₦airaland Forum

IjeBos:
Musk says "Some of the things I say will be incorrect".

How many people in this thread spread this 50 million dollars for Condoms in Gaza?
The US is going to have to tackle the misinformation that is being spread at a dizzying pace.

IjeBos:
Piffle?
You mean like this post?
What does it even mean? It's almost like reading the Jabberwocky


This whole quote shows a fundamental misunderstanding of US laws(esp. surrounding Student Loan forgiveness) and Supreme Court rulings.
You are basically asking for precedence of POTUS following the Law (I guess it may seem odd given Trump).
You also don't seem to understand what the Supreme Court found illegal about Biden's Student Loan plan yet here you are arguing something about it.
Honestly, I can't even make heads or tales of what you are trying to say.

This is my post:

Let me start where I started with Bud.aatum.
If I devise a plan to forgive student loans, find them summarily challenged in court, and SCOTUS returns them unconstitutional, should POTUS:

- Do what Biden did in this post if he did what you have above?

What you have above clearly is not a workaround, I agree. He simply revisited the other student loans he already knew existed but were not being implemented properly, found better ways to implement them, and was able to forgive more loans. Is that your argument? Let me be sure I've summarized it.

If so, how does that compare with the post below? There's a video for it too.
Notice he says "tried to BLOCK me".

IjeBos:
I've giving you enough information to help you on your way to actually speaking not out of ignorance.
You have google right? If so, google the programs the revised Student Loan relief was based on. Find which ones were not legal. Hint.. none were.
The premise of all your arguments on this topic is flawed because you've chosen to try to have a conversation on a topic you haven't studied.
I would assume you're goal here would be learning and not just standing by misinformation you find online.

Let me start where I started with Budaatum.
What did he mean here? I read what you have above. It is a lot of nothing. If I devise a plan to forgive student loans, find them summarily challenged in court, and SCOTUS returns them unconstitutional, should POTUS:

- Do what Biden did in this post if he did what you have above?

What you have above clearly is not a workaround, I agree. He simply revisited the other student loans he already knew existed but were not being implemented properly, found better ways to implement them, and was able to forgive more loans. Is that your argument? Let me be sure I've summarized it.

If so, how does that compare with the post below? There's a video for it too.
Notice he says "tried to BLOCK me".

airmark:
And I am here.

Kilishihunter:
The truth is you'll have been even beaten more badly if you went toe to toe with them on transitions, arsenal beat you at that game talkless of Madrid that's even dangerous, your midfield and defence has become somewhat weak, I know rodri 's absence played a huge part but you should still have been able to patch things up a little, maybe pep is also exhausted too like klopp was last season who knows

Kilishihunter:
If pep was to leave now or when his contract expires who do you reckon as an ideal candidate to replace him?

airmark:
This.



The road of 'I don't care' has now led you to the dungeon of had I known.

budaatum:
You are not following my argument at all, Android, and are adding your opinion to it and calling it mine.

The link simply lists the cases against dump. And I posted it to show you Dems weaponising, as in using the law to challenge dump.

Is it POTUS's duty to develop a workaround (that is not explicitly explained) except saying "we came up with one to still disobey SCOTUS' order"?

IjeBos:
If you wanted to discuss civilly, you would have spent time actually learning about what Biden did so you could discuss.
What you did here is spread a lot of propaganda, which is so often the case in this thread and in the US right now.

What I posted is not a workaround and is what Biden did.
What I posted and what Biden did is not inconsistent with what he wrote in the tweet you linked.
And the post was written in a way to make sure it was not inconstant.



Biden's problem and the Democrat's problem is he/they expects/ed people to actually read and understand policies before making assumptions.
That's not where the US and clearly this thread is in this day.
You didn't seem to.

Android17:
Let me tell you my M.O. I discuss civilly until people want to go down and dirty. Depending on my mood, I can be incredibly nasty. Just take note as your reputation precedes you.

Let me start where I started with Budaatum.
What did he mean here? I read what you have above. It is a lot of nothing. If I devise a plan to forgive student loans, find them summarily challenged in court, and SCOTUS returns them unconstitutional, should POTUS:

- Do what Biden did in this post if he did what you have above?

What you have above clearly is not a workaround, I agree. He simply revisited the other student loans he already knew existed but were not being implemented properly, found better ways to implement them, and was able to forgive more loans. Is that your argument? Let me be sure I've summarized it.

If so, how does that compare with the post below? There's a video for it too.
Notice he says "tried to BLOCK me".

budaatum:
You are being disingenuous by halves, I dare say.

Magas have been insisting page after page here that dump don't mean what he said but now you wanna claim Biden tweeted what you understand. I mean, could he not have been exaggerating a tad, or outright lying?

Biden used existing laws to forgive as much student loan as he could within the law, unless you want to show us a judge said it ain't.

What he forgave was way far below what he promised, and there's people who never got their loan forgiven because his path for more and as promised was blocked. By a judge.

Practically. On student loan forgiveness, Biden failed to deliver.

Imo, US student loan is Indentured servitude and the master is those owed, so he clearly was up against powerful resistance and I'm glad he tried. We Nigerians should learn about this considering these early days of our own student loaning.

170k after 24 years is usury, I'd think.

IjeBos:
This is a silly take untethered from what actually happened.

Biden created a plan for student loan relief.
The Supreme Court found that plan unconstitutional.
He then went and made sure the student loan relief programs that were already in law were being implemented and those students who were eligible for that relief received the relief.
The goal of some of these programs Congress passed was to get people working in fields that didn't pay a lot.

There was no workaround.
He followed the law.

You've spent a lot of time arguing something you heard on right wing propaganda that you don't understand.

airmark:
I warned you but you wouldn't learn, even without limbs you allowed Raumdeuter to mislead you.

Even with tears in your eyes, it's Fraudiola till you die.

nateevs:
You did not challenge anything because I never claimed authority over his self worth. What you are reading from me and what your are understanding are two different things. But I know how it's come about. It's sheep mentality.

budaatum:
Since, Android?

budaatum:
I love how you jumped there from your "Biden did", which I did not agree with since Biden didn't in my view, to dump should and therefore will do, lol. It enlightens.

No! Biden should not disregard every court order, and if he does I hope he loses the election, because that is just not the democracy I'd want for America and I hope the majority wouldn't vote for it, though I'm giggling at my own surprise.

What Biden did was some wuruwuru that no one (to the best of my little knowledge, so correct me if I'm wrong please), brought before a judge so a judge could have held him to account. Someone after all does have to go before a judge and say, "Judge! Biden doing what you said he shouldn't do. Sanction him!"

But you're right. Dump will disregard the law. And he has a supporting Scotus which Biden never had which bothers me. Not that Biden never had it, but that the right to disobey the law is seemingly being given to dump, in advance. Its like saying our King Charlie has immunity from any crime he commits, an immunity we don't even give to our gods.

But you know the Dems will "weaponise". Or so the pugs say we do when we lawyer up before a judge, and antifa, and blm, and union and etc etc etc for democracy, least as blues see it, and already are.

I did laugh at the below.

nateevs:
Your problem off the bat is assuming that because I am 100% anti-Trump, then I "thoroughly believe in" CNN.

This is the problem you guys have. Sheep mentality. You think no one is capable of forming opinions about Trump, unless it's from the media.

You are on a road to even more nonsense. You think his networth reduced, then you man up and phucking show us the proof of it. ........Instead, you are using a news source that you criticize as a Trump sheep to justify nonsense for this instance of winning..... and then trying to make it look like you know me with CNN from somewhere. Don't project your insecurities on me sheep.

Give us the reference point for Trump's wealth as at 2016. Trump as a President-elect and fully sworn in never declared his self worth, so what is your source?

Because the Fuhrer said it?

OkpaNsukkaisBae:
City committing so many mistakes.

But what was Guardiola thinking?
This match needed a winger who make things happen. The first time Fodden went for dribbling, it resulted in penalty

Kilishihunter:
You'll need to either hope rodri returns earlier or invest in your midfield, Nico looks like one who'll be a stalwart for years cause we knew his quality at lamasia but seeing kdb, gundo, stones getting tired legs in this modern football and your youngsters with low physicality it might still be a problem, also a great goalie to replace ederson too

Leyqute:
Android17

What do you have to say today?

Generational talent is not talenting again

swiz123:
Kovacic had no business being in this game. Dude was always clumsy and useless. Pep should have known better.

AirBere:
May be in Saudi because no way City is competitive with him in the starting 1. At this level, he's done. Great player.

A40:
I do not care for this jejune argument. Everybody know who don win and who lose.

Na you don dey wail since on top small matter

raumdeuter:
Will there be a next season for KdB at citeh

OkpaNsukkaisBae:
Does City know it's Valverde/Mendy playing FB?
Make dem try use wing if the center no gree.
Commit dis ad hoc FB.

swiz123:
KDB has been a disgrace. Old age treating him so badly.

nateevs:
Sir Sheep, at least do some diligence. Go find the reference point for Trump's Networth in 2016 that Forbes was quoting. Was it an official declaration from Trump?

budaatum:
You may indeed translate it how you wish, but if the supreme court disagreed with his workaround they have the power to sanction him and would have but didn't, just as they would if they disagree with dumps workaround or wouldn't if its legal.