₦airaland Forum

i don't trust these men......
this is another money making scheme to con gay rights activists all over the world....very soon these hideous looking men would be applying for asylum based on the fact that they are endangered species in nigeria. they should all be arrested!

dayokanu: Now the problem is Hazard whom you are Nateevs told us woud make Torres score bucketloads and Oscar who played 20mins or thereabout

they are not doing the business......
too much individual skills that does not help the team - hazard would tip the ball 25 times instead of finding the killer pass.....its like he does not trust his own passes....benitez also brainfarted looking at things from hindsight now - moses' substitution did nothing to swing it chelsea's way and ashley cole screwed up the possibility of chelsea getting an equaliser....

dayokanu: You are a lobotomized ape. Why cant Torres score his own do his part and leave the rest.

torres made the first goal!
a beautiful run in the channel and an exquisite pass to locate mata in the box - that's enough contribution to win you a game!

So because the Benitez improved defence is leaking was the reason Torres refused to score? or thats why he was missing easy chances

they all missed chances today - mata was the biggest culprit....oscar wasn't far behind and hazard is a frustrating player. chelsea broke like 6 times in the first half with hazard either making the wrong pass in the final third or doing something equally spastic!

Now that Benitez too can't figure out Torres, Isnt it about time we try Onigbinde or Tunde Disu

benitez figured torres out - torres contributed to the game. his assist was as good as mata's goal. without his brilliant run in the channel, mata wouldn't have scored. if that was hazard or oscar, they would go for the goal instead of finding an exquisite pass.....

dayokanu: Everyone who watches football knows when you put your opponent away early they lose the drive to fight. Keeping it 1-0 for longer spells gives WestHam the confidence

you are a spastic donkey.....
if chelsea scored 5 goals in the first half and defended the way they did in the second half, the score would have ended 6-5 to west ham! you cannot silence your opponent if you leave the back door open!

ussr went 4-0 against nigeria in saudi 89 - nigeria equalised and won on a shoot out. brazil went 3-1 in atlanta 96, nigeria equalised and won 4-3. jose mourinho became a legend out of scoring first and flattening the match! chelsea were 1-0 up at half time.....if they had defended like european champions, they woulda won the game!

OMO IBO: Im currently at a wedding and the subject of discussion on my table is 'how shyt torres is'

nigerian football fans are generally idiotic when it comes to football punditry! no offence to your wedding guests but i don't think many of them have a clue!

the chances were far and between for torres today......he had 4 shots on target and jussi made good saves to keep them out! the last chance was a diving header @ the far post - it was a half chance as the cross wasn't precise!

nateevs: Torres is to blame for everything. We conceded 3 goals. Is Torres to blame for that?
The introduction of Diame totally swung things West Ham's way because they completely dominated the midfield. Is Torres to blame for that?
Infact, Sky have named Diame the MOTM. Oh Torres should have marked him and curbed his influence and as such he is to blame.

I tire for beer parlour analysis.

you don't know the type of people you are dealing with...
ashley cole brainfarted - it's torres' fault........ivanovic got rapëd by cole - let's blame torres. mikel got sodomized by cole--torres should have been in his own box defending for his team!

dayokanu: What was Torres contribution to the game today., last week even from August? If Torres had buried his chances the wind would have been out of WestHam and could have been a routine win.

i can't believe you would ask this idiotic question - what was torres contribution? who made the assist for mata's goal? yekini?

You all asked us when Torres doesnt perform, the others should. This season the others have done their part its now left for Torres to do his. BTW he has started all league games this season

they have done their part indeed with oscar shooting wide @ every opportunity! hazard taking 25 touches to make a simple pass and the defence being generally crappy. how's that torres' fault? torres has created a goal today which was enough to see chelsea through.....how did chelsea concede 3 goals? torres' should have helped in the defence?

Ibime: At one-nil, Torres had great chance to kill the game. That's the cancer within Chelsea that shekpe fans won't admit to. The difference between Champions and crisis-team

you have to be a fool to type the above....
the torres chance you are yapping about is the same as the mata's double chance that he wasted. actually, mata's chance was worse. the ball fell kindly to mata's path a second time and he still managed to get his shot blocked by a defender.....

StarBoard: What has Benitez brought to Chelsea to warrant Di Matteo's sacking?
Coogar, nateevs and debosky, over to you to explain since we are simpletons and you are the experts

thanks for admitting you are a simpleton.....
neither of us endorsed benitez as a manager.....this was my take when dayokanu announced rafa signed for chelsea....

coogar: rafa is shyte - full stop!

he singlehandedly ruined inter milan's dreams in the short while he was there....obviously, roman hired him to steady the ship, he won't be there next summer unless pep guardiola turns down chelsea permanently.....

he knows the spanish market very well and he would bring loads of 2nd tier players from there. expect idiotic substitutions too - the fat spanish waiter is only good in cup competitions and i won't put it past him to qualify chelsea for the 2nd round. the league results would suffer as it's been proven rafa cannot cope with 2 competitions at the same time! his attention span is short....

dayokanu: The same Mata you told us is the problem is now the difference? Remember to update the number of goals scored in the league by Mata vs Torres despite the former playing lesser minutes

where did i say mata was the problem @ chelsea? you have resorted to cheap lies now to score cheap brownie points?

StarBoard: Forgot your golden boy Nani the liability.
Best winger whose eyes are always on the ground?...Forget that crap jare...Young is a thief collecting £105k a week for doing absolutely nothing...

young is as good as nani.
valencia is the worst of the lot - he's been shyte this season...

StarBoard: Coogar never ceases to amaze me.
First Nani was Uniteds best winger.
Now it's Young who hasn't done anything so far this season.
If Young is our best winger then United just sunk to Aston Villa's level.

young has been injured for most of the season - how many minutes has he played? his career @ united has been blighted with knocks and injuries when he's fit, fergie would play the useless giggs........ashley young is mad quality.....watch out for him in the 2nd half of the season!

nateevs: Good half. Solid and the back at the back and we've been very inventive going forward. I hope we get more goals. We need to build our confidence.
Azpilicueta. . . I'm impressed.

you saw the pass from moses to torres that led to the goal?
it was the same kinda run torres made that dayokanu condemned in the screenshots you loaded last week. mata brings a whole lot of dimension to the way chelsea play - resting him on wednesday as yielded dividends - he's the main difference between the 2 sides!

StarBoard: Can we get rid of Ashley Young, please?
Fella is utter w/a/n/kery

yes, get rid of our best winger when you have a disgraceful valencia and giggs in the team.

Luxythere: When I want the knacks I move to the sir stage. Its like submitting to him for me

what's knacks?
you from south london?

Katsumoto: In economic terms, Germany has a bigger economy than the UK. Strength of currency is not an indicator of economic strength. Otherwise, Kuwait, Oman, Latvia would have the best performing economies in the world.

having a stronger economy does not make a country greater too - it's only one factor out of the so many factors you can put together....i have not argued uk have the strongest economy, i am just saying they are mighty if you put everything into consideration!

4llerbuntu is a sensationalist.....
he's a prophet of doom and he would churn out every negative thing he reads about arsenal just to prove "i told you so". arsenal would make the champions league - their rivals have not made any significant stride to even make arsenal tremble!

when the natural order is restored, west brom and spurs would go back to their normal positions. it's going to be a long hard winter - the big teams know how to storm through it whilst the mid-table teams would fall apart when push becomes a shove!

[quote author=ekt_bear]hasn't been almighty in 60 or 70 years. It is just amusing to me to see someone refer to the UK, in 2012 as "almighty."

Maybe I should say almighty France too.

Even Germany is stronger than both the UK and France, and I wouldn't use that term to describe them.

Anyway, just a digression.[/quote]people tell themselves that just to feel funky.....
i asked a question - how many countries speak their language? if they are no longer mighty, the countries they colonised should have dropped their language, culture, etc.

you are typing in english language and you still doubt their mightiness. look at the map of the united kingdom and tell me they are not great to have explored and conquered the legion of countries who speak their language!

as per germany being stronger - pound vs euro, which is mightier?

[quote author=[CHocolaTE]]
Yes I agree, marriage is not a competition.
But you know in your initial post you said that the woman should let the husband have the final say in decision making regardless of whether she agrees with his decision and that if the decision fails they should BOTH return to the drawing board that was why I made that comment.[/quote]you still don't get it.....
whatever decision the husband takes must have the wife's blessings. of course, she might not have agreed at first but the husband was able to convince her to let them do it his way. the argument had stopped - they made a decision to take one road....it's now their decision not his decision. there were 2 roads - obviously, one of them must change his/her decision for the other party. the most important thing is that they both agreed to proceed with the decision they have taken.

Your comment above however, is different from the one you made earlier because you say that they should fail together if they both agree on a decision together.
Initially you said that they should do this even if the man is making a decision the woman doesn't agree with.

she has to submit to his will.
husband wants to buy oranges, wife wants to buy apples. husband insisted on buying oranges....the wife must submit to his will and let him buy the oranges. by doing this, no party has been disrespected or belittled.....it's an arbitrary decision taken regardless of the outcome by both parties!

if the oranges now purge the husband making him go to the loo every 5 mins, all they need to do is go back to the market and buy apples. although, the husband took the wrong decision but they have learnt from the mistakes, corrected it and they have moved on without anyone getting bruised or disrespected. moreover, they are also not stuck in one position still arguing if buying apple is a better choice than getting oranges.

[quote author=Busy_body]Chei, he scores, he shoots, he misses

kai, kai, kai, that was an invitation to propose in Italy nau

And to think you have been asking since 19gbogboro [/quote]tpia would never travel to italy - her nemesis(michelin89) resides in italy!

Katsumoto: I agree but we don't have the full details.

the full details is now an academic point with the loss of lives......no excuse can justify the death of 2 sons when the head of the house should be protecting them!

[quote author=[CHocolaTE]]
The thing is, men cannot ALWAYS be right. No human can always be right. Sometimes you are right and sometimes you are wrong; that is how life works so it might be wiser for the husband to let his wife have the final say sometimes. The woman might also be more knowledgeable or experienced in certain things they want to decide on.[/quote]of course, men cannot always be right.....and when he is wrong, the partner should come to his aid. she is expected to work with her partner to put things right and minimize the consequences rather than using them to prove a point or as an excuse for rejecting him in some way. a man who has a submissive wife acquires a greater sense of self respect because he knows that she respects his authority in her life and she is not in any way trying to belittle him.

It might also be that the wife is more intellectually sound than the husband (she might be smarter than him-yes it is possible) and I think this would make her better at decision making than him.

if a man already knows the woman he's married to is smarter than him, there won't be any argument. for instance, i am a quack in the kitchen - it's not possible for me to argue at what point should salt or pepper be added to a pot of stew. it's not my forte so whatever my wife decides to do won't be contested by me - she's superior in that field....same principle applies if the subject is my area of my specialisation!

That is easier said than done. Why should they BOTH return to the drawing board when the man was the one who made a mistake.

marriage is not a competiton.....it's a journey undertaken by the husband and the wife in which they have to take decisions on which road to take at every junction in their journey. there's going to be a time when the couple would desire taking different roads - this is where mutual respect is expected to kick in. if there's love between them, they would work it out between themselves which road to take. if they both decide on road 1, then road 1 it must be regardless of what the outcome is. they would either succeed together or fail together.......there's no shame in that!

tpia1: a vow?

is nl located in italy?

nl is located in zurich...

there's nothing wrong in the men having a final say too.....if a wife raises her fears and the husband insists on his own opinion, the wife should accept his will without malice(she's a helper). if everything goes to plan, then the two of them should be proud of what they collectively achieved with their decision. if the plan fails, the two of them should dust themselves, go back to the drawing board and try again. there should be no "i told you so" + "you should have listened to me"....they should succeed together and fail together!

Katsumoto: It never seems to end, the killing that is.

Two boys, like many before them, wasted for nothing.

Without knowing the full details of why the father left his family in Kano, it is difficult to place all the blame on him. He might not have had the resources to relocate his entire family and may have been trying to make arrangements for his family to move as well. If it was a temporary move, then he should at least have moved them to his village or somewhere else safe until he sorted out better arrangements.

But if he just left them in a dangerous place without looking back, then he is a bloody coward.

The one thing I can't seem to understand is why its so easy for some to take life.

It doesn't make sense for any Southerner to remain in the North.

no excuse, katsumoto - the jap rebel.
the captain of a ship is the last person to leave the ship - if anything, women and children should be rescued first before the head of the house....
this man puts the I in irresponsibility!

bluedum: Heheheh shey you go check your dictionary for all this words enh! wahali otiya weere.. i won't be surprise if u ar the same person as the poster oloribiruku ritualist

epitome of a firewood background.....

tpia1: @ dayokanu

i'm deeper life.

madam tpia, 2 months down the line and you have refused to grant me the interview you promised......
what should one call someone who failed to fulfill a vow?

[quote author=[CHocolaTE]]

Ok. But what does accepting your authority mean to you? Does it mean that you get the final say in all the processes of decision making?[/quote]very good question.....
my headship is actually a matter of responsibility and accountability - this is where african men generally screw things up. in sane climes, the head serves his subjects, in africa, the head wants to be served. accepting my authority means she cannot resist my will. this does not mean she cannot express her fears or disagree with some of my decisions...she's my helper not a doormat!

[quote author=ekt_bear]Slightly shocked that you used "UK" and "almighty" in the same sentence.[/quote]so you don't think the united kingdom is the almighty? how many countries speak their language?

submission is a gift my wife chooses to give me...it's a free will, a decision she's made to be led by me, to accept my authority and to be my helper whenever i need aid.

ronkebp: Big deal, whatever rocks their boat, Sarah called Abraham her "lord". so it depends on what makes the speaker and hearer happy.

good suggestion....
now i know what i would ask my wifey to call me....."my lord" .....i have always wanted to feel like a district judge.

bluedum: You are the one that is extremely daft and totally mad just because yu people saw a post with 250k & 500 on a thread makes your brain start thinking abnormal way. Pls take your useless time to read thru this poster topic very well and you will see its very glaring what his intention was nd i am %100 sure if someone contact him at back to offer a child for him 250k “cash n carry" he will gladly accept that

when your creator was distributing intelligence, you were busy throwing tantrums @ the back of the queue.....how obdurate can one be to think so obtusely? does it make any sense to you that the op would wait almost 12 months, pay thrice as much as he would have paid for cash and carry abandoned baby?

it's gooks like you that give this country a bad name - rational thinking is even beyond you. poverty of common sense is a serious ailment you need to address....if you marry a tool like you, you would produce idiöts. take your filthy judgemental self out of here and let meaningful people with intelligence comment.....you obnoxious gibbon!

1920MaMa: yeah, i agree with you on the responsibility thing, but is that enough reason to stop loving one's spouse completely?

of course....
there are reasons why a particular guy A wants to be with girl X. if guy A stops doing what girl X saw that got her attracted in the first place, girl X would lose interest gradually. if nothing is done to salvage the situation immediately, girl X would lose interest completely and the love would die. there's a thin line between love and hate - marriage or no marriage!

who is silifonia?