BlackManta's Posts
Nairaland Forum › BlackManta's Profile › BlackManta's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 (of 104 pages)
LilSmith55:It is actually MOHAMMED Salah 3-0 Gabriel JESUS > |
Lol 3-0 Liverpool is the only team that can beat Man City. Man City is overated. The reason why no other english team has beaten them is beacause of uneccesary FEAR. When you FEAR something, you cant overcome it. Liverpool no dey fear anybody. Liverpool is the only epl team that can look Man city in the face. They did it once and they are doing it again. Other epl teams are still shivering with FEAR. |
martineverest:barca wetin ![]() you cant compare Chelsea and Roma with PSG and Juventus. Barca never face tough team. Real Madrid is the bulldozer in UCL this season. |
derecho:Show me evidence pls ![]() |
derecho:Your replies is an example of a child running in circles. Simple question, you cant answer. Your GOD has no identity, no name ![]() Mr man, every god has a name. We have Yahweh, Sango, Thor, Allah, Krishma, Zeus...etc. They all have names. How do you expect me to learn anything from you when you cant even tell me the name of your GOD. I clearly told you that my disbelief was caused by lack of evidence. I never said anything about critical thinking. My reason is clear...I HAVE NO EVIDENCE. What has that got to do with critical thinking? It's up to the person who claims there is god to provide evidence. Can you show me evidence...NO. You cant even tell me the name of your GOD, infact i think you are confused theist who doesn't know the name of his god. You dont know the name of your GOD. When you are asked, you dodge the question. How will anyone take you serious. You dont know the name of your GOD, admit it. It's obvious you dont know anything about your faith. You are a product of indoctrination. You were programmed from birth to believe and when you called to answer a simple question, you run away with flimsy excuses. Na wetin indoctrination dey cause. What a shame. |
derecho:simple question. What is the name of your GOD ![]() Are you dodging the question ![]() Lack of evidence is my reason for disbelief. Can you show me any evidence ![]() |
derecho:what is the name of your GOD ? He no get name ![]() I have not been convinced that there is god due to lack of evidence. Many theists in the world and none of them has been able to prove with rock solid evidence that their god exists hence my disbelief. Btw, what is the name of your GOD? |
Hustlersdiary:which kind story be dis ![]() |
derecho:There are more than 4000. 4000 is just an estimate, there are numerous, even the least popular ones. There are labeled gods. Whether they are real or not. gods is just the general term, it's up to us to pick which one is real or not. MR man you never answer my question. You keep dodging it and asking more questions. This is getting suspicious. Why are you dodging ![]() Which of the god among the 4000 is real ![]() Hmmm...it's like you dont know but you dont wanna admit. |
derecho:You have not answered my question, instead you returned my question with another question. Are you dodging my question ![]() |
derecho:Which god is real ![]() Last time i checked there are over 4000 gods worshipped by man. Which of them is real ![]() |
mmachi96:Do you know the meaning of MERCY. Please define MERCY. |
mmachi96:Yes parents have favourites. But what kind of parents would abandon her children to die ![]() I asked a question about the mother with 4 children. You did not answer the question, rather you dodged it. I asked a direct question. I want a direct answer. God's love is unconditional but he will condemn millions to eternity in hell fire if they dont love him back. |
derecho:You have not answered my question. Instead you carefully dodged it with your long story. Read the post again and answer the question. Dont divert. I want a direct answer to a direct question. |
derecho:We are not so limited as humans. We can do what we can and we can also do what we want. Sometimes we have or create options. I saved one life and abandoned 23 people to die, even though i have the capability to save them. That is not me doing what i CAN ONLY do. That is me doing what i WANT to do. The story is just an analogy but stop trying to defend wickedness. God is like a child. Human beings are not children to him. We are toys in his eyes. TOYS not Children. No sane person would ever condemn his beloved children to suffering and pain. Only TOYS are allowed to be treated like that. My baby sister is dead. She was sick and she passed through so much pain before she died. What justification does God have to torture an innocent girl, to put under so much pain and take her life. Where is the justification ![]() To what end ![]() I would never worship such a God...NEVER. |
mmachi96:The problem with you christians is DOUBLE STANDARD. If a human being was discriminatory just like god, you will criticise him. But God can discriminate. God has favourites. Even though we are his children, we are not equal in his eyes. He can save you and he can abandon you to die. Christians give God a free pass in everything they would criticise humans for. Imagine if a mother has 4 children. These 4 children were involved in an accident. The mother has the money and resources to save her 4 children. But she saved her favourite child and abandoned the other 3 to die. If you met such a mother. What would you tell her ![]() Would you clap for her ![]() Be honest and tell me your reaction. I'm waiting. |
mmachi96:According to christians. "Mercy is when you have the capability to save all 24 lives but you decided to save only one life while the remaining 23 died." Why is it that only one person obtains mercy while 23 people are left to die ![]() Why ![]() I will start showing this kind of mercy to my fellow human beings. Thank you. |
derecho:Thank you very much. Allow me to narrate my personal expirience. I used to be a firefighter. One day fire engulfed a 5 storey building at Onitsha. My office was contacted and me and my crew went to quench the flames. It turns out there were 24 people trapped in the building. As the leader of my crew, I gave them instructions. I decided that only 1 person must be saved. The remaining 23 should be left to die. So we saved only 1 person and watched as fire destroyed 23 lives. Dont judge me. I decided i will show mercy to just one person. The 23 persons can die. If a human being did this, you would call him a wicked psychopath. But if God did it, you would tag it 'MERCY' and give testimony in church. IS God not wonderful ![]() Praise the rod...somebody...praise the rod ![]() |
I'm an atheist but when i was still a theist i found it crazy and nonsesical for some religiotards to use tragedies like accidents as proof of their god's existence. An accident would kill 23 people and the lone survivor would use it as testimony. They will even hold thanksgiving and praise their all powerful god. ![]() Yes...the same powerful god that saved only one person while 23 people died ![]() Imagine rejoicing and praising god over an accident that killed 23 ![]() I left my former church because of that nonsense. |
rekinomtla:You dont need God an religion to be a good person. If the only thing stopping you from going out and killing people is because some invisible man in the sky says so then perhaps you're to bleeped up for society in the first place. You see we who do not have a religion don't need some spooky invisible man to tell us what we should and shouldn't do, we simply know it and as a result have morals. Oh and if you think religion has such great morals then here are some nice biblical morals for you: - a rape victim must marry her rapist - woman are not allowed to exert power over men - you may have slaves from foreign countries - praying to other gods is illegal and met with the death penalty - mixing of races is not allowed I mean honestly, what kind of shitty morals are these? If this is the best morals god can offer then my grandmother can do a better job then him Don't get me wrong, I'm not anti-religion. But whether you're a good or bad person is unaffected by your religion. There are many religious people I met who are good and many I met who were bad, the same goes for atheism. Religion is a factor that doesn't effect other things. Though some people may use religion as an excuse to do good or bad things All you have to do is to do right. You do not need religion to do right. Common sense and the concept of not doing to others what you would not like done to you is more that enough. Religion always come down to a sense of us vs them, and of course us are always better than them, so you can treat them badly and immorally. As a matter of fact religion, in too many ways, leads to immorality. Inquisition, Crusades, treatment of American natives by the European governments. |
rekinomtla:Speaking of morality and subjective morality, Let me elaborate. Morality has changed.Morals are a personal gauge of right and wrong. To say that morality is objective is to say that notions of right and wrong are universal and fixed for all times; as in relating to or existing as an object of thought without consideration of independent existence. That is saying what are right and wrong today will be that way for all cultures and all time and are the same as they were in the past. It is a fact that some things were thought of as good in the past that are now thought bad, making it purely subjective. Morality is personal Simply put morality is what a person regards as 'right' and 'wrong'. What a person decides as 'morally right' or 'morally wrong' is down to their own ideals and principles. They are not decided by society or any other external source. Morals set by external sources, such as society, would be called 'ethics'. The morals of a violent sadistic murderer differ from those of a vegan pacifist. If you agree with that statement you automatically agree that morality is subjective. The above statement is also the same as saying: the morals of person A differ from person B. The point still remains. Also if morality wasn't subjective, humanity as a whole would be able to agree on a hell of a lot of topics that we clearly cannot agree on. Warfare, especially wars from antiquity, is a great example that shows that morality is subjective. Morality is SubjectiveThe reason morality is subjective is because there is no common moral law that ALL people agree on. If objective moral codes existed like "murder is bad" than there would be no murderers. But there are murderers. The reason most societies outlaw murder is because it is for the logical salvation of the society. However, salvation of society has little to do with individual salvation. Right and wrong become meaningless, and to an individuals point of view, moral becomes the best choice for the respective body, be it there family or self. The fact that this question exists is good evidence for subjective morality. Morality is subjective because human conciousness is subjective In order for morality to be objective, it must be right or wrong regardless of human perception. Morality does not exist without human conciousness to perceive and interpret it. Human perception is subjective because no one individual can interpret another's perception. Example: No other person can tell me how I perceive the color red. Sure, we could both look at a rose or a firetruck and be in agreement that they are indeed red, but that is not the same as that person perceiving red as I do. For all that person knows, my concept of 'red' is actually their concept of blue, or yellow, or some other color that they, if they were able to perceive through my mind, would not be red. To this point, I'll share an anecdote of my friend who is completely colorblind. He has no notion of what the color 'red' means, or any other color for that matter, according to my mind's interpretation of it, but he has acclimated himself to associate a certain shade of grey to be the color "red". So, if he were looking at the aforementioned rose or firetruck, or needed to make sure the traffic light he was approaching was warning him to stop, he would still be in agreement that they are red. This, however, is a learned association and not the same as a rose, firetruck, stoplight, etc. being objectively red. The same is true of morality. The statement, "It is morally wrong to kill another person" is subjective to the person who is faced with the prospect of killing another person. If, say, the person is going to kill another person who has strapped themselves with explosives and is about to blow up a school, then that person may feel morally justified in killing the other. On the other hand, the person strapped with explosives might feel a similar moral justification for what they are about to do. It might not be what you think is moral, be that doesn't make it any less moral to them, and that is precisely the point |
rekinomtla:sick atheistic belief ![]() Excuse me, let me make something clear. 1. Atheist believe that there is no god and no supreme being to judge our actions. 2. Atheism NEVER said "since there is no god to judge anyone, you can kill people and commit heinous crimes". 3. The one major anthem in atheism is THERE IS NO GOD, atheism does not teach people how to live their lives or how to treat their fellow humans. 4. If an atheist decides to kill millions of innocent people, it is a 100% personal decision. No atheism commandment ever taught something like that...unlike the bible which commands people to kill unbelievers. 5. Atheist (most atheist) believe that morality is subjective. Morality is a man-made concept that is defined by the society you live in; it is subjective. There is nothing called morality in nature. You cannot observe morality or test it in a laboratory. There is no absolute "morality." Even murdering or killing humans is not an absolute; it is societal, e.G., killing in war is OK, killing someone attacking you with deadly force where you are in fear of your life is OK. Atheism never said " since morality is subjective, go ahead and kill innocent people". Morality is societal, it depends on your society...there are societies that encourage gay marriage, there are societies that dont. Morality differs and atheist dont have any big moral guidebook. Even when a million atheists are gathered. You will notice that everybody has his own take on morality. 6. Atheist believe in subjective morality but atheism never had a commandment that promotes genocide and senseless killings. That would be a contradiction to subjective morality that we agree on. 7. Speaking of morality, i just remembered that the bible clearly commands people to slaughter unbelievers (objective morality huh )Peace |
rekinomtla:The title reads killings under communist not killing under atheism. Is there an atheist book or commandments that instructs atheist to murder non atheist ![]() We have a group of wicked atheist and dictators, yes i agree. But did they kill because of atheism ![]() |
festwiz:That's good to know. Thank you ![]() |
festwiz:I dont care where Jesus came from. If these blacks wanna act some stupid drama, they must use their sense. Millions of blacks in Uganda and they just had to put a white man on the horse. It sends a wrong and unpleasant message. Reminds me of the time of slavery when blacks served the whites. Today we are worshipping a white dude from fucking middle east and you think slavery has ended. Believe what you want. I dont have a lord and saviour, even if i do, he ain't some random white bloke from fucking middle east. We need help ASAP. Bleep religion. |
blackpanthar:Read my message again. |
Today is palm Sunday and as usual, christians all over the world gathered to celebrate the triumphant entry of Jesus Christ into Jerusalem. Meanwhile...in Uganda, a group of black christians (conquered slaves) took their stupidity to a whole new level. Armed with the primitive mentality that their master, lord and saviour is a white dude, they hired a white man to sit on a donkey as they sang praises and waved the palm fronds, imitating the drama in the bible. If you are a black man and you don't find anything wrong with these picture, I suggest you visit a mental asylum. You need help. These pictures are a gross display of inferiority complex and servitude to the white race. If they had put a black man on the donkey, I wouldn't be complaining. But a white man! Whatever happened to black people and their mentality! Our ancestors must be turning in their graves. Slavery was never abolished..NO. It was developed into a more powerful form of slavery...MENTAL SLAVERY! Like it or not, Blacks are still slaves. These pictures makes me wanna vommit. We need help...ASAP.
|
DC are not the only ones stealing characters and ideas. Bad news, hardcore Marvel nerds: many of your favorite characters were probably remorselessly stolen from your terrible arch-nemesis. Yes, it's true; DC Comics has been busting out awesome characters since 1934, so they had a five-year lead when Timely Comics, which would eventually become Marvel, launched in 1939, and Marvel's been trying to catch up ever since. Sure, Marvel is pretty great, but it has quite a few characters of questionable origin. Here are some of Marvel's greatest pitted against their earlier DC counterparts, so you can be the judge. |
.
|
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 (of 104 pages)


