₦airaland Forum

He had a bad health, he prayed over it, God asked him to resign, how about that? What's all the fus about? The same hypocrites here would believe and starve and give their last kobo to one pastor or 'man of god' if he tells them god asked him to buy a private jet.

kmcutez: Where did his strength go to? What of the Phil 4:13
which says, I can bless all altars boys through christ who stregthens me.

I had a cute reply for you but thAnk your ancestors the mod hid my post. Go clean up the cob webs in your brain, you sound like you got a big fat one in your throat.

The 2-0 scoreline was a big disappointment. I wish it ended 1-0 or 2-1. It won't be easy at all.

El Guapo: ^^ [color=#0066ff]LmAo - Not even double Posting, a Quintet Posting!

Operation Coogar must Listen [/color]

lol. I only had a problem with my internet.

coogar: it wasn't ball-to-hand. i said even if we assume it was for argument's sake, jordi alba handled the ball before the milan player and it should have been a second freekick for milan. however, there was no intention from both players to handle the ball and the distance was too short for the players to react and keep their hands away. referee made the right call.

no no referee got it wrong.various factors are put into consideration not just a judgement of ball to hand or hand to ball.of course once a case of ball to hand is established as with both players in this case, then 2 arguments come into play. 1.is the arm away from the body? If no then there is definitely no unfair advantage for an unintentional handling of the ball and the referee plays the game on,but if yes then there might be an unfair advantage resulting from a mistakened handling of the ball then the official must stop play if such an advantage exists; the milan player not the barca player is the culprit here. 2.does the unintentional handling of the ball, with arm away from body or not direct the ball to an advantageous position to himself or him team mate? If no the referee then it's at the official's discretion to stop play or not, but if yes then the official must stop play. The milan player I also the guilty party here. So the referee needs to deploy his common sense next time. Common sense should be sacrosant to the officials in these extreme cases. He got it wrong.

coogar: it wasn't ball-to-hand. i said even if we assume it was for argument's sake, jordi alba handled the ball before the milan player and it should have been a second freekick for milan. however, there was no intention from both players to handle the ball and the distance was too short for the players to react and keep their hands away. referee made the right call.

no no referee got it wrong.various factors are put into consideration not just a judgement of ball to hand or hand to ball.of course once a case of ball to hand is established as with both players in this case, then 2 arguments come into play. 1.is the arm away from the body? If no then there is definitely no unfair advantage for an unintentional handling of the ball and the referee plays the game on,but if yes then there might be an unfair advantage resulting from a mistakened handling of the ball then the official must stop play if such an advantage exists; the milan player not the barca player is the culprit here. 2.does the unintentional handling of the ball, with arm away from body or not direct the ball to an advantageous position to himself or him team mate? If no the referee then it's at the official's discretion to stop play or not, but if yes then the official must stop play. The milan player I also the guilty party here. So the referee needs to deploy his common sense next time. Common sense should be sacrosant to the officials in these extreme cases. He got it wrong.

coogar: it wasn't ball-to-hand. i said even if we assume it was for argument's sake, jordi alba handled the ball before the milan player and it should have been a second freekick for milan. however, there was no intention from both players to handle the ball and the distance was too short for the players to react and keep their hands away. referee made the right call.

no no referee got it wrong.various factors are put into consideration not just a judgement of ball to hand or hand to ball.of course once a case of ball to hand is established as with both players in this case, then 2 arguments come into play. 1.is the arm away from the body? If no then there is definitely no unfair advantage for an unintentional handling of the ball and the referee plays the game on,but if yes then there might be an unfair advantage resulting from a mistakened handling of the ball then the official must stop play if such an advantage exists; the milan player not the barca player is the culprit here. 2.does the unintentional handling of the ball, with arm away from body or not direct the ball to an advantageous position to himself or him team mate? If no the referee then it's at the official's discretion to stop play or not, but if yes then the official must stop play. The milan player I also the guilty party here. So the referee needs to deploy his common sense next time. Common sense should be sacrosant to the officials in these extreme cases. He got it wrong.

coogar: it wasn't ball-to-hand. i said even if we assume it was for argument's sake, jordi alba handled the ball before the milan player and it should have been a second freekick for milan. however, there was no intention from both players to handle the ball and the distance was too short for the players to react and keep their hands away. referee made the right call.

no no referee got it wrong.various factors are put into consideration not just a judgement of ball to hand or hand to ball.of course once a case of ball to hand is established as with both players in this case, then 2 arguments come into play. 1.is the arm away from the body? If no then there is definitely no unfair advantage for an unintentional handling of the ball and the referee plays the game on,but if yes then there might be an unfair advantage resulting from a mistakened handling of the ball then the official must stop play if such an advantage exists; the milan player not the barca player is the culprit here. 2.does the unintentional handling of the ball, with arm away from body or not direct the ball to an advantageous position to himself or him team mate? If no the referee then it's at the official's discretion to stop play or not, but if yes then the official must stop play. The milan player I also the guilty party here. So the referee needs to deploy his common sense next time. Common sense should be sacrosant to the officials in these extreme cases. He got it wrong.

coogar: it wasn't ball-to-hand. i said even if we assume it was for argument's sake, jordi alba handled the ball before the milan player and it should have been a second freekick for milan. however, there was no intention from both players to handle the ball and the distance was too short for the players to react and keep their hands away. referee made the right call.

no no referee got it wrong.various factors are put into consideration not just a judgement of ball to hand or hand to ball.of course once a case of ball to hand is established as with both players in this case, then 2 arguments come into play. 1.is the arm away from the body? If no then there is definitely no unfair advantage for an unintentional handling of the ball and the referee plays the game on,but if yes then there might be an unfair advantage resulting from a mistakened handling of the ball then the official must stop play if such an advantage exists; the milan player not the barca player is the culprit here. 2.does the unintentional handling of the ball, with arm away from body or not direct the ball to an advantageous position to himself or him team mate? If no the referee then it's at the official's discretion to stop play or not, but if yes then the official must stop play. The milan player I also the guilty party here. So the referee needs to deploy his common sense next time. Common sense should be sacrosant to the officials in these extreme cases. He got it wrong.

coogar: you are not being truthful!
alba is as guilty as the milan player. the fact is both incidents are ball to hand. the milan player couldn't have done anything to the ricochet. letting the goal stand is the correct decision.

the very simple logic Is that if a 'ball to hand' incident gives an undue advantage like a scoring chance, then the referee has to blow his whitle. I think the officials don't even need a lesson from fifa on this. Btw I thought you said it wassnt a handball, now you say both incidents were balls to hands! So which?

AjanleKoko: Bro, no writing on the wall jare.
So what if we go out of this Champions League? We won the 2006 edition, the next one we were bundled out by Liverpool in the round of 16. The one right after we got to the semis, and lost to United. Pep wasn't even the coach then.

Barcelona remains the issue in world footie. If we lose, it makes news. If we win, it makes news (that we were supported by UEFA or something).
Let the bus parkers keep parking bus jare. FC Barcelona will keep doing what it does. Shikena.

Very soon some managers will start putting it in their CV that they were able to beat Barcelona. Like Neil Lennon of Celtic. Doesn't change much for Barcelona, but changes a lot for him, doesn't it?

its amazing how its almost a public holiday whenever we lose a game. Bus parkers will come and go, we shall win some we shall lose same but if we keep on keeping the ball and stick to our philosophywe shall always be the standard.

coogar: how did the decision go against you even if we assume kevin constant handled the ball? can you not see jordi alba handled it befoire kevin constant even made any contact? if anything, it should be a second freekick to milan!

did alba handle the ball? Was his hand out of his body?did it have direct impact on the game?not every handball should be given. If constant had handled in the centre circle we probably wouldn't be having this discussion. constant's handball not only prevented the ball from going out of touch at a speed of 1 million meters per second but also directed the ball for a perfect shot at goal. Seriously coogar that was a very very big decision.

coogar: everyone thought it was hands because kevin constant raised his hands but the ball struck his face. the milan manager had no luxury of seeing the replay on the bench so he wouldn't have known what part of the body the ball struck. however, skysports zoomed on it to show the ball never touched the hand.

well the milan manager must have had to double check before admitting in his press conference. I don't think he comment on such without having the replay. Graham souness and a couple of guys just spoke about it on aljazeera sports less than an hour ago. I'd have to check out that sky sport zoom you talked about sha. Until then, no excuses for the loss, just pointing out that decision do go against us sometimes.

coogar: ball struck which outstretched arm? can you not see this gif?

https://i.minus.com/ibcKx36owXsO6H.gif

ok, I will upload the video iam looking at as soon as I can, maybe we then find out why the slight discrepancies in the uploads. I thought the whole world knew it was hands. Not even the milan coachee disputed.

coogar: the ball hit kevin constant in the face/head not his hands - go and watch the replay again. barcelona have no excuse!

no no the ball struck his out stretched arm. That is what I see in the replay. The milan coach said they got lucky with the decision some go agaainst you sometimes as well. The articles I've read on marca.com and goal.com and other sports tv and radio programme refer unequivocally to a hand ball. And then barca aint looking for an excuse, it's just a little pointer so that when it favours barca tomorrow, haters shouldn't lose their memories all of a sudden. No excuses.

nitlad: http://www.heraldscotland.com/sport/football/being-able-to-stop-barca-is-becoming-almost-as-predictable-as-the-catalans-themselves.20290826?_=8ff43d7ca2cf43a742557f16567acee7c051e24e

the official would argUe , the ball hit constant and was not intentional! That defies reason and common sense. The official had no common sense if hi argument is that it wasn't intentional. 1. There was a raised arm 2. The ball was going out for a goal kick. 3. The raised arm deflected the ball perfectly for a shot at goal. Btw, what's all this write up? Has losing to A C milan at the san siro suddenly become a scandal? The writer has probably been cooking some beef for so long(maybe a madrid fan, maybe a chelsea or man u fan) and just can't wait for a proper barca downfall before beginning to write these epistles.

Otses: The same RMD we know? Something seems to be amiss for sure.

rmd wey we know for where? This aint a movie girl.

usbcable: Best quote of the round.

but of course anything that has messi in it would always be the best in the world.

AjanleKoko: You bothered about that? We were just unlucky. Remember we got a really weird call in the game against Milan last year, and got a dubious penalty.
I would not blame that goal for the loss. It was a bad match/market

Haters are always going to hate anyway

AjanleKoko: You bothered about that? We were just unlucky. Remember we got a really weird call in the game against Milan last year, and got a dubious penalty.
I would not blame that goal for the loss. It was a bad match/market

Haters are always going to hate anyway

absolutely spot on! That how it has always been. Some for you some against you. My beef is with the losers who never see the decisions against barca. Let's just imagine barca equalised 2-2 last night with a hand ball like that, they will tell you it' platini' instruction.

aieromon: BALOTELLI: "I didn't participate today because of the laws of the CL but I do not know why Messi didn't participate.

that was exactly what they said against arsenal sometime ago and he came back and hit them with 4. And what did they say next? Nothing!

aieromon: BALOTELLI: "I didn't participate today because of the laws of the CL but I do not know why Messi didn't participate.

he just can't get messi's name out of his mouth!tell him if he gets half as marked as messi gets, he won't even partcipate in his own career!

I just hope that next time around when there is a handball in the 18 that directs the ball into our attackers boot to score, deliberate or incidental, the haters would see and reason beyond their tv sets and refrain from accussing uefa, even caf, even fifa, even obama, even goodluck, even the iaaf.

Johnpaul88: Poor game by us. We created very little in the final third. It 'll be very difficult for us to in through now. Not even an away goal to show and this is supposed to be our best line up.

its very difficult to create chances in the final third when there are at least 16 players in just that one third of the pitch. You don't succeed all the time.

Very solid defensive play from milan, there were no loop holes at all in that defence.

Except oscar was on some kind of substance, otherwise why would someone murder his girlfriend inside his own house? I would kill her in the bushes if I had to or have her wacked without any loose ends. There are a lot of assassins in sa who would do it for a dime even. Since there was no struggle, no assault he couldn't have lost his cool and done the shooting. A lot of things could happen, possibly he always heard her as she went to the bathroom at night but might not have heard on thAt fateful night and that could be the reason he didn't bother to check if she was in bed. I think it wasn't premeditated. He wouldn't kill her in his own home.

But for alexis messi would have had 2 assists and 2 goals. Goddamn, to the bench! with that dude.

usbcable: tight game.
tactically o.k.
wished we won actually
but a draw is still o.k
the second half is in old trafford
we will be there.
and we will play our game hopefully more accurately.

on another note
why did the ref not allow them play the last corner kick?

i think that van persie was trying to play smart, and the refknew that. van persie was delaying a little bit so that after he took the corner, the referee would stop the game twarting any probable madrid counter. the ref knew that, thats why he stopped the corner. it was an unfair decision nevertheless.

Artistree: If u were a female I'd have said you wear tribalipstick. Y u con dey talk wetin no dey Op mind na?

firstly i was responding to viewers' comments not the OP's comment, secondly i was only kiiidddiiing but apparently it aint funny, thirdly if you were a male i'd say you work out everyday with a lot of DUMBells.