₦airaland Forum

byvan: I humbly beseech thee to vote for this beautiful young lady, sleekch1c on the upcoming miss Nl ,starting 3rd of June 2013.

Thanks for your anticipated cooperation . you can view her profile on https://www.nairaland.com/1288545/miss-nairaland-june-2013-contest/57#15954453.

ileobatojo: Ha! Balanced my butt!

Telling bogus, made up stories and stats? I guess you tell it like it is in your own alternate universe!!

Unrepentant sexist!

ileobatojo: My sexism? Mtschieew!

Pot calling kettle black! Don't make me start digging up the evidence here.

ileobatojo: She got lucky. I wasn't as strong a witchdoctor at the time!!

ileobatojo: Lol! My friends are welcome in my home if they need a place to stay briefly. I've had various types of friends (including male) stay when they needed a place to pass the night.

Per the security part though, I have had an acquaintance (who didn't pass the night) steal my engagement ring. So there is definitely some validity to baby123's comment.

ileobatojo: Ah! What's a whole day without a pointless underhanded comment per your usual MO?

chaircover: As banks like to know their customers . . . . so should a woman know her husband.

If the husband is a dog who has no self control and is attracted to everything in skirt, then keep your friend away. . . but then again, seriously though, if he is the type that has no restraint and is going to sleep with your best friend, you shouldn't really stop her from coming cos he probably has already slept with all your other best friends, all the girls on your street and all the ladies in his office anyway and so another one wont really make much difference

If he is not the type to cheat and he is a decent and morally upright man, then if i were the husband, I will feel very insulted that my wife cant trust me around her best friend.

So once again its back to "know your husband" . . .and act accordingly.

dayokanu: French League is at par with Portuguese league and a little better than Cypriot.

The world cup is also more difficult to win now that the times when countries play East indonesia
Italy played US, Spain, Austria and Czech to win the world cup

dayokanu: When man Utd won the Champions league in 1999, they were not even Champions of the English league

In 2008 When Man Utd when they did not play the Champion of any Major league in Europe

dayokanu: Brazil won 3 of these trophies in the dark ages have you forgotten? When there was No single team from Africa and Asia, So why Call it a "World Cup"

dayokanu: @Debosky,
Based on your competitive era argument which is the better national team italy or Brazil

You mean the titles won by Pele, Cryuff, George best, beckenbauer are now irrelevant so how many years would it take for the titles won by Ronaldo and Zidane to be discarded?

Can we also say since England and Cyprus have both won nothing in this "new era" in national Team, they are at par?

nitlad: Forbes we know, Deloitte we know as well, dafuq is BrandFinance?

To the garbage with their fraudulent methodology!

Harbosede02: moderately tall

Policewoman: He looks malnourished.

Orikinla: He looks like one particular Danfo bus conductor at Mile 2.

Harbosede02: Nt lukin bad,bt it wud av been beta if u r tall,i don't do short guys

Jsmyth: Who's the most handsome guy on nairaland?.....I guess that would be me...any objection?

taryour: Seriously tell me you are joking

greatgod2012: chai! Coogar, may God help you o.
Thats unforgiveness now.

Daresh: Why should you tell him? Ol boi bone the matter, an last to do dey sweet pass" lol"

debosky: I never implied not counting all of them - what I was alluding to was the current subject of debate - which is the better club?

Do we judge that with an undue weighting on ancient achievements or do we place more emphasis on achievements within a reasonably competitive era?

DK is being inconsistent in this regard - he doesn't want to accept that, based on his 'all trophies' theory, Liverpool is a better club. But he wants to count the total European trophy haul to claim Bayern is better than United.

StarBoard: Note that the time frame we're talking about is 22 years. So it's not like they just fell off.
They won the Champions League in 2005, but how many years have they participated in the same competition since?

Plus, you forget that times have changed. Liverpool had Forest,Villa as title challengers back in the 80s.Arsenal emerged late 80s. Forest is no longer in the top division and Villa have been reduced to just being content with staying in the elite ranks. Liverpool aren't good enough, simple.

Never in a million years can Liverpool be brought into this argument, simply because Liverpool haven't featured in the top competition for eons!

Celtic?I truly find that hilarious. Celtic won just ONE measly European title.We're talking about MULTIPLE title winners and you bring up Celtic? why not bring in Red Star Belgrade, Steau Bucharest and Hamburg and Aston Villa into the equation as well?They are all former European champions as well.

Then we should wipe off United's 1968 title and the said Celtic title of 1967 too, and let's see where your point leads us to. We should discredit Ajax's three titles too since they were around the same time as Bayern's triumphs, and we should nullify Liverpool's twoo titles in 77 and 78, and let's understand what this argument is really about.

If the issue is substitutions, then you;re only lending credence to the argument that it was arguably harder to win the title since there wasn't the luxury of substitutions.

Overall trophies that include about 16 charity/community shields,some of which were shared?
Please you can do better.

On a European front, United can't match Bayern yet,that much is known. When Liverpool regain their status as part of Europe's elite by competing regularly in the champions league,we can then include them in the argument.