₦airaland Forum

Kay17:
I don't remember giving away my credentials as a biologist or that kind, hence I wonder why i am roped into a thread about biology?

Emmalot121:
This is what I was trying to say, the world started from something and not nothing, nonexistence couldn't start our world, this something is God.

Emmalot121:
I used vacuum in order to derive nothing. Vacuum and nothing are two different things, vacuum is the absence of air molecules, nothing is the act of nonexistence. We also have to know that we can't use any test to test whether nothing did start the universe, since we need to use something to bring out nothing. All we can use is logic.

Sibrah:
Those in heaven(beings) are still in line so qualify to be in heaven. Thought they have a choice. The case of humans who av bneen through earth is diff. They are locked to KIngdom 'network'.
Our being on earth is a tramsaction place where we have tje choice to buy 'into' the narrow and or wide path.

Sibrah:
All beings have the tendency to act in two diff directions, without this power of choice we will be as robots.

Emmalot121:
Atheists argue that life popped out of nothing, therefore God is not needed in the equation. They are quick at using M and B word. They say Earth is billions of years old and man is millions of years old and evolved from tiny organisms. They have refused to give us detailed reasons why it took so long and every process man took, if possible catalyze the whole process, subsequently giving us a human being.
Let me use the experiment that Galileo Galilei used to stun the entire world of science; the experiment that every object falls at same rate when air resistance is absent. To do this, we have to pump out the air to give us a vacuum (though logic tells us the vacuum is something, the absence of air molecules gives us a perfect example of nothing since we are only concerned about the air molecules and its emptiness.)
Through this experiment, we see that for nothing(absence of air molecules) to exist, something must have triggered it. What if we want to get our air molecules back(a very important component of life itself)? Should we wait for a few days, months, years or centuries for air molecules to pop out of nothing? A sane mind will realise that something can't come out of nothing but nothing can come out of something. This proof singlehandedly shows that the genesis of the 'faith' of atheists is shaky.
Since its now being proofed that life started from something and not nothing (even nothing must come from something,) we can then try to highlight the properties and characteristics this something must possess:
1) Must be called God because everything was created by him because without him was anything made that was made.
2) He must be infinite because he is infinity, he came from infinity, therefore he has no source, neither can he have an end because he is infinite.
3) He must be all powerful and infinitely intelligent. The works of his hands are sufficient proof.
4) He must possess properties beyond normal, properties beyond our wisdom e.g an invisible Spirit. People will wish to argue this one but Hebrews 11:3 says: Through faith, we understand that the worlds were framed by the word of God, so that "things which are seen are not made of things which do appear". This applies to everything in the universe, including you and this knowledge is applied in the making of televisions and phones.

Emmalot121:
I have the proof of God's existence

Emmalot121:
These are pointless and baseless. The complexity of the eyes I think should bother us more than how we wished it to be. Even if these are actually defects, it should rather amaze you how its still possible we can see, even with these perceived 'defects'.

Emmalot121:
The same way the complexity of life was identified before attributing it to God. Tell me, can an unintelligent process create this masterpiece?

Emmalot121:
Atheism is faith, can you prove the nonexistence of God? Faith is the substance of things hoped for, the evidence of things not seen. Atheists hope that God doesn't exist though you can't prove his nonexistence. You hope afterlife doesn't exist though you aren't sure it doesn't. Back your faith, before critiquing that of others.

Emmalot121:
Have you seen why I said atheism and science can't go together? If Newton didn't reason that for objects to fall, a force must be pulling it towards itself, where in the world would the priceless knowledge of gravity and its laws come from? Apply this to what we are discussing.

Emmalot121:
Atheism and science can't go together.

Emmalot121:
If you can't answer it, then that means there is still possibility of God doing it. In fact, it is impossible that something as sophisticated as human eyes was done through evolution.

Maamin:
I dont feel even the slightest twitch of neuron about them, Their lives, their choices, their consequences.

Maamin:
Who shove the believe in God to your face and restricted your right? Get real jor!



Restrict kor restrict ni

Maamin:
Of-course you bother way too much on something that does not exist.

When you start creating thread about cinderella,snowwhite,sleeping beauty,repunzel etc..then I will take you serious.

Maamin:
Removing the foundation of what exactly?..something that does not exist?

*unbelievable*

Hiswordxray:
You still haven't prove anything.
Or are your thought an action?

Maamin:
yet you are always here on religion section attacking everything about God/gods.

smh!

Maamin:
i said


i repeat a yes/no will be fine

Maamin:
Do you believe in God..the scripture I quoted from?

A yes or no will be fine

Hiswordxray:
Thought is a noun and you still haven't prove to me that people has thought.
If you could prove to me that people have thought then I would prove to you the existence of God.
We can keep going in circles of foolish talk or we could start speaking the truth. For example you know that God exist.

Maamin:
the meek shall inherit the earth..matt.5:5

shadowgwalker:
you claim to know things and events but your 'big' brain tells you Jesus was a wanderer with no food or accommodation. see how ungrateful and pathetic you sound? it's so annoying trying to argue with your kind, you think you have interesting facts, even the devil is scornfully laughing at you. the reason you are alive and working 'freely ' is because of that same 'Jesus that was wandering with no food and accommodation '.
Time will tell!
we will know if it's your research and technology that extends life beyond the '20years lifespan of yours '.

MAY THE GRACE OF GOD BE WITH YOU!

Hiswordxray:
Bla bla bla bla...
This didn't prove anything.

Show me a tangible evidence that people think.

Hiswordxray:
You still haven't prove that others could think and you are still deceiving yourself that others could think just because you can think.

Prove to me that I am thinking and I would prove to you that God exist.

Hiswordxray:
Well I could also say I don't believe you have thought. You can keep tricking yourself that you have thought or keep telling me that just because you have thought I also have thought. Or maybe you should honestly bear the burden of proof.

Can you proof to me that every human being can think in their mind just like you?

Hiswordxray:
If you tell me what you were thinking about this morning when you woke up would I be able to verify it?
Just because I am not able to verify it does it mean you were not thinking this morning and your mind doesn't exist?
Or tell me, is there a way to induce and/or test your thought?