₦airaland Forum

Easy choice: family over UK citizenship.

spikedcylinder:
Bashing on the side of the OP or on the side of the sister?

Bashing by the OP, who seems at ease with taking (what I deem as unnecessary) shots at the fiance's sister, who is not here to defend herself.
While the other lady might truly be at fault, the OP doesn't come off as a passive player in the issue.

Some people and their ego problems. So it is better for him to be a MAN while his family to be homeless?

The move is only temporary and the couple would use the time and peace of mind to better plan their future.

Na wa for all the 'smart'  madams of NL, who know all and are never guilty of poor judgment
There is no need to insult the OP. If you don't have any advice for her, please pack up your self-righteousness, ignore the thread, and move on.

@Poster
I would suggest you try to work things out with Mr B given that you are already pregnant, and if things don't work out, raise the kid on your own.
Mr. A is a definite NO, particularly after he showed tendencies for physical assault.
With your poor selection of men so far, I wouldn't suggest you bother with a Mr. C.

I am a bit skeptical of this one-sided bashing

Musa the Masseur!!!
Monkey smart, monkey smart - na tree near tree!
e don tay, u don dey 'enjoy' awuf massage from Musa like say im be mumu. u don forget say bodi no be wood
The guy probably wanted one for the road. (Un)fortunately, things didn't get too far.
Hopefully you have learnt you lesson, and will desist from getting massages from non-bf guys in the future.

ow11:
2. What is the approximate age of the oldest sedimentary rocks in Nigeria? error margin= +/- 10 million years

Please provide options as the questions are to be in a multi-choice format.

IMO some of the option 'get as e be'

1. Wealth/rich vs nice house-nice car. Doesn't the former infer the latter?
2. Highly educated is relative. Would be better if you put minimum degre levels like B.Sc, MS or PhD as options
3. Nice guy, bad boy vs personality. No be same all three they address?
4. Ego/pride and over protective, are often posed as negative traits which biases most against them

why not go with more objective criteria like smoking, complexion, ethnicity etc

No2Atheism:
As far as i remember and understand, the technicality comes from the fact that Adultery is the only excuse permitted as a ground for "divorce" in the bible, and to make it worse "both of them are not permitted to remarry" after divorce, infact any other sex with anyone else after divorce is considered "adultery".

Hence you see, whether or not the husband and first wife get divorced or not, the husband still does not have a spiritual right to start servicing another woman. His subscription to lawful consensual sex still remains locked with the first woman forever.

My problem with your argument is that you seem to be using the legal divorce as a basis for declaring the second marriage spiritually illegal. I would rather you stay in one realm.

From a physical point of view, the couple are now divorced and their relationship is extra-marital.

From a spiritual point of view, they are not divorced as the woman was not guilty of adultery, and the man maintains his relationship with her. Thus the 'servicing' is legal. On the second marriage, while one may advice against it, 'technically' speaking, there is no law against it.

No2Atheism:
Easier said than done,

Nah, not really. Anyone with a sound science, engineering or image processing background should be able to do it fairly easily. Blurring is a linear operation, and thus is reversible if there are no singularities (like in your pic). If one splits the picture into 2, the LHS is filled with well defined objects that can easily be recreated.

BTW seems you took the pic off, hope that wasn't on my account.
Anyways I made sure to save myself a copy to play around with, but haven't made up my mind on if it would be fair to post the processed pic (although your taunting makes it very tempting).

No2Atheism:
which kind of explanation wantest u

I 'm just curious as to your basis and definition for 'technically' and how you come to the conclusion that the second marriage is 'not really official'

No2Atheism:
1. The unfortunate truth is that "Divorce" is a very tricky case,

2. Technically a man and a woman cannot be divorced as far as spiritual matters are concerned, its just the hardness and ori kun kun of human beings that try to force the hand of the Creator in issues relating to marriage and divorce.

3. Hence[i] technically[/i] the man's marriage to the second wife is not really official as far as spiritual matters are concerned. Hence technically the man does not have a license to shag the second wife. Cus his subscription to the first wife is technically supposed to last forever.

4. Hence it can be argued from a spiritual point of view that the woman and the former husband still have a right to shag each other crazy again and again because they are already joined together forever spiritually the first time the became publicly and officially married.

5. Reality however is that its all just one big messy case of Adultery/Infidelity/Lust, whether divorce is ratified by law or not.

6. @DayoKanu wetin you want take Karmamods picture do, abeg wayo wayo, you dey look for trouble oh,  , just kidding,

Please explain the part in bold

Nice technical game. Hiddink once again shows what a great coach he is. 
Guardiola got it wrong by not switching henry onto Bosingwa, as there was no way messi would beat a right footed LB on the inside. The only time messi posed a threat, was when he went to the outside (which was awkward for both him and bosingwa).
The game is still up for grabs, but the schedule and injury concerns puts things slightly in Chelsea's favor.

y me:
@biina
please expantiate on your "general beholding"

There are some very good looking people that, while some might disagree with the opinion of most that they are the best looking person they have ever seen, all will agree that they are good looking.
Similar argument can be made for the other end of the spectrum.

Na person wey chop belleful dey worry say na animal cruelty.

Bloody detergent!!! Ose of the highest order!
You are just another 'hypothetical stallion' (esin inu iwe)

y me:
beauty is in the eyes of the beholder

but there are some 'general beholding'

Sorry to jump into your little game:
A faster way to identify No2Atheism is to take the pic in the first post, and reverse the blurring process, which is not difficult, given that he likely used one of the standard processes, and there is ample amount of background objects with defined edges in the pic

owo school fees

All cement bags are the same jare!

bluespice:
biina which Nl do u belong to again?


pm on NL?
gimme a break

Sorry, my mistake.
Visit too many forums (with a lot being based on SMF) and forgot that NL doesnt enable some of the basic features available on the others.

[quote author=St☆rStruck link=topic=266503.msg3788607#msg3788607 date=1240857443]biina don't you feel stupid now?[/quote]No, i don't. Do you feel stupid every time you make a mistake?

Are you aware of the existence of a PM system?

debosky:
Ghadaffi is a paranoid loon who abhors opposition of any form. I don't think the all female squad is simply down to feminine ferocity rather than fears of being compromised by corruptible men who want to usurp him.

Taking nothing away from the women though, amazons and the like have been known to be deadly warriors.

I don't believe women should be in the army if in this day and age such abuses continue. Either stamp out the abuses completely or take women out of these situations. 30% is a highly appalling figure.

I am all for equality and women being able to serve their country, but if under these harsh conditions they are continuously threatened and endangered by their own, then I would object strongly to their participation.

OT:
There is no factual evidence of the existence of the mythical Amazons, but there have been evidence of all female regiments in ancient armies.

Bones season 4

bawomolo:
you damn right am happy.

we are taking this series in 7 games.

we should have won this in regulation if not for bad FT shooting. This Celtics team can be beaten if the bulls continue to play defense like the 2nd OT

Nah, don't get carried away, you can get to game 7 with the celtics (almost any tom, dick and harry can), but winning the series is not up for grabs.
Boston have home court advantage, and still have 1 or 2 more gears they can step up to. there is no way, Chicago will win this series.

Just waiting for the cavs -heat (LJ vs Dwade) series.
Heat should be done with Atlanta in 5 games.

platinumnk:
thats a good idea but who is going to organize it?

preferably the mods (or someone in conjunction with the mods).
Its a simple process of starting  3 threads (x2), stating the rules in the OP and just policing afterwards.
Example
1. A 1-2 weeks period for contestants to post their entries in a nomination thread. You can specify number and format of pics. mods will have to delete irrelevant posts in the thread to keep it clean.
2. Close the nomination thread and open the polling thread for 1-2 weeks
3. Results not visible till the end to help the suspense
4. Have a separate thread for discussing the contest
5. One could possibly think up of something to award the winners (like small icons in their sig etc)

Why not just have a poll?
Create a thread with 2 pics (one close up and one full length) in a single post for each contestant, and a second thread with a poll in which posters select their top three choices.
We could actually have one for each gender.