₦airaland Forum

Welcome, Guest: Register • Login • With Google • Trending • Recent • New

Stats: 3,344,335 members, 8,511,331 topics. Date: Sunday, 01 November 2026 at 11:29 AM

Toggle theme

Cornelboy's Posts

Nairaland Forum › Cornelboy's Profile › Cornelboy's Posts

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 (of 162 pages)

Christianity Etc › Re: ` by cornelboy(f): 1:12pm On Jul 27, 2022
[quote author=MaryAye post=115129966][/quote]Hi
Christianity Etc › Re: Questions I Have About The Existence Of A Creator God by cornelboy(f): 11:32pm On Jul 25, 2022
MaxInDHouse:
Most of you guys do profess faith in Jesus of Nazareth but when issues having to do with his teachings comes up you quickly trash his sayings! Matthew 15:7-8
Today Russian citizens whose sons and daughters have died in the war are crying and protesting against their own government. So who is deceiving who?
My friend the problem is politicians deceiving you people making you feel they're fighting for your good whereas all they're interested in is their ambitions.
Russia annexed Ukraine, Ukraine annexed Russia. What's the business of a true disciple of Christ whose mind is focused on God's Kingdom? Matthew 5:38-42
Please there's no problem as long as God's Kingdom is yet to come all human governments are evil whether they speak your mother tongue or Ànàgó! smiley
cheesy cheesy cheesy
You comments make me laugh cheesy
Christianity Etc › Re: "Is The Watchtower Organisation A Trustworthy Interpreter Of Scripture?" by cornelboy(f): 12:25am On Jul 18, 2022
Mikee19:
Now over to you. Respond to my earlier comment as I've now responded to yours.
To respond to this u asked, here, the King James translators used a particular manuscript that it appeared in, but this manuscript is a later manuscript. It doesn't appear in the earlier ones, so it's safe to translate it without the words used in King James, because earlier manuscripts don't have it. But note that King James translators ACTUALLY SAW IT in the manuscript they used; they didn't invent it from nothing. But because the earlier manuscripts don't have it that way it's better to not include it in a translation (that's why more recent translations exclude it). Everyone knows it's a weak way to defend trinity..
Why didn't the earlier manuscripts have it but the later ones have it?
Which one is authentic? The ones KJV use or the one some other translations use?

You see, I can never use such scripture to defend trinity. I won't even use John 1:1. In fact, I will use the New World Translation of the JWs to prove trinity right in anyone's face! Because I know it's the truth of God's word. I can use anything. It'll remain the same.
Alright. Go for it.

First, who were the first people to believe in the trinity?
When was the doctrine established?
Christianity Etc › Re: The Son Is Superior To Angels by cornelboy(f): 12:15am On Jul 18, 2022
Jokerman:
Only a very very top angel can have to effontery to rebel and make war in heaven.
Yes, the Father is superior to the son... no arguments here
Are you not a trinitarian? Like Trinitarians says they are equal.
Christianity Etc › Re: "Is The Watchtower Organisation A Trustworthy Interpreter Of Scripture?" by cornelboy(f): 12:13am On Jul 18, 2022
Mikee19:
You asked ME? ? ? WHERE? ? ?
Pls always know who you address. You never asked me any question I didn't answer. If you know you did pls link to it. This is such a simple question, why would I avoid it?
Also, ppl are at liberty to not respond to everything they see. m sure u know this. There are so many things a person thinks of on his own, than to answer everything they see esp if you don't call them directly. Next time pls don't say stuff like this again unless u actually ask me!
Second, it takes a lot to type. It also takes an honest heart to read it all, if one really wants to be sure of what they know. It's not too huge a price to pay to read a lot if u know u don't know it all and your salvation may be at stake, no matter what.
To respond to this u asked, here, the King James translators used a particular manuscript that it appeared in, but this manuscript is a later manuscript. It doesn't appear in the earlier ones, so it's safe to translate it without the words used in King James, because earlier manuscripts don't have it. But note that King James translators ACTUALLY SAW IT in the manuscript they used; they didn't invent it from nothing. But because the earlier manuscripts don't have it that way it's better to not include it in a translation (that's why more recent translations exclude it). Everyone knows it's a weak way to defend trinity...
You see, I can never use such scripture to defend trinity. I won't even use John 1:1. In fact, I will use the New World Translation of the JWs to prove trinity right in anyone's face! Because I know it's the truth of God's word. I can use anything. It'll remain the same.
Now over to you. Respond to my earlier comment as I've now responded to yours.
Oh it wasn't you I asked no vex.

I like it short and precise.
Christianity Etc › Re: The Son Is Superior To Angels by cornelboy(f): 7:48pm On Jul 16, 2022
Jokerman:
1. You have no proof of this.
2. Archangel Michael isn't the express "word" of God
3. So what role was lucifer in heaven before he rebelled? Remember, no ordinary angel could have the effontery to rebelled against God.
Which angel has the effontery to rebel? grin
Any angel could rebel ogbeni.

My question is, if the son is superior to other angels, is the Father not superior to the son?
Christianity Etc › Re: The Son Is Superior To Angels by cornelboy(f): 7:44pm On Jul 16, 2022
MaxInDHouse:
How can the one who has been in eternity be rightly called the "firstborn of all creations"? Colossians 1:15
Common sense should tell that the firstborn can't be excluded from the rest of creations because it's part of it.
No wonder Jesus said to Mary Magdalene:
"I am ascending to my Father and your Father and to my God and your God.’” John 20:17
Jesus was created in the beginning of creation {Proverb 8:22} only God has no beginning! smiley
Leave the mumu alone jàre.

According to John 1:1
"In the beginning"...
In the beginning of what exactly?
É be like say their trio gods get beginning cheesy
Christianity Etc › Re: "Is The Watchtower Organisation A Trustworthy Interpreter Of Scripture?" by cornelboy(f): 7:40pm On Jul 16, 2022
Mikee19:
I wish i can have just 2hrs discussion with u. U are already throwing stuff u have no idea about. Who removed what? You have proof of this? You are turning out to be just like the others who say things they don't know for sure, except that one organization told them this.
Can you provide evidence for this claim? Does there exist ANY MANUSCRIPT IN THE WORLD where the name "Jehovah" exists in the New Testament ( "Greek scriptures" ) , or even the tetragrammation, and it was removed and replaced with "Lord"? No, you cannot, because it doesn't exist
Several thousands of manuscript have come down to us, not single one backs up this claim! Can you access the kingdom interlinear of the Jehovah witnesses? Surely u can see that in the Greek "Lord" is what appears, NOT anything else?
Moreso do u know the real implication of this claim? That right under God's "nose" in preserving his written word, somebody somewhere can come and change it, or a part of it, without leaving any traces? Such that ALL THE WHOLE MANUSCRIPTS IN THE WHOLE WORLD don't contain the word "Jehovah" in any form, tetragrammation inclusive, and God cannot prevent that? How then are you sure he can prevent anybody else from making any other changes to his word if he cannot prevent that from happening? Heck, how do u know no other part of the Bible has been changed undetected again? You have NO way of knowing! It's either God can protect his word from being changed, or he cannot. You are really claiming God CANNOT protect his word from alteration. He cannot keep it from being changed. It is God's power you're really challenging!
Be careful the things u say. God can protect his word. This is an unfounded JW claim that attacks the power of God. On the one hand they claim they can trust his word because he can preserve it without alteration. Then turn right around to say, "yes he can but only this one he couldn't". Don't throw such slap in the face of God. He preserved his word unaltered.
I was asking how KJV got their 1 John 5 7 from, you never responded to that.

You want me to respond to all your epistles here.
Keep it short abeg.
Christianity Etc › Re: "Is The Watchtower Organisation A Trustworthy Interpreter Of Scripture?" by cornelboy(f): 6:31pm On Jul 15, 2022
Emusan:
They removed the name yet you know about it today, how come?
Is there sense in that? cheesy grin cheesy grin cheesy
But the same people coined the name in which you even identify your organization with now cheesy grin cheesy grin
So your gullibility is raised to power 10
See ignoramus in display.
Go and read about FORMULATION OF THE WORD JEHOVAH, so that you'll know the difference between TRANSLITERATION and FORMULATION
cheesy grin cheesy grin grin
But they formulated the divine name you know today as Jehovah
When I say you people are olodo and ignorance to the Word of God you'll think it's a joke.
Just imagine Jesus was "COINED TOO" cheesy grin cheesy grin cheesy grin
Okay
Christianity Etc › Re: "Is The Watchtower Organisation A Trustworthy Interpreter Of Scripture?" by cornelboy(f): 6:43pm On Jul 14, 2022
Emusan:
Five years old thinking and reason can't erase the fact that Catholic coined the name Jehovah
cheesy grin grin grin
Lol.
Coined or not coined, those people removed God's sacred name and replaced it with "lord" just to coerce gullible people like you to believe in the trinity gods.

And mind you, it's just transliteration. They didn't give God name.
The same way "Jesus" was coined too.
Christianity Etc › Re: "Is The Watchtower Organisation A Trustworthy Interpreter Of Scripture?" by cornelboy(f): 2:10am On Jul 13, 2022
Emusan:
That's nice! The thing pained him cheesy grin cheesy grin
I'm no more a Deeper Life buy Roman Catholic. cheesy grin cheesy grin grin
Don't forget you're also indirectly a Roman Catholic since you accept their coined word "Jehovah" cheesy grin grin grin
You're even more Roman Catholic than I do cheesy grin cheesy grin
Haa! Five year old thinking and reasoning. Is this your best cheesy cheesy
Abeg getat.
Christianity Etc › Re: "Is The Watchtower Organisation A Trustworthy Interpreter Of Scripture?" by cornelboy(f): 12:41am On Jul 12, 2022
achorladey:
You should be smart enough to know the UNREASONABLENESS in that, at least you go school to learn and defend things that you don't believe or exist for academic purpose or certificationsgrin grin grin
I dé go YouTube jàre
Make I no waste my time with you.
Bye cheesy
Christianity Etc › Re: "Is The Watchtower Organisation A Trustworthy Interpreter Of Scripture?" by cornelboy(f): 12:40am On Jul 12, 2022
achorladey:
Smart people that upper part of their lips says
I am yet to be a Jehovah’s witness this morning
and later in the day
The lower part of their lips says
I am a Jehovah’s witness.
Smart people that can distinguish between TITLES and NAME grin grin grin grin
Na people indeed born smart people like you wey go insult and name dumb people only to come back and apologize grin grin grin
Awon smart people la n pe yin.
Your defended the trinity dogma with your life but your later said you don't believe in the trinity cheesy cheesy
Which kind wahala be that cheesy
Christianity Etc › Re: "Is The Watchtower Organisation A Trustworthy Interpreter Of Scripture?" by cornelboy(f): 12:34am On Jul 12, 2022
achorladey:
Which thread exactly?
Go back to your trinity thread.
Awon I never intend to have discussion with you. grin grin
Ọmọ ṣee silly response.
Oma se o
Make I go watch prank videos on YouTube jàre. cheesy cheesy

Only an unreasonable person denies that he don't believe in something but defended that same thing with his life cheesy cheesy cheesy
I give up on you cheesy cheesy
Christianity Etc › Re: "Is The Watchtower Organisation A Trustworthy Interpreter Of Scripture?" by cornelboy(f): 12:32am On Jul 12, 2022
achorladey:
Their usual mode of operation starts with
Na person born you like this o
Your too dumb.
I like to roll with smart people cheesy cheesy
Christianity Etc › Re: "Is The Watchtower Organisation A Trustworthy Interpreter Of Scripture?" by cornelboy(f): 12:30am On Jul 12, 2022
achorladey:
Sooooo? and seriously?
Starting to jump from pillar to post. Awon cruiser wey no want DISCUSSION.
Oya change mouth again grin grin grin
Go back to that your thread and read from A to Z.
Which thread exactly?

The thread where you denied you don't believe in the trinity or the one you defended it with your life cheesy cheesy
Christianity Etc › Re: "Is The Watchtower Organisation A Trustworthy Interpreter Of Scripture?" by cornelboy(f): 12:28am On Jul 12, 2022
achorladey:
Sooooo? and seriously?
Starting to jump from pillar to post. Awon cruiser wey no want DISCUSSION.
Oya change mouth again grin grin grin
Back to the question.

Do you believe in the trinity or not
cheesy cheesy
Christianity Etc › Re: "Is The Watchtower Organisation A Trustworthy Interpreter Of Scripture?" by cornelboy(f): 12:26am On Jul 12, 2022
achorladey:
I forgot you use your COULD which of course is a two way street.
1. proper discussion
2. Here to CRUISE grin
I never intended to have a discussion especially with you ogbeni.
Came to catch cruise with you guys.
cheesy cheesy
Christianity Etc › Re: "Is The Watchtower Organisation A Trustworthy Interpreter Of Scripture?" by cornelboy(f): 12:23am On Jul 12, 2022
achorladey:
Na your one liners dey hook you as your finding it difficult to respond grin grin grin grin
I think your the one finding it difficult to respond.

Do you believe in the trinity cheesy cheesy
Christianity Etc › Re: "Is The Watchtower Organisation A Trustworthy Interpreter Of Scripture?" by cornelboy(f): 12:22am On Jul 12, 2022
achorladey:
Now he wants a proper discussion. The one I had with you on your thread over trinity is called............ discussion.
Rather than face reality- JESUS he is chasing shadows. Face light wey no get variation dump shadow for one side.
You've successfully failed the question.
Who told you I wanted a discussion.
I'm here to cruise cheesy cheesy
Christianity Etc › Re: "Is The Watchtower Organisation A Trustworthy Interpreter Of Scripture?" by cornelboy(f): 12:19am On Jul 12, 2022
achorladey:
Hooked grin grin grin grin
Eyah what happened?
Who hooked you cheesy
Christianity Etc › Re: "Is The Watchtower Organisation A Trustworthy Interpreter Of Scripture?" by cornelboy(f): 12:17am On Jul 12, 2022
achorladey:
Your directly and indirectly a Jehovah's witness yourself ORGANIZATION members whether you accept or not. Since you believe in their man-made uninspired doctrines as your darling governing body said that they
Are uninspired and infallible they err and make mistakes in doctrines and organizational direction.. You believe what they teach you. Correct or deny?
A case of pot calling kettle BLACK.
Learn ko to maa wa Eni to n ti enu aja bo igbe grin grin grin
Soooo?
Christianity Etc › Re: "Is The Watchtower Organisation A Trustworthy Interpreter Of Scripture?" by cornelboy(f): 12:15am On Jul 12, 2022
Do you believe in trinity or not?
Answer that and we could have a proper discussion cheesy

Achorladey
Christianity Etc › Re: "Is The Watchtower Organisation A Trustworthy Interpreter Of Scripture?" by cornelboy(f): 12:11am On Jul 12, 2022
achorladey:
Let's rephrase
Who established the ORGANIZATION doctrine?
A) Jesus and his apostles
B) Watchtower WTBTS
C) I'm ignorant and brainwashed
I like this options ehn
You go show ORGANIZATION for BIBLE word for word as you want make them show you TRINITY word for word.
Seriously cheesy cheesy
Christianity Etc › Re: "Is The Watchtower Organisation A Trustworthy Interpreter Of Scripture?" by cornelboy(f): 12:09am On Jul 12, 2022
Emusan:
You called someone a "Roman Catholic Trinitarian" yet you still ask which DENOMINATION he belong?
Na wa ooooo
See the level of damage Watchtower has caused in your life grin cheesy grin grin
Talo ti enu ajá bo igbe cheesy

Your indirectly a Roman Catholic yourself trinitarian whether you accept or not. Since you believe in their man-made uninspired doctrines cheesy cheesy
Christianity Etc › Re: "Is The Watchtower Organisation A Trustworthy Interpreter Of Scripture?" by cornelboy(f): 12:05am On Jul 12, 2022
GoodIsGod:
Guy you are still swimming in the ocean of ignorance. I am a Christian Yes,I am. But did I tell you I am a Catholic? Why should you rant and conclude I am.
This is the wrong notion that you all were trained with by Watchtower.
You group everyone that is not a member of your sect together as one.
It is pride and holier than thou attitude that is the virus that has eaten deep into you.
You believe every one that calls himself or herself a Christian belongs to the same church or denomination.
I have come to understand that engaging a Jehovah's witness in argument is a mere waste of time and energy. So I might not respond to you anymore.
Lack of the freedom to think individually is your problem. Watchtower is still holding the remote.
It's So sad. grin
Sorry, Ive got better things to do.
Who established the trinity doctrine?
A) Jesus and his apostles
B) Roman Catholics
C) I'm ignorant and brainwashed

cheesy cheesy

I like this options ehn cheesy cheesy
Christianity Etc › Re: "Is The Watchtower Organisation A Trustworthy Interpreter Of Scripture?" by cornelboy(f): 6:34pm On Jul 11, 2022
GoodIsGod:
Brainwashed Watchtower Zombie.
You have been programed by your operators at New York to believe that anyone who is not a Jehovah's Witness that is a Christian has same beliefs with every other person that calls themselves a Christian.
It is true many are not christians that call themselves christians but a functional brain that is not remotely controlled by a group of persons would not group everyone that is not a member of their weird association together.
In a nutshell, you don't know my beliefs as a Christian. So, don't make conclusions foolishly.
Sorry for the foolishly it's not meant to insult you though.
Brainwashed Roman Catholic trinitarian zombie cheesy
You've been programmed to believe that 1+1+1=1
That's the highest level of brainwashing I have seen in my life cheesy

If your not a JW, what denomination do you belong then?
And what are your beliefs grin
Christianity Etc › Re: "Is The Watchtower Organisation A Trustworthy Interpreter Of Scripture?" by cornelboy(f): 6:19pm On Jul 11, 2022
achorladey:
What you called the WORST TRANSLATION is what your RELIGIOUS LEADERS and ORGANIZATION called the leading translation that help strengthen your FAITH and a prove that the WORD of GOD ENDURE FOREVER.
Awon reducing and oxidising someone's IQ crew grin grin grin check the below screenshot to LEVEL UP your IQ grin grin
King James version na your mate. In the committee of BIBLES known all over the world, NWT don't come close to KJV grin grin grin. That copy you called the WORST TRANSLATION can be found in every corner of your religious organization even on their apps and other electronic devices grin grin grin
Where did KJV get their 1 John 5 verse 7 from?
Christianity Etc › Re: "Is The Watchtower Organisation A Trustworthy Interpreter Of Scripture?" by cornelboy(f): 6:14pm On Jul 11, 2022
GoodIsGod:
You are not only stupid but you are as well thinking insane also. As "imperfect" as the king James was, that was what you guys were using before you manufactured your own bible which came into being not long. (80s or 90s)
Were you part of the Watchtower team that translated the New world version? No.
Do you have the original scripts of the scriptures in the original language or have access to their copies? No.
It is what they told you and gave you that you are defending.
People who have indoctrinated you with all manner of beliefs. What do you expect them to do but to bend the bible to comform with all the lies and guesses they have thought you?
They come up with new "discoveries" every day. grin
Jesus is Angel Michael. What does that have to do with salvation of a soul? Irrelevant guesses. grin .
They hold the remote of your brains in their New York building dishing out all manner of instructions to you world over.
It is your choice anyways, and I would not have talked about it if you guys were not arrogantly calling other christians names. You won't mind your business. Why don't you face your 144,000 discoveries and mind your business.
21st century Pharisees. grin
You don't have the reasoning of your own. You are like robots in the hands of watchtower.
Do you have the reasoning of your own or you believe in the pagan doctrines of the Roman Catholics?
Like did Jesus and the early apostles filled with the holy spirit teach or believe in the trinity?

Your like robots in the hands of the Roman Catholics cheesy cheesy

Here's the simple questions I asked in my previous post;

Where did KJV get their 1 John 5 verse 7 from?

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 (of 162 pages)