Welcome, Guest: Register On Nairaland / LOGIN! / Trending / Recent / New
Stats: 3,152,735 members, 7,817,024 topics. Date: Friday, 03 May 2024 at 11:18 PM

BARRISTERS's Posts

Nairaland Forum / BARRISTERS's Profile / BARRISTERS's Posts

(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) (12) (13) (of 15 pages)

Religion / Re: Is Michael The Archangel Really Jesus? (revelation 12:7) by BARRISTERS: 6:28pm On Nov 26, 2012
@Boomark

@barristers

Just remove "s" from the word 'translations'. I was just trying to tell you that i get several translations in one piece using bible.cc.

no shaking my broda, i also thought it could be a mistake too, nothing do you! at least your write ups are structured and very easy to work with you, the only area is that of different commanders, but then,we are learning here,as you have rightly noted, the bible should not contradict itself,i still need to also get get your view to my last post, thanks.
Religion / Re: Is Michael The Archangel Really Jesus? (revelation 12:7) by BARRISTERS: 6:20pm On Nov 26, 2012
@free123

@Barrister
i can understand ur frustration seeing the fallacy u peddled for long being exposed in the light of the truth. It is a shame that anyone with different view from ur falsehood u lump same together with catholics. I got tired reading the nonsense u spewed above. Do u think lengthy and incoherent falsehood wins a case?
Quoting scriptures for u is a waste of time seeing that u have swallowed every bit of rubbish from watchtower and that will not allow u to see that Jesus Christ is not angel Michael even from d falsehood u peddle.
Last question for falsehood peddlers - where in ur own version of the bible is Jesus Christ called Archangel Michael?

frustration ke? iyen o tile si ni diary mi rara! more are still coming!sho ti ri iyen gbo!, all you need to do is to view it, you dont really need to agree with it,rara o ,when you do not even have anything to offer,ki la tie nso gan! i never expected you to see more than your nose,i expect you to be pained at the expose, expecially when the same hebrews that you thought is supporting your view is telling you in heb 2:7,9 that 'jesus was even made lower than the angels at some point' but still i honor himand pray through his name.because he has been exalted.

you cannot be better than your ogas! who tied william tyndale to a tree and burn him live! but can you stop the expose that tyndale champion? your catholic priests will fraudulently collect money from relatives of dead ones,promising them that the soul of their loved ones are being 'purged' in the purgatory, i want to ask,such moneys if used to settle abuse cases thereby leaving the dead to be feeling horror in purgatory, dont you think that they will be praying for your priest or curse them? have you ever put your hand in fire just for 2 mins, how does it feel,yet you abandon someone there trading the atonement money aaah, this catholics are a case.

who told you that lenthy write ups dont win case, you think lazy and indecisive people people like you who cannot even defend your faith talkless of winning a case,you are even having a dine nothing to contribute posingg as someone who is already tired,olodo broda-ooole! typical omo naija, alaimora ,you guys have nothing to offer. more still to come!
Religion / Re: Is Michael The Archangel Really Jesus? (revelation 12:7) by BARRISTERS: 3:11pm On Nov 26, 2012
@Boomark

and any other interested ones,

i earlier stated before that;
BARRISTERS: @Boomark, you do have a good point in hebrew 1;5, however we still need to debate that and reconcile with other stronger proofs


Does Hebrews chapter 1 deny jesus beign an Angel/Messenger/servant ever before?

Before we go into the book of hebrews,we need to understand that the name 'jesus christ' was never mentioned in the OT(old testament)from Genesis to malachi, but then,before Abraham(in Genesis) was,i(proposed jesus) was...jesus said! and he was evidently active,and not reduntant. but why was the name 'jesus christ' made secret? even in the book of isaih,where the prophecy of 'the son' was proclaimed,jesu christ 'was not' included! not untill he was conceived by Mary,that an angel unfold the name in the book of Matthew. the question is,how is this (proposed jesus) being addressed?

lets first check the meaning of Angel G32 and H4397 both used for angels in greek/hebrew dict;

G32

ἄγγελος

aggelos

ang'-el-os

From ἀγγέλλω aggellō ; a messenger ; especially an angel ; by implication: - {angel} messenger.

But something noteworthy here is that jesus was reffered to in malachi 3:1-3 as 'my messanger' by the God of host himself, and fortunately, the greek word used to describe jesus as 'my messenger' is just the same used directly for angels word-for-word.

lets see the greek transliteration using the hebrew/greek bible dict.;

Malachi 3:1
Behold, I will sendH7971 [size=18pt]my messenger[/size],H4397 and he shall prepareH6437 the wayH1870 beforeH6440 me: and the Lord,H113 whom ye seek,H1245 shall suddenlyH6597 comeH935 to his temple,H1964 even the [size=18pt]messenger[/size].H4397 of the covenant,H1285 whom ye delightH2655 in: behold, he shall come,H935 saithH559 the LORDH3068 of hosts.H6635

note H4397 above;

[size=14pt]H4397[/size]

מלאך

mal'âk

mal-awk'

From an unused root meaning to despatch as a deputy; a messenger ; specifically of {God} that {is} an angel

furthermore,lets see an example of where H4397 was used below;

(1)Gen 19:1

And there cameH935 twoH8147 [size=14pt]angels[/size].H4397 to SodomH5467 at even;H6153 and LotH3876 satH3427 in the gateH8179 of Sodom:H5467 and LotH3876 seeingH7200 [them] rose upH6965 to meetH7125 them; and he bowedH7812 himself with his faceH639 toward the ground;H776
.

(2)Gen 19:15

And whenH3644 the morningH7837 arose,H5927 then the [size=14pt].angels[/size]H4397 hastenedH213 Lot,H3876 saying,H559 Arise,H6965 takeH3947 thy wife,H802 and thy twoH8147 daughters,H1323 which are here;H4672 lest thou be consumedH5595 in

with above proof,
it will be superflous after rendering jesus as 'messenger/angel' in malachi 3:1, to expect a contradiction in hebrews 1:5 ..... ''For to which of the angels did He ever say:''... as meaning that 'no other angels/messanger that he has ever uttered the word 'you are my son'.and of couse, no other messenger/or angel did come to perform the same task of beign born on earth and have to die so as to warrant beign adressed''you are my son'' except the firstborn of all creation collosians 1:15.

will Gods inspired word contradict itself? no, we have to reason as wise ones and not unwise ones.the word angel was derived from greek sylable,(angelos) but must we stick to the sylable or the meaning? definately we need to stick to the meaning to get the bigger picture.

Definately, God did not tell the(proposed jesus) 'while in heaven' either as a messenger or not, the words next “You are My Son,
Today I have begotten You”?[/b]while in heaven. but these words in quotes were directed
to the (proposed christ)only after he had been transformed or born as a man on earth, and precisely during his baptism by john the baptist,and several other places like Mathew 17:5, mark 1:11, mark 9:7 etc, ;


the answer to verse 5 of heb,was found in the the preeceding verse4,see bolded;

hebrews chapter 1:4 KJV

4 [b]Being made so much better than the angels
,(main clause) as he hath by inheritance obtained a more excellent name than they.(sub-ordinate clause)

New International Version

So he became as much superior to the angels .(main clause)as the name he has inherited is superior to theirs.(sub-ordinate clause)

we have the main clause here 'depending' on the sub-ordinate, that is the main clause cannot stand on its own;

that is jesus became or was beign made superior or better than the angels, was because,or due to the fact,or dependent on the fact that he inherited 'a name'(concealled in OT until he came to the earth), which proved to be.[size=14pt] a more superior or excellent name than they[/size] (angels)

can we merge this statement with that of philipians 2:7-9;

7 rather, he made himself nothing
by taking the very nature of a servant,
being made in human likeness.
8 And being found in appearance as a man,
he humbled himself
by becoming obedient to death—
even death on a cross!
9 Therefore God exalted him to the highest place
and gave him
[size=14pt]the name that is above every name[/size],

The (proposed jesus) was not yet ripe to be addressed as (jesus christ) before his birth(no record in the OT to that effect), he remained 'Gods messenger/angel' as he was righly addressed in malachi 3:1 above before his birth. and not better in that capacity because he is yet to be addresed with 'the superior name' only after his assignment on earth,of which no other messenger/or angel did come to perform the same task of beign born and have to die.

Was jesus ever beign reffered to be lower than the angels before or ever took a lower form than the angels? and if yes does that in anyway reduce his dignity?

unfortunately for frosbel and trinitarians who tried to be more emotional in adoring jesus, their denial that jesus being called angel/messanger was even laid bare in next bible verses that i will quote here,jesus was even said to ''be made lower than the angels''

lets read;the same hebrews 2:7 and 9;

7[b] Thou madest him a little lower than the angels;[/b] thou crownedst him with glory and honour, and didst set him over the works of thy hands:


9[b] But we see that Jesus, was made a little lower than the angels [/b]for the suffering of death, crowned with glory and honour; that he by the grace of God should taste death for every man

no hiding place in Gods word,can we also say now that at a time when jesus became human, he was lower than the angels! that is angels are superior to humans! instead of faking emotions for christ who doesnt need it anyway but your obedince, why not see the bigger picture he plays as revealed from OT to NT, plappvile has done much on that.
Religion / Re: Is Michael The Archangel Really Jesus? (revelation 12:7) by BARRISTERS: 11:48am On Nov 26, 2012
@Boomark

you directed me to google Daniel 10:13 precisely from 'bible.cc.'

Boomark;..If you Google Da 10:13, you will see various translations from 'bible.cc.' I use NWT and NKJV, both gave me one of the 'foremost princes and chief princes.' I also saw 'archangels' in some other translations..

i did, but i was surprised at your report that you saw 'archangels' in some other translations. when archangels only appear in just 'one' translation and that is NLT, of which i have noted the controversy in my earlier post,about why the publisher kenneth taylor changed it from the original old Living Bible(now NLT) which which originally uses 'one of the chief princes' before changing to 'archangels'.

well it will be noted just as i have pointed out before that if New Living Translation 2007 is the only one translation that you refer to as 'some other translations'(in plural) thereby making it up the idea that really other translations really used archangels,that do not exist in your refference presicely 'bible.cc.' pasted below,i want to say that you erred.or can you dispute that? anyway i dont want to insinuate mischief.

at least,before 2007,just 5 yrs ago,when this edition of NLT was published, no bible rendered dan 10:13 'archangels' because we have only one archangel (archo) 'first' of them all,the very first to be created there cant be two! thats why its unique, unless you rely on apocripha pagan scriptures like the tobit, who rendered gabriel and raphael archangel, but nowhere in the bible that ever say;angel gabriel or raphael...and his angels,never! nowhere in the bible ever rendered gabriel and raphael leading other angels.

lets see where you reffered me below 'bible.cc.' and let us see the result, out of 15 translation, only one rendered the verse 'archangels' while 14 others do not.lets see;


<< Daniel 10:13 >> bible.cc/daniel/10-13.htm

1, New International Version (©1984)
But the prince of the Persian kingdom resisted me twenty-one days. Then Michael, one of the chief princes, came to help me, because I was detained there with the king of Persia.
2, New Living Translation (©2007)
But for twenty-one days the spirit prince of the kingdom of Persia blocked my way. Then Michael, one of the archangels, came to help me, and I left him there with the spirit prince of the kingdom of Persia.

3, English Standard Version (©2001)
The prince of the kingdom of Persia withstood me twenty-one days, but Michael, one of the chief princes, came to help me, for I was left there with the kings of Persia,

4, New American Standard Bible (©1995)
"But the prince of the kingdom of Persia was withstanding me for twenty-one days; then behold, Michael, one of the chief princes, came to help me, for I had been left there with the kings of Persia.

5, King James Bible (Cambridge Ed.)
But the prince of the kingdom of Persia withstood me one and twenty days: but, lo, Michael, one of the chief princes, [/b]came to help me; and I remained there with the kings of Persia.

6, GOD'S WORD® Translation (©1995)
The commander of the Persian kingdom opposed me for 21 days. But then Michael,[b] one of the chief commanders
, came to help me because I was left alone with the kings of Persia.

7, King James 2000 Bible (©2003)
But the prince of the kingdom of Persia withstood me one and twenty days: but, lo, Michael, one of the chief princes, came to help me; for I had remained there with the kings of Persia.

8, American King James Version
But the prince of the kingdom of Persia withstood me one and twenty days: but, see, Michael, one of the chief princes, came to help me; and I remained there with the kings of Persia.

9, American Standard Version
But the prince of the kingdom of Persia withstood me one and twenty days; but, lo, Michael, one of the chief princes, came to help me: and I remained there with the kings of Persia.

10, Douay-Rheims Bible
But the prince of the kingdom of the Persians resisted me one and twenty days: and behold Michael, one of the chief princes, [/b]came to help me, and I remained there by the king of the Persians.

11, Darby Bible Translation
But the prince of the kingdom of Persia withstood me one and twenty days; and behold, Michael, [b]one of the chief princes
, came to help me; and I remained there with the kings of Persia.

12, English Revised Version
But the prince of the kingdom of Persia withstood me one and twenty days; but, lo, Michael, one of the chief princes, came to help me: and I remained there with the kings of Persia.

13, Webster's Bible Translation
But the prince of the kingdom of Persia withstood me one and twenty days: but lo, Michael, one of the chief princes, came to help me; and I remained there with the kings of Persia.

14, World English Bible
But the prince of the kingdom of Persia withstood me twenty-one days; but, behold, Michael, one of the chief princes ,came to help me: and I remained there with the kings of Persia.

15, Young's Literal Translation
'And the head of the kingdom of Persia is standing over-against me twenty and one days, and lo, Michael, first of the chief heads, hath come in to help me, and I have remained there near the kings

4 Likes

Religion / Re: Is Michael The Archangel Really Jesus? (revelation 12:7) by BARRISTERS: 12:38am On Nov 26, 2012
free123
free123: doctrine is one tough thing to deal with. Being known to always change ones belief is one reason i cant join issues with JW. What exactly will become of these fellas when some kind of light gets brighter and the whole belief system is changed?

The lenghth some JW can go to defend manmade doctrine is quite amazing forgeting that their light may get brighter tomorrow and their belief today becomes a sin. What kind of light is this that can never be brightest? Certainly not the light from God.

lie! im not a JW,but you are a distraction looking for attention!(you are the last to join the likes of;Chukwudi44,true2God,Ubenedictus and now free123, all these have nothing to offer the forumites!

and your aim on this tread is to derail it, you are pained by the structured facts stylely presented without duplication from OT to NT to prove facts here! learned counsels find it easy to work with these JWS than you guys with nothing to cotribute but 'derail'(kill them before they grow) why are you guys still bent on hiding the truth at any expense? at least you have testified to how they can defend below;

The lenghth some JW can go to defend manmade doctrine is quite amazing
man made doctrines! is that how you view your faith,no wonder you dont have anything to contribute, but rather saying that you dont join issues with JWS you are not having anything,nothing to contribute ,it is when you have something that you can give but if you dont,how can you give? and who's fault? while the JWS without needing an ally from catholics are very consistent, frosbel who even insult you guys became an ally and even with his contribution to help you against JWS, page 13 now and just see the level of the JWS sustainance! all of you guys have faded into oblivion and ever since page 6 most of you cannot quote the bible again! but people like plappvile continue to knock you from piller to post and from all angles with new bible quotes, cant you see the chemistry? using Gods word to interprete itself,and not using a philosophical book like sunkoye who only copy and paste some theologian works but could not personally express what he believes!

i understand that most of you guys have grown up with the doctrines of catholics but could not help the embarrasement that they are soaked with,but instead of being honest you resort to either 'forceful denial' or 'insult/curse' and fanatical,calling names!

it is noteworthy that you (free123) have not contributed a dine to the issue on the ground. i have made my reseaches on JWS activities and i can tell you that they are very consistent and more to their credit they work with facts,and not fiction like the catholics! you guys accuse them of false prophecy but it will be noteworthy that they never prophecy!and have not crossed their boundary, what do i mean? nobody can accuse wacthtower of crossing the boundary set by jesus! that is they have never set a 'day' and 'hour' for the end to come!....(nobody knows the day and the hour....even the son of man,except my father in the heavens....jesus) so whats the fuss all about?


lets see an example of a ''prophecy of destruction'' here again, i have cited it before,
jonah 3:1-3,
(1) Then the Lord spoke to Jonah a second time: (2) “Get up and go to the great city of Nineveh, and deliver the message I have given you.”

NOTE ABOVE THAT JONAH HAS RECEIVE A 'REVELATION' AND WAS TO GO AND DELIVER IT JUST THE WAY IT WAS REVEALED TO HIM;

3 This time Jonah obeyed the Lord’s command and went to Nineveh, a city so large that it took three days to see it all.[a] 4 On the day Jonah entered the city, he shouted to the crowds:[size=18pt] “Forty days from now Nineveh will be destroyed!” [/size]

FOURTY DAYS WILL BE A MONTH AND FEW DAYS IN NISSAN CALLENDAR! THE PEOPLE CAN COUNT FROM THE 'HOUR' OF THE 'DAY' THEY HEARD THE MESSAGE WHICH WILL BE A PARTICULAR HOUR OF THE 41ST DAY, HAD IT BEEN WE KNEW THE DATE JONAH WAS SAYING THIS OF WHICH THE PEOPLE OF NINEVEH CAN SPECIFY THAN US NOW.

40 DAYS NEVER WAS, AND DID JONAH SEE BEIGN ACCUSED AS SOMETHING THAT COULD DERAIL HIS SERVICE TO GOD? OR

BUT DID JONAH AND OTHER FAITHFULL WORSHIPPERS OF GOD RELENT? KNOWING THAT GOD IS FULL OF LOVING KINDNESS AND MAY BECAUSE OF THOSE WHO REPENT CHANGE HIS THREATS? NO THEY CONTINUED.


SO, THE ENTIRE NOTION THAT WATCHTOWER PROPHECIED IS COMPLETELY UNFOUNDED,HERE AND A DISTRACTION,AND ANYONE WITH FACTS CAN PLS ENGAGE ME PERSONALLY.

THERE WAS NO INGREDIENTS LIKE WHAT A PROPHECY SHOULD LOOK LIKE, THE INGREDIENTS THAT ARE TO BE SATISFIED IS THE 'DAY' AND 'HOUR', ACCUSERS MUST COMMIT JWS TO DAY AND HOUR AGAINST JESUS CLAIM THAT ''NOBODY KNOWS THE DAY AND HOUR''

THERE WAS NO TIME THAT THEIR DOCTRINE HAS EVER CHANGE, AND FOR EXAMPLE,1914 STILL REMAIN A REMARKABLE YEAR THEY INSIST THAT JESUS ENTHRONED AS THE KING! THE LATEST STUDY OF THEIR WATCHTOWER SEPTEMBER 15 2012 IS VERY CLEAR ON THAT JUST AS EVER BEFORE AND THERE IS NO REASON FOR FEAR IN ANYWAY WHATSOEVER THAT THEIR BELIEF IS UNSTABLE OR CHANGES OVERTIME.

TO BE FAIR TO JWS, NOBODY HAS COME OUT WITH A 'FIX DAY OF 24HRS IN A MONTH OF 30DAYS' TO NAIL THEM EXCEPT WHAT CAN BE TERMED AS EMPTY INSULTS THAT DOES NOT CHANGE ANYTHING.

WHAT ARE WE TALKING ABOUT, IF THE LEADERS OF JWS SAYS THAT 'LIGHT IS SHINING' THEY HAVE THE FULL BAKING OF THE FOLLOWERS BECAUSE THEY ARE VERY CONSISTENT,UNLIK THE CATOLIC LEADERS THAT THEIR LIGHT INSTEAD OF SHINING CONTINUE TO BE DULL TO THE EXTENT THAT CHURCH MEMBERS WERE ASHAMED TO HIDE FURTHER ALLEGATIONS OF PRIESTS INVOLVED IN MOLESTATION OF THE CHURCH MEMBERS EXPECIALLY YOUNG BOYS, AND THIS HAS BROUGHT AN UNTOLD SHAME TO THE RCC SUCH THAT 8 DIOCEESE WERE BANKRUPT AFTER ALL THEIR MONEYS (mostly moneys deposited to atone or purge the souls of those alledged to be in purgatory,a state before the hell)ALL THESE MONEYS WERE EMPTIED ON ABUSE CASES, CHURCH BUILDINGS SOLD AND A WHOOPING AMOUNT OF ONLY 3 BILLION DOLLARS WERE USED FOR SETTLEMENT ALONE BETWEEN 2OO4-2011 ONLY IN THE UNITED STATES BY THE CATHOLIC,

jws TOO HAVE BETWEEN 8-11 ABUSE CASES IN THE LAST 50 YRS,BUT MOSTLY INVOLVING MEMBERS, AND ALL WERE DISFELLOWSHIPED FOLLOWING BIBLE STANDARD,BUT THE CATHOLIC ROTATE THEIR OWN PRIESTS WHICH CAUSE ONLY THE DIOCEESE IN USA ALONE 95 PERCENT DIOCEESE INFLICTED WITH FLOOD OF ABUSE CLAIMS! WHAT A SHAME!

IS THE LIGHT NOT GETTING DIMMER? DEFINATELY, NOT ONLY IN THE UNITED STATES WE HAVE 18 OTHER COUNTRIES THAT CATHOLIC PRISTS THAT AR SUPPOSE TO BE LEADING WITH EXAMPLE HAVE MESSED UP COMPLETELY. IF YOU CARE TO KNOW HOW RCC LIGHT IS GETTING DIMMER SEE THE LINK BELOW;
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Catholic_sexual_abuse_scandal_in_the_United_States

https://www.nairaland.com/1103419/8-catholic-diocese-declared-bankruptcy

4 Likes

Religion / Re: Is Michael The Archangel Really Jesus? (revelation 12:7) by BARRISTERS: 11:03pm On Nov 20, 2012
@frosbel

Jesus is neither GOD nor an angel.

He is quite simply the SON of GOD , the Messiah and the Christ.


I will not allow you spread error.

yeah, you called jesus a liar and said jesus was wrong to say that he; 'ever exist before he was born' isn'nt it? and that he was wrong by even saying that he ; ''shared glory with God before the world was created'' isn'nt it?

you even went ahead to say that 3 jesus exist, isn'nt it?

and who are you to stop barristers, you only care about using peoples comment to create new treads,to your own credit, go and stop that!
Religion / Re: Is Michael The Archangel Really Jesus? (revelation 12:7) by BARRISTERS: 7:10pm On Nov 20, 2012
@Boomark, you do have a good point in hebrew 1;5, however we still need to debate that and reconcile with other stronger proofs, i think logically you are are very consistent.

in Daniel 10:13, why is your own bible using princes and not archangels, can you give your own comment?

@frosbel, you lost me when in face of glarring affimation by jesus (the subject)that ''he existed even before the world'' you went further to say that we have 3 jesus,im i correct? totally illogical....this goes to show that you have your own agenda; you believe in creation frictions to as to get peoples views to create more tread,isnt it? and not you being fully commited and hold fast to the truth,well thats good for you!

@plappville

wonderfull job! your facts are presented logically from OT to NT, and an objective reader will get the facts easily with the time that you have put, but unfortunately you wasted too much time with a wall,'someone who had made up his mind' who is not ready to reason from other forumites that are operating within the sacred scriptures, but 'apocripha' scriptures,including the book of Tobit,maccabee were unsacred as it were,they were of pagan, and going into cannon history may derail this tread,so i will contribute if another tread is opened to address it.

But you cannot continue to give more time to adress chukwudi and as you can see,it is either he doesnt understand logic, or that he just choose to be unyielding and adamant,and rather make you go in circles,and succeed in sapping your energy,be wise and be economical with your valuables before undeserved ones.

@ijawkid

good job.but be wise and be economical with your valuables before undeserved ones,direct them to the deserved ones.

@chukwudi44,
it amased me the way you breeze through facts presented by forumites and still come back to square one, from all the point presented to you with the occurence of joshua's encounter with 'the commander of Gods army' you keep denying the commander as not an angel, remember the same way the angels that abram entertained were of the same appearance,they appeared phisically for a purpose, its needless to go further with you on that brother, what surprised me was that 'you singularly pick the area that joshua fell to worship the angel' and to also justify mary worship by catholics, but fail to aknowledge other glarring facts before you because you are only bent on defending catholics,thats purely immature, anyway you have the right to your own opinion, but others too should be aware about saving their time and resourses arguing with you.

2 Likes

Religion / Re: Is Michael The Archangel Really Jesus? (revelation 12:7) by BARRISTERS: 7:00pm On Nov 20, 2012
Before any considering any other (english) bible translation,

let us consider the direct translation from hebrew/greek (both language originally used to write OT/NT)dictionary

1Thess 4:16

For.G3754 the Lord[/b]G2962. [b]himself. G846.shall .descend.G2597. from[/b]G575. [b]heaven[/b]G3772. [b]with.G1722 a shout,G2752. with[/b]G1722. [b] the voice[/b]G5456. [b]of the archangel.[size=18pt]G743[/size]. and[/b]G2532. [b]with[/b]G1722. [b]the trump[/b]G4536. [b]of God:G2316. and[/b]G2532. [b]the dead.G3498 inG1722 Christ.G5547. shall rise[/b]G450. [b]first:[/b]G4412


archangel G743

appears in 'greek'

G743
[b]ἀρχάγγελος
archaggelos
ar-khang'-el-os

From G757 and G32 ; a chief angel: - archangel.

lets see further how arch angel (archaggelos)was derived ,From G757 and G32

ἄρχω
archō
ar'-kho
A primary verb; [size=18pt]to be first[/size] (in political rank or power): - reign (rule) over

unfortunately, archaggelos ἀρχάγγελος, archangel in greek was not used in Daniel 10:13 the way it was used in 1 thess 4:16;


Dan 10:13
But the prince[/b]H8269. [b]of the kingdom.H4438[b] of Persia[/b].H6539 withstood.H5975[b]me one[/b].H259 and twenty.H6242 days.:H3117 but, lo, Michael,H4317. [size=18pt]one[/size].H259[size=18pt]of the chief[/size]H7223. [size=18pt]princes[/size],H8269 cameH935 to helpH5826 me; and I remainedH3498 there withH681 the kingsH4428 of Persia.H6539

fortunately, שׂר ώar sar is the greek word used in Daniel 10:13,

H8269
שׂר
ώar
sar

a head person (of any rank or class): - (captain) ([]chief ) {general} {governor} {keeper} ([-task-]) {master} prince steward.

what do we learn here, that is the original greek words used in these bible verses (1thess 4:16 and Daniel 10:13) goes thus


1,....((archangel)as used in 1thess 4:16)....., ar-khang'-el-os ἀρχάγγελος (archangel); a chief angel.[size=18pt]to be first[/size]. (in political rank or power): - reign (rule) over

2,......שׂר ώar sar is the greek word used in Daniel 10:13,

a head person : - (captain) (chief ) {general} {governor} {keeper} ([-task-]) {master} prince steward.

so, ar-khang'-el-os ((archangel) is not only a chief angel, but 'the first'in reign (rule) over...
while שׂר ώar sar the greek word used in Daniel 10:13 is of lower status to ar-khang'-el-os.

and so, we only have 'one'archangel and not and not archangels more, but we have princes as boomark rightly noted,so micheal 'double as ar'-kho (arch) and ώar sar (prince).

I wondered why NLT (new living translation) a very recent translation among others choose to render archangel in (plural) form when it is a known fact agreed upon by many bible translators that archangel was never rendered in anyway in pluralform(archangels) and the oldest bibles expecially King james version 1611 testifies to that.

Daniel 10:13 NLT (2007)

13 But for twenty-one days the spirit prince* of the kingdom of Persia blocked my way. Then Michael,
one of the archangels
came to help me, and I left him there with the spirit prince of the kingdom of Persia.*

Daniel 10:13
King James Version (1611)
13 But the prince of the kingdom of Persia withstood me one and twenty days: but, lo, Michael, one of the chief princes, came to help me; and I remained there with the kings of Persia.


the answer is not far fetched from the preface of (NLT)2007, a rebrand of (Living bible), by keneth taylor(publisher) who claimed that ''he got some criticm on the older Living Bible from especially pastors accusing it of being paraphrased' but have to make NLT to suit the chalenge.

so adding archangel as a plural where it does not exist originally in the 'greek' word in Daniel 10:13,expose some 'personal interest' of the (NLT)bible publisher to suit some beliefs and not beign nuetral,no wonder tithe tithe preachers use (NLT) most because of 'adding' a new phrase to mathew 23:23...''yes,you must tithe'' which cannot be found in older bible,and also portrayed jesus as supporting paying tithe, so we cannot rely on (NLT) bible translation for credibility,because it is just too recent,less than a decade and found wanting.

it is a atatement of fact that there are no other archangels in the bible, it is only one...Micheal

daniel 10:13 was only talking about[b] part of[/b] micheal's title as chief prince, it was the same in all other bible, and it agrees with the original

2 Likes

Religion / Re: Is Michael The Archangel Really Jesus? (revelation 12:7) by BARRISTERS: 8:05am On Nov 19, 2012
@boomark
Don't say am confused when you don't know what it means to be similar to the sons of men.

i have showed you in my last post, just the way it sound! 'similar to the sons of men' the same pattern used 'daugthers of men' and not 'daughter of man' was rendered' in Gen 6:2


''sons of men'' is not ''son of man'' used for jesus, and from the usage of the word,the meaning is not far fetched,

in Gen 6:2

That the sons of God [/b]saw [b]the daughters of men [/b]that they were fair; and they took them wives of all which they chose


Who are men(human beings) btw?


it is not reffering to only one particular special human (like in the case of jesus)but by using ''sons of men' in the same form 'daughters of men' is rendered shows that the imformation we need here is only to the 'extent' of recognising only what 'look' the one that appears to Daniel looks like!

Michael is the commander of God's army and atimes also [b]appear as a man.

Daniel 10:16 And, behold, one like the
similitude of the sons of men

Again Daniel 10:16 does not support your assumption that it was micheal that the appearance is similar to that of the 'sons of men'

other angels too have appeared like men before, the angels that abraham entertained unknowinly,they appeared like 'sons of men' such that abram could not differentiate them.

Michael is the commander of God's army and a times also appear as a man

are you saying that we have 2 commanders of Gods army?

sorry, God gave the angels charge only to jesus;

mathew 4:6
6 and said to Him, “If You are the Son of God, throw Yourself down. For it is written:

‘He shall give His angels charge over you,’
He does not only commands God's army but we all also. He is our commander.
how is this separate commander apart from jesus our commander? you are muddling things up, we only have one commander...jesus.

So tell me who is it that the commander is helping?

i dont know what you are talking about, but only one person has Gods authority to lead the army

in John 5:25-29
New King James Version (NKJV)

25 Most assuredly, I say to you, the hour is coming, and now is, when the dead will hear the voice of the Son of God; and those who hear will live. 26 For as the Father has life in Himself, so He has granted the Son to have life in Himself, 27[b] and has given Him authority[/b] to execute judgment also, because He is the Son of Man.

with these authority, jesus or the son of man, who receives this authority to judge,aknowledging this fact, daniel does not neccesarily inlude jesus or son of man but directly mention micheal as the executor of judgement based on the authority

Daniel 12:1
New King James Version (NKJV)

12 “At that time[b] Michael shall stand up,[/b]
The great prince who stands watch over the sons of your people;
And there shall be a time of trouble,
Such as never was since there was a nation,
Even to that time.
And at that time your people shall be delivered,
Every one who is found written in the book.

These are the things He will come with but Let me start with this "...with the trumpet of God"

I hope you know he is not the one to[b] blow the trumpet[/b].[/quote]

blowing the trumpet forms 'part of the shout'
vs 16 ''For the Lord Himself will descend from heaven with a shout''


but something very distinct is [size=18pt]'the voice that the dead will hear'[/size] vs 16 [size=18pt]''the voice of an archangel'',
[/size]
this agrees with john 5:25

25 Most assuredly, I say to you, the hour is coming, and now is, when the dead will hear the [size=18pt]voice[/size] of the Son of God;

taking into consideration that the authority of who executes this rest on jesus and no other person and not even another commander.
Religion / Re: Is Michael The Archangel Really Jesus? (revelation 12:7) by BARRISTERS: 3:04am On Nov 19, 2012
These three bible verses; (a1)John 5:25-29 (a2) 1 Thessalonians 4:16 (a3) Daniel 12 :1 pointed to the same event,and were recorded with similarities, the actors role and functions as recorded has provided a very strong identity of Micheal;

The strongest of proof here against all other speculation is ''the voice''

mentioned twice in John 5:25-29 below; clearly fits in perfectly with 1 thes 4:16;



John 5:25-29
New King James Version (NKJV)

25 Most assuredly, I say to you, the hour is coming, and now is, when the dead will hear [size=18pt]the voice[/size] of the Son of God; and those who hear will live. 26 For as the Father has life in Himself, so He has granted the Son to have life in Himself, 27 and has given Him authority to execute judgment also, because He is the Son of Man. 28 Do not marvel at this; for the hour is coming in which[b] all who are in the graves will hear[/b]. [size=18pt]His voice[/size] 29 and come forth—those who have done good, to the resurrection of life, and those who have done evil, to the resurrection of condemnation.
Apart from jesus the son of God who receives the authority to 'ressurects'(vs 27) using 'his voice'(vs25), no authority was given to anyone to perform that task except jesus,and

Apart from sentiments, the identity of ''the person credited with the voice was clearly mentioned below'' 'Micheal'; and not only that,the dead in christ will rise first after hearing 'the voice' of Micheal;


1 Thessalonians 4:16
New King James Version (NKJV)
16 For the Lord Himself will descend from heaven with a shout, [size=18pt]with the voice of an archangel[/size], and with the trumpet of God. And the dead in Christ will rise first.



and to cap it all, in recording the same event, Micheal was clearly mentioned, in Dan 12:1; without the mention of jesus again, then the record proceeds to the ressurection direcly.

Daniel 12:1
New King James Version (NKJV)

12 “At that time [size=18pt]Michael shall stand up[/size],
The great prince who stands watch over the sons of your people;
And there shall be a time of trouble,
Such as never was since there was a nation,
Even to that time.
And at that time your people shall be delivered,
Every one who is found written in the book.

1 Like

Religion / Re: Is Michael The Archangel Really Jesus? (revelation 12:7) by BARRISTERS: 2:00am On Nov 19, 2012
@boomark
Michael came to Daniels aid. And the Son of man also came as you can see from the bolded.

(a) firstly, you erred by confusing ''the Son of man'' with ''sons of men''thereby leading you in error towards concluding that;
v21 gave us clearly the answer we were looking for. It showed us why Christ will be coming with an arch angels voice, 1Th 4:16.

you confused yourself from (bolded)verse 16, below;


16 And, behold, one like the
similitude of [b]the son[size=18pt]s[/size] of m[size=18pt]e[/size]n

touched my lips

lets prove that;


in Gen 6:2

That the [size=14pt]son(s) of God [/size]saw the daughters of men that they were fair; and they took them wives of all which they chose

note that ''the son(s) of God'' [/b]as used in Gen 6:2 above is[b] reffering to the fallen angels,and different from ''the son God'' as used in Luke 1:35 which reffers to jesus christ;

Luke 1:35

35 And the angel answered her, “The Holy Spirit will come upon you, and the power of the Most High will overshadow you; therefore the child to be born will be called holy—the Son of God


hence;''the Son of man'' is totally different from[b]''son(s) of men''
[/b]

(b) secondly,

the verse was not conclusive;

16 ''And, behold, one like the
similitude of the sons of men''

'similitude' often used for 'similarity' or 'likeness' (using the greek translations which the OT manuscript existed originally)dictionary

H1823

similitude

דּמוּת

demûth

dem-ooth'

; resemblance , like ({-ness}


and this further shows why the identity of 'the one with the likeness of the sons of men' here cannot be conclusively determined.

(c) and thirdly;

'the one with the likeness of the sons of men' here should have not have been a 'dependent' on a superior which he proclaimed to be micheal, or are we saying Micheal is greater or supperior to the alledged jesus?

although he strenthens Daniel, and Daniel called him my lord, but it is very common to call angel 'my lord' it doesnt make him jesus, Lot called the 2 angels that rescued him 'my Lord',

how do we derive that;(using the greek translations)

Dan 10:21(NKJV) (new king jame version) But I will tell you what is noted in the Scripture of Truth. (No one upholds me against these, except Michael your prince.

Dan 10:21 But I will shew thee that which is noted in the scripture of truth: and [there is] none that holdeth H2388 with me in these things, but Michael your prince.

holdeth
H2388

חזק

châzaq

khaw-zak'

H2388 a similar greek word used for 'holdeth' above was also used below, shows lending on a superior to achieve a kind of success;

Gen 21:18 Arise, lift up the lad, and hold H2388 [/b]him in thine hand; for I will make him a great nation.

considering the proofs established in a,b and c above, the one reffered to as 'the one with the[b] likeness of the sons of men
' is not the son of God, neither is he son of man talkless of being jesus christ!

1 Like

Religion / Re: Is Michael The Archangel Really Jesus? (revelation 12:7) by BARRISTERS: 2:36pm On Nov 17, 2012
Barristers where did you get "a leading angel"? I can't see it where you quoted.
14 The armies of heaven were following him, riding on white horses and dressed in fine linen, white and clean.
Religion / Re: Is Michael The Archangel Really Jesus? (revelation 12:7) by BARRISTERS: 2:17pm On Nov 17, 2012
@frosbel

you mean your post can be without a quote of bible? well lets see;

Jesus is the Son of the living GOD.

No argument about that, God credited jesus as 'my son'.Gods first creation. (prov.8:22-24)
Michael is the chief of God's angels,

yes

to suggest that Jesus is angel Micheal is pure speculation and wrongly so.

to suggest that it is a pure speculation that Jesus is not angel Micheal in the face of established strong proofs in the bible that the person reffered to in revelation 19 is (a)'' an angel''and a leader of heavenly armies (b)he hath on his vesture and on his thigh a name written, "KING OF KINGS, AND LORD OF LORDS." (Revelation 19:14-16). (c)and his name is called "The Word of God." and that you are yet to give counter proofs from the bible

this makes you look like someone seeking to get glued blindly to what you want to hear but tries to discredit a sound proof from the bible which you knew that you are supposed to give a counter proofs.

suggesting that it is a pure speculation that Jesus is angel Micheal in the face of established strong proofs in (a,b and c)above shows gross disrespect towards using bible as our guide.

because it is evident in your counteinance that you are defeated.your last post here contain 'no bible quote' and that shows that you are relying on verbal comments on this issue rather than proving by using the bible.


No angel would have EVER qualified to die for the sins of Mankind,

pls back up this statement,unless you are adding to the scripture, i challenge you to do it now pls! waiting.

only a man will suffice and that MAN is Jesus the Lord of Lords and King of Kings.

you can see the flaw in using your analogy,''only a man will suffice'' now lets me ask you, was jesus a 'man' in the heaven? that his beign a man will suffice? again you failed to back this insinuation with the bible. but

that MAN is Jesus the Lord of Lords and King of Kings.

you admitted here that the title has one personality, and that is jesus christ,and that agrees with the ' angel' in the heaven with the inscription in revelation 19, can you see the bible back up?

In summary :

1) JESUS came as a MAN

is jesus a human beign in the heaven, pls answer, or if we have to go into spiritual body discussion,i will be ready for you.
2) He was not yet born at the time of the OT

revelation is not OT,ok?
Religion / Re: Is Michael The Archangel Really Jesus? (revelation 12:7) by BARRISTERS: 1:42pm On Nov 17, 2012
@frosbel,

do you want to be taking seriously at all?

FROSBEL;...Sorry , but this does not prove anything.

Are you using your own standard by dismissing strong proofs with links to the subject? because you are yet to counter the strong proofs contained here? its like in the court of law, a judge is bound by the 'pleadings;...(statements supplied by both parties involved in a case before the trial starts.)' so anything out these are not entertained again no matter how relevant. a judge cannot use his own opinion or sentiment to judge outside the facts pleaded before him.even if his relative is involved in the case,he is bound by what is pleaded in written form before him. so when you say ''this does not prove anything'' in the face of these strong titles used for 'a leading Angel below' your refusal to provide 'where the same titles ("KING OF KINGS, AND LORD OF LORDS." and WORD OF GOD)are also used for another person apart from jesus makes your objection so childish and forcefull without substance,and as it stands now,the existing evidences here (a,b and c)below are strong evidences,and until these are duly countered, they remain strong evidence to conclude that JESUS EXIST AS A ANGEL IN HEAVEN. why?

because based on the evidence supplied,it is a statement of fact duly established in the bible, that the person reffered to in revelation 19 is (a)'' an angel''and a leader of heavenly armies (b)he hath on his vesture and on his thigh a name written, "KING OF KINGS, AND LORD OF LORDS." (Revelation 19:14-16). (c)and his name is called "The Word of God." and that you are yet to give counter proofs from the bible. maybe the evidence is enough to convince you is not an issue here, but 'YOU' should provide a counter proof from biblical record. maybe some people share your sentiment, like the OP on these, but are not bold enogh to counter it by supplying another person apart from jesus who is credited with (b and c) above are NOT helping but sharing ignorance based on pady-pady relationship and not based on real proof.

1 Like

Religion / Re: Is Michael The Archangel Really Jesus? (revelation 12:7) by BARRISTERS: 5:07pm On Nov 16, 2012
@frosbel
honestly comment on the (bolded) they are very strong claims;

"And I saw [size=16pt]an angel[/size] standing in the sun...........................And he

hath on his vesture and on his thigh a name written, "KING OF KINGS, AND LORD OF LORDS." (Revelation 19:14-16).


and [size=14pt]his name is called "The Word of God." [/size](Revelation 19:11-13).

im waiting pls!
Religion / Re: Protestant Sex Abuse Equals Or Exceeds Catholic Sex Abuse In The United States by BARRISTERS: 3:43pm On Nov 16, 2012
@op

Protestant Sex Abuse [size=14pt]Equals[/size] Or Exceeds Catholic Sex Abuse In The United States
Do you know the implication of this comparism above?

PROTESTANTS; REFFERED TO NON-CATHOLICS, WHO DOES NOT SHARE CATHOLIC FAITH AND THE SOVEREIGN OF THE POPE.
WELL IN THE UNITED STATES ALONE,

WE HAVE 223 MAJOR PROTESTANT CHURCHES VS (only) THE CATHOLIC CHURCH,

YET THE CATHOLIC CHURCH'S SEX ABUSE ALONE EQUALS 223 MAJOR PROTESTANT CHURCHES,

IS THAT A CREDIT? 95 PER CENT OF THE U.S PARISHES WERE CONTAMINATED WITH SEX ABUSE INVOLVING PRIESTS TARGETING YOUNG BOYS. CATHOLIC PRIESTS WERE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE WIDESPREAD GAY MOLESTATIONS THAT SPREAD LIKE WILDFIRE IN THE U.S THAT CONSUME ALMOST 8 DIOCEESE THAT WERE SEEKING FOR BANKRUPTCY PROTECTION,CATHOLIC CHURCH BUILDINGS WERE SOLD TO SETTLE CLAIMS.

(1)CATHOLIC CHURCH

vs

(223)PROTESTANT CHURCHES; (1)Baptist Church (2)Apostolic Faith Church .............(223)

3 Likes

Religion / Re: 8 CATHOLIC DIOCESE DECLARED BANKRUPTCY Due To Sex Abuse Cases Over $3 billion by BARRISTERS: 8:53am On Nov 15, 2012
@ijawkid
@BArrister.......you don't have to do this.......
Leave these issues alone.....

We should be here to tackle doctrinal issues not scandals.........

Just don't let chukwudi get to you.....

@Ubenidictus....how far??......we never finish our image debate o......

you know im not yet a witnesses, i have said it severally,but have good history and thier records up to date,my wife is one of them,yes. so im not bound to treat doctrinal issues alone, i choose to respond to any claim, because im loaded with comprehensive facts of catholics and the rest, and if chukwudi or anybody's ox is gored,let him/her come out to face the challenge!
Religion / Re: 8 CATHOLIC DIOCESE DECLARED BANKRUPTCY Due To Sex Abuse Cases Over $3 billion by BARRISTERS: 3:01am On Nov 15, 2012
check the link, it is new, this year Over $3 billion incured till 2012 from 2004 only from child abuse,thats crazy men
Religion / 8 CATHOLIC DIOCESE DECLARED BANKRUPTCY Due To Sex Abuse Cases Over $3 billion by BARRISTERS: 2:39am On Nov 15, 2012
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Catholic_sexual_abuse_scandal_in_the_United_States

Over $3 billion incured till 2012 from 2004 only from child abuse

In July 2008 the Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Denver agreed "to pay $5.5 million to settle 18 claims of childhood sexual abuse."[22] The Associated Press estimated the total from settlements of sex abuse cases from 1950-2007 to be more than $2 billion.[20] BishopAccountability reports that figure reached more than $3 billion in 2012.[13][23] Addressing "a flood of abuse claims" five dioceses (Tucson, Arizona; Spokane, Washington; Portland, Oregon.; Davenport, Iowa, and San Diego) got bankruptcy protection.[20] Eight Catholic diocese have declared bankruptcy due to sex abuse cases from 2004-2011.[24]
As it became clear that there was truth to many of the allegations and that there was a pattern of cover-up in a number of large dioceses across the United States, the issue exploded into a nationwide scandal, creating a crisis for the Catholic Church in the United States. Allegations in the United States also encouraged victims in other nations to come forward, rapidly creating a global crisis for the Church. Over several decades in the 20th century, priests and lay members of religious orders in the Catholic Church had sexually abused minors on a scale such that the accusations reached into the thousands.[25] A major aggravating factor was the actions of Catholic bishops to keep these crimes secret and to reassign the accused to other parishes in positions where they had continued unsupervised contact with youth.
Religion / Re: Woman Awarded $28m In Jehovah's Witness Sex Abuse Claim by BARRISTERS: 2:26am On Nov 15, 2012
@ chukwudi44
CATHOLIC CHURCH'S OWN CASE HAS ECLYPSED THE WHOLE CONTINENT, ONLY IN THE USA,95 PERCENT OF THE DIOCEESE WERE AFFECTED,

WHAT IS YOUR CHURCH,CATHOLIC DOING,THAT THEY HAVE TO SETTLE CASSES OF NOT THE MEMBERS BUT PRIESTS AMOUNTING TO[b] 3BILLION DOLLARS[/b], ONLY ON SEX ABUSE ALONE, AND 5 PARISHES WERE GIVEN BANKRUPCY PROTECTION?[/b]PARISHES SOLD TO SETTLE ABUSE FROM PRIEST.

LETS SEE BELOW;
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cases_of_child_sexual_abuse_in_the_Roman_Catholic_Church


[b]Roman Catholic sex abuse cases

Starting with the united states.

BishopAccountability.org,

an "online archive established by lay Catholics," [size14pt]reports that over 3,000 "civil lawsuits have been filed against the church" in the United States,[13] some of these cases have resulted in multi-million dollar settlements with many claimants.[/size] The Roman Catholic Diocese of Dallas paid [size=14pt]$30.9 million[/size] in 1998 to twelve victims of one priest [size=14pt]($44.1 million in present-day terms)[/size].[14][15] In July 2003 the Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Louisville [size=14pt]paid $25.7 million [/size]to "settle child sexual-abuse allegations made in 240 lawsuits naming 34 priests and other church workers."[14] In 2003, the Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Boston settled a large case for $85 million with 552 alleged victims.[16] In 2004, the Roman Catholic Diocese of Orange settled nearly [size=14pt]90 cases for $100 million.[/size][17] In April 2007 the Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Portland in Oregon agreed to a [size=14pt]$75 million settlement with 177 claimants and the Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Seattle agreed to a $48 million settlement with more than 160 victims.[/size][18] In July 2007 the Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Los Angeles reached a[size=14pt] $660 million agreement with more than 500 alleged victims, in December 2006, the archdiocese had a settlement of 45 lawsuits for $60 million.[/size][19][20] In September 2007, the Roman Catholic Diocese of San Diego reached a [size=14pt]$198.1 million "agreement with 144 childhood sexual abuse victims[/size]."[21] In July 2008 the Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Denver agreed "to pay [size=14pt]$5.5 million to settle 18 claims of childhood sexual abuse.[/size]"[22] The Associate Press estimated the total from settlements of sex abuse cases from 1950-2007 to be more than $2 billion.[20] [size=18pt]BishopAccountability reports that figure reached more than $3 billion in 2012.[/size][13][23] Addressing[b] "a flood of abuse claims" five dioceses

[size=14pt](Tucson, Arizona; Spokane, Washington; Portland, Oregon.; Davenport, Iowa, and San Diego) got bankruptcy protection.[20] Eight Catholic diocese have declared bankruptcy due to sex abuse cases from 2004-2011.[/size]
[b]As it became clear that there was truth to many of the allegations and that there was a pattern of cover-up in a number of large dioceses across the United States, the issue exploded into a nationwide scandal, creating a crisis for the Catholic Church in the United States. Allegations in the United States also encouraged victims in other nations to come forward, rapidly creating a global crisis for the Church. Over several decades in the 20th century, priests and lay members of religious orders in the Catholic Church had sexually abused minors on a scale such that the accusations reached into the thousands.[25][size=14pt]]A major aggravating factor was the actions of Catholic bishops to keep these crimes secret and to reassign the accused to other parishes in positions where they had continued unsupervised contact with youth.
[/size]

[size=14pt]AND TO WORSEN THE CASE, THE CATHOLICS GIVE UP COMPLETELY IN CONTROLLING THE SCORGE,SEE BELOW;
[/size]
In response to criticism that the Catholic hierarchy should have acted more quickly and decisively to remove priests accused of sexual misconduct, contemporary bishops have responded that the hierarchy was unaware until recent years of the danger in shuffling priests from one parish to another and in concealing the priests' problems from those they served. [size=18pt]For example, Cardinal Roger Mahony of the Archdiocese of Los Angeles, said: "We have said repeatedly that ... our understanding of this problem and the way it's dealt with today evolved, and that in those years ago, decades ago, people didn't realize how serious this was, and so, rather than pulling people out of ministry directly and fully, they were moved."[/size]
[edit]Diocesan response to allegations

Some bishops have been heavily criticized for moving offending priests from parish to parish, where they still had personal contact with children, rather than seeking to have them permanently removed from the priesthood. Instead of reporting the incidents to police, many dioceses directed the offending priests to seek psychological treatment and assessment. According to the John Jay report, nearly 40% of priests alleged to have committed sexual abuse participated in treatment programs. The more allegations a priest had, the more likely he was to participate in treatment.

REMEMBER THAT THERE ARE OTHER NUMEROUS CLAIMS BELOW,IF YOU HAVE THE TIME JUST CLICK ON EACH COUNTRY BELOW ON WIKIPEDIA'S PAGE.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cases_of_child_sexual_abuse_in_the_Roman_Catholic_Church

1 Austria
1.1 Archdiocese of Vienna
1.1.1 Diocese of Sankt Pölten
2 Belgium
2.1 Archdiocese of Mechlin-Brussels
2.1.1 Diocese of Antwerp
2.1.2 Diocese of Bruges
2.1.3 Diocese of Ghent
2.1.4 Diocese of Hasselt
2.1.5 Diocese of Liège
2.1.6 Diocese of Namur
2.1.7 Diocese of Tournai
2.2 Salesians
3 Croatia
3.1 Archdiocese of Zagreb
3.2 Archdiocese of Rijeka
4 Czech Republic
4.1 Archdiocese of Olomouc
5 Denmark
5.1 Diocese of Copenhagen
6 France
6.1 Archdiocese of Paris
6.1.1 Diocese of Meaux
6.2 Archdiocese of Rouen
6.2.1 Diocese of Evreux
6.3 Archdiocese of Besançon
7 Germany
7.1 Archdiocese of Munich and Freising
7.2 Diocese of Regensburg
7.3 Archdiocese of Berlin
7.3.1 Canisius-Kolleg Berlin
7.4 Archdiocese of Freiburg
7.4.1 Kolleg Sankt Blasien
8 Great Britain
8.1 Archdiocese of Southwark
8.1.1 Diocese of Arundel and Brighton
8.1.2 Diocese of Plymouth
8.2 Archdiocese of Cardiff
8.3 Benedictines
8.4 Kiltegan Fathers
8.5 Diocese of Middlesbrough
8.6 Archdiocese of Birmingham
9 Ireland
9.1 Archdiocese of Cashel and Emly
9.1.1 Diocese of Cloyne
9.1.2 Diocese of Limerick
9.2 Archdiocese of Dublin
9.2.1 Diocese of Ferns
9.3 Archdiocese of Tuam
9.4 Archdiocese of Armagh
9.4.1 Diocese of Raphoe
10 Italy
10.1 Archdiocese of Trento
10.1.1 Diocese of Bolzano-Brixen
10.2 Archdiocese of Venice
10.2.1 Diocese of Verona
11 Malta
11.1 Archdiocese of Malta
12 Netherlands
12.1 Archdiocese of Utrecht
12.1.1 Diocese of Den Bosch
12.1.2 Diocese of Roermond
12.1.3 Diocese of Rotterdam
12.2 Salesians
13 Norway
13.1 Territorial Prelature of Trondheim
14 Poland
14.1 Archdiocese of Poznan
14.2 Archdiocese of Warsaw
14.2.1 Diocese of Plock
15 Slovenia
15.1 Archdiocese of Ljubljana
16 Spain
16.1 Society of Jesus
17 Sweden
17.1 Diocese of Stockholm
17.2 Sweden generally
18 See also
19 References

IN CONCLUSION, ONLY IF ONLY IN AMERICA 80 PER-CENT OF ONLY THE PRIESTS ARE SEX ABUSERS WHAT DO YO SAY ABOUT THE CHURCH MEMBERS.
THEY HAD TO GIVE UP IN CONTROLLING IT!
Religion / Re: Woman Awarded $28m In Jehovah's Witness Sex Abuse Claim by BARRISTERS: 2:11am On Nov 15, 2012
@chukwudi44

the case has been appealled now since august, and as you can even see the motive to appeal in your own quotes below;

The Alameda County Superior Court awarded Conti a total of $28 million in damages. The Watchtower’s press release about the Candace Conti case states that the organization will try to appeal the court’s decision [/b]on grounds that a sentence made against a corporation because of the [b]actions of a member of the organization is unprecedented.

IT IS ALSO NOTEWORTHY THAT WATCHTOWER WERE AWARDED CAD$142,000 WRONGFULLY JOINED IN AN ABUSE CASE!
In 2004, a Canadian court awarded CAD$5000 to a plaintiff for the negligence of an elder who failed to follow the official policy of the church. [size=14pt]However, the court dismissed charges against the Watchtower Society, and directed the plaintiff to pay the Watchtower Society's legal fees amounting to CAD$142,000.[/size]

JWS are not cyborg,but they seek to teach common people,former drug addicts,drunkards and many more even child abusers to know God, so if one of these relapse,what and how do they treat it, first of all,disfellowship and even at times handed over to the police,see how they treat it below link;

http://www.jw-media.org/aboutjw/article23.htm

they are on top of the situation,as anybody fingered are disffelowshipped and can never be a leader in their church.

All these cases are only limited to the united states,and out of 12,300 congregations[/size] … During the last 100 years,[size=14pt] only thirteen lawsuits filed in the United States; In seven of these lawsuits ,.[/size] [size=18pt]accusations against the Watchtower Society itself were dismissed by the courts,THATS MASSIVELY COMMENDABLE.
WE CAN CONCLUDE HERE THAT, JWS HAVE EFFECTIVELY PUT A MEASURE TO ERADICATE IT.

3 Likes

Religion / Re: Prophetical Blunders Of The Jehovah Witnesses Cult by BARRISTERS: 11:49pm On Nov 14, 2012
@chukwudi

ARE YOU READY? ITS SEEMS YOU DONT KNOW WHAT SUBSTANTIAL PROOFS ARE,

unfortunately,the alledged link does not contain just one full page of what is reffered to as a whole magazine,and you have not done your home work to get just one of those magazine,but rather the link contain join-join sentences that are weak and unsubstancial to be presented as a proof in a trial in court, they are lifted sentences from a paragraphs, but unfortunately they could not also lift the particular 'day' and 'hour' together, so i demand for a scanned copy so as to confirm,and also see wheather there is a fix date of a day in a month in particular year that jws actually says that the world would end. can you again quote a full page or just 5 paragraphs in one page of one of the numerous magazines alledged?

2 Likes

Religion / Re: FAILED PROPHECIES OF THE WATCHTOWER SOCIETY WITH REFERENCES!!! by BARRISTERS: 11:32pm On Nov 14, 2012
@chukwu
At least when God reoented he informed him before the day of the prophecy.

God did not inform him, no proof that God inform him before the lapse of the 40days,see his statement again, but he tried on his own TO FORESTALL,

''That is what I tried to forestall by fleeing to Tarshish. I knew that you are a gracious and compassionate God'',

he knew God as a compassionate,no proof that shows God tells him otherwise.

.Why did the Jw wait for theb prophecies to fail b4 recanting

get it right, the JWs never had a prophecy that failed! you are yet to supply just a page from your alledged magazines of theirs, and we are waiting for either a scaned copy or a full page of a 1914 alledged prophecy,as it is now, there is no proof! your link is only containing lifted sentences from a paragraphs,from original contexts,and statetements can be better understood 'in its original context and not secondary context as your link is devoid,and unfortunately too, they could not lift the particular 'day' together, so i demand for a scanned copy so as to confirm,and also see wheather there is a fix date of a day in a month in particular year that jws actually says that the world would end. NO PROOF UNTIL ONE IS PROVIDED THAT CAN STAND TRIAL IN A COURT.

1 Like

Religion / Re: FAILED PROPHECIES OF THE WATCHTOWER SOCIETY WITH REFERENCES!!! by BARRISTERS: 5:56pm On Nov 14, 2012
@chukwu

noo sir,

what d you mean by conditioner? does this tone suggest conditioner? it was a fixed date!
“Forty days from now Nineveh will be destroyed!” (not may be but will be)

Jonah's prophecy was conditional "if they don't repent" besides when God recants he will inform his prophets before the appointed date about his decision.
Jonah 4:1-10,

4 But to Jonah this seemed very wrong, and he became angry. 2 He prayed to the Lord, “Isn’t this what I said, Lord, when I was still at home? That is what I tried to forestall by fleeing to Tarshish. I knew that you are a gracious and compassionate God, slow to anger and abounding in love, a God who relents from sending calamity. 3 Now, Lord, take away my life, for it is better for me to die than to live.”

4 But the Lord replied, “Is it right for you to be angry?”


so,how happy we are that God wants to be compassionate despite predicting an end to this world soo

''I knew that you are a gracious and compassionate God, slow to anger and abounding in love, a God who relents from sending calamity''
Religion / Re: FAILED PROPHECIES OF THE WATCHTOWER SOCIETY WITH REFERENCES!!! by BARRISTERS: 5:47pm On Nov 14, 2012
@Chukwudi44

are you attacking the bible? i believe that you are not an atheist!
Religion / Re: FAILED PROPHECIES OF THE WATCHTOWER SOCIETY WITH REFERENCES!!! by BARRISTERS: 5:23pm On Nov 14, 2012
@chukwudi44

The fact remains anyone who claims to prophesy in the name of the Lord and it does not come to pass is a failed prophet.
so jonah is a false prophet,isn'nt it see what he said...“Forty days from now Nineveh will be destroyed!” but it never was in 40 days, cant you see that God is more interested in having many people repent? than killing and destroy? that is the message, are you living in such a way that if you die today,you are having the rest of mind that you were alert at signs of the last days?
Religion / Re: Prophetical Blunders Of The Jehovah Witnesses Cult by BARRISTERS: 5:14pm On Nov 14, 2012
@op CHUKWUDI

SCAN OR COPY ONE OF THE MAGAZINE,AND PASTE SHOWING THE FULL PARAGRAPHS,ONE THAT CAN STAND AS A PROOF IN A COURT OF LAW, PICK A WHOLE PAGE IN THAT MAGAZINE AND PASTE.

Do you read those contained in the list? they are lifted sentences from a paragraphs, but unfortunately they could not lift the particular 'day' and 'hour' together, so i demand for a scanned copy so as to confirm,and also see wheather there is a fix date of a day in a month in particular year that jws actually says that the world would end. that will go against jesus word that the day and hour,nobody knows, then i will say that JWS did oversabi in that, but failure to do that, means that they are following what jesus says to be 'alert' at events with the happenings prophesied in luke 10:31 '' if you see all these happening,know that the kingdom of God is here''.

2 Likes

Religion / Re: FAILED PROPHECIES OF THE WATCHTOWER SOCIETY WITH REFERENCES!!! by BARRISTERS: 4:56pm On Nov 14, 2012
BARRISTERS: @t-med



do you read those claims that was brought? they are lifted sentences from a paragraphs, but unfortunately they could not lift the particular 'day' together, so i demand for a scanned copy so as to confirm,and also see wheather there is a fix date of a day in a month in particular year that jws actually says that the world would end.

speculate? is not the issue here? read the main topic here;
''FAILED PROPHECIES OF THE WATCHTOWER SOCIETY WITH REFERENCES''

lets see what a calamity 'prophecy' in the bible looks like, there are three ingredients it must contain;
1, The prophecy must be relayed through vision, or revelation to a person who convey the message to the one concerned. watchtower never claim to receive any vision whatsoever concerning the endtime,but it was jesus who declare an end to come, but the 'day and hour' nobody knows, so jesus carries the burden of the claim of 'who prophecied endtime' in the first place.
2,A prophecy (of a calamity) must be specific to a day or count to a particular day of a month of a particular year. no evidence has been brought forward that indicate a particular date that jws 'fix' like 29/8/2012......

see an example of a ''prophecy of destruction'' here again, i have cited it before,
jonah 3:1-3,
1 Then the Lord spoke to Jonah [/b]a second time: 2 [b]“Get up and go to the great city of Nineveh, and deliver the message I have given you.”

NOTE ABOVE THAT JONAH HAS RECEIVE A 'REVELATION' AND WAS TO GO AND DELIVER IT JUST THE WAY IT WAS REVEALED TO HIM;

3 This time Jonah obeyed the Lord’s command and went to Nineveh, a city so large that it took three days to see it all.[a] 4 On the day Jonah entered the city, he shouted to the crowds: [size=14pt]“Forty days from now Nineveh will be destroyed!”[/size]

FOURTY DAYS WILL BE A MONTH AND FEW DAYS IN NISSAN CALLENDAR! THE PEOPLE CAN COUNT FROM THE 'HOUR' OF THE 'DAY' THEY HEARD THE MESSAGE WHICH WILL BE A PARTICULAR HOUR OF THE 41ST DAY, HAD IT BEEN WE KNEW THE DATE JONAH WAS SAYING THIS OF WHICH THE PEOPLE OF NINEVEH CAN SPECIFY THAN US NOW.

SO, THE ENTIRE NOTION THAT WATCHTOWER PROPHECIED IS COMPLETELY UNFOUNDED. THERE WAS NO INGREDIENTS LIKE WHAT A PROPHECY SHOULD LOOK LIKE, THE INGREDIENTS THAT ARE TO BE SATISFIED IS THE 'DAY' AND 'HOUR', ACCUSERS MUST COMMIT JWS TO DAY AND HOUR AGAINST JESUS CLAIM THAT ''NOBODY KNOWS THE DAY AND HOUR''

TO BE FAIR TO JWS, NOBODY HAS COME OUT WITH A 'FIX DAY OF 24HRS IN A MONTH OF 30DAYS' TO NAIL THEM EXCEPT WHAT CAN BE TERMED AS EMPTY INSULTS THAT DOES NOT CHANGE ANYTHING.




Religion / Re: Prophetical Blunders Of The Jehovah Witnesses Cult by BARRISTERS: 4:51pm On Nov 14, 2012
DO JEHOVAH WITNESSES PROPHECY?

lets see what a calamity 'prophecy' in the bible looks like, there are three ingredients it must contain;
1, The prophecy must be relayed through vision, or revelation to a person who convey the message to the one concerned. watchtower never claim to receive any vision whatsoever concerning the endtime,but it was jesus who declare an end to come, but the 'day and hour' nobody knows, so jesus carries the burden of the claim of 'who prophecied endtime' in the first place.
2,A prophecy (of a calamity) must be specific to a day or count to a particular day of a month of a particular year. no evidence has been brought forward that indicate a particular date that jws 'fix' like 29/8/2012......

see an example of a ''prophecy of destruction'' here again, i have cited it before,
jonah 3:1-3,
1 Then the Lord spoke to Jonah a second time: 2 “Get up and go to the great city of Nineveh, and deliver the message I have given you.”

NOTE ABOVE THAT JONAH HAS RECEIVE A 'REVELATION' AND WAS TO GO AND DELIVER IT JUST THE WAY IT WAS REVEALED TO HIM;

3 This time Jonah obeyed the Lord’s command and went to Nineveh, a city so large that it took three days to see it all.[a] 4 On the day Jonah entered the city, he shouted to the crowds: [size=14pt]“Forty days from now Nineveh will be destroyed!”[/size]

FOURTY DAYS WILL BE A MONTH AND FEW DAYS IN NISSAN CALLENDAR! THE PEOPLE CAN COUNT FROM THE 'HOUR' OF THE 'DAY' THEY HEARD THE MESSAGE WHICH WILL BE A PARTICULAR HOUR OF THE 41ST DAY, HAD IT BEEN WE KNEW THE DATE JONAH WAS SAYING THIS OF WHICH THE PEOPLE OF NINEVEH CAN SPECIFY THAN US NOW.

SO, THE ENTIRE NOTION THAT WATCHTOWER PROPHECIED IS COMPLETELY UNFOUNDED. THERE WAS NO INGREDIENTS LIKE WHAT A PROPHECY SHOULD LOOK LIKE, THE INGREDIENTS THAT ARE TO BE SATISFIED IS THE 'DAY' AND 'HOUR', ACCUSERS MUST COMMIT JWS TO DAY AND HOUR AGAINST JESUS CLAIM THAT ''NOBODY KNOWS THE DAY AND HOUR''

TO BE FAIR TO JWS, NOBODY HAS COME OUT WITH A 'FIX DAY OF 24HRS IN A MONTH OF 30DAYS' TO NAIL THEM EXCEPT WHAT CAN BE TERMED AS EMPTY INSULTS THAT DOES NOT CHANGE ANYTHING.

1 Like

Religion / Re: Prophetical Blunders Of The Jehovah Witnesses Cult by BARRISTERS: 4:46pm On Nov 14, 2012
@op CHUKWUDI44

They had propesied they would would end in 1914.ijawkid,truthislight et al come and defend your faith.

Extracts from the link are given below

Changed Dates :: Failed Predictions

This section covers some of the lesser known failed predictions and changed date doctrine of the Watchtower Society. For the more important dates see the pages on 1914, 1925, 1975. Many of the following quotes are from the Watchtower Society's Studies in the Scriptures Series. Scanned copies of these books can be downloaded for free from jehovah.net.au/books.html.




"He said: "Look out that YOU are not misled; for many will come on the basis of my name, saying, 'I am he,' and, 'The due time has approached.' Do not go after them." Luke 21:8

At John 16:13 Jesus said he would provide his followers Holy Spirit to correctly understand what the future holds;

"However, when that one arrives, the spirit of the truth, he will guide YOU into all the truth, for he will not speak of his own impulse, but what things he hears he will speak, and he will declare to YOU the things coming."

Moses warned against those that make predictions in the name of Jehovah that do not come true;

"And in case you should say in your heart: "How shall we know the word that Jehovah has not spoken?" When the prophet speaks in the name of Jehovah and the word does not occur or come true, that is the word that Jehovah did not speak..." Deuteronomy 18:20-22

The Watchtower says that the standard by which to judge a false messenger is whether their messages "come true"?

"Jehovah is the Grand identifier of his true messengers. He identifies them by making the messages he delivers through them come true. Jehovah is also the Great Exposer of false messengers." Watchtower 1997 May 1 p.8

Ironic, considering the Watchtower specifically said the end would come in 1914 and then 1925. The following section contains over 20 other "messages" promoted by the Watchtower for decades that turned out not to be "true". What does this prove about them as messengers?

Whereas doctrine is subjective and un-provable, time prophecy leaves no room for error. On a number of occasions the Watchtower put a line in the sand when saying a specific event was going to happen on a specific date. When those dates passed without event those statements proved beyond argument to be false. When something predicted to happen does not occur there is irrefutable evidence that Jehovah did not direct the interpretation. In line with the Scriptures above, the following incorrect dates prove the Watchtower Society is not guided by Jehovah.

In 1876, Russell became interested in time prophecy, after reading a copy of Barbour's publication Herald of the Morning. The end had not come in 1874, as the Adventists had predicted. However, Barbour explained that Matthew 24:27 meant Jesus' invisible presence commenced in 1874, the rapture would be 1878, and the end of the world was to occur in 1914. (see Watch Tower, 1906 July 15 for a detailed account.)

In Russell's doctrinal chronology the most important dates were 1874 and 1914:

"The chapter in SCRIPTURE STUDIES, Vol. II, showing the parallels between the Jewish and Christian Dispensations, makes prominent four dates, viz., (1) October, 1874; (2) April, 1878; (3) October, 1881, and (4) October, 1914;" Watch Tower 1911 June 15 p.190

"The careful student will have observed that the period designated 'The Time of the End' is very appropriately named, since not only does the Gospel age close in it, but in it, also, all prophesies relating to the close of this age terminate, reaching their fulfillments. The same class of readers will have noticed, too, the special importance of the last 40 of these 115 years (1874-1914), called 'The End' or 'Harvest.'" Studies in the Scriptures Series III - Thy Kingdom Come p.121



The above timeline shows Russell's concept that the Second Coming of Jesus was 1874, and the start of the 1000 year earthly reign was 1914, as it was to end in 2914 A.D.



For Rutherford the important dates were:

"WE HAVE no doubt whatever in regard to the chronology relating to the dates of 1874, 1914, 1918, and 1925." Watchtower 1922 May 15 p.147



Other significant dates the Watchtower no longer refer to are;

1799 A.D. - The beginning of the Last Days.

539 A.D. - Thought to be the start of Catholic Papal rule and the start point of many prophetic interpretations.

Of these above dates only 1914 is still considered significant, and even then, mostly for different reasons than originally prescribed. Though part of Watchtower lore for 60 years, most current Jehovah's Witnesses are unaware of their significance and that each one failed to eventuate as predicted.

Each time the Watchtower has predicted an occurrence, it has not eventuated as foretold, a 100% failure rate. Does this inspire confidence in Watchtower interpretation? Jehovah's Witnesses promoted these falsehoods in the past, and continue to zealously advocate current doctrine as unfailing truths.

It is claimed that Jesus found a cleansed Slave Class dispensing truthful food in 1919. However, Rutherford continued to promote Russell's interpretation of the dates for the 1700's, 1800's and 1914 until the 1930's. Many of the date prophecies were re-explained between 1930 and 1932; the remainder were adjusted in 1943. Rutherford even dismissed the majority of his own 1900's predictions.

Chapter 10 of Jehovah's Witnesses - Proclaimers of God's Kingdom is devoted to the subject "Growing in Accurate Knowledge of the Truth". This discusses that truth is progressive, yet makes little reference to the failed dates. Relegated to a footnote on page 133 is the statement that;

"A clearer understanding of Biblical chronology was published in 1943, in the book "The Truth Shall Make You Free" and it was then refined the following year in the book "The Kingdom Is at Hand," as well as in later publications.

Scant mention is made of the incredible list of dates that had been abandoned. Nor does it clarify that it was not until 1943 that the beginning of Christ's presence was specifically changed from the year 1874 to 1914. This change was in The Truth Shall Make You Free, released in the time of Knorr and the first book to be printed that did not list the author's name. This was after the death of Rutherford and well after 1919 when Jesus inspection supposedly found a spiritually cleansed Organization.

One can imagine that over time most of the current doctrine describing events of the 1900's will eventually be seen to be of little relevance and relegated to the forgotten annals of Watchtower history. It is yet to be seen what will become of 1914; being the most significant doctrine it will be the most difficult to eradicate without overwhelming consequences.

1780

May 19, 1780 was the date for the first sign of the last days, "The Dark Day." Certain Adventists still hold to this date. It was said by Ellen that "Since the time of Moses no period of darkness of equal density, extent, and duration, has ever been recorded." (Great Controversy, p. 308) This was touched on in Studies in the Scriptures Series 4 (1897) p.604;

"Reckoning a hundred years from 1780, the date of the first sign, the limit would reach to 1880; and, to our understanding, every item predicted had begun to be fulfilled at that date"

The time of darkness, the first sign of the end, was caused by fires in New England and was confined mostly to the North-Eastern part of the United States. Quite typically a new religion will think their country is predicted in prophecy. The Adventists, Mormons and Watchtower Society all began as US centric religions.

1798

"And, perhaps we can answer: the "time, times, and a-half," ended in 1798, at the taking away of the papal dominion, and is one of the great landmarks of prophecy." Three Worlds and The Harvest of This World (1877) p.158

The 1260 days in Revelation 12:7 were said to extend from 538 A.D. to 1798 A.D. and marked by the end of Papal rule. In 1889, Russell changed the last days from 1798 to 1799, based on a new understanding that papal rule started in 539 A.D.

1799

"THE "Time of the End," a period of one hundred and fifteen (115) years, from A.D. 1799 to A.D. 1914, is particularly marked in the Scriptures. "The Day of His Preparation" is another name given to the same period " Studies in the Scriptures Series 3 Thy Kingdom Come p.23

Few Witnesses today are aware of the relevance of the year 1799, that this year is pivotal to the very existence of Jehovah's Witnesses. 1799 was the beginning of 'the time of the end'. This concept started the era of enlightenment and Adventist movement of the 1800's, resulting in Russell's end time belief system.

In 1796, George Bell explained that the Pope was the Antichrist and would fall in 1797. The war that started shortly afterwards along with Napoleon debasing the Pope was seen as evidence of the fulfilment of this. So dramatic was the effect of the apparent fulfilment of this prophecy that it started a general belief that the last days had started and led to the Adventist movement as a whole. The reasoning was related to Daniel's prophecy of the King of the North and prophecies of the 1260 days in Daniel 7:25, Revelation 12:7 and 11:1-3.

Studies in the Scriptures Series II and Zion's Watch Tower 1889 discussed this as relating to the 1799 date.

Catholic Papal rule started in 539 A.D. and was said to have ended 1260 years later in 1799, thus starting the beginning of the time of the end. The prophecy of the 1355 days was similarly calculated to extend from 539 A.D. to 1874, another key date in Russell's understanding of the end times. Although Russell did not get involved in the Adventist movement until the 1870's, he accepted this date as truth and felt that God had chosen him as his mouthpiece to preach the urgency of the times.

This reasoning was still held well after the 1919.

"Napoleon began this Egyptian campaign in 1798, ... and being completed in 1799, marks, according to the Prophet's own words, the beginning of the "time of the end."... "The time of the end" embraces a period from 1799 A.D., as above indicated to the time of the complete overthrow of Satan's empire and the establishment of the kingdom of the Messiah." The Harp ofGod (1921) pp.228,229,236

"The indisputable facts, therefore, show that the "time of the end" began in 1799; that the Lord's second presence began in 1874." Watchtower 1922 Mar 1 p.73

"Napoleon began this Egyptian campaign in 1798, finished it, and then returned to France on October 1, 1799. The campaign is briefly, yet graphically described in the prophecy, verses 40-44; and its being completed in 1799 marks, according to the prophet's own words, the beginning of "the time of the end. Twelve hundred and sixty years from 539 A.D. brings us to 1799, which is another proof that 1799 definitely marks the beginning of "the time of the end." This also shows that it is from the date 539 A.D. that the other prophetic days of Daniel must be counted." Creation (1927) 2,175,000 ed. p.293

It is amusing to see the lengthy list of inventions The Harp of God used as proof that the 1800's was the time of the end; cream separators, fireless cookers, Darkest Africa, shoe-sewing machines, the telegraph, the telephone, the great increase in knowledge and vacuum cleaners. The locomotive, where people could travel at a rate of 100 miles an hour and the 'flying machine, which is a very modern invention' were considered fulfilment of the 'day of God's preparation' spoken of in Nahum 2:1-6.

"The running to and fro of people is without question a fulfilment of the prophecy testifying to the "time of the end". These physical facts can not be disputed and are sufficient to convince any reasonable mind that we have been in "the time of the end" since 1799."

Then as now, the Watchtower resorted to insult, with Rutherford indicating above that a person is not of "reasonable mind" if they do not believe the time of the end started in 1799. Today, a Witness that does not believe 1914 was the start of the end is labelled "the Antichrist" and disfellowshipped.

UNFORTUNATELY, ALL OF ABOVE ARE ARE WITHOUT EVIDENCES, NO PROOFS AS IT IS NOW! DO YOU KNOW THAT WHEN YOU ACCUSE SOMEONE,YOU MUST ALSO PROVIDE (FULL EVIDENCES) TO PROVE YOUR CASE, NOT JUST COPYING FROM ANOTHER SITE, CAN YOU SUPPLY A SCANNED COPIES OF THEIR MAGAZINES THAT YOU REFFERED TO? ONLY IF YOU WANT TO BE TAKEN SERIOUSLY, BECAUSE THE LINKS YOU PROVIDED ALSO REFFERED YOU TO UNKNOWN MAGAZINES,FOR EXAMPLE;IN YOUR CLAIM("The indisputable facts, therefore, show that the "time of the end" began in 1799; that the Lord's second presence began in 1874." Watchtower 1922 Mar 1 p.73) LET US SEE THE TRUE COPY OR SCANNED, SO AS TO BELIEVE YOUR CLAIM.
WE NEED TO HAVE A LINK TO EITHER A SCANNED COPY OF THOSE MAGAZINES OR TRUE COPY ONLINE THAT DISPLAYS THE PARAGRAPHS AS IT WERE, WHERE THE FALSE PROPHECIES YOU CLAIM ARE ACTUALLY FOUND.
Religion / Re: Can A Born Again Christian Be A Soldier? by BARRISTERS: 3:57pm On Oct 24, 2012
As usual, many priests commits crimes in leading war,blessing weapons to kill their christian brothers in another land, Do you think God is happy with these;

(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) (12) (13) (of 15 pages)

(Go Up)

Sections: politics (1) business autos (1) jobs (1) career education (1) romance computers phones travel sports fashion health
religion celebs tv-movies music-radio literature webmasters programming techmarket

Links: (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10)

Nairaland - Copyright © 2005 - 2024 Oluwaseun Osewa. All rights reserved. See How To Advertise. 237
Disclaimer: Every Nairaland member is solely responsible for anything that he/she posts or uploads on Nairaland.