₦airaland Forum

DlegendofGarden:
Sex is designed for married people

Horseshit.

AndroidAI:
There's nothing to prove.

It's proven already.

But since you are ignorant of such data, all you should have done is comfirm the data using that device you are holding.

But because you are a disgusting homophobe, you will prefer to stall and constitute nuisance.

You are an open book.

You are the one being escapist.

Anyone can say anything and then deceitfully demand that others should go on an errand to Google.

Let me also give you a counter-errand to show you just how silly what you're doing is.

Here is my statement: "It has been proven through experiments that there is no creature other than man which shows homosexual tendencies."

Now, please go to Google and find out if that is true or false. Start the errand.

Nitwit.

Glitcher:
stop using animals as reference.

Its actually not a bad argument to use the natural world as a reference point especially when talking about a natural urge like sex.

Animals walk naked too, should we also do that.

Some of us do. Many ancient societies certainly did. And in the modern world there are avowed nudists.

Some animals kill their mate after intercourse, should we also start to do that.

Many people into a certain type of fetish do this.

You are not an animal even if you don't know that yet.

We are a type of animal, just a higher type, with greater sentience and intelligence. And larger capacities in world perception.

Overall, however, I understand your point. We have the capacity to make distinctions which animals cannot. We can conceive of logic and ethics and morality in a way that animals cannot. Nevertheless, the points I have made above are just to help you see that we still do all those weird things to an extent.

AndroidAI:
If till now you are expecting me to do your job for you, you will wait till eternity.

If you really think its my job to prove or disprove a statement you made - you either didnt go to any school, or are simply nuts.
Its well known, in the immortal words of Christopher Hitchens, that anything stated without proof can be equally dismissed without proof.

Like i said, you stink of homophobia.

And you stink of lazy intellectual dishonesty and cowardice.

AndroidAI:
How do I prove my claim when it has already been proven?

All you needed to do was punch the right keywords and boom, evidence will be staring you at the face.

But no. You'd rather choose to be a nuisance.

You stink of homophobia.

You are just being silly. You cant make a claim and then begin to send others on an errand to prove or disprove it.

You are the one who made the claim. Why should I do your homework for you?

Since you are recommending Google, why cant you use it yourself to produce even one example?

Looney. Coward.

Flamemignon1:
Sexual preference and orientation are not the same buddy,lol.... that's on that,not saying more

Well we can rescue ourselves from being confused with words - suffice to say that I agree that a homosexual orientation can be natural for some people to the extent that its not an active choice, but the way they are born. The reason I believe this is because there are people with obvious hormonal imbalances or hormonal uniqueness. So for example you can see some women who are extremely masculine in their build up to the point of having a beard and hairy chests - and you can see some men who are very effeminate naturally. Some women have a higher degree of testosterone than normal and same goes with some men with oestrogen. It cannot be surprising to note that such people may have a tendency to same sex unions.

Such imbalances also sometimes have other implications -

"A fully grown male usually has an estradiol level of 10-40 picograms per milliliter (pg/ml) and an estrone level of 10-50 pg/ml. Although the male body needs estrogen to function properly, high estrogen levels can cause health problems such as gynecomastia, erectile dysfunction, or infertility."

https://www.news-medical.net/health/The-Role-of-Estrogen-in-Mene28099s-Health.aspx

Like I said,this banter can go on forever even with proof but you are in position to change or do shit

At least be intellectually honest. Dont make a claim then run away and try to send others to prove or disprove your random claim. Back up your statements with proof. Show me the homosexual lions, penguins and flamingoes you said exist. Its as simple as that, if you are actually a serious minded discussant.

Flamemignon1:
It's not an assertion, it's a fact whereas you are looking for a way to dispute that fact with no proof

Dont get it twisted bro, he who asserts must prove. That's standard. He made the assertion that up to 1,500 species practice homosexuality. I said, mention three. He cant.

Flamemignon1:
Wow,are you in denial? Moreover, homosexuality isn't a sexual preference, it's not chosen, it's an orientation created by different factors.

You guys are weird. Its obvious you are just being escapist. Who said anything about whether its a choice as opposed to an orientation? When I use the term "sexual preference" I actually mean orientation - thats the way a person may be oriented. His natural preference, simple. Understand one thing - and don't make assumptions - I am not one of those who believe sexual orientation is necessarily a choice. It is in most instances just natural.

From the looks of things, it's like you are in complete denial as you are looking for proof to assert your claim but I'm not gonna go in on a banter with you because guess what? You have no power neither are you in a position to change what has already been set by those who've worked on the field. I would rather accept facts from the people who have devoted their time,will power and knowledge to carry out that research than from you who have little to no knowledge on the field. Have a good day

This has nothing to do with denial. You guys are obviously the intellectually dishonest ones.

I asked the other chap to cite just three examples and he is speaking grammar. He said there are up to 1, 500 but he cant mention three. Rather he sends me on an errand to Google. He must be a joker.

As for you, you mentioned three (penguins, lions, flamingos) - and when asked to show us just one instance of such with these animals, again, grammar.

Look, anyone can say anything. Na you get your mouth. You can even claim that square-circles exist. Saying a thing is easy. Proving it is the serious part.

He who asserts must prove. That is the standard law of logic and science.

AndroidAI:
You are actually the lazy one.

You came across a claim and instead of verifying from the biggest search engine, you are asking me to list 3.

I don't like entertaining lazy folks.

This is stupid. It is elementary that he who asserts must prove. No serious person goes about making stupendous claims and then asking others to go and verify them.

I could just as well make a claim that there are animals who practice necrophilia, I could even say up to 10, 000 species do so. And if asked to mention just one, I would then accuse such a person of being lazy because he ought to use Google.

That is just cowardly and daft.

Flamemignon1:
Even if he told you, wouldn't you still have to use the search engine to verify his claim?

Maybe and maybe not. I actually would just look at the case he point outs and assess it for what it is.
It is lazy and cowardly in the extreme for him to assert that there are up to 1500 species that practice homosexuality and not be able to cite three.

Flamemignon1:
Wow, people still think like this in the 21st century? Bruh keep up with the times,penguin, flamingos and even lions expresses same sex behavior

That is simply not true. Can you kindly show me cases in point?

In doing this, please be careful to note a critical difference. Homosexuality is the preference for same sex sexual activity. We do not see animals that have such a preference - what we see is animals who, in extreme or unique circumstances, will "hump" anything. So for example, when my dog is on heat, he will even clamber onto my legs and begin to make sexual motions. He will do same to almost any moving thing in that moment. This is actually something more akin to masturbation than any kind of bestiality on its part.

In the same way, animals on heat can be observed exhibiting similar behavior. This is distinct and different from having a special preference for those of their own sex.

Again, another thing to be distinguished from same sex union is friendship. Some animals develop close bonds with others of their kind - and in many cases with completely different species. Those bonds are to be distinguished from a desire for the flesh of those of its own species and same sex.

Both examples above are not the same thing as homosexuality.

AndroidAI:
Don't you have Google?

This is the height of lazy cowardice. You make a bold claim - that there are up to 1500 species that practice homosexuality in nature. I did not ask you to list them all. I did not ask you to list half, or a quarter of them. I did not even ask for a hundred, or fifty, or ten. I did not even ask for five. I asked for three. And all you can do is refer me to Google.

You are obviously intellectually dishonest in the extreme.

AndroidAI:
In nature, we have counted over 1500 species that engage in homosexuality.

Please be so kind as to mention just three. Thank you.

wirinet:
I agree eve should be a heroine. Without her humans would still dumb animals wothout knowledge walking naked in the garden of Eden. There would not be sex and procreation and God would have to continuously molding clay to create more men, who would then need to have a rib removed to create corresponding women.

The Genesis account does not say that there would not have been sex and procreation - indeed, God appears to suggest the contrary:

26 And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness: and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth.

27 So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them.

28 And God blessed them, and God said unto them, Be fruitful, and multiply, and replenish the earth, and subdue it: and have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over every living thing that moveth upon the earth.

ganisucks:
Kikiki..
Why don't you wait till Monday. Or do you want me to tell you the truth? You won't like it.

Pls tell.

wirinet:
I cringe any time I read your advocacy for white interests and talking points, even much more than most known white extremists. You isolate issues from their real context in order angelize extreme right wing talking points and agenda and the demonize any black relate issue.

You take the George Floyd saga in isolation and causally attribute it to "lack of training lack of discipline, lack of oversight and questionable hiring practices in police departments", asking the blacks and the world to forget decades of racism they had undergone in the US.
You are asking blacks in the US to forget Amadou Diallo, who was shot 41 times by police officers in front of his house.
You are asking blacks in the US to forget about Oscar Grant,who was shot in the back with his hands tied behind his back by police officers, you are asking blacks for forget about Micheal Brown, Eric Gardner, Gary King Jr, and so many young men who were needlessly killed by white police officers.
And worst of all, you are saying that the civil right movement never happened, that police did not kill black youths sometimes setting dogs on unarmed black protesters.

To you these events were as a result of "the lack of training lack of discipline, lack of oversight and questionable hiring practices in police departments"

I am sure If you were a police officer that was deployed to quell a protest or riot by "Black Lives Matter, Antifa and a number of other far left Marxist groups" as you call them, you would be more brutal than even white police officers as your hatred for blacks is even more than those of white supremacist s." To you the whites had actually been victims of unfair treatment in the US.

I must confess to say that I have not seen or even heard of a sicker black man.

Well said.

What is suffered here is a terrible disease of self hatred and inferiority complex from cultural brain washing which some black people have: they are mentally and spiritually enslaved to the idea of white sainthood and supremacy.

MartinsD12:
Ok I understand, the thing is this most of these politicans don't Care about the masses, this new naira issue is affecting the masses it doesn't affect the politicians they know how to get new naira notes from their banks, so my opinion has always been make old naira available also since new naira notes is not available for the masses but it's available for politicians themselves

Completely agree.

Femisol:
Oloun This country don tire me

Was it not El-Rufai that told us the other day that Malami called him on phone to say CBN has destroyed all the old 500 and 1000 naira notes

Just watch how Tinubu Urchins will celebrate this judgement

He actually said agents of the FG in the Villa claimed those notes had been destroyed, but they were lying - he said he had evidence that not a single note had been destroyed.

MartinsD12:
I don't know about oshimhole, but then CBN should give us the new naira notes or just allow us to be spending the old naira notes pending when the new naira notes are available, that's very simple thing to do.

U didn't even wonder what I meant by "PBM".... I meant "Principal Betrayer of the Masses"

MartinsD12:
If you can't give us new naira notes , bring back the old naira notes pending when the new naira notes it's available, this is how it's been done in other developed countries of the world.

Oshiomhole (PBM) actually said something which was very sensible regarding this. He said - "If you want to take away my old clothes, give me new clothes to wear. Now, if you cant give me new clothes, at least leave me with my old clothes. Don't leave me naked."

Ballo1292:
You are a complete FOOL.

The man, Tinubu is your President for the next 4 years.

Its not necessarily a problem that you support the Jagaban Borgu, my suggestion would be that you take a stance of real-politick rather than a stance of denial. What does this mean? It means accepting reality in the midst of your position, so basically, rather than deny that there was rigging or collusion, you should say something like - "thats real-politick, politics involves a lot of maneuvering, and our candidate as a sharp politician has out-maneuvered the rest, and thats what happens in the real world, if you don't like it, hang."

Thats the sort of thing you should be saying, and thats what I would say if I were you, rather than deny that there have been sharp practices involved.

wirinet:
Noone is destined to be president. That's for kings and queens. Presidents are determined through political maneuvers, treachery, murder and even war.

I think Jsucre is speaking in the broad sense of predestination. Remember that even one who is born as heir to a throne may not be destined to ever sit on that throne, in that sense. In fact, given the words you yourself used, you ought to recognize that an usurper can take that throne by any of the means highlighted in bold in yours above.

History is replete with this.

WATCHOVER:
Am not Igbo I bet you need a hot slap for talking like a child! You must always listen to message not the messenger.
What he said is 100% correct but looking at the recent sceneries conducted by Supreme Court one is afraid justice might not be served.
Our Judiciary has now become a scam

Its an absurd argument. It suggests that even if one candidate wins all the states 99 per cent and doesn't get the FCT 25 per cent then he doesn't win. That's not the correct reading. The provision which says 36 states and the FCT should be read conjunctively and not disjunctively.

AlexReports:
https://barristerng.com/without-winning-fct-a-president-cannot-be-legally-declared-ozoani/

How shameful, for an S.A.N.
Pathetic.

MarketDispatch:
For Court to have any meaningful outings,

1. Accounts of Judges should be monitored by EFCC
2. Telephone communications of Judges should be monitored by NIA, SSS,
3. Email communication should be monitored by NIA, SSS.

4. Telephone conversation of INEC Chairman, and Accounts should be monitored.

Just like they do in USA .

Well intentioned as this may seem, it will give the executive too much leverage over the judiciary.

PureMe01:
The FCT 25% argument isn't over

Its an absurd argument. It suggests that even if one candidate wins all the states 99 per cent and doesn't get the FCT 25 per cent then he doesn't win. That's not the correct reading. The provision which says 36 states and the FCT should be read conjunctively and not disjunctively.

FalseProphet1:
I see Sanwo-olu winning the governorship election in the coming weeks.

This I have seen.

Sire. Your loyal servant salutes.

DesChyko:
He said Germany. I got him Germany in a blink. Which means there are hundreds of secure websites that have been around for years, advertising same essay writing service; some in the exact language you're expecting me to reference from the website.

Just use your Google app, Chief.

I have said I have gone through the website. It does not say what you say it says. Can you quote where it says they will write your dissertation for you? This is a simple enough question if you are being honest.

DesChyko:
That's what's on the website and that is the essay writing service the OP offers.

Can you quote from the website because I have been through the website and it does not say that they will write your dissertation for you.

DesChyko:
Meanwhile this is in Germany https://www.dissertationhelp.de/

Ignorance 🤦🏾‍♂️

Just went through this website and its obvious you are terribly confused. They do not offer the wholesale writing of dissertations which the OP offers. They offer legitimate professional assistance. Nowhere there does it talk about writing your dissertation for you.

DesChyko:
Quote which section of the law makes it criminal. It's not by shedding your heart contents. You're either here or there.😎



Meanwhile this is in Germany https://www.dissertationhelp.de/

Ignorance 🤦🏾‍♂️

What you posted talks about "help" and "assistance" and there are many legitimate forms of such, including proof reading. In fact, one can get help with actual research such as collating information, data, field studies, etc. This is altogether different from writing a work wholsesale.

This is what the OP wrote, take note -

"We are a verified professional writing service of qualified writers and will write your assignments, thesis (PhD), and dissertation (MSc) for an affordable fee. Yes, we have dedicated writers."

The above is unethical and criminal.
End of.

DesChyko:
Nah. He was more interested in throwing jabs than actually making a point. Three sentences and no point made. That's always from a position of weakness 😌

And I'm just not interested in interchanging both roles. One is a third party legitimate service provider. The other is a client subject to 'the academia'.

As you please. You are very wrong on this though, and what you are advocating is criminal, unethical, and very shameful.
Nevertheless, have a good day, I have said enough.