₦airaland Forum

“There’s no shame in it,” said Sarah Mann, a 55-year-old editor in Tel Aviv weighing whether to take a few-months break from the country or leave it altogether. “Are you kidding?” she asked rhetorically. “This is a matter of survival.”

https://forward.com/news/581271/israelis-leaving-country-war-safety-abroad/

bemeruca:
the ones killing the nation

Name one please.

bemeruca:
Of course, I am not talking about all. You know this because I used Malaysia as an example of people you would want to migrate to your country. I talk about how Iran wants to spread Caliphate all over the world whereas Saudi-Arabia does not share the same idea

Iran is not in UK. Iran is in Iran. And the Iranians that are in our country are not spreading caliphate here and do not disobey our laws or we would catch them and try them before a jury, and if found guilty we will imprison them, and after they have served their prison sentence we will deport them back to Iran.

Do note that some, and not the majority of Iranians in UK are active Jewish and Christians. Would you like us to blanket kick them out top or just the Muslim ones?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iranians_in_the_United_Kingdom

bemeruca:
the ones killing the nation

No one is killing our nation.

No, scrap that.

We just had elections where we have kicked out those the majority believe are killing our country. They are called the Conservative Party. And we have just now kicked them out democratically, as we do, and replaced them with the Labour Party. And when the Labour Party too start killing our country, we will democratically kick them out too.

bemeruca:
Not let them in the country. Is it that hard?

Yes, it is that hard. We have people born here who share the values of those you posted and whom we can not stop from being in our country. And unless we know you are a terrorist when you apply for your visa, we can't exactly know that your values differ to ours now, can we? Or would you like them to provide us with a mind report along with their police report so we can see what their values are before we let them in?

We are more concerned with our laws than whatever values a person may have. If you break our laws after we let you in, we will imprison you. And after you've served your sentence we will deport you back to wherever you came from.

bemeruca:
he is not anti-immigrant, he is anti illegal migrant

He is a lot of things I can't stand. And there are far more better candidates and parties for me to consider before he becomes an option.

New Prime Minister is Labour's Keir Starmer.

bemeruca:
there are other verses they follow. I think you should send them this verse

I thought you said you were not talking about all muslims.

Do all muslims follow what you posted?

bemeruca:
people who allow you to express yourself without fear. Multiple examples has been shown to you.

Not let them in the country. Is it that hard?

This is liberal UK where nobody stops us expressing ourselves if we want to. As you can see for yourself, we even allow those you claim are terrorists to come here and say whatever they want so long as they are not committing crimes. If they can say whatever they want without being afraid, I can say whatever I want too without fear.

What's good for the goose is equally good for the gander.

bemeruca:
Why won't you vote for this guy?

First, I can't even if I wanted to, since he is not running in my constituency. I wouldn't vote for his party neither because he is antiimmigrants and I am pro-migration.

Besides, this guy left dump's campaign to come and run in UK elections. That, and what I've know of him since he was a Member of the European Parliament is enough to detest him.

Basically, his values do not represent mine so he does not get my vote.

bemeruca:
you only allow people who share your values.

"You only allow allow people who share your values" to what? Live? Speak? And what do you propose be done to those who don't share your values? Do you shoot them? Put them in gulags and burn them in ovens? Not let them speak?

Go on, tell me what you would do to those who don't share your values please.

bemeruca:
I answered. I am not saying all Muslims are terrorists, am I?

If you know that all Muslims are not terrorists or intolerant, why are you posting youtubes of intolerant terrorists and claiming they represent Muslims?

Would you hate Christians if Obrigado posts youtubes of lots of church ministers imprisoned for paedophilia?

If not, why not?

bemeruca:
what were you expecting?

More like what was I hoping for. That Farage's party win zero seats.

One of their 2 is a defecting Conservative who i expected to win. I was hoping Farage lost.

bemeruca:
I answered. I am not saying all Muslims are terrorists, am I?

I am saying they have a doctrine that does not tolerate people with opposing views or expressions like burning a book or drawing a cartoon.

Are you saying all muslims have a doctrine that does not tolerate people with opposing views?

If so, can you kindly explain how Muslims survive in UK where the majority are not Muslims?

Also explain why London would elect a Muslim as Mayor if he has a doctrine of intolerance please.

And explain your understanding of the text below, which is from the Muslim book.

Meanwhile, on the UK election, anti immigration Nigel Farage of Reform UK wins in Clacton, to my utter disappointment.

Pro-Palestine Jeremy Corbyn wins in Islington as an Independent, to my utter delight.

Reform UK has 2 seats as Rishi Sunaks Conservatives implode.

bemeruca:
blasphemy is punishable by death and it is something they practice. we already know the catholic church. i am saying their way of life is not compatible. Imagine the UK shutting down a screening because of them. they banned religious drawings in fear of terror attacks. you don't bring people like this into your country.

Did you not see the question i asked you?

I'll post it again in bold in case you didn't.

budaatum:

Question.

If Obrigardo posts here a few Christian ministers jailed for paedophilia, will you say Christianity is a religion of paedophiles?

Please kindly explain the reason for your answer.

Intergrated:
do they count votes in the country?

Yes, they obviously do. Can't count your's though if you don't vote.

PDJT:
- Nigel Farage party, Reform UK, has done well going by the exit polls. Interesting times.

- As for Labour, the party that sponsored the Biafran genocide, though our IPOB leadership has links with some of their senior MPs, I don't have high hopes for them.

Reform UK has one seat so far, far too many more than I hoped. And it would seem your lack of hope for Labour will be disappointed.

bemeruca:
see the peaceful people following your values. they can make fun of Christianity ....

Question.

If Obrigardo posts here a few Christian ministers jailed for paedophilia, will you say Christianity is a religion of paedophiles?

Please kindly explain the reason for your answer.

I expect Rishi to resign come morning if this turns out to be true. Going from 365 seats to a mere 131 is far too many not to.

IMAliyu2:
Just keep in mind this is a strategy that only works when you're both interacting in good faith.

This, no! All that is required is that I interact in good faith and trust they have a brain and know how to use it.

Even if they slap my right cheek and then my left cheek, they will eventually get tired and bored and start wondering if my cheek is made of iron or is worth slapping. And if they don't stop, there is always the law.

IMAliyu2:
Well I'll hope so, I'm worried by the fact that they even have people who listen to them.

Don't be worried. The UK like Nigeria, at one time too believed that eating the fruits of knowledge will kill them and so built churches everywhere to make people believe that. Then a time came after Jesus had opened our eyes we understood that nourishing our selves with fruits of knowledge is not what kills but ignorance does, so we built lots of schools and libraries instead to teach people to use their God given minds to empower them to "Be fruitful and increase in number; fill the earth and subdue it. Rule over the fish in the sea and the birds in the sky and over every living creature that moves on the ground".

So long as we get the children in our schools, which is mandatory, we will teach them our values and culture and not to be ignorant mud but to use the brains in their heads instead of blowing people up, and those children will contribute to the wealth of the Crown and will be better off for it.

This explains why Europe and many other countries need immigrants. They can't find enough educated workers to grow their economies so they invite immigrants. The more proactive countries go one step further and invite you to come have your babies in their country so they can be trained from birth.

https://www.bangkokpost.com/business/general/2823233/portugal-reviving-tax-breaks-for-foreigners

Those afraid of dump's immunity do rather amuse me. Our own King Charles the First (and not the current) thought the same thing till We The People offed his head.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5FjfauwXoJ4?si=3As9S6HTT9aWJUix

If we were only to have the majority opinion, we would not know that the doctrine of the rule of law existed, let alone that it should regulate the potential criminal liability of the head of the executive branch.

This omission is a shame, and it indicates that the majority judgment is weak. A robust and confident judgment would take on the doctrine of equality of law and show why there would have to be an exception in this instance. But instead, it ignores the point, almost acting as if it is not there.

The weak and one-sided nature of the majority opinion in turn suggests that it is partisan and the result of motivated reasoning. Such allegations are often made with politically appointed judges, but they are not always true. A look at the reasoning in a judgment can often dispel any unease at the bias of a judge.

https://www.prospectmagazine.co.uk/ideas/law/67136/the-us-supreme-courts-weak-and-partisan-judgment

immortalcrown:
You are the childish one here. Otherwise, point out where I said it is impossible for Seun to do such.

immortalcrown:
Are you sure Seun tweeted this?

It could be a photoshopped image.

Not "impossible" per se, but you did doubt he wrote it. And I am suggesting to you that seun is childish and seun did write it. Sadly.

immortalcrown:
You are the childish one here. Otherwise, point out where I said it is impossible for Seun to do such.

If you thought seun had written it you would not have suggested it were photoshopped I don't think.

immortalcrown:
You are the childish one here. Otherwise, point out where I said it is impossible for Seun to do such.

I will translate my post using more words so you might reconsider.

The tweet alleged to be by seun is so immature that a sensible mature immortalcrown can not believe seun can possibly be so immature to have posted it.

Your apology for misunderstanding is noted.

001Lagos:
Seun supposed ban Helinues and his likes for life for constituting nuisance on Nairaland

Na, that would not do. It insufficiently shows the judicious use of seun's immense powers.

Seun should ban them from living life itself so we can see how powerful he can be.

immortalcrown:
Are you sure Seun tweeted this?

It could be a photoshopped image.

It is so childishly ridiculous that you find it impossible to believe seun would write it, lol.

slimfit1:
If you know this much why didn't you contest.

Would Nigerian you vote for him if he contests?

How much did we bribe pay to get this?