Android17's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Android17's Profile › Android17's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 (of 133 pages)
airmark:Hahahahahahahaha. So witty. How long did it take you to come up with that? |
basilico:The damage you've done to their agenda is here for all to see. I know you don't need the pep talk but just like IjeDross, that guy's reputation precedes him. People that should be humble and leaking their wounds, want to play reverse psychology to hide obvious TDS and Post-election PTSD. I'm bidding my time till Zelensky and the Ukrainian war don finally scatter like I predicted. I'll revisit some of the foolishness on display. Should be fun. |
descarado:10-15 years? Bill Gates has already gone to The View to announce another one is in the offing. His acolytes like Peter Hotez etc. have started doing same. Obviously fools here will call it a conspiracy theory now until they are wrong again like concerning everything they've ever said on literally anything. The lack of USAID funding is really affecting them. I used to think Bill Gates was psychotic enough to use his own money but the revelations from DOGE showed GAVI received $4 bln from USAID. Everything about that guy is just not what meets the eyes. Even his philanthropy is fake. A completely deranged psychopath just like Tony Fauci. |
Bimmarlykay:I understand if they're saying Flick or Slot not Carlo, now. Nothing against him, but even he knows he is praying not to play Barca again this season. People may not believe me, but this RM is the worst RM team City have faced since 2020. Leverkusen will toy with this RM. AC Milan beat them at the Bernabéu. Conversely, this City team drew 3-3 from 3-0 vs Feyernoord at the Etihad. I'm not sure people understand why I don't rate Enzo Maresca. City are shxt this season. Nsi. If we played this same team against BHA, Bournemouth or Newcastle they'll thrash us. Let alone RM at the Bernabéu. This is like that Barca vs Bayern that lost 0-7 on Agg. Physically we are past it but Pep thinks he can positionally play his way out of our personnel deficiencies. |
drisham:Sporting that Arsenal thrashed 1-5 at Sporting's ground. That same Sporting that common Dortmund walloped 0-3 at their ground o. Thrashed City 1-4. |
Unlimited22:Nothing do my afternoon. I watched only 35 mins or so and focused on the Liverpool game. I want to be in the judgment room when God is judging Pep on that last day. The team-sabotage of today, I'll like to listen to his excuses. Something that has failed 14/40 games this season, is what Pep decided to try again against RM at the Bernabéu. Even neophytes will at least try something else. Not Pep. There's only one way to play according to Pep. |
Godx:Don't worry. The scales will soon fall off. |
Sporting beat City 4-1 Tottenham beat City 4-0 (at the Etihad) Arsenal beat City 5-1 PSG beat City 4-2 (really could have been 8-2) This same RM lost to Barca 4-0 and 5-2. But Carlo is better than Pep. He's not even started sniffing Flick. Foolish talk. Otherwise, Amorim, Big Ange, Arteta and Enrique are all better than Pep. See why we said, foolish talk? |
raumdeuter:Haaland said he didn't feel too good so his is understandable. Marmoush is LW and Foden will play false 9 according to what I am reading online. So you're right, Pep wants a fluid front and enough control to not lose the game by the first half. I just don't see what Bernardo brings to the table. Jude and Cama are much stronger and taller. They'll win most of the duels. Then he doesn't shoot and barely passes forward. He just helps when we are playing OOP. I don't understand why Pep cannot see his team without Bernardo in it. Vinicius has many tricks in his sleeves but they ultimately boil down to his pace and strength. To that end, I actually think Khusanov can hold his own against Vini. My prediction still won't change. I saw enough during the PSG game to know Bernardo needs more than heart and willpower to combat with these more physical midfielders. Except he will just sit in that midfield to mop up any 2nd balls. |
raumdeuter:Pep doing Pep things. RM will beat City on the day probably 3-1 or 4-2. Bernardo, Gundogan in this day and age? I can even forgive Gundogan since it worked against Newcastle. But Bernardo? |
basilico:Yeah. His comeuppance is loading. Maybe just maybe some people will only then realize they had been deceived all along. Denialists do you remember when Fauci assured the govt of 2017 that they will surely face a pandemic? Yeah, DOGE saw $40m of USAID funds sent to Wuhan in 2017. The Wuhan Virology lab where gain-of-function research is being conducted. Basically, where they engineer viruses and possible vaccines to combat them. That is literally what that lab does. Fauci used tax payers money to engineer a virus. Lied about the origin of said virus, oversaw the banning of all forms of alternative OTC drugs like HCQ and IVM (even though his emails showed he knew they were effective). Then supported people getting fired for refusing an experimental procedure they knew was never safe nor effective. Think of it. And Biden pardoned him. That should make you wonder why Biden will do so right? No. That does not get well-thinking people infuriated. Instead, they pile on Trump and Elon for exposing bast@rds like him. |
basilico:I will read articles here and there to extract truth especially for people who trust those news sources but we should never lose sight of the larger game at play. The AP received over $52m from USAID to push liberal agenda. That means they can NEVER be reasonable concerning this DOGE, Treasury, social security benefits discussion. The person who pays the piper dictates the tune.
|
descarado:People that were wrong about everything concerning COVID-19 want to come back to the table to play miserable skeptic to the people who were right about everything. Yet same fools have gone right back to quoting the same news sources that lied to them. Don't forget "Safe" and "effective" is not one lie but two. Hehehehehehe. |
cococandy:Cool story Missus. IQ validation complete. Candidate did not qualify for intelligent conversation. |
IjeBos:I'm feeling so sad. That's how much I value your opinion. *yes I am being sarcastic* |
IjeBos:Chemical Engineer. Anti-science? You better ask about me. There is a reason some people you see here don't touch my posts. Nobody wants to be reminded about all their posts from 2020. Let's leave it at that. If you want me to make a fool of you as always, look for something stupid to post about the nonsense they packaged to you fools as science. You can invite the best epidemiologist you know to post through your account. I'll make a laughing stock of said person. Preferably, get Fauci. I've been looking for his arse for a while now. ![]() |
So the next foolish argument is Trump banned abortions or plans to? How do you people debate with people who should be confined to an Insane Asylum? |
basilico:You started by entertaining AP as a news source even though they are one of those who received USAID funds to push lies. This is like Biden saying "the FBI/CIA have ruled the laptop as showing all signs of a Russian disinformation campaign" by quoting Politico that were getting the same government patronage. And you also did not even read the article. The caption and contents are at variance. The article says Trump & Elon may have exaggerated the number of dead/ineligible people who received the benefits. Think of it. That is pure sophistry. It is not denying the claims but instead downplaying the impact. That's (D)ownplayingism - what Democrats do for their faves. People really need to understand what the data they are looking at is actually portraying. There is no way of verifying that the person on the receiving end was the individual who qualified for those social security benefits. The verification processes, where available, are very lax. On the treasury's side, Elon said every single disbursement was approved by the treasury with zero proof of following any verification process. Also, the lie about the system rejecting any D-O-Bs beyond anyone aged 115, is Julius Agwu Crack your Ribs material. Again, the system approved every single payment and there was no verification process before or after disbursements. |
descarado:No single bird flu anywhere. Nobody bought the bs. They may later try again with climate flu or some other sh!t. These niccurs is ridiculous. |
See them quarreling o. You people that predicted it, I doff my hat.
|
budaatum:YoUrE cOrReCt ![]() We no dey cuss special people for my tribe abeg no vex ![]() |
descarado:Yeah. Political Bird flu. Announced by the center for disease CONTROL (not eradication if you weren't listening ). |
grandstar:You're bloviating. So this is the first time the egg prices have risen? Is that your claim? If no. Then, why won't you start by saying exterminating chickens is the cause of the rising egg prices? And since it was caused by Biden, why do you think it is the sole responsibility of Trump to correct it in 3 weeks? Answer progressively. Stop saying 40 different things at the same time. Lets do the right RCA here. Do you think food importation brings down the prices of those consumer goods? Really? |
SpaceX:Not just that. He thinks lack of chickens to lay eggs is less significant than the underpaid illegals (42% of which contribute to the poultry industry). Voodoo economics just to spite Orange man. |
budaatum:Do you really believe this article? I gleaned through and saw this (attached). Just wanted to make sure we are on the same page before proceeding or ignoring.
|
basilico:TDS. |
raumdeuter:
|
basilico:Imagine the type of gaslighting required to tell someone labor shortage rather than govt spending is responsible for inflation. What is it about hating Trump that makes fools out of otherwise intelligent people? |
grandstar:Just so we are clear, if Bird flu and bird extermination will lead to egg shortages and rising prices, why is Trump's name brought into this? What will the national plan do about the current situation? Which factor contributes more to product pricing in this regard? Chickens vs Illegals? Why is the timeline July and not say 6-9 months that it takes new Hatchlings to grow into Hens that can lay eggs? |
descarado:Who runs a business here and will sit casually when you are told your business cannot account for $1000? Just $1000 and these people will murder someone. But $50 bln/yr is what they want you to sneeze at. Tax player's money oh. Money I'd have gone to jail for, for not remitting to the govt. That's what they tell me not to care about. |
basilico:Of course Bruh. I was adding to your point. |
bemeruca:You people let his excesses go unchecked for a while so he started believing his own hype. - Congress can only gut a program that was congressionally created. - Congress can only appropriate funds to a program that was created by congressional consensus. - Even when Congress appropriates funds to a program, the execution of the funds rests solely on the Federal govt headed by POTUS. - Congressional appropriation does not bind the executive to irrevocably spend those funds. In other words, because Congress appropriated $5 bln for X Y Z program doesn't mean the executive must spend $5 bln. It just means the executive cannot go beyond $5 bln without requiring Congressional consensus. The guy just parrots brainless talking points without vetting them. Imagine thinking USAID for e.g (established by an EXECUTIVE order) requires Congress to be defunded. EXECUTIVE order anyone? It means the order will be implemented by the executive arm of govt. Some people should read a book. Sheesh. |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 (of 133 pages)


