Budaatum's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Budaatum's Profile › Budaatum's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 702 703 704 705 706 707 708 709 710 (of 1630 pages)
budaatum: |
HenryDion:That must be your own bitter truth called life, Dion. When I suffered my friends and family were rocks by my side encouraging me to desuffer, so perhaps your truth called life differs to mine. |
TenQ:I do not think philosophers call themselves scientists, but correct me if I am wrong. |
TenQ:I do have a problem using mind and soul synonymously because they are not synonyms at all. Nor does my soul feel my emotions for me. I feel my emotions myself! |
DeepsightX:Soul doesn't appear in science at all, as far as I know, so it was rather odd that TenQ wants to discuss it scientifically. But I guess that's what those who generalise on insufficient information would do, thinking others might not know any better. |
HenryDion:You don't have any friends to provide for by your very own submission Dion, where you were moaning about finding friends, so how can you possibly be providing for friends you do not yet have? HenryDion: HenryDion:Change your mind? You'd have to tell me what you think capitalism is first and how it is bad, for me to know your mind and then to consider if I wanted to change it or not. But lets take your friend issue. They want to receive from you without giving anything back, which is the opposite of capitalism. Would you mind if they worked for you, earning you profit from which you pay their wages? Would either you or them be poor under such an arrangement? |
TenQ:Wrong, TenQ. buda has never seen God but understands what people mean by God. TenQ:Last time I checked, a theory based on insufficient information is not presented as fact, but as a start point for seeking facts, unlike you who present a generalisation based on insufficient information as fact. TenQ:When scientists discuss how the universe began, they state that that is as far as they can determine, and they are open to new discoveries. You TenQ, however, present generalisations based on insufficient evidence as facts. I have not read your responses to others, but I do expect the scientists amongst them to disagree with you a lot on souls. |
HenryDion:Why? Should the entire human population eat free food? And who is supposed to provide it for them when you yourself are not even providing for your 'friends', lol? |
Those who enjoy life alone suffer alone. |
killyaselfie:I concur. Though I might have said, the mind. |
TenQ:Hmm. Your soul is that which your mind identifies as you? (I say, mind, on the assumption that is where you ability to be conscious resides). I don't have an "Internal/Personal Identity", TenQ. I find that my mind constantly evolves as I feed it with knowledge and experiences, and the ability to reflect has ensured the feedback loop creates constant flux so that buda saying buda identifies as this or that would be untrue almost immediately after it is said. Others do label one with personal identity however, though obviously not internal, but I find they often have insufficient information and are just generalising. |
TenQ:I would claim it is my mind that I feed with knowledge and experience and learning with my entire being too for it to grow well, me being a huge fan of ask and knock and seek with all one's heart and soul and mind and being. Can we agree that where you say soul I say mind? It has to do with the level of control one has over either, I think. |
TenQ:Are you saying my consciousness is my soul? TenQ:Do you not see a problem with this? Why would I generalise about something I admit to having insufficient information about? Is that not the same as ignorantly asserting? Consider how you would react if I generalise about what you in fact have more information about. Would I not sound rather ignorant if my insufficiently informed generalisation does not conform to your own knowledge or the actual facts? I think one should just admit one does not have sufficient information and go look for more information instead of believing ones insufficiently informed generalising and then asking others to believe it too. |
TenQ:Really? Perhaps define soul. |
TenQ:I can not argue that you might identify me by my physical body, TenQ, though grabbing the trunk of an elephant does come to mind, but I would object to your claim that my Internal/personal identity is some sort of soul. Personal Identity is simply how one identifies oneself, as in, how one sees or describes oneself, and nothing to do with some imaginary soul. I may drive a huge car for instance, earn good money and live in a big house and identify my self as successful, but none of that would be describing what you term a soul. One may also identify oneself as a Samaritan when one might truly be a Levite of a Priest. |
killyaselfie:This can not possibly be true! If it were true, all our minds would work the same way and we'd all reason the same way, except for the fact that while our minds might be a product of how we individually arranged our interaction with matter which differs immensely, our behavior can therefore not just be a "vast assembly of nerve cells and their associated molecules" which we all pretty much have in common. Just as we don't all have the same hardware (I'm missing a sixpack), so have we not all developed our minds to work the same way which would be the case if minds were "vast assembly of nerve cells and their associated molecules", is my unauthorised point. |
DeepSight:You might leave it at that deepsight, but I will continue delving be assured, after all we just might have different subjective understandings and I might learn [from] your's. |
TenQ:I love the fact that you recognise that others might not see like you see. I, for instance, do not see souls at all, never have, though I do witness the functioning of minds in their respective bodies like their software propelling their physical hardware. To me, TenQ's soul is not TenQ (self/personal/internal IDENTITY), nor is your soul responsible for the development of your mind (software). What effects the mind is how well the self/personal/internal IDENTITY of TenQ bothered to propel TenQ to develop TenQ's "WILL, INTELLECT and EMOTION" and that learning is what forms TenQ's self/personal/internal IDENTITY identity, as seen especially by those who do not merely rely on the material hardware they see nor on their assumption of their understanding of softwares alone but on the produced fruit of the being too. A different seeing I suppose, though chicken and eggy. |
LordReed:Perhaps some knowledge of the history of the topic might help. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/ancient-soul/ |
DeepSight:You are funny. "Simpler way of communicating your thoughts", like you have done below, right? But forgive me. My english school is so limited. DeepSight:You are beffudled, which is funny since you are supposed to deeply see. Good too, since you must look beyond the mere material to be unbeffudled, which should be easy since you are not one to focus only on the material, lets assume. Read this. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Materialism?wprov=sfla1 and tell me if any human you know has "consistency", or "simpy cogency", or "subjective experiences" of the relevant "known factors" not to talk of be against them, and then tell me where they acquire this so called "collective". I'd say you threw the kitchen sink and hoped it stick because you were not "simpler way of communicating your thoughts" one tiny bit there, DeepSight. I in fact accuse you of beffudling yourself! |
DeepSight:Straw, DeepSight! There is no "consistency of the materialist worldview"! |
DeepSight:"Strict materialist"? Try "strict Christian", or "strict Muslim". Tell me if that does not sound absurd to you unless you consider a religious terrorist. Does the "strict materialist" also learn doctrines they must all believe without questioning? I know you have a hard time understanding me. Have you noticed you've not even tried by asking a single question about what you've read me write but do not understand? |
DeepSight:That's precisely what Evolutionists would say too, yet you strawman them as materialists and then commence arguing against straw. If you were honest, you'd have said you don't really know much of what you wrote about in that post as if it were fact, and were merely speculating, and I would have loved you for pushing thought forward a bit, but you've unfortunately presented it as fact, which it isn't. |
DeepSight:Good. Glad I did not say you did. Deepsight, how did life come about? |
sandrajbru:The fact that so few appreciate what you appreciate indicates how much more work must be done. https://www.nairaland.com/6431743/nairaland-democratic-party |
DeepSight:I'm going to deal only with the above. Evolutionists make no claim that life rose spontaneously. They'll tell you life evolved over a very long period of time, but that aside. I guess from the above, no God could possibly have created humans neither, since the process of creations we read describes a "spontaneously - virtually magically" creation, and out of nothing, of which there is no evidence whatsoever. |
kkins25:I bet you don't see chains on the necks of millions of ill-educated marginalised Africans either. |
|
kkins25:I know you know better but I will help you. First, they have been marginalised. Second, in many parts they continue to be marginalised. But I guess sitting in Nigeria you'd not know. I spoke to a friend who just relocated to Czech Republic. Master's school fees £200. Wages £1200 a month. He said he submitted his first paper in school and was told he plagirised. He was shocked. They taught him nothing in Naija he said. That's how we marginalize in Nigeria. We teach ourselves to believe we know what we obviously know nothing about. Yes, kk. I am presenting an excuse for when the millions of victims we are currently marginalizing justifiably rise up against their marginalizers! |
kkins25:I have not heard Americans say, "I suffer pass you", kk, nor have I said that, so please don't strawman me! Donkey rightly described it as "pass tha fails to ah keep ah them ah down", or perhaps you missed it in his donkeynese? Read my comment to it, teacher kk, and tell me why a teacher will give a pass to a student who failed if not because they never bothered to teach the student in the first place. If anything, black Americans are claiming opportunities have been shut to them for decades. Here's another example of it, just so you know similar brews in our own backyard. https://www.nairaland.com/3238410/what-dont-know-almajiri-system#102926679 |
Banchotmods:You are a stupid ignorant donkey who can obviously not read. budaatum: |
DeepSight:Hand him a tissue. |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 702 703 704 705 706 707 708 709 710 (of 1630 pages)