AwesomeJ's Posts
Nairaland Forum › AwesomeJ's Profile › AwesomeJ's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 (of 109 pages)
Itsrm:I certainly heard reports of 980 from the ABCON chairman, and unless you identify yourself as someone who has more insight of the business than him, your claim is obviously falacious. check naira rates. if 1509 on monday to 1448 yesterday to 1423 today is what you call dollar strengthenin, then you're on your own. I sold usd at 1498 over the weekend, I could only sell off the rest at 1486 0n monday, today i've bought at 1413. I'm not forcing any opinion on you, but don't be quick to dispel facts just based on incomplete info you have, some of us are way past saying what we aren't certain about. |
Itsrm:The disparity doesn't necessarily mean a reverse of stance on unification, one segment will always lag the other when there are to be significant price movements. In early April when the parallel market tested sub 1000, the official market remained above 1150, but when the official rates stayed at those elevated levels, the street market naturally alligned. If these price levels are sustained for the rest of the week, the street market should start adjusting as well especially if a supply to BDCs is announced. Street market may go sub 1300 before weekend, and by next week, we should again have less than 5% disparity. |
LordAdam16:Could you please use figures to do an analogy of this statement: "The CBN flooded the market to precipitate a sharp drop so as to reduce their bill." Isn't the whole essence of futures that their settlement is independent of prevailing prices? If prices fell on their own, and CBN got to buy at lower prices to settle the futures, then it's easy to follow your point, but what you're saying is that they're the ones selling dollars cos of maturing futures, kindly expantiate. |
Those doubting the NAFEM figures I quoted yesterday, you can check again now. |
Mills55:Next two auctions should be 5th and 12th June if public holidays don't disrupt. |
Naira seems to be having its best week ever. Currently up 20.83% in two days. From 1482 on Friday to 1173 today. Looks like MPR has peaked!!! |
Streetinvestor2:Some sukuk are traded on the NGX, so you may be able to offload there. The big market for debt and currency trading is the FMDQ, but unless you have an associate license, you won't be able to trade there. Unless you become a client of the dealers there. Most sukuk I'm seeing on the NGX are trading sub face value. In the last session, FGSUKUK2027S3 traded 1,184 units at an average price of #71 (total value about 840k) and FGSUKUK2033S6 traded about 50k units at #99.5 (total value about 50m). So check if your instrument is listed on the NGX and see what the bids are on it. But the principle remains, nobody would want to buy you debt at 13% when they could as well go for the 19% you're targeting. The only time liquidating makes sense is if you need the proceeds for other purposes or you're moving across asset classes. Like selling off to buy stocks that are doing 0.3x PE, stuffs like that, but selling an instrument in expectation of getting into the same instrument at the prevailing yield won't work for the sole reason that no one is gonna rake your 13%, they may even be asking you for 21% which is higher than the 19% you were targeting. One has to really consider two factors before going long term: 1. How stable is the exchange rate gonna be over the duration of my investment? Give this an 80% weight in your decision. Cos folks who bought USD assets with 1m three years ago bought about $2000 which has now become 3m. The coupons on any bond couldn't have matched that. 2. How likely is it that rates will go significantly higher/lower than what I want to lock into right now? Give that a 20% weighting. |
farydah:You're welcome. |
farydah:1. Except you find someone that will buy the bills from you below that 18.8%, liquidating won't make any difference. 2. 352-day Tbills at 15.5% discount has about 18.3% yield which is close enough to the MMF yield. Since you actually bought in March, my opinion is that that 15.5% deal you took wasn't fair enough as rates for long dated bills were already in the 20% levels. Again, liquidating the bills to seek 18.8% in MMF isn't worth the effort as you're already getting over 18% yield. |
farydah:I don't know when exactly you bought in February, but I'll assume late February implying that you've held for 90 days. If the bank decides to discount it at 22%, Term to maturity is 262 days. Discount to the new buyer should be 5000000*0.22*262/366 = 790k approximately. This means the new buyer only pays you 4,210,000. At the time of purchase, you must have gotten a discount of about 747k meaning you were debited 4,253,000. So your investment of 4,253,000 in February will now become 4,210,000 now, implying a loss on investment of about 43k. Kindly note: 1. There are fees that may add up to increase this loss amount. 2. The actual loss may be slightly different since you didn't state the exact date you invested and I don't know the exact date you'll liquidate. But I think 90 days is a good approximation. 3. The primary reason you're losing money here is cos you bought at a low rate(15.5) and prevailing rates are now higher. 4. If the bank doesn't request for a discount as high as 22%, your losses will be reduced, but the higher the discount you're offering, the easier it is to get a buyer and the faster the liquidation. |
PNomsule:You're welcome boss. I do not know any training class on Finance, except you're talking of certifications like CFA, FMVA, and the likes. |
PNomsule:Yes. One year papers have c. 26% yields on them. Prime lending rate is typically MPR+4%, but only blue chips get those. For the regular Joe, it could be as high as MPR +14%. So 30.25 - 40.25% |
TheAlchemist:You need to verify what the actual yield is. You make it sound like they offer 26% interest and pay the interest upfront. I doubt that being the case. It's more likely that by electing to get your interest upfront, the rate will be lower than 26%. |
TheAlchemist:First 26% from Fair money is effectively 23.4% netting off WHT. 2. NTB has sovereign guaranty, while Fair Money's solvency is not as guaranteed. |
farydah:Depends on the tenor. If it's around 91 days, they'll be expecting to discount your bills at say 19%. Basically, the going rate plus 1-2% markup. You may lose part of your principal of you haven't held for long. If you want more specific analysis, give more info about the investment, we'll run the numbers for you, then you can make an informed decision |
Rates changed today.
|
fucc12:I pray you get it very soon. |
fucc12:Yes. Theoretically, you can bid as high as the CBN offers. About N509bn across the 3 tenors tomorrow. It's guys like you that are really enjoying T-bills sha, so you'll just make N260m like that? Cool. |
KayOn1:5-10% depending on location and type of structure. Although capital gains are there too. For instance, I bought 10 tonnes of steel @ 380k averagely about 2 years ago, when I checked in February, it was already 1.2m pee ton. Looks like someone is out to buy close to 1% of ACCESS. |
Seun:Please modify this post. I can't quite make much out what you're conveying with the second sentence. It doesn't being?? |
cutedharmee:Depends on your goal. If you're a trader that bought at 1000/1200 levels,. You may want to take profit. However I think today's pull back in some quarters is temporary, cos NAFEM closed at 1533(naira down 4.04%), while I'm seeing 1406 in some places(naira up 6.52%). |
Adegokenath:There's no PMA today. Last auction for this quarter is slated for next Wednesday 22nd. |
maishai:I think it boils down to our legal system not being strong enough too. Imagine transaction history vanishing from a bank's books, that's the sort of thing that will have a 250m dollar fine land on their head na. Abi if I had 400k with them verified before that said transaction, and somehow, my balance became 300k, are they not fully responsible for explaining where the 100k went and how it did?? I recently read a naira metrics article where a court awarded about 500m dollars to a mechanic against Exxon Mobil cos he claimed that they didn't put warning on their container that the benzene in their fuel could cause cancer. Here in nigeria, folks like some here would rather blame the mechanic. |
ojesymsym:So what you read about me asking davit for how to set up sim lock sounded like not listening to you ![]() |
ojesymsym:Well, you obviously feel the need to flout your ignorance. All you need do is read with some level of mild comprehension, then you'd understand that no one is complaining about losing any money here. As a matter of fact, if they had taken more money from the other bank the situation would have made more sense. Read calmly to understand that the focus here is not about the 5 dollars taken but 100℅ on having a banking system that provides a reasonable level of confidence. Anyways in the midst of all the noise from folks like you who feel the need to talk even though you really have nothing to offer on the subject, I was still able to sieve out useful info from others, the type I sought when I made the post. Someone has said unlike other banks that have added security layer for pin reset, access just uses otp, if that's true, it explains the whole situation which is what I wanted, but then it shows a weak system design on their part. And about advantages and all, security usually takes precedence over convenience. Then again, someone said, while this whole situation may not make sense, just set up sim lock to protect yourself. Those sorts of inputs make it worth reading through the noise from folks like youyou who just have more of impulse to talk than the requisite knowledge. |
dacool1:This certainly is a reasonable explanation. It quite explains the situation. If it's true though, then it's a weak design, except of course it's only for USSD which is for small amounts. But to be able to reset my app password without knowing my existing password, security question or visiting a branch would be too weak a design. And I'm sure there would be security standards that guard against this that Access isn't implementing. If what you're saying applies to all their channels that is. But I doubt that it does though. |
chukzyfcbb:Your points are valid. However, the point here is not about whether or not lost sim card can be exploited. The point is understanding how two banks one with small money, another with a larger amount, same ussd pin, attempts to pull funds were made on both banks, it succeeded in one bank, it failed on the other. The point is understanding how Access could have gone through when the guys obviously didn't use the pin. All my other accounts, wallets and all have since be restored without issues. The money lost is infinitesimal, but if banks are lax, you guys should stop assuming that the responsibility is on the customer. If I had gotten a debit of just 20k on my GTB account, then this whole discussion wouldn't be happening cos then it would have been obvious my pin was compromised. However that's not the case, so the bank is liable, and it's a good thing the person in charge seems to understand, he's not defending like some of you here seem to be doing, rather he's agreed to estate the issue to their team to investigate and make any necessary modifications. Someone here also just reported a case of fraudsters changing the phone number linked to their account without any request from the customer, now that has cost them 1m, and some of you still want to assume banks can never be wrong?? Come on!! |
Streetinvestor2:This is my opinion on the matter: The fraudsters could have set up a phishing site where inputing your card details and pin will help them retrieve same and use. But since there's supposed to be an added otp security layer, phone number change is supposed to only happen via a secured zenith bank API. The fact that the fraudsters were able to access that API to change the phone number linked to the account makes zenith bank liable. The bank obviously has no record of your wife requesting for a phone number change. I think the legal system in this country is the issue. Imagine Google having to pay out billions of dollars to users just cos the users sued that their incognito browsing wasn't private enough. And banks are being this reckless?? |
ojesymsym:Your use of the word "paranoia" is out of place. If you read the thread well, you would see where someone (davit) suggested sim lock, and how I reacted. The fact that someone else makes a lame argument that having access to my sim means having 90% access to my account, and I refute doesn't mean you should be quick to use wrong vocabulary. His entire arguments are lame. I lost my sim, and my money at GTB was entirely intact, that already proves his funny 90% argument as faulty. You should be open to ideas as well, but smart ones, not just any ideas thrown at you. You have to be smart enough to sieve out the incoherent ones. |
Rizin:Any bank who uses this weak system you describe is weak and undeserving of even a microfinance banking license. In your funny imagination, anyone can just click reset PIN, and type in anything they like to reset my PIN? you must think the banks are fools. In my experience, to reset your PIN at GTB for instance, you need to know the answer to a secret question, without which, you'll have to visit a branch for a physical reset. Stanbic too would require a physical visit for PIN reset if I remember correctly. Basically, contrary to your inexperienced idea about these authorizations, any OTP sent to your line for PIN reset would only be possible after you've either provided an old PIN, your ATM PIN, an answer to a secret question, or gone to the bank for physical bimetric verification. You're extremely wrong in thinking any bank has a system that just lets you reset a PIn just cos you clicked a link, without having any other form of authorization. Stop peddling ignorance, If you have an experience contrary to what I described, narrate. |
Rizin:Facts you say?? When you attempted a reset of your pin without going to the bank, did the system ask for your old pin or not? Could you have succeeded in resetting the pin without knowing the old pin? I really don't know why you feel the need to push these weak points? Did you do basic computer programming? |
Rizin:What renders your argument faulty us you making it seem like sim card is the primary mode of authorization for transaction, it's not. You should compare my pin to the house key, then you'd be having a solid point. No one is blaming a bank for a compromise of their pin. The blame comes duly on them, when I have a pin that should give me a level of security, and fraudsters still bypass their system regardless. Using your contractor analogy, it's like me never losing my key, locking my door, yet people still gain access to my home. The contractor has got to be liable then for installing a faulty lock system. As long as I can prove that I locked my doors and the invaders never used my key. |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 (of 109 pages)
