossed the borders. Trump's Administration has waived all such stupid requirements now. In Texas, AG Paxton had beat the FG on 2 different occasions. Yet, they never complied with it till January 23rd, after Trump's Inauguration.

Are you not entertained? Are you not?

Pay me my money!

A40:
Which explains the bubble gum pop rap he keeps dropping.

Who argued with you about Drake and being a streams merchant. Now you're just imagining things.

Grammies don't matter but streams do? Sorry I am not a pop lover like you. I don't judge my MCs based on streams

You've claimed I stopped listening to Drake cause he stopped hanging with Jay. I showed you proof that from day 1 that I was never a fan unlike you that turned on K-dot

I would rather listen to Phonte from Little Brother (the guy Drake got his whole influence and style from btw) than that mass production wack song merchant

If I destroy the lies again, it will be that I typed an epistle. Just stop discussing this guy, truly. You don't know anything about him. Please. Just stop. LOL. Please.

Nobody is rating rapper's pens based on streams but how else will I decide who the best team in the EPL is? Points on the table. That's what streams (tours, clout, reach, influence, replay value, consistency, range, versatility etc) encompass. Awards that are voted on by select committees made of clicks are subjective nonsense. It is based on horse trading and networking.

That's why Esperanza Spalding (doubt you even know her) won best new artist over Drake and Bieber in 2010. Preposterous. But if you summarily investigated why she won, it will be clear. I would soon start charging fees for my free lectures here.

At least we have someone who will win Free throws for us. What a relief.

Steph has gone back to being good. I love him when he isn't opening his dirty mouth to endorse that witch that . . .

Anyways, welcome Jimmy we love you.

KD, you are forgiven. I love you bro.

User09:
Have to be honest A40, Android17 has really solid and compelling arguments.

I just dey dash the guy likes dey go

To me, truly it is not even about being a fan.

My issue is, Michael Jackson fought with Sony Music because they tried to break him too, when he got too big. What did he have to deal with for the rest of his life? Pedophile allegations even though, everyone in Hollywood knew that he was not.

Is it not funny that Lebron, Jay-Z, Dre etc, won't make any comment about Diddy but all are comfy dancing to a song that is accusing someone else of what Diddy actually did? And human beings are happy with it?

Me and you don't need to be lawyers to agree that, if there is a pending litigation around a song - especially as it relates to a distributor and their client - everyone will be afraid to touch the song based on "pending litigation".

In fact, with Jay-Z's recent Pedophilia charges, the NFL were not supposed to go-ahead and continue their selection deal with RocNation (until the case was over). These people ended Janet Jackson for her nipple slip, and canceled M.I.A for showing the middle finger. Think if it. That's how sensitive the NFL are about showing or alluding to anything that could be provocative to underage viewers.

Yet, the NFL, UMG etc, ignored Jay-Z's own case, but allowed K-dot perform (even if it was an edited version of the song) a song glorifying Pedophilia! Especially when that song is against the most successful artist under UMG, and he has sued them for promoting it.

Instead, they dared him to sue them (in his lawsuit, he said they told him he would be ridiculed in the court of public opinion and his career will never recover from it).

Who does that if it is not malicious intent, and why are people brainwashed enough to think he is on the wrong side of history?

The man does not want anything related to Pedophilia attached to his name and instead of his label, actively trying to make that happen, they are saying he is trying to cancel free speech!

Fun Fact: Jimmy Jam is the father of Bella Harris. Buahahaha.

A40:
Coping? No be you don dey lament and salaye since why my guy just dey pack Grammies and other accolades dey go.

Back to Grammies? Grammies are subjective, dude. Milli Vanilli won one. Cardi and Doechii have but Nicki Minaj doesn't?

If I tell you, you're really scrambling, it is because it is true. Drake does not want to win Grammies again. That last time he won in 2019, he used the opportunity to drag them on their stage. He does not submit his work to the committee. He threatened UMG in 2022 when they wanted to submit his work without his consent. Drake is not on anyone's level as far as music streaming is concerned. That's why they want him down, bad. Sorry to have to correct your lies again, man.

See what Drake values below (who sold the most, who got streamed the most, who made the most money): He has 39. Kdot has 7.

You guys are better than K-bot. He can't cope. You are doing it so well.

A40:
More long winded filler just like a Drake album.

Nigga I've showed you posts from 8 years ago mirroring the same opinion that I had today which highlights this era is weak.

You said you were a K-dot fan till recently so who's the inconsistent one?

Ol boy I do not care about convincing you on nothing. Just keep bandaging and nursing Drake's bruised ego.

Like Kbot, it is the reality that you guys never want to deal with hence why you're coping really hard. 😉 --> remember how Drake stopped hanging with Pedophile Jigga and you stopped listening to his music too?

A40:
This your cry don too much mehn kilode. Emotional just like Drake. You said I stopped fvckin with Drake cos he wasn't cool with Jay Z no more

I showed you receipts that I never really liked Drake and his bubble gum music that's mundane and repetitive, now you're going on another wild tangent. I don't know Drake's music well? That's your opinion, that I care nothing about

Relax. He's not the first to lose a rap beef neither will he be the last

A40:
Just because I can't stand this era of rap as a whole[/b]don't mean I don't rate Kendrick over Drake's bubble gum weak music with trash beats and weak storylines. I only enjoy the Jay features where Jay comes and rinses him on his tracks like Light Up, Talk Up, Pound cake.

[b]Since he stopped fvckin with Jay I don't really care much for his music

This should be clear to anyone. Here you are saying: the whole era is weak but I rate Kendrick over Drake (in the land of the blind the one-eyed man. . . ). That is not the same with the post where you are claiming potential GOAT status. That's a walk-back.

The second bolded, that is you stating what I attributed to you. Abi no be your own post?

Again, don't worry with all the side talk of lose beef and emotions. When I need your subjective unsubstantiated opinions, I can ask for them.

That's my way of telling you, there is nothing you will say in this world that can convince me Drake lost. So don't waste your time. I only engaged when you said he sued Kbot or that he was the first to sue a label.

If you want to analyze lyricism, don't you have to know what is expected before it can be analyzed? We can fact-check the lines and their quality since you have said Drake's writing is weak and repetitive. Maybe, you'll explain how what is below is not weak and repetitive.

A40:
Mr Man this is as far back as 2017. I've never been enamored with Drake. So stop chatting confidently about things you don't know about

Messed with the music initially but over time it became too weak and watered down

So because K-dot belongs to this era I can't say it's weak? Are you hearing yourself.

As you can see I've always been a K-dot guy. So hopefully you can rest now

We can both agree that Drake is not missing out on not having you as a fan. So it is not special to tell us you don't like him. That's why I said ab initio, nobody is trying to change anyone's opinions of the other or the beef. I was a K-dot fan until recently so I know most of his music very well. You don't know Drake's music well so stop speaking on it like you do. That's the difference.

By the way, nobody said you're not a fan of Kendrick. You are clearly trying to now come off as he is the best of a bad bunch when you were projecting Rushmore status on him before. We can see it.

A40:
I backpedaled on being a Kendrick fan? Put the keyboard down man. I've always considered him the best of this generation

Resist the urge to salaye my guy. All this thesis doesn't undo Drake's L and public disgrace

Why feel the need to tell us how mixed your feelings are about an era of rap that has Kdot in? Almost like you don't want the stench of the terrible SP performance to stain your white. We can all see it. You ain't fooling no one bruh.

PS: Stop quoting these weak and watery bars man. Rap has really fell off if this is what is wowing people

Those are not his hard bars. They're just responses he has given in the past to your arguments. That's why I cited them.

Afrobeats
RnB
Grime
Drill
Rap
Conductor Rap
Melodic Rap
Dance hall
Patois

And so on. Drake is incredibly versatile that he has top 10 hits in almost every musical genre possible. Of course, being a purist, he has purist rap tracks too.

#StopTalkingAboutAnArtistYouDon'tKnow

A40:
Lmaoo. What a spectacular cope. I'm helping you compile the list of people Drake can sue. City of New Orleans, state of Louisiana, Serena Williams

Na you dey mansplain and salaye since.

Wetin consign me to debate with you over beef wey your guy don lose and is filing lawsuits all about.

Critically acclaimed album
5 Grammies
A memorable Superbowl performance where 70,000 people called Drake a minor lover.

I understand where you are right now. You even back-pedaled on being a Kbot fan and pivoted on mansplaining that your hate for Drake is because he isn't cool with Pedophile Jigga no more. That's cope bro.

Stop scrambling about who got sued. It was UMG. The same people who struck down the set of the performance when it leaked. Everyone who watched Akademiks or Suonosphere already knew the entire pre-recorded moment that you tried to harp on. It means so much to you people that Pedophilia be celebrated as entertainment so that Dre and Jigga won't be afraid of joining their bestie, Diddy.

Of course, nothing concern you and Drake apart from all the lies I had to destroy here. After lies, the next move is all the subjective nonsense about his music. You're not going to convince anyone that the artist whose work is more valued than 70's-90's music put together is wack. Just like citing Serena does not make your argument any less terrible than it was when it was originally on Twitter. LOL.

Drake don chop SZA and Serena clean mouth. Even chop Jack Dorsey's own too join. Chop J-lo. Chop Rihanna sef. But K-dot rapped "we hate the bitches you've bleeped" and the fringe Opps wey like love-vendor-C and what not celebrated it as barssssssss.

Then Kbot brought 2 of those on the SP stage. Talk about Coping on a kentro level.

Kbot told people to switch the TV off at the end of his performance. The consensus is, that's what he should have started with. #BotLikeUs

We are not Muslims. We do not #AllowWackBars.

SpaceX:
The missing keywords should be "He was falsely investigated".

The author of the article is a gremlin that turns out, was receiving USAID funds.