₦airaland Forum

TheSourcerer:
I initially thought it was a dead thread , a quiet one but you brought it out here , why ? To claim trolling ? Why the fvck would i troll

I did not "claim", The.

Please be conscious that I simply asked a question.

TheSourcerer:
"Consciousness of your being is pain
Knowing is pain

Yes, it is, Thesourcerer. Some wrote of it that if one consumes what makes one conscious "you will certainly die", but if one doesn't. Well, you know the story I suppose.

Big people food, I call it. Not for everyone, but definitely yum for those seeking consciousness.

benalvino3:
You cannot sue. Have you seen someone sue before for something like this?

I can at least use her "lies" to ridicule her and to gain political advantage over those who chose to believe her.

I mean, what other evidence do non-magas need that Jan. 6 Hearings is a charade, if it is?

benalvino3:
He has testified, they didn't rely on his testimony but hearsay from another person. Stop making stupid excuses. Just like Russia collusion, you are being used for a fool.

Money Money Money, is all accused hears when they think of "U.S Secret Service guy Engel" witnessing for them that what she said never happened.

Even if accused don't bother suing it would play well on the presidential campaign.

benalvino3:
under oath
on a banana hearing. how do you test a lie is being told without cross examination. use your head for once.
you dont say things without evidence and not give the accused a chance to cross examine.

You the accused do have a lot of chance to cross examine, Ben. You simply sue for millions in a court of law for lying against you and defaming you and for ruining your reputation under oath. After all, it's not as if she is immune from our legal action now that we control the Supreme Court.

They'll have to show what they said was not untrue by presenting evidence that shows it is true, and witnesses too, and she and it would be cross examined, and if all she presents doesn't collaborate what was said under oath you'd get paid and the liar gets charged for lying under oath and goes to that place I told you we call Prison where we put those who endanger their neighbours by not obeying our law called U.S. Code sections 1621 that says, don't lie under oath or it will cost you dearly!

Trust me. Only a drumpghtpf would have such a mindless liar working for and around it without considering the cost of lying under oath on worldwide TV.

TheSourcerer:
I'm fine bud ! All good here ...

TheSourcerer:
buda I'm lost , theres literally no hope in sight, I fought depression years ago now it's back , its very real , tastable even.I see no reason to hope , to live .

Fine and all good in this thread but lost in the other.

So, which is it? Is it back or are you trolling in the other thread?

AgentnairaIand:
Am I Fg or the guardian news paper? If at all Iswap is not responsible for this attack they should denial it or are you one of them?

https://guardian.ng/news/iswap-behind-owo-church-attack-says-fg/

Do you have no Muslims in your family or in your neighbourhood? Are they evil and attacking you?

Guardian is reporting what Muslim Aregbesola said, but I guess some will allow themselves to be "pitched against one another and make it appear as ethno-religious war".

TheSourcerer:
l am just really Tired buda

Depressed! In case you don't already know.

What are you tired of and what are you doing about it?

AgentnairaIand:
https://guardian.ng/news/iswap-behind-owo-church-attack-says-fg/

Funny. Did you notice that the National Security Council meeting was presided over by President Muhammadu Buhari at the State House, Abuja, with Minister of Interior, Rauf Aregbesola, in attendance, who said "security agencies were already on the trail of the culprits".

I put it to you therefore that President Muhammadu Buhari and Rauf Aregbesola must have converted from Islam to some other religion or we'd need to wonder why they are on the trail of people they have described as "culprits".

AgentnairaIand:
Who are the terrorists that attacked Owo Catholic Church if not Muslims. Devilish people from satanic religion.

Murderers, as the op clearly stated. After all, if I, a non-believing Nigerian, kills, you will not say "Nigeria kills", even though you might claim a "Nigerian killed", but you would definitely not say "Nigerians are satanic" just because individual I might be satanic.

Same if a Christian kills. You would not blame Christianity for that individual's sin of killing, unless you want to use bigotry to fool the unthinking or don't know anything about the religion and it's book.

ljoh:
The Northerners are doing house to house registration while INEC is failing the south

I think you should mean The Northerners are doing house to house registration while INEC Southerners are failing the south.

Are you aware you are describing depression?

Are you depressed?

TheSourcerer:
In all honesty food taste like wood now, uninteresting
In all honesty My smiles and Smileys are routine .
In all honesty numbness is the only emotion I perceive
In all honesty Colours are no more bright
In all honesty the smiles of parents do no more worth the stay any longer
In all honesty pain is sane but the same
This is honesty not a poem ,its a note written in blood
In all honesty its not depression
In all honesty its not Sadness
In all honesty its not lack of love
In all honesty its not about having money or not having money
Its an emotion no one can explain unless its your emotion
In all honesty its sudden ,it grew .
In all honesty , I won the battle
It is now back , terribly overwhelming ,this already downtrodden beign
In all honesty I tried
Now I'm tired
Consciousness of your being is pain
Knowing is pain
Ignorance is truly bliss,
Death is bliss
I wish I never felt the first feeling
I wish I never saw the light



And really hope you enjoy your evening , the air is actually great , clean too , yum !

DoveXlover:
well you are right and I understands your point.
I feel the black race has had lots of time for correction though.
Whether in Africa or In USA, now with education, things can actually change but the problem is that there are lots of bad eggs in our black system.
But be it as it may, we can't keep finding excuse, now the world is free to go and get the right things for your community. This is why i said we have had lots of time over the years to change this things. Problem is that Very few black or Africa Americans are reaching for the stars.
The community needs proper sensitisation. And yes !! Our black celebs especially the musicians should stopped singing and rapping about drugs and gangs and guns.
It's having a negative Influence on black people and communities, making it looks like doing drugs and going to jail makes someone a man.

I tell my fellow Blacks that rap songs are a way used by white people to keep the blacks in America in bondage.
Instead of always idolising 2pac and biggie.
Why not idolise Obama and Denzel Washington?
So you see where the mind control comes from?
Look at the series by 50 cent called power and the rest.
These series are a form of mind control to keep the blacks in bondage.
If you noticed that in those series, drugs are prohibited in white neighbourhoods.
Making it feels like drugs and gangs are a black thing.

Bob Marley saw this and called it mental slavery.

Reminds me being asked if I liked Tupac because I was reading Machiavelli. I had to go sensitise myself on Tupac pronto.

Education, and I agree. If we learn to use our own senses it would be harder for our minds to be controlled.

armyofone:
Many rich people with special need kid don't abort them. They have the money to provide the expensive care thru out life.

Consider please, that many poor people with special need kids don't abort them neither because they don't have the money to look into their wombs to know they might have special needs.

armyofone:
I'm ok with what the supreme just did. Let each states make their decisions. People should make love responsibly and with eyes opened.

I'm ok too. When I see those people on the street yelling my body my choice, I can't help feeling they are silly. It's after all their body, so they should just make a decision and choose instead of seeking permission is what I think.

Thankfully, I am aware RvW is a proxy for a dialogue about rights in general.

benalvino3:
Why are they forcing you not to kill your neighbors?

No one is forcing him not to kill his neighbours, Ben, because he does not want to kill his neighbours! But if he did want to kill his neighbours, we his neighbours will definitely force him not to because we do not want to be killed, and if he insists we will relocate him to a place we call Prison.

And please. He knew this before moving into the neighbourhood or he would have moved to a hood where the neighbours don't force each other not to kill each other, though I think they might have all killed each other before he moved in which might just have made him move elsewhere because he does not want to be dead.

Now you got to the end Ben, I suggest you read it again and again because whatever it is that you have so far inferred and understood is most definitely not likely what I've written and implied.

DoveXlover:
And yeah in America we all know how most black people behaves, go to the hood and see for yourself so allowing Blacks to be majority in USA is a bad idea.
Look at Africa especially Nigeria that is Black populated, we all know how the country and continent is fairing when it comes to corruption, lack of development, insecurity, rituals, scam and many more.

Greetings. The above is where I object. Blacks in those hoods were placed in a hood where the resources for development and progression were non-existent and in most cases consciously made unavailable, I would have you consider. If I deprive just you of the nutrients for healthy growth you will be stunted. For evidence, I present Nigeria, where an important nutrient for growth (education) is consciously made unavailable or of a low quality, and the resulting stunted society.

As for we Africans, unfortunately, we were slow to come across those things that Europeans and many other parts of the world, discovered (books and learning to be precise), that has made them prosper. And more unfortunately, when we did get what we got it arrived through what could best be described as the whispers of the Chinese so lots was lost in transmission. Thankfully, the self imposed suffering due to "corruption, lack of development, insecurity, rituals, scam and many more", is what will make us decide to learn and eventually prosper or die.

DoveXlover:
So yeah you can't blame them for wanting to make sure that the whites remain huge majority.

Yes I can blame them, Americans, for wanting to make sure whites remain huge majority, especially when I consider they first wiped out a majority in order to become the present majority! By God, they should have learnt not to oppress since oppression was partly that made some of them run away from where they can from.

Besides, were they not at one time breeding these blacks for profit, even those that were impregnated with their own sperm? Did they not think we'd be a growing population then, or did it not matter because they could turn our labour into their profit?

DoveXlover:
Some times, racism towards blacks is actually the fault of the behaviours of black people.

You saved yourself with that "sometimes".

DoveXlover:
If you want racism to stop then let black people earn their respect by changing Africa to 1st world continent.

I suspect if you were saying this to an African American you'd say "earn their respect by changing the hood to 1st city".

Now, can I please have the resources that were used to create 1st world, like slaves and the resources of plunder? Let me have what was plundered from say, Africa, and the hood, and let's see if Africa and the hood do not become 1st world!

DoveXlover:
Sorry this is just the bitter truth.

Can we agree to call it your bitter truth because, as you can see, it's bitter but not in any way my truth. And neither is it true that most whites care that their whites are declining. If it were true, they'd abort less and have more children instead of trying to reduce the non-white population.

In fact, one could argue that banning abortions is in order to increase the population of both whites and blacks (I'm sure you'd agree we in the hood may abort more but we also have more bastards per woman), because America sure as hell does need more hands to convert labour in to profit and they can't only rely on importing it.

Again, welcome. It's not often new sensible people turn up here.

This is like people who can't cook cooking for a state banquet.

https://wolfstreet.com/2022/06/24/inflation-forecasts-arent-worth-the-paper-theyre-written-on-this-is-about-the-bank-of-canadas-reaction-to-inflation-but-its-the-same-in-the-us-a/

Livelystone01:
Isn't this what I was saying yesterday? Politics was making us blame the judgment when we could have ecourage others to push for this issue to become law.
Election is coming, instead of the deceit, sensitize your base to vote for those who'd pass this as a law.

People just like quarreling for nothing these days.

While at the same time not using the powerful tools they have.

I swear I'm going to same sex marry Stacey!

AmazonHippolyta:
Sanpipita, Budatuum, Timiofak they are not hiding it anymore.

They are now bold to say it out loud.

I am so very pleased and delighted that they are showing their true colours so voters get to see them for what they are.

It will amuse me if Americans vote for the equivalent of Afghanistan's boko haram. Our local harams are far too mild, compared.

AmazonHippolyta:
Who said Beto will win I would be shocked if he does the point is that Texas is shifting blue and turning purple and the polls show it.
The last elections showed it. Republicans should know that Texas is no longer Idaho or South Dakota it is not a completely red state the only advantage they have is in the rurals and what matters is turnout and effective messaging.

The district had a low turnout nothing out of the ordinary and will go back to the democratic column when other cities are added because of redistricting the Republican won because there were three democrats in the race another thing is this the turnout in November will not be 7%. Was it not an Hispanic woman that was nearly jailed a few months ago for having an abortion lol they are coming.

Did not lots of love lib left woke Musk employees recently move to Texas? I'm certain they intend to vote. But don't tell magas least they work out Musk is part of the plan along with raising the dead to vote woke.

sanpipita:
Foolishness of some people to think this American Christianity fueled laws is godly, American Christianity just wants to maintain its order that's all, American Christianity if it has its way will still have some of you plucking cottons in a plantation

It's like the Boko Haram Nigerian Party wins the presidential election, and does not bother padding the Supreme Court because they don't need to, but just passes laws that women must hijab and western education is abolished and every one must go Mosque 5 times a day and worship Allah.

All they need is a 'majority', and the only reason I have hope for America is it's not so full of dumb inferring maga consuming individuals like Nigeria currently is, but full of people who know the importance of using their minds and voting.

benalvino3:
We are talking about the constitution.
Abortion is not in it. the Judges in the SC are not the authors of the constitution. You said they have long died, kinder implying the law should be abolished, you said it is not what you meant. I am only trying to know what you meant because you sure did sound that way.

Biden can only sign a law that is within the constitution. if he goes above it, the Court will strike down the law. that does not mean the court is making its own laws.

Ben please learn to take responsibility for your misinferences instead of claiming I imply as if I am writing on your silly brain! My "they are long dead" was to imply that the living have the power to deenshrine what had been enshrined in the past, even if the enshriners were still living, i.e., a current president deenshrining what a previous living president enshrined, and that's not to talk of if they are actually long dead. The SCOTUS have exercised their power to deenshrine RvW which had previously been enshrined, and which is what makes the word enshrine mean no more than a pencil and an eraser.

I have shown you an example of a Constitutional deenshrinement already, and bet others reading will soon point out other deenshrinements of the Constitution of the Evolving United States of America as opposed to a country that enshrines and tries to remain stagnant, but if you can read, here's a list of deenshrinements of the Constitution.

The Constitution of the United States, which entered into force in 1789, is the oldest written national constitution in use. The framers of the U.S. Constitution included a provision whereby the document may be amended, generally (though not solely) by a two-thirds majority of each house of Congress followed by ratification by legislatures in three-fourths of the states. (Only one amendment, the Twenty-first Amendment, repealing Prohibition, was ratified in an alternate way—by ratifying conventions in three-fourths of the states.) Since 1789 the Constitution has been amended 27 times; of those amendments, the first 10 are collectively known as the Bill of Rights and were certified on December 15, 1791.
https://www.britannica.com/topic/list-of-amendments-to-the-U-S-Constitution-1787122

Does the bold not infer to you that the framers of the U.S. Constitution so did not enshrine it that they included a provision whereby the document may be deenshrined even if it were ever enshrined?

benalvino3:
Well, at the moment rights to own a gun is enshrined till it is amended. so saying dead men bla bla bla... sounds vague
the Argument here and you are missing the point. it is not for the supreme court to enshrine things... it is for them know make sure the laws of the land are being followed.

they cannot enshrine and deenshrine anything. that is why he was arguing that Gun Laws are enshrined in the constitution and abortion is not.

Amending the constitution is another topic.

Now you are close to getting it. Ben. See what happens when you open your eyes and use your mind instead of misinterpreting what I write?

Some were arguing that abortions too were "enshrined" until now that they've been deenshrined, and note that Biden just signed a law reducing the supposed enshrinement of Gun Laws.

basilico:
What would be the requirements for amendments? Two cigar smoking oligarchs in an office or a whole number of states? You betray yourself by the way by saying SCOTUS deenshrined Roe v Wade. What they did which you may not understand is to correct the creation of a law that did not exist. They found that Roe v Wade was not constitutional.

Basically, Scotus deenshrined what Scotus had enshrined with RoevWade.

benalvino3:
Kachills:


You:


tell us what you mean about your words. you are discussing the rights of Guns and you are also trying to argue against those who say Gun rights constitutional in contrast to abortion. Tell us what you mean then, when you make that statement.

Nothing is enshrined, is my simple point, since it is a meaningless word concerning a constitution which is constantly amended. Or don't you know that an amendment deenshrines?

An example is, some would claim the Supreme Court enshrined a woman's right to abort with Roe v Wade, but as you can clearly see, the Supreme Court just deenshrined it and can deenshrine whatever the constitution supposedly enshrined too.

Here is another example of deenshrining.

benalvino3:
Again, according to you, abortion should be legal because they can't police it. lol.

That is according to you, Ben. And law abiding Planned Parenthood may have closed down but the quack performing secret abortions just opened shop.

For me, abortion should be legal because illegalising abortions only make people go seek secret abortions which you can not police, nor can you stop me crossing the border into a state that does not criminalise me for aborting you.

benalvino3:
this is your words


how else would you understand it? it is in the constitution, if they can amend it, let them amend it but saying people who died long ago as an argument to why the law should be abolished does not make sense.

No Ben, that doesn't make sense at all and that's why I never said that nor do my words mean what you seem to understand.

benalvino3:
so what? because people die it means their laws will not stand?
you are proving his point

So that's what you understood from what I wrote that you read, ben?

smh.

basilico:
I don't come here to read minds . I come here to exchange my opinions with others. You on the other hand comes here sometimes to just irk people, be obnoxious and take them round in circles when you have no reasonable answer.

Bas, you have no opinion worth exchanging. What you deserve is what I give you.

Kachills:
There's no hypocrisy there, Gun ownership rights are enshrined.....

"Enshrined" on a piece of paper by some people who died years ago.

I'm certain if you listen carefully you'd find some claiming the recently overturned Roe v Wade was enshrined by the Supreme Court who just deenshrined it.

Sorry, but that sentimental manipulative language does not work with me.

OkCornel:
All I see here are emotional sentiments.

You do not need to mention me since I am subscribed to the thread though I'm not exactly interested in the pointless to and fro.