Am the last born in my family and there are too many ups and downs and wahala in my family because it was a polygamous home and my father was one of the man I mistakenly ever met on earth and unlucky for me he is my father 😭😢 So how I wish I should start my life with my own fresh lineage from my wife and children. Like I don't want to be part of the father tree again.
I gave birth 3days ago and I don't want my son to bear my surname 🤔 I want my own name to be his surname so my father lineage will be cut off ☹️
Please is there any future implications in this decision? Or rather something bad behind this decision??
Thanks 😌
Yes.
At the Hospital.
Just tell them what they will write as the Surname inside the Birth Certificate..
No matter what theory they give to you,, just refuse. Tell them that the new surname is what you want for the baby. And that the baby can change it when he or she grows.
That's for the name alone.
As for the Family TREE 🌲🌲🌴.. You cannot cut it off..
Blood still binds all of you together. The baby is still part of the kindred and bloodline.
Your father is still going to be his grandfather,, whether you take the baby 🐥🐥 to him or not.
[quote author=Whiteangel1234 post=124667181]A Trade have just been shot dead in Enugu over the ongoing Protest against Gov Mbah Who Sealed Over 100 shops and impose fine of 100k for closing shops during last Monday sit at Home at Ogbete Market
Updated : Two traders shot dead currently by the Military and Police
A yet to be identified man has been gunned down in Ogbete market Enugu, following the traders protest against ‘sealing of shops’.
If it would be to the better gain of the company, then they would agree..
But if not, then they would reject your idea.
Then again, if it would be to the better gain of the company, and they didn't still buy the idea (even shun you down),, then the person in charge knew about it, and had been siphoning it constantly and frequently at the end of each months payments.
solreb: This is a niece piece that actually cleared Tinubu rather than nailed him. It shows clearly why USA didn't see him as a criminal as they understood people may fall victim if being in custody of drug money. Once they establish your innocence the USA government just seize the money first until you prove to them that the money eas not illegally obtained. .Since it dawned on Tinubu that the $460k was illegally obtained by the drug criminal that put it I his bank account he did not contend for the money not to be seized
Hollusilva28: Omg this Rubbish program don start again. This is not a coincidence. They want you Nigerians to hold on to that program and forget this current predicament that is befalling Nigeria now.
Don’t be deceive, If Nigerians is wise enough they should boycott that program by not subscribing at all.
Hunger is full everywhere on the land. Real People are begging on daily basis.
We need to stand up for ourselves & I hoped the Ronu group that called me Omo Yoruba Vagabond can come together and let’s try to build our lives from scratch. I’m tired of seeing people begging me for money everyday.
Nelson7474: Kiddwaya offers Cee-C N120million to leave the Big Brother Naija #BBNaijaAllStars House.
Big Brother Naija All Stars housemate, Terseer Kiddwaya popularly known as Kiddwaya has offered to give his fellow housemate, Cee-C, the sum of N120 million if she leaves the house. Cee-C is the first housemate to be introduced in the All-Star edition of the reality show followed by Kiddwaya.
aswani: Not stumbling, just explaining the circumstances and how your narrow narrative doesn't fit.
A forfeition is not a fine, that should be clear by now.
President Tinubu clearly wasn't the owner of the money, why should he try and get it back?
Are you sure you are an Obidient, we've been going back and forth a few times now and you haven't insulted me yet?
That's the problem with you guys.
Bad character attracts bad character.
You've been attracting IPOB miscreants to yourself, and you call them Obidients.
The true Obidients do not have bad character. If you want to meet true Obidients,, bring up good topics for discussion. Even strong topics if you like. And you will get your brains razzled as you try to defend your point..
Obidients are not IPOB apologists or sympathizers.. Know this and know peace.
Where are the list of the victims which we have been asking for over 3 years now?
All those who fell for the acclaimed Lekki massacre should check into rehabilitation center from brain check.
Modified: To all those cursing themselves, God is not mischievous, the ones we received during the event don turned to Milo, this new one na peak milk.
Can the Lagos Government give us the list of the 103-Dead-Victims they intended to bury.??
They want to bury people who they don't know? Whose identity they have not established or identified.?? And thus, not identity data-base for them.?
aswani: The money was forfeited because it was in President Tinubu's account, most likely paid in by a third party or he himself would have faced stiffer penalties.
The person that paid it in cannot forfeit the amount because the money is not in that person's account.
It’s not his money that was seized, albeit in his account, so he has nothing to prove regarding the true source of the money.
If the person(s) that owned or paid the monies into President Tinubu's account ever tried to contest for a Presidency against Peter Obi in the future, feel free to quote the contents of the link against them.
See stumbling..
I just explained to you what Civil Forfeiture means.
And you started staggering.
The property was forfeited as a form of fine. And the owner was specifically named. It's up to the owner to prove that the source of the property was genuine, and get it back.
sanpipita: Did you even read this section 64 you are talking about, e transmission of results is very much embedded in the electoral act, INEC said this themselves.
You don't understand me. Do you??
The LP-People would always go court without Section-64 which happened to be the ACTUAL APPLICATION of Transmission.
Thus,, how can they always go to court and be demanding for transmission,, yet they wouldn't present to the Judges the Uses of the same Transmission as required by the Electoral-Act..??
So,, when they are ready to do the right things right, they would have the true Judgement the seek. If not,, then, let them continue to beat about the bush.
Since all these LP-People are more interested in the Section 50(2) and Section 60(5) of the Electoral-Act-2022 whenever they go to the Courts,, rather than paying serious attention to the whole of Section-64 which is even more serious than the Transmission itself,, then I wish them luck in the court..
Let them continue to wallow about,, until they are ready to do the right thing..
aswani: Ah but there was no Conviction either, a Conviction is not a Forfeiture. A Fine, like an imprisonment, is a Conviction though.
Hehehe..
CIVIL FORFEITURE IN THE US
Civil forfeiture allows the government (typically the police) to seize — and then keep or sell — any property that is allegedly involved in a crime or illegal activity. Owners need not ever be arrested or convicted of a crime for their cash, cars, or even real estate to be taken away permanently by the government. The government does not have to charge the property owner with any specific crime in order to seize the property, and must prove only by a preponderance of the evidence that the property is legally forfeitable.
After property has been seized, the burden of proof shifts to the owner, who must prove that the property was not involved in nor obtained as a result of illegal activity.
While the government views civil forfeiture as a powerful tool against the drug trade, organized crime, and political corruption, it is often criticized as an unconstitutional exercise of government power.
Proponents argue that it is effective in thwarting criminal organizations by efficiently and directly harming suspected criminals economically while helping law enforcement financially.
But Critics argue that innocent owners can become entangled in the process where they are already presumed guilty instead of being presumed innocent. Critics also argue that the incentives could lead to corruption and law enforcement misbehavior and abuse.
aswani: The Tribunal are not interested in the money being legit or not, they want to see indisputable proof of Conviction because the constitution is clear about convicted people contesting for Presidency.
That is why it is a court of law and not a viewing centre where the loudest people win the argument, you bring your proof and it is deliberated on, chikena.
The relevant part, which I saw in the constitution was: ....“A SENTENCE of Imprisonment OR FINE for any Offence INVOLVING dishonesty or fraud (by whatever name called)”... ==>>Section-137(1)(d)
Thus,,.. There Was “A SENTENCE OF FINE” On Tinubu. .... ... You're here talking about CONVICTION.?? No wahalla.. Section-137(1)(e) is a totally different section. Its application cannot be superimposed into Section-137(1)(d). ... A “SENTENCE” is totally different from A “CONVICTION”..