₦airaland Forum

basilico:
Can that inflation rise be countered by a massive drop on federal spending?
Assuming illegals stop harvesting and thousands of USAID orphans are fired,that would imply a lot of people seeking jobs will increase, be it farm jobs or if they learn to code.

Did Biden not get his Inspector Generals to obliterate 100-140m Chickens shortly before Trump's Inauguration?

If you kill Chickens (for a fictitious bird flu), that has already affected the supply chain of eggs and the cascading effect will lead to more expensive eggs.

You have to be profoundly dishonest (not You obviously), to skip the part of the cause and hop on the effect. But the D in Denialism is for Democrats.

Remember, I told you Nigerians asked the right questions in the past but simply came down to the wrong conclusions.

This is a former foreign affairs minister who was part of the original BH investigation team.

basilico:
Agree. You need to watch this Professor,ex CIA guy interviewed. He is presented facts , denies the obvious, talks over and insults the host.

https://www.rt.com/shows/going-underground/612774-goodman-rattansi-trump-policy-clash/

That's how our resident idiot behaves.

TDS. A very real disease.

The people who never held the previous govts accountable for auditing the Pentagon think Trump is dishonest until he investigates the Pentagon.

News Flash! He plans on auditing the Pentagon and gutting the M-I-C of their slush fund source to sponsor forever wars. Rather than pontificating and pretending you care about real reforms, y'all dumb boomers can shut up and watch things unfold.

Again, hypocrites who hold Trump to one standard, and the evil psychos that actually destroyed the country? Excuses.

Just sit down and research why DOGE started with USAID. The answers are online. Hint: when a president puts a freeze on foreign aid spending. No agency is allowed to circumvent that. Especially one that was merely created by an EO and can be summarily discontinued with the brush of his pen.

The Pentagon will be audited as well. Just stop pretending you care. You don't. See the stupid easily disprovable lies you useful eediots post here for e.g

basilico:
Trump already had evidence Biden forced the Ukrainian general prosecutor out for investigating Burisma.
Why was he sending them aid when Hunter was still being paid by Burisma.
Furthermore during impeachment, the FBI already had the laptop from hell and knew it was authentic. FBI didn't interject. They would have blown the impeachment apart had they revealed the corruption of the Biden

He doesn't care about facts but I can play his game. I still have posers to trap him in any argument he deflects to.

The new one he is trying to research is why the media needed to call the aid a military one?

Obviously he wants to claim Trump's impeachment was justified even though I'm trying to show how they impeached Trump for something Biden did. Even though they knew the laptop was real. That's how evil these people are.

Android17:
When you are done wasting your own time, you will point out where in my post I called it military aid.

If you cannot, will you accept that you typed rubbish? If I ask you to prove that that aid is exclusively military aid, you will run away. Always indulging in topics that he is clearly at sea with.

Grow up. You sound childish.

IjeBos:
Everyone's understanding is wrong except the person who just learned the word "security assistance" 1 hour ago?
You should see a psychologist for that narcissism you have going on there.

Again, deflection.

You're not fooling anyone.

To think this all started from trying to defend Hunter. Hahaha. He didn't think I'll dismiss Foxnews.

Next time stop arguing nonsense.

At least, we know you don't want to touch your impeachment argument anymore.

Run along now.

IjeBos:
Here. You're spinning so hard, you seem to be having a hard time remembering your bullshit.


<<< After furiously googling "what is a Plaintiff and a Defendant for dummies">>>>


You're welcome, I'm glad I could make you smarter on this.
People usually get smarter after talking to me.
Unfortunately for you you still sound like you have a 5th grade understanding of this.
I guess better than not having any understanding as you previously demonstrated.
In the future, you might want to do your research first so you won't sound as dumb as you have the last few pages.

Weak attempt to deflect again.

You started from defending Hunter, you've now settled for making stuff up and arguing with yourself lol.

Just follow the foolish argument you're trying to make. I said all charges are petitions. You brought the plea agreement on your own and then turned around to say I called plea agreements petitions. What do you think paragraphs are for when replying people?

You tried to quote my post but didn't post it well. So I used a '.' to quote your post. That's why I just typed "they are all petitions. . ." in the first paragraph

It was responding to my ". . .what Smirnov was charged with. . ."

IjeBos:
I assume Fox NEws is legacy media as well...
But we all can see how well listening to "non legacy media" is working out for you
😂😂😂😂😂



Why would I shut up when schooling you is soo much fun?
Are you not embarrassed yet?

Yes Foxnews is legacy media.

Yes, you are indeed dummer than Basilico thinks.

Do you know the original screenshot is from your CNBC link? And that if I was to scroll through your Foxnews link I'd see the same thing I'm showing to you?

Do you know how stupid you have to be not to even know when you don't know what you are talking about?

Like, how dumb can you really be?

Military aid is a SUBSET of Security Assistance. Do you actually know what that means or do you need urgent medical attention?

The Security Assistance covers economic, defense and military support. This is another disinfectant and bleach argument.

Stop and actually think before typing.

Do you know why your legacy media would rather call it a military aid vs security assistance?

Like I said, from defending Hunter to proving you are incapable of layered reading. You're bummy.

IjeBos:
Hey dumbfuck, a plea agreement is not a petition.
Noone is petitioning the court for anything.


Do you even understand who a plaintiff is in relation to a defendant?
You would be embarrassed to have written this if you had even an iota of understanding what you were talking about.
You continuously write the dumbest shit and smile in your ignorance.



I've given you everything you need to educate yourself and not sound like a fool.
If you want to continue to sound like a fool that is your business.
If you want to learn about how the US courts work, plea agreements or what really happened in the Biden case, all you have to do is read.
It seems you prefer bullshitting and sounding stupid instead.

Can you show where I said a plea agreement is a petition?

Funny enough. Thanks for helping me catch the error in my post. Yes. I just meant the defendant defends himself against the charge, petition, argument brought. So he is the one that signs the plea agreement. Not the plaintiff or prosecutor.

See, it is easy for me to admit my mistakes because they are rare and inconsequential.

Now tell us why you presented a plea agreement as evidence in Hunter's defense? Do you see why I told you your arguments are circular and dumb?

IjeBos:
This guy is going to die on the hill of semantics he doesn't even understand.
What the fux are you even talking about.
Did you even read the shit you linked?

He blocked two tranches, aid the Defense Department was supposed to deliver and aid the State department was supposed to deliver.
Both tranches were for military spending, thus the military aid.


https://www.defensenews.com/congress/2019/09/25/what-you-need-to-know-about-the-us-aid-package-to-ukraine-that-trump-delayed/

This is going to be my last post on this.
You're following the Bemeruca, Raumdeuter path on thins. Gaslighting and lying some more when you get called out for Bullshitting.
You've reached the, "you are an idiot with nothing intelligent to say" level for me.

My friend sharrap and stop trying to deflect.

Do you know why it is called a security assistance rather than a military aid?

Do you know why the eediots you listen to at CBNC and the rest of the legacy media conveniently framed it a military aid vs security assistance?

Stop pretending you even understand what is being discussed. I'm talking A and you are bringing up countries to change the topic.

When you find out that the person on the other end knows more than you and can write down everything you know on a mustard seed, learn to shut up.

Like shut the fvck up already.

IjeBos:
.

They are all petitions, silly.

The petition, charge, case or argument against Smirnov is brought forward by the prosecutor- DOJ

The person who defends himself against the charge is called the defendant.

It is the defendant (Smirnov) that comes to a plea agreement.

What in the world of mad people are you talking about?

I asked you to post how the court came to sentencing Smirnov for 6 years after finding him guilty. Let's see if he played any role with respect to the laptop and all the other pieces of evidence that linked Biden to Burisma.

IjeBos:
You didn't call it military aid.
But it was military aid. Hence the big issue.
It was military aid intended to help them fend off Russia.
You don't even understand what you are posting on.

You will learn to look both ways before crossing me.

This is culled from your link:

https://www.cnbc.com/2020/01/16/trump-administration-broke-law-in-withholding-ukraine-aid.html

It is called a Security Assistance. And before you say it is merely semantics, this is the disparity between the 2. One is a subset of the other.

So stop trying to feed us waffles for supper.

Do you even know why the lying media and retards at CNBC called it military aid? It was to hoodwink foolish people like you. Buahahahahaha. Keep parroting their talking points. You look and read, silly.

IjeBos:
Of course you didn't because as I keep saying you're an idiot who doesn't know what you are talking about.
What fuxing type of aid did you think he was withholding, cookies and crackers?
It was military aid approved by congress Ukraine needed to fend off Russia.
Lol.
God you are a dumbass





The rest is a reiteration of the nonsense you have been posting supported by nothing.
Do you see the difference between what I do and you do.
You write nonsense, unsupported by anything but that clearly disturbed mind of yours.
I write posts supported by articles and court documents or things people call facts.

#FactsoverMentallyDeranagedNonense

When you are done wasting your own time, you will point out where in my post I called it military aid.

If you cannot, will you accept that you typed rubbish? If I ask you to prove that that aid is exclusively military aid, you will run away. Always indulging in topics that he is clearly at sea with.

Grow up. You sound childish.

IjeBos:
Huh?
Holy shit @ this statement.
I can't.
It was a plea agreement that was accepted by the court (Judge) and Smirnov was sentenced to 6 years in jail.
I get why you wanted me to post the Supreme Court ruling on the Student Relief Case now. You have no idea what it is.
You should really stop talking about things you have 0 idea about.
Lol @ telling someone to read a book while spouting off nonsense you are clearly wrong about.

So for the record, you have proven:
- You have 0 idea how the US government works and the role the Supreme Court plays
- You have 0 idea at how Us Courts work and how defendants make deals and are sentenced.
Here, this may help you with some of it:
Courts 101: An Understanding of the Court System
https://ijis.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/ijis_wp_courts_101_understan.pdf

As for the rest of the nonsense in your post.
I can't make any sense of it as it doesn't make sense.
It's clear you have 0 idea or understanding about what you are talking about here either.

Does bullshiting and rambling like this work for you in real life?

Why were you posting what Smirnov was charged with? What does that have to do with the court's interpretation about how the guilty judgment was arrived at?

Hope you're not deceiving anyone with your antics. It is clear you want nothing to do with the initial argument you started with.

That should teach you to stop commenting on issues that are clearly above your pay grade.

IjeBos:
Your posts are always fill so many lies it's hard to hit them all.
It's amazing that someone can write a post that i close to 100% inaccurate. Well done, that's an achievement.

The above is one of many many I found esp. brain dead.

Trump was not just impeached for withholding Military aid. He was impeached for withholding aid for Ukraine for a corrupt motive.
The corrupt motive being he wanted Ukraine to open an investigation into Joe Biden and announce it.
Not necessarily investigate, just announce they were opening an investigation. (It's no surprise that shortly after Smirnov made his now false allegations about Joe biden bribery in Ukraine)
In the US Legal system that corrupt motive can separate legal actions from illegal actions.

Recap:
Legal to withhold aid from countries.
Illegal to withhold aid from countries if they don't open an investigation into your political rivals.

It's a minor distinction that requires a little bit of brain power and thought.
No wonder you are having a hard time with it. That thought part seems to be a struggle for you.

Not who is always correcting people's posts for errors? Ha ha ha.

I want it on record that I was ashamed I responded to this monstrosity of a post.

First, nobody mentioned military aid.
Second, Trump did not withhold any aids to Ukraine
Third, there was no corrupt motive. He simply told them he knew Joe Biden was colluding with Burisma via Hunter and he wanted the tea otherwise he wouldn't release the funds.

- he did not withhold the funds
- nothing was provided to him about Biden, yet he still released the funds
- as POTUS, he had the rights to withhold those funds
- turns out Biden was colluding with Burisma
- Trump was impeached even though he didn't withhold the funds.
- Biden was protected. First by denying the laptop story. I could go on and on.

Think of it, you deranged Trumpist. Trump was impeached for something Biden ACTUALLY did. But you hate one and defend the other. Shame on you.

Tueh.

IjeBos:
Ahh, so I thought you'd expose me if I posted the court documents? Guess not.
Just another mentally ill rant.
Next you will be talking about how the aliens abducted you as a child... and they all looked like Hunter Biden.

You mean that Smirnov whose allegations were central to the House impeachment of Joe Biden was not central to the Burisma case?
You sound more and more like a nut.
When Basilico has gone silent trying to defend it, you should probably know you've lost.

And it's so odd that you still revive this multiply debunked lie that somehow Biden tried to get the Ukrainian prosecutor fired for investigating his son. It's a lie for particularly stupid people which you seem to be one.
The Ukrainian prosecutor wasn't investigating corruption. Hence why everyone, from the International community to Ukrainians wanted him gone. Joe Biden was just delivering that message which was a bipartisan US message.

I love when people reveal themselves as nuts real time.
The right wing echo machine has done real damage to minds of people like you.
This shit is easy to read and research.
But it's like up is down and left is right.

And fyi, stop trying so hard to sound witty. You're not.
Reading your feigned intelligence is cringe.

IjeDunce, a petition is not a ruling. The petition is the argument made by the DOJ against Smirnov. Read a book or something.

You said Smirnov was central to what case, IjeDunce? He was central to the flimsy DOJ case to exculpate Biden. Not the case to discuss Hunter's laptop and its content. Again, stop pretending you know what the case was about. You're just so poorly put together as a human being if you want to wear a cape for the Biden's, even when you don't know what they did. Something has to be wrong with you mentally. Seriously.

Biden was . . .IjeDunce is trying to tell YOU not to listen to what Biden said even though there is a video online but he will tell you to ignore what Trump actually said, so he will be the Fuhrer they claim he is. Post the video so others can watch it. Then they can decide if they are as stupid as you. Simple.

FYI, 3 things are needed to prove a bribe. The briber, bribee and the objective of the bribe.

Burisma needed the prosecutor off the case. They had the motive to bribe. Hunter was involved with Burisma. He needed the protection of his father. Biden got 10% and needed to protect his son and family name.

Was the prosecutor, removed? Yes. Which means the objective of the bribe was met.

You, silly stupid dummy you, want us to believe the prosecutor was removed at the request of Biden for being corrupt. LOL. It doesn't matter if a prosecutor is corrupt, e-diot. What does that have to do with the laptop content? IjeEdiot.

IjeBos:
No need to force me to post anything.
I can easily back up whatever I say... that's the benefit of posting factual info and not being a mindless right wing drone.

It's always amazes me though, how to people like you the facts/court filings/confessions in court that are out there are lies and the lies without any facts behind them you take as Gospel truth.

Your mind is broken.

I plucked the section from the pertinent court filing.
https://www.courthousenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/smirnov-plea-deal.pdf

The mistake you keep making is replying, rather than hiding like all you ninnies do when nabbed. Now we don't even suspect you are a spastic numpty, we have proof for it here.

Stop posting this fluff about a freaking petition conjured by the corrupt DOJ and FBI. Hello The same FBI that got 51 of their ex and current staffers to swear an oath against the verisimilitude of the laptop? Even though, they had received it for months on end and could verify the contents?

Do you even know why that laptop was discovered? You think Hunter randomly forgot it? Do you think Ashley's diary was randomly leaked? You're so naive, I feel like calling you a fool. Hunter intentionally forgot the laptop at the repair shop and never went back to retrieve it even after the repair man had reached out repeatedly!

Hunter wanted to get back at his father! Another fact you TDS denialists will have to deal with as you cape for Biden.

Back to Smirnov, lol, please allow me lay out how stupid what you posted is;

- Hunter's laptop had his emails and texts
- Hunter's laptop had payment receipts from Burisma and co
- Hunter's laptop had the sharing formula
- Hunter's laptop had names many of which confirmed the exchanges (proving they were real)
- Hunter's laptop had Tony Bobulinski's name ( a Navy Seal and successful business man)
-Tony Bobulinski confirmed meeting Joe in meetings and hearing Hunter name drop his father in their dealings with Burisma and co
-Tony confirmed Joe was the big guy who got 10%
- I'm not bringing up the hard drugs, prostitutes, underage women and so on.

Biden is on video saying he threatened to withhold $1 bln of Ukraine foreign aid if the chief prosecutor investigating Burisma was not removed.
Biden called the prosecutor a son of a bitch. All on video.

The prosecutor was removed. (Fun fact: Trump was impeached first time for withholding aid from Ukraine even though he only threatened to. He still released the money without Ukraine doing what he asked for).

IjeDross wants you to ignore everything above, and settle for the fact that an FBI informant (meaning said person used to work for the corrupt FBI by proxy) who was not related to the case, made some fabrications about it. Then they sentenced him and made it look like it proved Joe had no role in his son's dealings. Think of it.

What's to say, they did not bribe that fake informant to make up those statements just so they could attach him to the case. Then by finding him guilty, they absolved sleepy Joe. What's to say that did not happen.

Afterall, Joe pardoned that son as well as the rest of his family from 2014 (when Burisma issue started).

The DNC does not rate their party supporters and loyalists. They treat you guys like fools. See the type of botched job IjeDross is needing to do here. That's rough.

IjeBos:
I told you to provide evidence of 'underage sextapes' and then "tons of undersage pics'.
I'm sure you spent tons of time searching and if you had any you would post them.
But what we got? Nada. No evidence. Because there is none to post.
Instead you wrote a wall of words some of which it's clear you don't understand.

But this is always the case with you right wing nutters.
You spend hours writing conspiracy theories and lies you allow right wing sites to fill your heads with, but when asked for evidence of any of it?
Nada.

You did this with your claim that Biden broke the law and ignored the Supreme Court, now this nonsense.
Spend more time actually reading credible information and less on this type of bullshit and you'll be smarter for it.

And this post reads like someone who is unwell or something Basilico would write.

More infantile rubbish. You're basically begging me to look elsewhere because you have nothing to say. Imagine thinking my refusal to post underage porn is your cop-out.

Next time don't talk nonsense on a public forum. There are some of us waiting in the lurk to disprove your lies before they even grow legs. I've noticed how you're side stepping the Alexander Smirnov part. If you make the mistake of pushing it any further, I'll force you to post the ruling here. We all know you guys run when it is time to defend your lies.

For those who care to know: Biden DOJ had democrats talking about an informant (Smirnov) as if he was THE source of the Biden corruption. He was not: the source was the email, texts, meetings and payoffs that proved the corruption.

But like voodoo, the DOJ just threw an FBI informant (that they had been using for years) under the bus, sentenced him and made him the poster boy for the corruption saga when he was not. Completely evil and deceptive S-O-B's those ones. And this zombified parrot just started posting it.

Livelystone01:
Hunter is garbage, the media covered everything up and acted surprised afterwards when the contents were released.

I have always said it, the media was one of the biggest tools of the Biden's administration.

The DNC in my opinion is something else. They haven't done a full investigation to find out why they lost and how to come back, they are still all over the place blaming others.

I do not like Trump but I will not just comment against him because of that, I'd have to have a very genuine reason to.

America's division is expanding, China will be licking their wounds.

You're more reasonable than the regular run-of-the-mill Libtard. You're not a libtard obviously because you have reservations but won't die on their hill until you are sure. That's very rational. That's what all of us did.

Trump can be an acquired taste but compared to the f-a-g-g-o-t Obama and Sleepy Joe? Trump is much better than those 2 who basically destroyed America. Obama disliked Biden so much that he is famously quoted for saying nobody was to underestimate Biden's ability to fvck things up. Even Obama knew, and he himself was a terrible narcissist and compulsive liar.

IjeBos:
The fact that that you consider Basilico a credible source means you are fuxing nut.

Let's just look at one example from your post.
You started with

to


So, from underage sextapes to pics of an underage girls?
Why don't you post one of these many pics of underage girls that were on his laptop.
Don't waste your time they don't exist.

So you lie about the bribery - someone was actually charged for making up that story.
And you lie about the sex tapes and pics of underge girls - they don't exist.

And you are talking about Whataboutism? Your whole post is whataboutism.
You are talking about Hunter Biden, the son of a President who isn't in government to defend Trump saying he wants to grab women by the pu&&y.
You might want go back and review the definition of whataboutism.

You're soo down the rabbit hole of right wing propaganda you've met up Basilico there.

This should serve as the reference that you're not only dishonest, but you're incredibly ignorant and will still scramble to defend your faves regardless of their crimes.

Look at what I highlighted vs what you are typing? I've never seen this type of cognitive impairment being disguised as sanity. Hunter fvcked his late brother Beau's wife after he died of cancer. Then went on to fvck his niece (Beau's daughter) and left the pictures and videos on his laptop. That's why I asked you if Beau's daughter qualified as underage since you're hellbent on being dissonant to truth.

This shows, you either don't know the contents of the laptop or never cared because of who was involved. Then ask yourself if you'd have done same for Trump. That's TDS at work.

And before I pounce on the nonsense you have up there about the bribery part, do you understand now why no democrat-supporting libtard should ever be taken seriously? You guys already hate Trump so much you'd defend literal satanists to paint him in bad light.

It is on this thread we are told to ignore Trump's words until they appear to make him bad. Ignore that his net worth shrunk between his time as the 45th, but swallow the cockamamie that he was stashing up dollars for himself during that same time that his net worth, shrunk, by the way.

Now, we are to ignore the fact that Biden is on video bragging about getting a prosecutor fired for investigating Burisma since he threatened to hold back foreign aid to Ukraine. The videos are literally online.

Same Biden's sons laptop that they initially claimed was made up, had text messages from his business partner and friend (former Navy Seal Anthony Bobulinski) texting Hunter about the split of their loot with his father. Tony (the other end of the texts confessed this publicly and in hearings).

Hunter threatened he will out the entire criminal family syndicate if he wasn't protected and just like he angled for, his father pardons him retroactively starting from 2014 (when the Burisma allegations were rife).

Yet, to the average Libtard, we are to ignore all these and quibble over some clear misdirection. Almost like you don't know there are consequences for telling lies continously. Almost like, if you claim a laptop is fake and Russian disinformation, but turns out it is not, you have lost every right to tell people they live in a different reality. That's just stupid cope. Hope you know.

Don't forget when Biden was sharp as a tack? You have no moral ground to stand on. I'm just responding to show how hypocritical most of you fools are. Trump is already the 47th. That goes for those calling him a felon. Calling him that won't change shit. Just so we are clear. LOL

Raumdeuter,

This too if Aké is available. This lineup can definitely upset RM.

IjeBos:
Garbage in, Garbage out.
Most of this post is lies and half truths.
You have been so totally engulfed by right wing propaganda that you're living in an alternate reality.

Weak deflection. Superficial. Circular. Bullshxt style argument. Pontius Pilate type argument.

The bribery allegation is such bullshit that there is someone who just plead guilty and will be in jail for 6 years for admitting he made it up during Trump's 1st term when trump was trying to manufacture dirt on Joe Biden related to Ukraine.

More bullshxt. Dismissive fallacy. I can bludgeon you with facts about Tony Bobulinski, or the fact that you're just stopping yourself from saying the whole laptop was Russian disinformation, but you know it won't fly.

The only fitting response for you is, why is Joe pardoning his son and family from 2014? Why that specific year if . .[fill in tropy nonsense you have above] is true?

Hunter's laptop literally has text messages, of him, threatening his father, for not protecting him enough, even though he was paying everyone's bills, including Beau's tuition.

Cho cho cho you prattle on without any facts - just tabloidy circular mumbo-jumbo.

As to Hunter Biden. He went to Yale Law School and was a professor at Georgetown. He wasn't some bum who just got a job.

The only difference between this your post and Ice cream is, I actually asked for Ice cream.

As to the underage drinking, there is no evidence he had any underage women.. that is another lie.

You mean Beau's daughter? Do you know how many underage [16 and below] girls were in that laptop? The cognitive dissonance is painful to observe in real-time. You're coping so hard. Sheesh.

As to the drinking, drugs and prostitutes. Welcome to anyone who has worked anywhere near Wall St. Cocaine and prostitutes are common. I was at a party where guys were snorting cocaine off of naked women. Highly successful guys.

Basilico has you to the finest details. Denialism. Downplayingism. Whataboutism. All you offer for your faves. Trump on the other hand . . .

The paradoxical thing is that Republicans just elected someone to Defense Secretary after trashing Hunter Biden who seems to have lived the exact life Hunter Biden did. Alcohol, Drugs, Women/Prostitutes. Difference he had a sexual assault charge too.

Whataboutism. Your arguments are weak . . . like . . . seven days. Do better.

basilico:
Whatever Trump says whether out of jest or as a matter of fact is twisted to turn him into the monster they want him to be.
When it comes to democrats all stops are pulled to downplay the matter, prove it was lies or disinformation.
That's where the democrats are. Majority of Americans didn't buy into democrat lies.

That's what the election results tell us but instead of listening they're coming up with excuses or just denying the whole thing out rightly. The level of cope is insane.

IjeBos:
You argument is that because he was joking about seuxally assaulting women in private it is excusable?
I hope you understand that you are taking umbridge about Trump being recorded without his consent (they weren't, the mic was left on), when in the clip Trump is talking about touching woman's pu$$ies without their consent.
It's odd what you've chosen to be indignant about.
I'm not sure you thought this one through.


What does Hunter Biden have to do with anything. Was he elected by anyone, running for public office, or working for the government?
And can you link where anyone claimed he grabbed underage women by the kitten.
Not sure you thought this one through as well.

You might want to go back to the drawing board on your attempts at defending a sexual predator.
Or you might even just want to ask yourself why you've chosen to defend a sexual predator.

I don't know where any excuses were made. But in the same vein, the conversation is inadmissible as it was collected at a time that the record button should not have been hit. So Trump did not want you to listen to that conversation and that's perfectly acceptable in court.

Which leads to Hunter. And yes, while he was not elected or voted for, Hunter symbolizes the virtue-signalling and perfomative nonsense of the TDSists.

He had security clearances he shouldn't have had due to his records. He had underage sextapes and porn videos in his laptop. He took bribes on behalf of his family and kicked back 10% to the big guy, his father. Hunter played an activer role in Burisma, the fall-outs of which, required the 11-year retroactive pardon his father gave him. Hunter represented his father so Joe was essentially pardoning. . .wait for it. . . HIMSELF!

Did you celebrate his pardoning here? Why should you hold Trump to his words (when he did not expect to be recorded) vs Hunter - who actually did it?

Who did Trump grab by the poosie? Where's your post for Joe who showered with his daughter Ashley?

What's annoying is seeing this from the people that can't explain why their election predictions aged like rancid milk.

Labeling and ad hominem in 2025 to dismiss a Congressman you clearly don't know shit about. Just like Vindman all over. Why do you people do this all the time? Shxts corny.

I'm not the one that told you about USAID. That's coming straight from DOGE. Before DOGE, Mike Benz and others had been calling USAID out but it was harder to expose them as no one had as much data as we do now.

David Hundenyin is online doing same with the documents made available by DOGE and he is coming to the same conclusions.

I've just told people one way to validate the theory about USAID & BH will be the attacks. All of a sudden, people are pretending they don't know what an act of terror is, or that my proposal is not a meaningful test experiment for the USAID & BH nexus.

I understand where you people are at with the post-election PTSD. Go on your knees and start praying for terror attacks in Nigeria. Shameless.

raumdeuter:
Android17

will you keep this lineup vs Madrid? I will drop Savinho or Foden for an extra midfielder Kovacic or Bernardo. Dont know who will be best to play RB and face Vini. Then Dias for Khusanov

I would swap Rico for Khusanov. Ruben should pair with Stones in the CB pairing. I'd play O'Reilly with Nico Gonzalez in midfield and drop Gundo. I know Pep will play Kovacic here. If he plays Bernardo, RM will thrash City.

I'll drop Foden for KdB. Play Savio as RW, KdB behind Erling and Marmoush on the LW. I prefer Savio because he is more direct and connects well with Erling. KdB, even if he is past it physically, is the best chance creator at City. Marmoush and Erling will feast.

Foden should come on 2nd half as KdBs replacement.

There is no away goals rule in this so I doubt RM can successfully bunker and hit City on the break. They struggle against teams that can keep the ball and their defense is still very suspect.

It might be a scorefest because they'll create chances too. But if Pep sets up to win duels using O'Reilly, getting diagonal switches and protection from Nico, and then KdB behind Marmoush & Erling with Savio supporting, I actually do think City can upset RM at the Bernabeu. With my team, I'd predict RM 2- 4 City.

Wow, most of you are overrated.

You know that Trump & Billy Bush conversation was recorded without their consent?

You know it was recorded during the pre-interview conversation and the person who recorded it and got it leaked should have broken NDAs to do that, but because it was done to spite orange man, it is allowed?

That's why you have to call him Fuhrer & Hitler, so it would justify the multiple assassination attempts on his life.

But how dare you question Hunter Biden (who actually grabbed underaged women by the poosay). What about his father Biden? That one specialized in showering with Ashley (his daughter) and even she knew it was inappropriate.

Keep going, post more e-diotic facebook posts and links. If you need lies to prove someone is bad, just maybe you are the evil person yourself.

LordAdam16:
Humans are flawed.

Still, Nicole is a gem. A kooky gem tbf.
Her MAHA ads were the sh*t during the 2024 election cycle.

-Lord

Peng tinz. And she's rich as a b*tch.

She can really get it.

Amoto94:
.

I said it here when Tinubu said same. That even if the entire USAID budget went to Nigeria, it won't change shxt. That Nigerians should stop crying about handouts.

All these handouts man, they're getting out of hand/
Trump should start telling Nations, get it how you can!/

LordAdam16:
Yep.

Her affair with Elon allegedly prompted the divorce.
https://www.wsj.com/articles/elon-musk-affair-sergey-brin-wife-divorce-11658674840
https://nypost.com/2024/05/23/business/nicole-shanahan-walked-away-with-1b-after-sergey-brin-divorce/

-Lord

My mouth is agape

Where I bin dey na? And I like that Nicole. Don't know how to explain it.

I know a shameless troll when I see one.

Keep quoting the stupid media. There's literally a video of Elon Musk making that speech. If dem born you well, post the video and listen to it.

Shame will force you to delete your last 2 posts.

Big shame will do so.

⏰ Tick Tock.