₦airaland Forum

Welcome, Guest: RegisterLoginWith GoogleTrendingRecentNew

Stats: 3,327,244 members, 8,430,007 topics. Date: Friday, 19 June 2026 at 06:00 PM

Toggle theme

Daboomb's Posts

Nairaland ForumDaboomb's ProfileDaboomb's Posts

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 (of 158 pages)

PoliticsRe: It’s wrong to say results of presidential Poll were not transmitted - INEC Tech by Daboomb: 6:39pm On Jul 08, 2019
tuniski:
It is not prohibited please.
Do you know which law guided the conduct of the 2019 presidential election? If YES, state it here.

After that, Do oyu know that that law PROHIBITS the Electronic transmission of result? If you dont know, l have no business engaging you because it shows that your ignorance is incurable.

But you can also show me WHY you say it is not prohibitted, maybe l can also learn something from you. undecided
PoliticsRe: It’s wrong to say results of presidential Poll were not transmitted - INEC Tech by Daboomb: 6:36pm On Jul 08, 2019
Spallanzani:
What if INEC said they didn't utilize the server based on some technical glitches. This case will not see the light of the day. See I'm an IT expert and I know what I'm saying, infact I've worked and still work with different servers. There are alot of set back that won't allow centralized submission of the election results. The card reader was only used for accreditation not voting so how do you want to transmit result when the device wasn't used to vote?
I am just surprised at how these people are jumping to coclusions. huh huh huh

Please help me confirm the following issues to them, they just cant seem to grab the issue at stake:

- There can be more than one Server, serving different purposes in an organisation.
- Election result Server, according to INEC Chairman, was put offline for the Presidential election (as usage will be illegal under the 2015 electoral Act)
- "SENDing" information and "DELIVERY/DELIVERED" of the same information are two different things and a lot of other things can happen in-betwen

- Election result can be "SENT" but the only way to CONFIRM it is delivered, is if an AKNPWLEGEMENT PACKET was sent to the Sender

- If a Server was downintentionally (Powered Down or just taken Offline) and you send information to it, it wont be DELIVERED to that Server.

- The Sender would still see SENT on their device, meanwhile, The SENT PACKETS will just be DISCARDED in due course.

The ignorance of most of these people that voted for Atiku and want him to win by all means, is legendary! grin grin
PoliticsRe: It’s wrong to say results of presidential Poll were not transmitted - INEC Tech by Daboomb: 6:27pm On Jul 08, 2019
lexy2014:
Y did buhari not rest in 2003,2007&2011 when he availed himself d same tribunal which atiku is availaing himself today? If people in INEC use their office to carry out what u call illegal acts, u mean that there are no laws that spell out punitive measures for so doing?
Certainly there are PUNISHMENT for erring Electoral officers, including the INEC chairman himself.

But what ILLEGAL ACTIVITIES are you referring to, that you said INEC Staff carried out?
PoliticsRe: It’s wrong to say results of presidential Poll were not transmitted - INEC Tech by Daboomb: 6:25pm On Jul 08, 2019
dadexcel:
.....ok..noted bro. In order words the INEC appointment letter for all RATECHS are illegal appointments...which still portends illegality and in law, you cannot achieve legality through illegal means ...so the entire election dutues carried out by these "illegal" INEC employees should be declared a nullity right?
This is not true!
Read my post above, to explain why l said so.

"Appointment", "Specified Dutie" and "what was actually done on election day", are three separate issues affecting a RATECH person.
PoliticsRe: It’s wrong to say results of presidential Poll were not transmitted - INEC Tech by Daboomb: 6:18pm On Jul 08, 2019
decub:
It wouldn't also be wrong for us to understand the role of the RATECH employee so we can truly determine if he actually went beyond his scope of assigned duties; not just to swallow what INEC told us.

I appreciate your comment, but would appreciate it more if we can analyze without looking at the ethnic affiliation of the accused or defendant.
The RATECH are specifically "Technical Support" staff to assist other staff to solve problems with hardware (Card readers especially).
They are like the I.T staff of a bank, they support other non-technical staff but that does not make them a Cash Officer or Financial Officer who makes and takes finncial decisions.

Now, l agree that a RATECH may have been initially told they would transmit election result to a Server and trained on what to do and how to solve related problems.....based on the assumption that the President was going to sign the New Electoral Bill into law.
Some of them might even have gone ahead to do so, not minding what the INEC Chair said later!

But when it was not signed into Law, INEC chairman knew that it will be Illegal to TRANSMIT any result ELECTRONICALLY (We all know why the president refuse to sign it into law).
So, he came on TV and gave a Press Briefing saying that their "Results Server" will be offline as it have become illegal to use it.7he also added the issue of "Hacking" it by some actors.
If anyone "transmitted result" to a Server that was offline, it is just an Undelivered message and it will be discarded by the Network



See, l know what we all want (For INEC to be proved wrong), that would have been poetic justice. grin grin
But we must disabuse our mind and look at it from a legal angle because that is what the Supreme Court will look at, not sentiments. undecided
PoliticsRe: It’s wrong to say results of presidential Poll were not transmitted - INEC Tech by Daboomb: 6:08pm On Jul 08, 2019
Kenturkey048:
okay Sir....bye bye..
Apologies Sir, l think you might be offended by my choice of words.
PoliticsRe: It’s wrong to say results of presidential Poll were not transmitted - INEC Tech by Daboomb:
Kenturkey048:
senior,no server was shut down sir..the transmission was successful sir...you dear not leave the RAC as a P.O without completing your transmission sir.....
Honestly Sir, I am not partisan in this matter because l always look at issues from the pontof view of THE LAW (since it is the court that will decide eventually!).

I heard INEC Chairman issue a Press Statement that INEC SERVERS will be offline for the Presidential election and he gave two reasons.

1) Amended electoral Law which suggested electronic/Server use, hasnot been SIGNED into law by Mr. President

2) INEC has got wind that "some actors" have commissioned HACKERS to hack into the Server (reasoin Mr. President refuse to sign the Bill inot law) and manipulate the election result.

So, who is in the best position to know whether Server was shutdown, whether Server can be used and Whether Server can RECIEVE election Results electronically, than the INEC Chairman?

Mind you, if someone sent an Email to a Server tha is down, it will still say "SENT" but until the Server accepts it and send an "Acknowlegement Packet" (Network guys will understand this part).....the sent message is not declared as RECIEVED!
The sent message is just DISCARDED by the Network, after a few "unsucessful tries" to deliver it to the "offlined" Server.


Please just think about these points first, before you reply.

Edit: Let me also add that INEC has more than FIVE SERVERS for different roles like authentication of voters, computation of results, logistics, etc (though they are all on the same network and can communicate with each other).

The SERVER INEC shutdown was the one P.O's were initially supposed to send the election results to, if the "Amended Bill" has been sign into law
other Servers remain Online.
Also, if say for lack of communication, if a P.O still decides to transmit the results to the "Result Server", which has been taken offline, it will still say "SENT" but be assured that it was not delivered to any Server as that Server is unavailable...and it is still illegal, null and void
PoliticsRe: It’s wrong to say results of presidential Poll were not transmitted - INEC Tech by Daboomb: 5:49pm On Jul 08, 2019
Kenturkey048:
as in,the matter no clear me...I am not looking at this from the angle of Buhari and Atiku..

am only viewing from the transparency test of Inec..how them go say they no transmit results electrically or the RATECH guys assigned to pooling units all of a sudden turns illegal staff....we P.O called the result for them(RATECH) they did the transmission..
What kind of P.O are you, if you dont know that is is prohibitted BY LAW and therefore illegal, to transmit election result ELECTRONICALLY.....even after your (INEC) Chairman said Servers have been taken offline, , just before the elections?x

l think all P.O's and RATECH like you who transmitted election result electronically, should write down their details, so INEC can give them COMPENSATION for a good job.
grin grin grin
PoliticsRe: It’s wrong to say results of presidential Poll were not transmitted - INEC Tech by Daboomb: 5:11pm On Jul 08, 2019
Buckubuck:
You still don't understand do you? He never said he transmitted the result. He said his role is to work with APOs when they have issues with the SCR and part of his training includes issues that may come up during transmission of results. There's another thread where the APO said they transmitted results. This RATECH's testimony is to establish the ability of the SCR to transmit results electronically and the intent of INEC to do that during elections.
Please now? huh

- Do you agree that it is the 2015 Electoral law that guided this 2019 election?

- Do you agree that that law PROHIBITS (makes it illegal) to transmit electoral Results by electronic means (SCR to Server)?

- Do you agree that INEC said, before the Election, that it will not be transmitting election results ELECTONICALLY, because Mr. president did not sign the amended Bill (which alows electronic transmission) into Law?

- Do you agree that anything done, that is prohibitted by LAW, is illegal, nul and void and of no-effect?


If you agree with all the above, then whatever anyone says concerning that past election, is NULL and VOID and of No-effect.
A Court does not give legality to actons that are Null and Void before the law, ab initio.


I dont know why most of the youngers ones of today (not all of them o) dont sit back and reason about an issue, apply the law and then see the outcome? They just like to argue blindly!
When they were arguing on the Adelek (Osun's case), l told them that his basis for going to court is faulty and he will lose, because he was not challenging the outcome of the election in his appeal, but was challenging whenther the "absence of one of the Appeal court's Electoral Appeal Judges" is not enough grounds to invalidate the judgement given.
Did he not lose?

As sure as daylight, Atiku has lost this case because he is anchoring his appeal on an illegality, something prohibitted by the Electoral Law 2015
Please bookmark my post, cross check when the judgement is delivered and you dont even need to thank me.
PoliticsRe: It’s wrong to say results of presidential Poll were not transmitted - INEC Tech by Daboomb: 4:59pm On Jul 08, 2019
tech18:
This RATECH doesn't know his job oooh


The main job of RATECH is to troubleshoot ,replace and reconfigure the card reader if any technical issues erupts.

E-collation was part of the training manual and even the card reader.But NOBODY did any e_collation ,because it was not supported by law.


I believe there are many people that served as RATECHs,POs and APPs here
The RATECH guy suddenly assume the role he was not employed for an turned himself to a presiding officer. shocked shocked shocked
I tell you, that RATECH guy just bought himself a Kirikiri jail uniform. grin grin
PoliticsRe: It’s wrong to say results of presidential Poll were not transmitted - INEC Tech by Daboomb: 4:54pm On Jul 08, 2019
blank:
Is that not what Atiku is trying to prove? That INEC acted outside the law by appointing RATECH and using them to illegally transmit data electronically?
Not so Sir!

INEC basis of defense is that IT DID NOT TRANSMIT nor Authorise anyone to TRANSMIT Election results ELECTRONICALLY ......which is something prohitted by the Elelctoral Act 2015 (the law in effect and guiding the 2019 elections).

So, even if Atiku and his team can prove that election results were transmitted electronically, (which is like proving that God does not exist!), the best that can happen is that all those who did so, will go to jail for breaking the law but INEC itself has said it before the election that OUR SERVES HAVE BEEN TAKEN OFFLINE (synonymous to a shutdown) because we cant transmit election result electronically, as it is forbidden by law.

Kenturkey048:
[b]me personally don't know what point inec is tryna prove
..our ward consisted 23 pooling units and we all transmitted result electronically when we got the the RAC,with the help of the RATECH guy posted with us ..we had to sleep over till the next morning which was Sunday just to get network by midnight ..
if you "transmit" election results electornically, it does not take a computer genius to know that if that Server is shut down, your "transmission" will not be DELIVERED and it is as good as "lost in transmission".[/b] grin grin grin
PoliticsRe: It’s wrong to say results of presidential Poll were not transmitted - INEC Tech by Daboomb: 4:48pm On Jul 08, 2019
decub:
At a point, I stopped following the electoral law as amended because of the delay in signing it into law. But I know that this is what the amendment look like so the issue of the 2016 verdict might not also hold; that is, if it was later signed into law.
Insertion of a new subsection (1A)
and amendment to subsection (5)

The insertion of the new subsection
1A mandates the Commission to keep
a Register of Voters as the National
Register of Voters in its National
Headquarters and other locations as
it may determine. It also provides for
the keeping of the Voters Register in
an electronic format in INEC’s central
database, as well as in manual, printed
or hard copy format.


Now the issue of 'the exact role of these technicians' comes to mind.

If there's ever a RATECH, then there should be some kinda synergy. It's either they transmit a unanimous result as agreed by all other officers or they transmit exactly what the presiding officer announced (should announce).
Thank you very much for dealing "on facts".

However, it is unfortunate that the Amended Electoral Bill, was NEVER SIGNED INTO LAW by Mr. President ..........so, it is the 2015 Electoral Act that is still the "guiding valid Law"!

And that Law says it is PROHIBITTED TO TRANSMIT ELECTION RESULTS ELECTRONICALLY.
That is why l think this RATECH has just put himself into jeopardy. undecided undecided
PoliticsRe: It’s wrong to say results of presidential Poll were not transmitted - INEC Tech by Daboomb: 4:44pm On Jul 08, 2019
garfield1:
The actual elections and transmission were done with legally recognized staffs
Peeps dont seem to understand that "there is a legal reason" why INEC Rules state that ONLY Presiding Officers (PO) can transmit results! grin grin

They are Full/PERMANENT INEC staff, accountable to INEC as an Institution of government!
Do you think a Permanent INEC staff would come to court to give evidence against his own organisation, for the benefit of those suing his organisation?
PoliticsRe: It’s wrong to say results of presidential Poll were not transmitted - INEC Tech by Daboomb: 4:40pm On Jul 08, 2019
OyiboOyibo:
Can you hear yourself idiot, you just wasted you time and MB writing gibberish just to get likes and shares from APC e-rats... Did the guy employed himself?
No need to be abusive or insulting..........it only TENDS TO confirms two things about you no one knows previously:

1) Intellectually defective and unable to make logically sound arguments

2.) Very defective parental Upbringing!


But l am willing to cut you some slack and let that insult pass unnoticed.
PoliticsRe: It’s wrong to say results of presidential Poll were not transmitted - INEC Tech by Daboomb: 4:37pm On Jul 08, 2019
tuniski:
Joke
I wont call you DUMB but l think you will have been better-served, if you rebut my arguements, is more logically sound, legally valid arguements of yours.

We are all learning from each other. undecided
PoliticsRe: It’s wrong to say results of presidential Poll were not transmitted - INEC Tech by Daboomb: 4:35pm On Jul 08, 2019
chinedu234:
For the sake of legal arguments,which law empowers inec to make rules for conducts required for smooth elections.
INEC does not make rules.....INEC follows RULES already SINGED in to LAW (Electoral Act 2015).

As long as whetever INEC does, is supported by the contents of that valid law, INEC is safe and sound, irrespective of how any of us here feels about it.
grin grin
PoliticsRe: It’s wrong to say results of presidential Poll were not transmitted - INEC Tech by Daboomb: 4:32pm On Jul 08, 2019
decub:
Well, the Electoral Act provides for the appointment of any other staff of the commission.

It went on to grant INEC powers to delegate authority to any staff (ad hoc or permanent) so RATECH might not be illegal.

If there is a RATECH (in the first place) appointed by the commission, trained by the commission and working for the commission under some specific instruction/guideline, then needless to call them illegal workers as the law already gave them such powers.
He is certainly not an illegal "adhoc worker" of INEC.
(He is not a Staff though, staffing goes beyond "employment", even if not adhoc, it involves "probation and confirmation of that employment"wink

he will be mor eproperly defined as an "Adhoc Employee" of INEC.

But the crux of the matter here is that INEC, which reserves the right to stipulate the the duties, responsibilities and SCOPE of SUTIES" of anybody it hires, albeit temporarily or permanently, has said that this "RATECH" employee has gone beyond his "SCOPE OF ASSIGNED DUTIES", if he actually "transmit results electronically" to a supposed INEC Server!

This RATECH might also he opening himself to jail time, for contravening the Electoral Act, which forbids the transmission of election results, ELECTORNICALLY.
I just hope, in his zeal to support a "partisan policy" (he is Igbo and we know where the allegiance of most Igbos lie, between APC and PDP), he wont land himself in jail, after the election Petition has been decided, because he is making his testimony ON OATH!


If it is true testimony => he breaks the Electoral Act 2015 => JAIL TIME
If it is false testimony => he is guilty of lying to the Court under Oath (Perjury) => JAIL TIME

It takes a really stupid individual, to emesh yourself into this kind of "power play" by Politicians, no matter how much they promise you!
PoliticsRe: It’s wrong to say results of presidential Poll were not transmitted - INEC Tech by Daboomb: 4:18pm On Jul 08, 2019
muykem:
Olanipekun is too sound. He has killed the evidence of this witness without struggle. INEC guidelines didn't recognize registration area technicians simple.
Buhari's Lawyers reminded this INEC "adhoc staff" that INEC has "No Designation" in its record, for the designation he was claiming for himself => You are just acting above yourself, giving yourself title and actions you are not authorised to do! (Even if you transmitted results, it was at your personal behest) Chai! grin grin

Not only that., let us assume you actully "transmitted result"!
INEC reminded him that only a Presiding officer is empowered to "transmit result" so whatever result you transmitted was "unauthorised and invalid".

Finally, if the Electoral Act has not been amended nor signed into Law, and the current Electoral Act PROHIBITS the Electronic transmission of results, whatever result transmitted electorally, is still NULL and VOID because a Law Court would not "recognise or give authority| to an ILLEGALITY.

Honestly, the Supreme Court Judges should stop these carricature and shennanigans they are doing with tax-payers Money, they already know what the outcome of this Atiku's legal charade will be...........they should just go straight to the point.


We told "Twerking Senator" Adeleke back then that he should stop his "legal charade" but he wont listen, now that he had been beaten 5-2 at the Supreme Court, he is congratulating Oyetola!......after wasting the time of the Court, time that could have been used to decide other worthy cases that involve the lives of people.
HealthRe: Trader Caught Spraying Sniper Insecticide On Stockfish Meant For Sale (Photos) by Daboomb: 4:06pm On Jul 08, 2019
desiredhome:
This thing is not new in our society, learnt that that is what they use to prevent insects from the grains, even in beans we eat.
The truth is with the increasing rate of cancer and other strange illnesses, it's believe that most of them are from what we eat.
Some market women will always mix the local palm oil with colors just for more profits not minding the danger it could cause
I bought ordinary banana and was perceiving carbite from the peels, I understand they use carbite to force reap both banana and plantain, which is very dangerous to human health.
Not new?, as in when did it start?
'Sniper' itself, is a recent invention so stop trying to justify this nonsense.
There was no product in Nigerian market, called Snipper as recent as 2010. If you have any record of such, provide it.

It is 'ASH' they use in preserving Beans in the past, until recently when they discovered it is easier and faster to use Snipper, not minding whether it is killing people, causing Cancer, Stomach upsets or other mild diseases, depending on the "unregulated amount" one fool decides to spray on the foodstuff.


Why is it that it is only in Nigeria, and only Abokis do this 'poisoning with Snipper' stuuf on foodstuffs?
HealthRe: Trader Caught Spraying Sniper Insecticide On Stockfish Meant For Sale (Photos) by Daboomb: 4:01pm On Jul 08, 2019
sevo:
This ode is trying to kill human beings all in the name of killing insects
Na Aboki now, wetin you dey expect? grin grin grin

I dont know why NAFDAC is not active in these areas, confisticating all contaminated wares?

The other time, it was also an Aboki, using Sniper to remove insects from raw beans....beans that humans will eat!
And it is in lagos and the South of Nigeria they do all these nonsense, they wont try it Up-North.
undecided undecided

"Southerners" sef no dey try, why can you all depend on Aboki for your food and Meat?
What if they just decide to poison you all with adequate quantity of Sniper in your foodstuffs, as revenge for refusing RUGA? shocked shocked huh huh huh
Those who know, will know.
undecided
CrimeRe: Aliyu Tijjani Dies In Kyrgyzstan: Nigerian Lecturer Mobbed In Racist Attack by Daboomb: 5:31pm On Jul 05, 2019
Tolexander:
Na wetin e go do for Kyrgyzstan?

Kyrgyzstan of all places?

Nigerians can travel to hustle o.

It is high time we let our people know that though Nigeria is not so good, but the situation is better than the situation in many countries
We should also let them know that "Nationalsim" (That is a Diplomatic way to describe extreme RCISM), is on the rise in the Western/Caucasian World!~

Some places are a COMPLETE NO-NO for you, as a Black Man, no tto mention a Nigerian!
See what haeppned in Libya recently......Warlord bombs Refugee camp filled with black refugees, then the Camp Security opened fire on those who did not die and were trying to runaway!

These Arabs and Arabic-Europeans in Eastern Europe are bloody racists.
PoliticsRe: Herdsmen Hail Suspension Of Ruga Settlements by Daboomb: 12:12pm On Jul 04, 2019
Debaiz:
No be wetin the FG Dey talk be dat. Must it be Fulani that will occupy the RUGA?


The FG even wants to give them money for it instead of using the state money but everyone started making noise.


What people failed to realize is that once the RUGA is established(which can be dominated by indigenes of the state) the following will start taking effect

1. Fulani will no more have monopoly on cattle rearing cos you can’t establish a federal project in my state and import foreigners.


2. The states can effectively ban open grazing with the support of the FG to protect the local RUGA. Then Fulani would stop moving around and killing innocent people.


Instead of state governor to negotiate that they will be the one to give license to the RUGA settlers and in the process of granting license, they deny the Fulani license to the RUGA and they rather grant it to their citizens and have the Fulani as tenants that can be evicted anytime. Then they can enact anti open grazing laws.


We no Dey think for this country. I swear
Not at all.
What the fed Govt is saying is a completely different FULANI RUGA.
it will be populated By ONLY Fulanis, even if it is within a christian city, it will be Islamic and Sharia compliant (Your hands and head is in danger!), and these Fulanis are not even Nigerians but their Cousins from all over West Africa.


As we have seen over the last few years, these brand foreign Fulanis are very violent and ungodly! No evil is beyond them.
And with the passage of time these violent foreigners will be using the same violence that the people of Benue, Zamfara, Plateau, Southern kaduna, etc have been subjected to, to eject other people around their RUGA, expanding it more and more and building it into a Fulani City (Dont forget it will have houses, roads, hospitals and every other thing a city needs!

It has happned in Ladunga, Kaduna state. go and find out what happened there.

There is a Proverb that says "Dont smell what you dont intend to eat".
The whole of Sambissa Forest is more than enough for any stupid RUGA of Buhari.
But the solution to the Fulani nonsense is RANCHING, as a Privately funded Business with low/zero interest rates from Agric Banks.
Killing People and RUGA are not alternatives or mutually exlusives.
The Ranches in Europe and Americas, Brazi and Argentina were not established to compensate foreign, murderous Fulanis ...they were established as a Business and have being making money since day one
.
PoliticsRe: Herdsmen Hail Suspension Of Ruga Settlements by Daboomb: 12:01pm On Jul 04, 2019
GoTV:
sad As a born again Christian who is meant to speak the truth at all times, i think we Christians cum southerners has overblown the good intentions of president Buhari on this issue of Ruga settlement. We complain of how Fulani herdsmen are destroying our farms and killing people without facts, yet we we reject a program meant to isolate cattle herders in a confined location nationwide. Before we blab further, let us remember that the Fulanis are Nigerians like us and the Nigerian constitution guarantees them freedom of movement and doing business nationwide. If an igbo man can have multiple shops in Ladipo, Alaba, kano and other places, why can't we live peacefully with the Fulanis like we tolerated the igbos who are the most traveled tribe in Nigeriahuh I hope we Christians have a rethink about this so we can have lasting peace sad
I have gone through most of your post and it is so COINCIDENTAL that you ALWAYS start your posts with "I am a Christian".

Like many people have told you over and over again, that line does not sell anymore.
You are not even a true Muslim.
You have been unmasked as a satanic Jihadist so stop IMPERSONATING Christians.


Be a man and be bold to defend whatever you believe and whoever you are.
Vile nuisance like you are worse that Cockroaches.
Let me use this my Ibo-made shoe to crush that youe brainless, sewer-cocroah head.
.......................................................................................................................................


At the bolded, [b]rewarding FOREIGNERS who Buhari imported into Nigeria, to kill indigenes in Benue, Plateau, Zamfara, e.t.c and then take over their Ancestral land IS NOT HOW TO SOLVE A PROBLEM, IF BUHARI'S INTENTIONS ARE GENUINE.

Let their Foreign, imported Fulanis from Mali, Gambia, Guinea, Senegal, e.t.c TAKE BANK LOAN (even at Zero interest rate) to BUY LAND AS A COPERATIVE in Sokoto, Kano, Katsina and other fringe States that practice cattle rearing or use SAMBISA Forest and RANCH THEIR CATTLES THERE!

People of the Middle Belts and Southern Nigeria are Farmers and if they want to BUY CATTLE FEEDS from the South/Middle Belt, they should order for it ONLINE (dont even come down there grin ) and it would be delivered to them via Train loads.

If they also want to sell cattle to other parts of Nigeria, they should move the cattles from the ranches into Train or Trucks and deliver them to the South.

That way, no one will be stealing another person's land or burning their villages or slaughtering their families[/b].

When Buhari, his interior Minister Dambazzau, his IG of Police, his Director of DSs and his Military Chiefs refuse to arrest these Foreign Fulanis, despite their carrying AK47 openly, killing villagers enmasse, we knew they had a "grand plan" to steal other people's land.

I have given Mr. President the solution now let us wait for his next sinister plan
. undecided undecided
PoliticsRe: Herdsmen Hail Suspension Of Ruga Settlements by Daboomb: 10:43am On Jul 04, 2019
I think Nigerians need to pay attention very closely. to this deceptive Buhari President and his foreign Fulanis.

Let me quote what this MACBAN terrorist leader said
“We don’t need Ruga settlements. Every Fulani man in Nigeria has a Ruga. The entire scheme is political because even the Fulani leaders and traditional rulers were not consulted,” Mr Bodejo was quoted by Leadership newspaper as saying.

“What we need is a return to our grazing areas. Facilities should be provided in them so that the herders can graze their cattle because the Ruga issue is political and does not help the Fulanis in the country
Did we notice that his grouse was that "the Presidency DID NOT INFORM his Association?
We all know this is a big lie. He says this only to save face.

Did we notice that the Fed Govt just "suspended" the RUGA Cattle Colonies?
They did not abolish the idea which means they can sneak it back anytime!


Did we notice that the Bodejo Bororo Cattle terrorist said what they want is a return to "Grazing Areas"?
What this means is that they still want the Buhari govt to carve out GRAZING ROUTES (large chinks of land from the North to Lagos, through all states!) for them, on other people's land!


No one should get carried away, these Foreign Fulanis means business and all they want is to grab our ancestral lands.
The local Fulani has always been around other Nigerians for decades, they dont cerry AK47 and dont burn down whole villages.
Buhari is just using the Fulanis form Mali, Senegal, Gambia, Guinea, et.c, to grab land and plant them into Nigeria.

The ONLY SOLUTION that can and will work is for the LOCAL Fulanis to embrace RANCHING at LOCAL level.
What this means is that they should create RANCHES in the North of Nigeria (since that is where Cattle Farming is the main occupation), in places like Kano, Kaduna, Sokoto, etc.
This would be large areas of land where they can keep there Cattle, house and feed them, just like we have in advance countries.
If any Fulani wants to buy land to make a Ranch anywhere else, they would negotiate with the indigene owners of the land to establish such Ranch, for the Fulani Herdsmen
.


We should also be very aware of some Governors, for personal interest, who wants to donate the land of their people to Buhari's foreign Fulanis.
Governors must be reminded that State land is not their personal property, they cannot do and undo as they like with it.
They can only appropriate land if and when the local indigene owners of such appropriation approve of it


Let us all be vigilant, these foreigners and their sponsors, especially in the Presidency, are not done yet.
HealthRe: Man Discovers A Lady Has Breast Lump During Sex by Daboomb: 10:12am On Jul 04, 2019
vastolord4:
Your a kind man! Some guy would press till the lump burst in the boobs sef
Let us just hope that 20years down the line, he is not accused of Sexual assault because she withdrew her consent mid-way into the action! undecided undecided

Based on his online admission, he will be in jail faster than he can imagine.
PoliticsRe: Senator Abbo Lied About Being Physically Assaulted – Guardian by Daboomb: 6:24pm On Jul 03, 2019
Senator Abbo: “This is a political season and now I am now a politician, before I was not a politician but now the reality of the fact is that I am now a politician and politicians are not people who are liked, they exhume things of 20 years and they hang it on their neck now,” he said.

“As I said before we will release a robust response to everything, and[b] we will also ask for the entire video to be released since they have the video. We will seat and discuss the video[/b]. Just to be clear that video was taken long before now and it was released just as this point.”
One has to be extremely stupid, like this HIV Senator, to make the above statements!

So, because he is now a Politcian, he can assault others and go scot-free ?
Who told this daft m0r0n that Politicians are not liked? If they are not liked, then who votes for them? Ghosts?

Someone should please tell this daft Senator that the owner of the video does not owe him "the provision of the Video", it is the Victims evidence that she was assaulted by Abbo.

Abbo should provide his own video to back up his claim, as far as the victim is concerned, that was all they have, that was all they could get from their camera and no one can force them to "manufacture more". End of story.

The fool even said "We will seat and discuss the video"?
Sit with who? The Judge in a law Court?
Yeeye dey smell
PoliticsRe: Assault: Senator Abbo Shuns Senate Plenary by Daboomb: 6:14pm On Jul 03, 2019
doctokwus:
Shut up.
When he sued the Navy for denying him enlistment due to his status,what happened to the naval authorities or personnel?
Its also a crime to hide your status from your employers.
Did he inform his senatorial district he was positive or don't you know that could have informed part of the decision they made while voting?
Did he inform those he has been having sexual liasons with he is positive or you think you can just go around hiding your status,but turnaround to claim discrimination later?
If you lack knowledge,seek it,instead of making a fool of yourself in cyberspace,all in bid to childishly appear socially correct.
You are correct!
I am sure their is a jail sentence for sleeping with someone, knowing you are HIV_positive and not informing them ab initio.
That would amount to willfully infecting them with a deadly disease without their consent.


The Senate President and all other Senators of repute in the House must riseup above party partisanship and suspend this brutal animal, relieve him of any police protection and allow the Police to charge him to court for serious assault.

All the NGO' and Human Rights association that have been falling over themselves on COZA matter should also be active on this one because it is on video and not twenty years old story. Carry Placard on the gate of the Senate, his house and anywhere he is seen until the Justice System/police do something about this brazen assault.
PoliticsRe: Cattle Colony: Cross River Has No Land For Ruga Settlement – PANDEF Tells FG by Daboomb: 6:50pm On Jul 01, 2019
Benekruku:
[s][/s]

I am a Fulani Dunderhead
Fixed. undecided
PoliticsRe: Cattle Colony: Cross River Has No Land For Ruga Settlement – PANDEF Tells FG by Daboomb: 6:48pm On Jul 01, 2019
Softhands:
liar...ogun State and Oyo State have lands for Ruga settlements!
STOP msrepresenting others, it wont add food to your table.

Not one single state in the South West has approved any land for Cattle Colony.
This matter transcends "party or tribe". it is a matter of "EXISTENCIAL THREAT" to the whole Middle belt and Southern Nigeria
.
PoliticsRe: Cattle Colony: Cross River Has No Land For Ruga Settlement – PANDEF Tells FG by Daboomb: 6:41pm On Jul 01, 2019
Benekruku:
[s][/s]

Ogun Lakaaye kee you!
Shut your trap there, you Fulani terrorist pretender.
Go and set up you stupid Cattle Colony in Mali or Senegal where your progenitors came from.
Indigenes has "our land", get that into your thick skull though l understand that nomads like you cant figure-out where your oen "our land" is.
grin grin
PoliticsRe: Cattle Colony: Cross River Has No Land For Ruga Settlement – PANDEF Tells FG by Daboomb: 6:35pm On Jul 01, 2019
PrecisionFx:
m



The grand patron of the murderous Herdsmen asked them for land
One must also wonder WHY they are hiding from naming the TWELVE STATES they said have given them land for this Cattle Colonies, a.k.a RUGA (a Fulani word!)
Why do such thing in SECRECY, if it has genuine intentions?
So, Buhari wants to bribe some usless Governor, to give him RUGA land, behind the knowledge of the indigenes who own the land?

INDIGENES should be ready for a very, very serious PROTEST, even against their Governor and any Governor that gives Buhari and his terrorist, Fulani herdsmen Cattle Colony on our land, MUST BE IMPEACHED otherwise, the indigene citizens of that state must make the state ungovernable for him until he is impeached.
PoliticsRe: Cattle Colony: Cross River Has No Land For Ruga Settlement – PANDEF Tells FG by Daboomb: 6:10pm On Jul 01, 2019
Born2Breed:
ANYONE with sense must read this.
Hahhaaa! grin grin
i was the one that posted that peice this morning https://www.nairaland.com/5274503/jonathan-asake-fulani-converted-ruga/2
but @blackthunder is not giving me credit for it. huh

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 (of 158 pages)