₦airaland Forum

Udmaster:
I thought the VP have a residential house already. What kind of country is this?

Ezenwammadu:
How does this hotel affect the life of the citizen

shamecurls:
[size=38pt]wailing wailers! Food is ready oo....Make una come chop o[/size]

stevecantrell:
OP, that was not a church, neither was the man on the altar representing the Most High . Everywhere is called 'church' these days.

Story reeks of B.S tho..

Lemon12:
Waiting patiently for Amala and Ewedu eaters to invade this thread ..... With their hate speeches

Lemon12:
Yeye people ..... They are yet to neutralize bokoharam dats killing hundred of people everyday .... A harmless invisible Radio Biafra ...... Is now their problem


SHame

On you Buhari and your Yorubas slave

ba7man:
I can imagine Fayose trying to govern a state like Lagos with this kind of cheap publicity stunts in the midst of the exposed citizens of the state.

It's in that same market he'll be reminded that he should have better things to do.

obailala:
In this age of information technology, I don't have to go all the way to Ekiti to know how people in Ekiti are faring. Stop reasoning like you are living in the primitive era.

Ghost01:
Oni dualised the road to Ifaki, not Fayose. And you can't credit Fayose for the one leading to Ilawe either (even though the dual-carriage way didn't reach Ilawe). The one Fayose did that reaches a neighbouring town is the one that connects Ado to Ikere. Besides we are talking of the 10 months since he's been the governor in Ekiti now. Care to share the monumental projects he's initiated or commissioned since?

ocelot2006:
Sure...judge both Governors from single pics. Fayose may be buying Kpom in that pic, but in reality he could be hard at work. El Rufai may be looking at city plans, but in reality isn't doing jack xcept looting the State's coffers. Only residents in these states can tell us if these Governors are hard at work or not. Till then I suggest the rest of us shut the hell up and observe.

ocelot2006:
God bless GEJ

vague:
use unclear and stop mentioning me joor

jlinkd78:
All they are saying is dat their guy Fashola didnt do well on this one

jlinkd78:
u startd well in this ur response but d pathological gene in u to insult others suddenly became evident. D words 'foolishness' and 'irresponsible' shd not be part of ur reply. Learn to write without appearing to be of inferiority complex, marshal out ur points devoid of innuendos, abuses and inflammatory remarks. To be honest with u most of d critics here are ardent Fashola admirers. All they are saying is dat their guy Fashola didnt do well on this one, Most including me wud still want him to serve PMB at d natnl level.

jlinkd78:
true to type u v ended up with rhetorics deviating from facts. I never bandied confusing figures but ur Fash and d Info Access co did. The only figure dat is constant in all is d N78million, while Fash claimed N12million was paid to Info Access (dat will leave a missing balance of N66million), d company claimed they were paid N10 million (dat will leave a missing balance of N68 million). Aside from these figures, I asked u 4 questions which u v 'smartly' avoided n this has only exposed ur made up mindset. For ur info, if there is any politician I cherish, dt politician is Fashola. Most Nigerians do too. U are not doing him any good defending this poor outing. If u r only interestd in insulting me, do not reply. If u v my answers u are welcome.

logica:
Killing me how? LMAO. From the get-go it was obvious your argument was not based on anything resembling logic. You too can continue with your M0r0nic defense of a "life-time" website. Please, we are not all clueless.

logica:
Mr Man, what is there to maintain on a website when the website is to track the activities of a government with an expiry date? Are you telling me the guys are still posting photos and press releases of Fashola's activities? Long and short, this is a scam. Yes, there are guidelines on which contracts are awarded. No serious minded government will award a life-time maintenance contract for a website. Shikena.

logica:
...and that, Mr Man is the reason a "life-time" maintenance contract makes no sense as nothing guarantees the website will continue to be funded. As I pointed out, 1 or 2 year contracts or even less are customary for contracts awarded by governments. This is not the maintenance of an airport which for obvious reasons may be long-term (though still not without a defined end period).

jlinkd78:
d way u r going on this makes me feel u v a vested interest short of good logic like most commentators here. Stop turning logic upside down. Who was d N66 million paid to? Were there any oda company involved outside this company dat acknowledged receipt of N10 million? If this company collectd N78 million, were they not to knw d details of d money collectd n wud v told us N10 million is for this and N66 million is for that? If another company was involved in d upgrade to d tune of d unaccountable N66 million, while did d govt of d day lump d whole sum into Info Access name? If u wish to respond, pls let it be issue based with answers to d questions I asked.

logica:
Life-time contract? LMAO. Where and who comes up with such a contract (especially for a government contract)? That is the more reason to smell a rat. Maintenance of a website should be a short-term contract of no more than 2 years; except you are telling us Babatunde Fashola's government was going to last forever like Camelot. In fact, someone on here already stated that the contract was for a year (though I never bothered to confirm).

jlinkd78:
u forgot dat d company also said dat for this website creation and its lifetime maintenance, they were paid N10 milla. What we r asking is d balance N66 or N68 milla. For ur info am not a kid dat rants but was only arguing out case as a concerned Nigerian. In any case in this case dat d main project cost N10million while other modification to d website cost N66 million is simply like eating a plate of food for N100 naira while d cost of extra food was N660. If u understand this analogy of mine then u will understand while Nigerians are reacting d way they are. The question will remain on d whereabout of d bogus N66 million naira as d company handling d job never made mention of it. Remember there was no oda company dat was reflectd. If d deal is as neat as Mr Fash want us to believe, d company shd v bin d one to v come with this clarification but since they knw they are unconnected with d perceived fraud, no mention was made by them about it. Overall I still wish Fashola survives this 'roforofo' fight and have his amiable respect back but he sure needs to do a better rejoinder. Am sure Fash himself will knw by now dat his explanation did not fly.

jlinkd78:
u forgot dat d company also said dat for this website creation and its lifetime maintenance, they were paid N10 milla. What we r asking is d balance N66 or N68 milla.

Amorl:
God bless u for this. Fashola to me was discharging is duty as Lagos sates' Governor, why must he spend so much in publicizing it, what will happen if he doesn't even publicize it at all, I mean those projects are there for all to see. Fashola did is best for Lagos state but if he's found guilty..he shld face the law.

ExInferis:
I too was only reacting to his press release, and he presented it as evidence enough to justify the cost. If we keep taking things at face value, then we should stop wailing about corruption.

There's no way in heck it costs even 20k to code and publish a mobile app. I do this for fun, so i know.

With some tools you can create an app once and publish to all platforms at once, such as Appery.

I feel insulted, as a Nigerian, by this very obvious theft and childish explanation from Fashola, more so when he's supposedly a CHANGE agent.

If my dad steals and got jailed, I'd visit him in jail, just to laugh at his locked up arse and throw out a couple of raspberries.

PS: i just did an Assessment Test and interview for IT employment in a major corp yesterday. Wish me luck!

utumunta:
My signature is for people like you!

1. If you have an education; you'd know the essence of being civil and diplomatic in a public forum like this.

2. If you have a job; you'd have a superior and know that respect should be accorded people even when you have a different opinion from them. When you want to ventilate your opinion, you do it within the confines of civil ethics. The same applies to self-employed persons.

3. I know you are very poor cos you sound very bitter, aggressive, angry, hungry and frustrated. The Jonathan you hate and Tinubu you worship will never resort to your type of language to counter an opposing view, because they are not desperate and frustrated.

I know that where there is lack, people tend to see life as the survival of the 'most desperate, angry and hungry'. People tend to be living on edge cos life is short, nasty and brutish where you come from.

Sorry and work hard to change your situation. Displaying this level of bile and ranting on social media for a paltry 20k monthly and 5GB weekly won't help you.

You have my attention cos I wanted to use this opportunity to advise you. You won't be this lucky next time!

persius555:
Pls, save us us all the rhetorics that dont hold water in any circle of discussion. In as much as i support and append BRF's massive contribution to the lives of lagosians and nigerians, this project was an overkill and uncalled for. Why should an administration use public funds to fund a project that solely publicises the works a public office holder, making it look like the former governor was doing lagosians a favor. Ideally, a noble idea of such should have been included as part and parcel of the entire lagos state establishment with or without BRF on seat of govt. A subdomain attached to the numerous LASG websites would have been appritate and cheaper to maintain, e.g brfprojects.lasg.gov. Whatever the intent of the project was, it was overpriced, over valued and controversial. It did more damage to BRF's image than good. All the same, BRF is my man any day.

dabossman:
The most interesting thing about BRF's response is that he has not denied spending the said amount on the website. The onus of proof is now on those accusing him to show beyond reasonable doubt that the contract was overinflated. Sometimes this may be difficult to prove though. What A may charge for a service like this will defer from B. Like you noted, what are the terms of engagement?

I'll be watching from sidelines to see how this pans out.

ldpele:
na illiterate Buhari ofcourse winner , smh