₦airaland Forum

Putin must take Ukraine, no matter what. The world needs checks and balances. China should start preparing against Taiwan too

NATO puppet

See idiots. How many times have Ukrainians ever done that for you?

Blablamalala:
Can we say this comment by you is also inconsequential?

You got the bastard by the balls

bigpriik:
In this war Who else noticed that Whenever Russian army captures a territory,they respect the civilians still living there, Russian tanks were actually stopping for ukrainian vehicles to pass,After a bloody battle in Kiev as Ukrainians soldiers retreat , Russian soldiers were actually going round looking for injured ukrainian civilians to help and treat with their available healthcare provisions .
My brother oya bring it to Africa,let's say Nigeria invaded Benin and capture coutonou,our soldiers will loot, rape,commit genocide on innocent civilians living there ,no wonder God keep blessing the whites.

You are seeing that because this is a light invasion and they are related. Go and see what Russia, USA, and Israel have done in Vietnam and the middle East. . Pure annihilation.

Notice the soldier's reaction when this man offered to tow a Russian tank. Imagine an Arab trying this with IDF

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F-znzh6uDOE

I thought Russia is losing?

FERNANDEZISBACK:
That doesn't STOP the almighty from crushing Putin if he misbehaves...
Putin will never achieve his evil motive against Ukraine and the world..

Stop dragging the world into this. This is a European conflict and that's that.

Smallboynocare:
Idiot he's killing hundreds of innocent citizens making them loose their homes,jobs and business i hope something of such befall u too sooner or later u this idiot

Where was your concern for the innocent when Israel was killing Arabs? What about those in Iraq?

taxfine:
Putin is a depressed leader who cannot operate in modern world. Apart from arms and ammunition, what else can Russia offer the world? Putin is trying to be relevant.

People like this person here are those that allowed colonialism to thrive. You want him to sit down and let USA do to his country what they can never accept in America or Western Europe just because you see them as your masters.

It's 1962 all over again. USA took missiles to Turkey without any problem. Seeing this, USSR retaliated by taking their missiles to Cuba and all hell was let loose. USA almost annihilated the world and caused a third major war.

The fight has stopped na. Wait for the outcome of the negotiation before boasting

I thought they said it's 5000?

When Afghan and Iraqi civilians were gathering molotovs to defend their lands, everyone described them as terrorists.


The West is powerful indeed.

Respect to Russian soldiers. I have never seen IDF trying to plead with an Arab man before but Someone literally stood in the way of a Russian tank convoy without losing his life.

Russia has a right to defend itself

I have said it already. Russia is only being soft with Ukraine. In one video, one woman was throwing tantrums against Russian troops while they tried calm her down. In another, a single Ukrainian man stood in front of a Russian convoy consisting of TANKS.

This is something you can't try with USA or IDF without being shot

Brendaniel:
What he should have done since, see don't be deceived, Russia is not fighting a full war with Ukraine, they only want to bully them into submission, I've seen a lot of people here saying Russia is weak and is living on past glory, I just laugh, If you don't know deep details of the history of Russia, please don't just make arguments against them, If you have been following abandoned engineering on Discovery channel you will know what I'm talking about...

Don't mind those fools. I saw a video of a Ukrainian woman insulting Russian troops while they are trying to calm her down.

In another video, a single Ukrainian man stood in the way of a CONVOY OF TANKS and still lived to tell the story.

Just imagine an Arab man trying this with a NATO army or with IDF

Loewe:
So what's the bottom line now? That since the US allegedly invaded some countries, Russia should be allowed to run down Ukraine?

His sentiments reveal the conclusion of his line of thought.

"Allegedly, " he says

omenkaLives:
The Hague is only meant for the leaders of very poor countries. If that institution truly means what they insist it stands for, Bush and Blair would have been in jail right now.

I had a very funny argument on Facebook with a white woman on this issue. She was hell-bent on telling me how George Bush is not a criminal while Putin is.

On the surface, it looks like USA has free press but they are very effective indoctrinators.

International Courts are meant for poor countries. It is like Hisbah

ibnlawal:
I'm sure she will sign pre-nup before the wedding.
Ronaldo isn't an idiot, and even if he is. He's got family members to set him right

Prenuptials are often thrown away by courts in Europe if the agreements don't give the wife what the court intends to give. Im not saying this out of misogyny, but Western men have been fully emasculated by feminists. Marriage is a very bad financial move if you live there because you can easily lose half of your life savings and assets. There's a reason the women file 80% of the divorce there

Misterdhee1:
See as you wrote essay just to spew trash. All those worthy innovations you mentioned which ones did your forefathers contributed to making ?

Help me ask the fool. I don't know if some African Christians see muslims in their sleep. Even on Facebook you see them going to BBC pages to make anti-muslim posts even if the topic has nothing to do with religion or terrism.

franchasng:
Muslims, the only thing they contribute to humanity is bloodshed, sorrows, tears, poverty, confusion, and terror.



A single bolt in that motorcycle they are riding proudly on they cannot produce yet they feel so full of themselves using technologies whites and Asians created to improve human life to rather destroy their own fellow blacks.



Why cant they commit all these time, devotion and passion to developing their own indigenous technologies and help make humanity better?



Before you quote me, ask yourself why majority of the countries and regions currently at war or being terrorized are Muslim countries?


Dont come here to remind me about UAE, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, etc.

I will not mention all the wars and chaos instigated by the West or the war about to go down in Ukraine.

Kindly mention a single bolt in that motorcycle that was built by an African christian.

While pointing your fingers at Muslims (who did a lot of scientific breakthroughs in the past by the way. Aljebra is a good example.), can you also mention what YOU AS AN AFRICAN have invented to the world? Don't even discriminate between muslims and Christians. Mention any technological breakthrough that has been achieved by an African muslim or Christian.

Also, what if I told you that all the casualties of muslim terrorist groups combined have not reached half of those killed in Vietnam by your white masters?

Thank you.

Ahmback:
Dumbo, that's because Russia sells its weapons to anybody and everybody, terrorist or gang members. As long as you are with the money. Now U.S of A regulates their weapons sale thats why you'd hardly see theirs in the hands of terrorists. Russia are indirectly sponsoring terrorism.

That doesn't make their rifles better though. Even without the regulation, most countries prefer AKs

Agreed

FOOLS

seunny4lif:
F35
That will be the number 7 or 8
Expensive flying coffin
No wonder Canada, France and Germany rejected the jet
Japan have grounded their own F35 for long.
F35 and B2 bomber spending more time maintaining then flying it

It is heavily overrated.

Fahdiga:
I'm Yoruba but I support Igbo presidency for equity and performance sake

Respect yourself, Fahdiga.

Hassanmaye:
Yes I agree with you but just like the Qur'an have abrogating and abrogated verses the Hadith also have.
For example.
O prophet urge the believers to battle. If there are among you twenty who are steadfast they will overcome two hundred.. and if there are among you one hundred who are steadfast they will overcome a thousand who have disbelieve. Qur'an 8:65.
But this verse was later abrogated by Qur'an 8: 66
Now Allah has lighten the hardship for you and he knows that among you is weakness.
So if there are from you one hundred who are steadfast they will overcome two hundred..

Yes, the Hadiths teaches us many things and a lot of them are truly authentic. I still apply many Hadiths in my way of life but it's just a few that I am not convinced with.

Biodun556:
The Hadith collectors have made their own research and contributions. Muslim schorlars of today should continue to make it better. However , some schorlars are bent on replacing hadith with their own opinions in order to propagate their own ideology and create divisions among muslims, one must be careful of this. Many Quran verses point to the relevance of hadith which makes it inevitable while interpreting Qur'an. I am of the opinion that not all the hadiths that were rejected are fakes, muslim recognised body and reputable schorlars who are sincere should continue to work on them.

This is the point I'm trying to make. More needs to be worked on.

Itzlinda:
Only Quran is infallible. I wish you understand Hausa so I could attach a ruling of late gummi where he said not all Hadith in sahihul bukhari are authentic.

The summary of what he says is that Allah only promise to protect Quran from contamination so numerous Hadith books can be contaminated.

He gave an example of the Hadith that says some unbelievers used charm on prophet Muhammad (s.a.w) which caused him sickness.

The sheikh says it is even a grave sin to believe charm could work on the noble prophet. And this Hadith is found right there in Imamul bukhari.
Allahu a’alam

Please do share. I'm a native Hausa man.

There are so many examples. I've read on one where Prophet Muhammad tells someone not to get angry 3x, meaning that the prophet discourages such feelings.

Yet in the same Hadiths, we have several reports of the prophet making decisions out of fury and even killing some visitors by chopping their hands and and legs off, and their eyes burnt with hot iron till they die.


Volume 8, Book 82, Number 794:
Narrated Anas:
Some people from the tribe of 'Ukl came to the Prophet and embraced Islam. The climate of Medina did not suit them, so the Prophet ordered them to go to the (herd of milch) camels of charity and to drink, their milk and urine (as a medicine). They did so, and after they had recovered from their ailment (became healthy) they turned renegades (reverted from Islam) and killed the shepherd of the camels and took the camels away. The Prophet sent (some people) in their pursuit and so they were (caught and) brought, and the Prophets ordered that their hands and legs should be cut off and that their eyes should be branded with heated pieces of iron, and that their cut hands and legs should not be cauterized, till they die.

SamuelAnyawu:
The North don’t emigrate for greener pastures outside Naija as most of them have this belief that their current ordeal is What God has destined for them.

Some other part of the country fully believes than an individual can get to the top against all odds.

That's another misconception. Yes, the north is religious but that is not what is keeping us from moving outside. And bigotry aside, the south is just as superstitious as the north if you look into the prevalence of money rituals, cultism, etc and the way many of them attribute world events and natural disasters to "endtime", "wrath of God", etc.

Migration is not just part of our culture and those that do it do so for various reasons. Even in the south, it's mostly Igbos that are traveling around. You can find them in countries that are 4x worse than Nigeria so people don't necessarily travel because of adversity at home.

AlBaqir:
This is an excellent observation. Allow me to add my inputs as follows:

1. To the Muslim fundamentalists, we need to be crystal clear that doubting or questioning a particular hadith does not necessarily meant one doubts the Messenger of Allah; rather, the doubt is on what is attributed to him that no one could say 100% its from him.

For a fact, neither the Prophet nor his companions authenticate any of the hadith compilations. For example, Sahih al-Bukhari was compiled almost 200 years after the demise of Imam al-Bukhari from a 50-page manuscript where many passages were left blank. How it transformed into 9 to 10 volumes containing 6000+ ahadith is still a mystery.

You can read more: https://www.nairaland.com/3108197/wrote-sahih-bukhari-obviously-not


2. Authenticity of hadith:

Generally, there are two popular criteria to discern an authentic Hadith from false one: verification of the sanad (chain of transmission) and verification of the matn (content). Unfortunately, the former is 99% relied upon in judging the authenticity of Hadith while the latter is rarely used. This is the problem with Sahih al-Bukhari and sahih Muslim. All their respective ahadith are adjudged authentic based on the verification of their sanad but scholars disregard the matn of their ahadith. This is the reason why hadith will be classified as authentic while its matn opposed Quran and rationality blatantly.

Looking at the matn (content, text) of Hadith in line with overall Quranic injunction / message, historical facts or comparison with other Hadith that is widely reported is the best way to judge authenticity of Hadith. We have seen scholars who graded ahadith weak based on its sanad (chain of transmission) but authenticate the hadith based on its matn using aforementioned standards.

3. Sometimes, a hadith is half-reported (and that might makes it irrational) or a part of it is mistakenly heard leading to wrong meaning, or a part of the hadith is falsified, or interpolated. Here, scholars tried to sieve grain from chaff. However, I need to add that it is subjective to throw every hadith away because it does not fit into individual's understanding, and it is counterproductive to use empirical science to verify authenticity of hadith. This does not meant we should throw rationality and science away, both have been used many times to understand various ahadith.

4. When it comes to the fundamental Islamic messages and personality of the noble Prophet [peace be upon him and his progeny], the ONLY standard to judge the authenticity of any hadith on these two subjects irrespective of where it is documented is the holy Qur'an.

For example, Qur'an states emphatically that the Prophet had exalted and Sublime characters, and believers are enjoined to emulate him. If a so-called authentic Hadith describes him as a mean or base person, obviously such hadith is false despite its authentic tag. Another example is the age of Aishah when Prophet got married to her. In this case, no single hadith is attributed to the Prophet himself that his wife was 6 when he married her and consummated the marriage at 9. Verifying the hadith with history shows Aishah was between 19 - 21.


There are lot I intend to add but let me stop here for now.

Salaam alaykum.

Well said. Especially the last hadith, the idea that Aisha was married at 6 doesn't make sense when you look into other historical accounts. Unfortunately, this is what people are placing on the same level with the holy Qur'an