₦airaland Forum

delkuf:
I don't if you guys have listened to this song so will I by Hillsong. This song is the best. If everything exist to lift you high, so will I. If the wind goes where you send it, so will I. As you speak, a hundred billions failures disappear. this is the best part, if you gave your life to love them, so will I. I love this song.

Kiddo01:
For many years now, I've read the account of Matthew 8 Vs 22 , but I seem not to grasp fully the meaning of Christ's words when he said :

"But Jesus told him, "Follow me, and let the dead bury their own dead"

I've been thinking, what did Jesus mean when he said the dead should bury their dead? Can dead bodies actually perform burial?

LordReed:
Since this question was asked on the front page it has resonated frequently in my mind. The question is how do you know god is not lying?

LordReed:
If he told you he is good, how do you know he is not lying?

LordReed:
If he told you he can't make a mistake, how do you know he is not lying?

GRIMMJOE:
Saying something is real doesn't make it any real.

orisa37:
In the Book of Genesis we have the THREE specified:-

We have GOD exclusively in Heaven. He is The "Father of" meaning NATURE, of all CREATIONS

orisa37:
We have LORDGOD representing God's Movements from Heaven to the Earth in Spirit. Christians' call Him HOLY, not minding that He is in Control of Darkness, Evil and Death as well as Light, Goodness and Life.

orisa37:
Then we have THE LORD on Earth. He is The One who acts interacts and move on Earth representing God in Heaven. He is God The Son.

orisa37:
"Christians' call Him HOLY, not minding that He is in Control of Darkness, Evil and Death as well as Light, Goodness and Life.

bingbagbo:
1 John 3:1
Behold what manner of love the Father has bestowed on us, that we should be called children of God! [/b]Therefore the world does not know us, [b]because it did not know Him.

Fact that the verse above is talking about God the Father is incontrovertible. Well, from the verse, it is God the Father who makes us children of God.

Yet again, from the verse, The world did not know the Father.

John Chapter one throws more light on 1 John 3:1, we will all see who this Father is.

John 1:1,3-4,10-13
[1]In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.
[3]All things were made through Him, and without Him nothing was made that was made.
[4]In Him was life, and the life was the light of men.
[10]He was in the world, and the world was made through Him, and the world did not know Him.
[11]He came to His own, and His own did not receive Him.
[12]But as many as received Him, to them He gave the right to become children of God, to those who believe in His name:
[13]who were born, not of blood, nor of the will of the flesh, nor of the will of man, but of God. The Word Becomes Flesh

As you have read from the text above, it is the word (Jesus) who made us the children of God. It is the word (Jesus) that the world didn't know in verse 10 as emphasised in 1 John 3:1.

Conclusion

Jesus Christ is the Father. It was the Father who is spirit that incarnated as man to bring man back to himself.

Jesus Christ is the Father.

Hallelujah

MuttleyLaff:
I already said that you lied, when I typed that you, stop lying, that, you did put what was not there, that you did remove and replace with, what wasn't originally there

You know enough to think you’re right, but not enough, to know you are wrong and are perpetuating lies

You remind me of reading the classic "The Vulture is a Patient Bird" novel by James Hadley Chase. incidentally, and by the very good grace of God, I am a patient person and so, I am capable of accepting and tolerating delays. Besides that, I dont upstage the Holy Spirit, and truthfully speaking, there isn't any need/want to show off. Just so you know, I disclose, only after the Holy Spirit has collared, arrested and convicted you, not before

No one can force anyone to understand a message that they are not yet ready to receive, but, hey, must never underestimate the power of planting a seed

Where did an idea of "... wasn't at war with you" come from. You've been misinformed, you've been miseducated and so your old ways, won't lead you to open new doors

I respect your, entitled to have, humble views, so much to the extent, I dont, myself have to shoot your forwarded superficial on-the-surface discovery banal views down.

It might interest you, to know that, petroleum oil isn't scooped on the surface, coal is picked on the ground surface, gold, diamonds and other precious gems aren't lifted off the ground surface, pearls are plucked from water surfaces. Just muse or thoughtfully think about all those listed discoveries for a moment and about the fact that the devil has no power ... except in the dark, a dark like that of Leviticus 18:22 and Leviticus 20:13, but you dont want to yourself, ferret through, but you instead want me, to draw the picture for you.

You think too highly of yourself. I never called on you requiring any assistance or aid to establish your imagined defence of homosexuality. You selectively have chose to forget, it was you who reared your head, fishing for information, without realising that you wouldn't be able to stand when the heat gets hot and hotter

You aren't adequately biblical educated and mentally mature enough to grasp what is contained in Leviticus 18:22 and Leviticus 20:13, hence your failure in not properly investigating, probing and examining Leviticus 18:22 and Leviticus 20:13, closely and thoroughly enough, so that, with the help of the Spirit of Truth aka the Holy Spirit, you by now, could have already rightly divided, the word of God, with sound judgement, as regards what exactly, under the hood or bonnet, was going on, with Leviticus 18:22 and Leviticus 20:13 and then on top, get to know, for sure, why and how these particular acts, behaviours, practices are to God "abominable" or "a detestable sin" or "an abomination" or "detestable act" or "detestable" or "disgusting" or "what God hates" et cetera.

Wtf, where's the faith. I haven't failed in planting a seed, threatening your accepted half baked interpretation of Leviticus 18:22 and Leviticus 20:13.

Obviously, its you whose failed, to understand that many people like you, are not ready to be unplugged, because you are so accustomed to Leviticus 18:22 and Leviticus 20:13 gross misinterpretation and hopelessly will fight to protect the illusions so not to have it destroyed. Some people, like you, who should be spiritually mature and ready to confront hard truth, aren't spiritually mature and aren't ready to confront the Leviticus 18:22 and Leviticus 20:13 hard truths

Let me clarify, I am not on this thread to establish "it" Notice I was drawn into the limelight and never had any intent to establish "it". If you must know, I really dont give a toss however you and that mischief maker feels about "it". The choice to become aware, alert and/or enlightened, is your call, not and never mine. I am sure you've found out that, I would never disclose anything before you've got to worked out for yourself what Leviticus 18:22 and Leviticus 20:13 is all about

It is our obligation to ourselves, to make certain that amidst misinterpretation of any manners, our knowledge is increased in accordance with absolute truth

You're a fast learner, of course, you're right that, I have nothing to give you, to trample upon

Your inability to activate your lateral thinking, proves, why you aren't a biblical detective and unable to investigate, find, probe and examine biblical evidence(s)

Sorry sweetheart? You made me raise my eyebrow there

Would you kindly, in exactly the same words as original were used by me, reproduce the question or request, I asked you and paste it here please?

It is true I've got gunpowder and loads of ammo, the sort suited for Armageddon, but what will be the point of wasting good ammo, ahead of time, hmm? Nah, the guns are safely tucked away in their holsters

MuttleyLaff:
I'll give you another opportunity, to now, state clearly and in detail, leaving no room for confusion, doubt or repeating "it is prohibited", why did God, The Law Giver, says it is prohibited?

MuttleyLaff:
Just admit you are out of your depth Dtruthspeaker

Stop lying, you did put what was not there, you did remove and replace with what wasn't originally there

MuttleyLaff:
I have left the door wide open and ajar, it is up to you with your own very eyes to see whats inside. I have shed light into Leviticus 18:22 and Leviticus 20:13, it is up to you, to strain your eyes so to clearly see. You're a big grown son and moG, I am not going to spoon feed you.

MuttleyLaff:
You have strong strapping arms, use them to lift up the bonnet and dive in to look under Leviticus 18:22 and Leviticus 20:13. Stop forwarding superficial on the surface discoveries

MuttleyLaff:
The bible, in Proverbs 25:2, states that:
"It is the glory of God to conceal a matter; to search out a matter is the glory of kings" or "It is God’s privilege to conceal things and the king’s privilege to discover them" Roll up your sleeves, pull out your fingers and get to work. "Ise logun ise" loosely translated means "Work or study, cancels out knowledge poverty" You are not, at this point, in a position of getting anything from me, on a platter of gold. As soon as you earn that I privilege, of course, I'll ever oblige you doing so and more

MuttleyLaff:
That is not how it works José. You know that I requested for was, explicit command, and not implicit command, so quit playing games.

You merely are adding to what the bible hasn't explicitly said, trying to make it say what it didnt say, in short you are busy trying so hard to make fetch happen, proof-texting with bible verses.

MuttleyLaff:
You're deceiving yourself, not me. You are incapable of deceiving me. It is fascinating watching you wriggling all over the place.

Let me reel you back in position. I corrected you that you are only asked to fear God and not fear commands or laws of God, and this you clearly have problems accepting, so I then asked you, to provide bible verse(s) that explicitly commands that you FEAR God's law and/or commandment, but you've woefully failed at presenting any, only resorting to clutching at straws and continued with your proof-texting bible verses exercise.

MuttleyLaff:
Sigh and smh, you still havent got a clue, and this is why you are getting hung up on "... only one type of homosexuality ..."

This is like how HRH Oluwo of Iwo, says to Olori Chanel Chi: "You're part of the enemy" then when she asks "who's the enemy" he replies "them" and when Olori asks "who's them" HRH restates "the enemy," leaving no one any the wiser, of knowing the identity of "the enemy"

I'll give you another opportunity, to now, state clearly and in detail, leaving no room for confusion, doubt or repeating "it is prohibited", why did God, The Law Giver, says it is prohibited?

You just felt that derogation is a big grammatical word you could use, that even has no correlation or connection to what transpired in Leviticus 18:22 and Leviticus 20:13.

Your obstinate problem makes you incapable of properly investigating, probing and examining Leviticus 18:22 and Leviticus 20:13, closely and thoroughly, so that, with the help of the Spirit of Truth aka the Holy Spirit, you by now, could have already rightly divided, the word of God, with sound judgement, as regards what exactly, under the hood or bonnet, is going on, in Leviticus 18:22 and Leviticus 20:13 and then on top, get to know, for sure, why and how this particular act, behaviour, practice is "abominable" or "it is a detestable sin" or "it is an abomination" or "it is a detestable act" or "that is detestable" or "It is disgusting" or "God hates that" et cetera.

You are just doing a poor attempt of beating around the bush and without exactly telling us what the specific problem is in Leviticus 18:22 and Leviticus 20:13.

You havent done your best, you havent studied to show yourself approved to God, a workman that needs not to be ashamed, rightly dividing the word of truth. All what you've been doing is guesstimates and waffling.

MuttleyLaff:
Has it, out of desperation, now come to you doing this ni, hmm? Do you really have to resort to deceit and proof-texting, erhn?

I'll repeat the question again, so that you dont miss the opportunity to correctly answer it. Give me one scripture that explicitly commands that you FEAR God's law and/or commandment.

MuttleyLaff:
Will you please stop all these your eisegesis

OK, give me one scripture that explicitly commands that you fear God's law and/or commandment.

MuttleyLaff:
Until you do a 2 Timothy 2:15 on Leviticus 18:22 and Leviticus 20:13, all the above that you've typed is unnecessary and irrelevant. You can see how your lack of depth and full knowledge of Leviticus 18:22 and Leviticus 20:13 is betraying you to the extent of you being confused.

Let me ask you this. Are there types of heterosexualism, hmm? If your answer is no, then why asking about types of homosexuality then, erhn?

When people start to employ all sorts of accusations, like "... attempting to amend God's Laws" or typing "respectfully, you would be wrongly using Miischief Rule which is already Clearly Prohibited by the The Law Giver in interpreting the clear provisions of the Commandments, to input what is not there" it is because the light of the truth can be harsh to the eyes of them that for so long, have been in the dark.

It is your choice, to wallow in ignorance and not know what and why Leviticus 18:22 and Leviticus 20:13 clearly, directly, expressly forbids and prohibits man lying with man as with a woman. Notice that, unlike you, I had no need nor want, to add or change, what Leviticus 18:22 and Leviticus 20:13 says.

MuttleyLaff:
You fear only God, and not law(s). God has not given believers the spirit of fear, but of power, love and a sound mind for understanding

MuttleyLaff:
Adultery is about infidelity, and it happens in heterosexual and homosexual relationships, so why is this particular form of homosexuals mentioned in Leviticus 18:22 and Leviticus 20:13 worse, hmm?

You fear only God, and not law(s). God has not given believers the spirit of fear, but of power, love and a sound mind for understanding. You havent understood the law concerning Leviticus 18:22 and Leviticus 20:13, this has made you develop the fear of the unknown

MuttleyLaff:
To God be the glory

[img]https://s5/images/LetsHearThis.gif[/img]
I am all ears Dtruthspeaker, you have my undivided attention.

"Therefore, as the elect of God, holy and beloved,
clothe yourselves with hearts of compassion, kindness, humility, gentleness, and patience."
- Colossians 3:12

"Do nothing out of selfish ambition or empty pride,
but in humility consider others more important than yourselves"
- Philippians 2:3

Dtruthspeaker, you see brother, the common denominator among Psalm 138:6, Proverbs 3:34, Proverbs 29:23, Matthew 23:12, Luke 1:52, Luke 14:11, James 4:6 and 1 Peter 5:5, is that God exalts the humble. God opposes the proud, the likes who have shown their faces on this thread but gives grace to the humble. I just need to put it out there, that I thank God for the humility, you've consistently displayed not just on this thread but also noticed upandan the Religion forum.

I appreciate your beautiful breakdown above concerning the three categories of Laws which the Commandments fall into, but I was expecting that by now, you would have already investigated, probed and examined Leviticus 18:22, closely and thoroughly, so that, with the help of the Spirit of Truth aka the Holy Spirit, you by now, would have already rightly divided, the word of God, with sound judgement, as regards what exactly, under the hood or bonnet, is going on, in Leviticus 18:22 and then on top, got to know why and how this particular act, behaviour, practice is "abominable" or "it is a detestable sin" or "it is an abomination" or "it is a detestable act" or "that is detestable" or "It is disgusting" or "God hates that" et cetera.

What specifically, is it that is abominable in Leviticus 18:22 and Leviticus 20:13. What is it and why is it abominable. There is another verse that throws more light on what the act is, but I'll leave it for the Holy Spirit to guide and reveal it to you.

I appreciate your honesty, sincerity and straightforwardness. Please allow me to drop that from a Hebrew/Jewish POV, sin, in a simplest and purest form, means missing the mark. It is like, shooting an arrow, at archery target rings but miss hitting the centred inner bulls-eye ring.

A&E, missed the mark in the garden of Eden and so at the last hour, sinned and consequently failed to achieve a result that was intended. "For I know the thoughts that I think toward you, saith the LORD, thoughts of peace, and not of evil, to give you an expected end", so says God, in Jeremiah 29:11, but we aren't talking of A&E here, we are dealing with the Israelites and their arrival on the land of Canaan, the Promised Land of inheritance, the land flowing with milk and honey and we specifically, are talking of both Leviticus 18:22 and Leviticus 20:13.

Please again I warn to let us not get ahead of ourselves, but to limit ourselves to the context and confines of Leviticus 18:22 and Leviticus 20:13, otherwise, we will fall victim to doing an eisegesis of them two verses, namely Leviticus 18:22 and Leviticus 20:13.

I'll give you time to go find out what you'll be able to uncover and know more about concerning Leviticus 18:22 and Leviticus 20:13

MuttleyLaff:
Dtruthspeaker, affirmative, bullseye. Of course, you're absolutely right to think that, what is very necessary, for an adherent, apologist, disciple and strong enthusiast influenced by 2 Timothy 2:15, to take cognisance of, is the phrase "it is an abomination" of which, some bible versions, translate this original same phrase with descriptions like: "it is a detestable sin" or "it is an abomination" or "it is a detestable act" or "that is detestable" or "It is disgusting" or "God hates that" et cetera

Without trying to overstretch the word of God, can we please, just limit ourselves, to at what God specifically used "abominable" for, hmm? You do know what would happen when an initially stretched rubber band, held in front of your face and pulled, is suddenly released at one end, hmm? God intentionally and deliberately, in the whole of Leviticus 18, only used "abominable" for Leviticus 18:22.

Now, as a very good student of 2 Timothy 2:15, which I very much hope you truly are, reasonably, I would expect you to investigate, probe and examine Leviticus 18:22, closely and thoroughly, so that, with the help of the Spirit of Truth aka the Holy Spirit, you rightly divide, the word of God, with sound judgement, as regards what exactly, under the hood or bonnet, is going on, in Leviticus 18:22 and then further get to know why and how this particular act, behaviour, practice is "abominable" or "it is a detestable sin" or "it is an abomination" or "it is a detestable act" or "that is detestable" or "It is disgusting" or "God hates that" et cetera

I apologise in advance, if for highlighting Leviticus 18:22 and Leviticus 20:13, I come across as a broken record but I am certain you know that Leviticus 20 is a mirror image of Leviticus 18, and so, that Leviticus 18:22 and Leviticus 20:13 are identical twins, joined at the hip, with the word "abomination," specifically mentioned about them but not for the other verses

The difference between you and I, is, you think, but I know. I know the subject matter I am discussing here. I know that Leviticus 18:22 and Leviticus 20:13 is not talking of an ordinarily blanket ban. You also can see that God was specific of the gender here, meaning He didn't talk of a female version of the act.

You see Dtruthspeaker, God is not an author of confusion. God, specifically makes know what gives Him, a sense of disgust and/or feeling of intense dislike. Now, you really need to strap on the whole armour of 2 Timothy 2:15 to dissect Leviticus 18:22 and Leviticus 20:13, in order for you, to, in the real sense of the think word, think otherwise an/or differently

AntiChristian:
There is a clear difference between dawn and sunrise!

The holy spirit could have been more scientific!

AntiChristian:
That analogy aint applicable here!

When Did the Women Visit the Tomb?
Whoever visited and however many there were, it’s also not clear when they arrived.
Mark 16:2—They arrive after sunrise
Matthew 28:1—They arrive at about dawn
Luke 24:1—It is early dawn when they arrive
John 20:1— It is dark when they arrive

valarinz:
Which S80 model did they tell you 20k for one pointer light, 2018 model?

From 07 above doesn't use separate pointer lights, they're attached to the Headlamp from then, so it's obvious your car was 06 below... 20k from mechanic? That's na obvious exaggeration, no kazeem go do baranda reach that level

sagenaija:
You're so quick to respond.
I guess you didn't even bother to check the meaning of contradiction.

You posted the matter. Not me.
Who is giving "an orange and a Mango" and which is the third who "said it was two grapes and one water melon"?

If you have no direct answer it simply means that you just posted another man's article without even understanding it.

You're the one claiming contradictions. Show us how. Instead you're asking for it to be debunked. Have you even bothered to read the posts responding to the claims?

You made the above highlighted statement. Show us what you mean, but you can't. Instead you now want to run for cover.

AntiChristian:
By Austin Cline

Jesus’ burial is important because, without it, there can be no tomb from which Jesus can arise in three days. It’s also historically implausible: crucifixion was intended as a shameful, horrible execution which included allowing the bodies to remain nailed up until they rotted off. It’s inconceivable that Pilate would have agreed to turn the body over to anyone for any reason. This may have something to do with why the gospel authors all have different stories about it.

How Long Was Jesus in the Tomb?
Jesus is portrayed as being dead and in the tomb for a given length time, but how long?
Mark 10:34—Jesus says he will “rise again” after “three days.”
Matthew 12:40—Jesus says he will be in the earth “three days and three nights...”

No resurrection narrative describes Jesus as being in a tomb for three full days, or for three days and three nights.

Guarding the Tomb
Would the Romans have guarded Jesus’ tomb? The gospels disagree on what happened.
Matthew 27:62-66—A guard is stationed outside the tomb the day after Jesus’ burial
Mark, Luke, John—No guard is mentioned. In Mark and Luke, the women who approach the tomb do not appear to expect to see any guards

Jesus Is Anointed Before Burial
It was tradition to anoint a person’s body after they died. Who anointed Jesus and when?
Mark 16:1-3, Luke 23:55-56—A group of women who were at Jesus’ burial come back later to anoint his body
Matthew—Joseph wraps the body, and the women come the next morning, but no mention is made of anointing Jesus
John 19:39-40—Joseph of Arimathea anoints Jesus’ body before burial

Who Visited Jesus’ Tomb?
The women visiting Jesus’ tomb is central to the resurrection story, but who visited?
Mark 16:1—Three women visit Jesus’ tomb: Mary Magdalene, a second Mary, and Salome
Matthew 28:1—Two women visit Jesus’ tomb: Mary Magdalene and another Mary
Luke 24:10—At least five women visit Jesus’ tomb: Mary Magdalene, Mary the mother of James, Joanna, and “other women.”
John 20:1—One woman visits Jesus’ tomb: Mary Magdalene. She later fetches Peter and another disciple

When Did the Women Visit the Tomb?
Whoever visited and however many there were, it’s also not clear when they arrived.
Mark 16:2—They arrive after sunrise
Matthew 28:1—They arrive at about dawn
Luke 24:1—It is early dawn when they arrive
John 20:1— It is dark when they arrive

What Was the Tomb Like?
It’s not clear what the women saw when they arrived at the tomb.
Mark 16:4, Luke 24:2, John 20:1—The stone in front of Jesus’ tomb had been rolled away
Matthew 28:1-2—The stone in front of Jesus’ tomb was still in place and would be rolled away later

Who Greets the Women?
The women aren’t alone for long, but it’s not clear who greets them.
Mark 16:5—The women enter the tomb and meet one young man in there
Matthew 28:2—An angel arrives during an earthquake and rolls the stone away, and sits on it outside. Pilate’s guards are also there
Luke 24:2-4—The women enter the tomb, and two men suddenly appear — it’s not clear if they are inside or outside
John 20:12—The women do not enter the tomb, but there are two angels sitting inside

What Do the Women Do?
Whatever happened, it must have been pretty amazing. The gospels are inconsistent in how the women react, though.
Mark 16:8—The women keep quiet, despite being told to spread the word
Matthew 28:8—The women go tell the disciples
Luke 24:9—The women tell “the eleven and to all the rest.”
John 20:10-11— Mary stays to cry while the two disciples just go home

https://www.learnreligions.com/contradictions-in-gospel-accounts-of-jesus-tomb-250141

CodeTemplar, Sagenaija,

This should strictly be biblical.

MuttleyLaff:
Respect begets respect. Dtruthspeaker respectfully, thoughtfully and closely looking at Leviticus 18 and this including Leviticus 18:22, God gives reasons for each of those various kinds of sexual liaisons, whether done openly or secretively, like, Judah and Tamar, king David and Bathsheba et cetera, why He doesnt endorse them. Now it will interest you to know, from reading Leviticus 18:22, that God, actually gave a specific reason why He was against the particular type of same sex liaison. Is that not so, Dtruthspeaker, hmm, that God gave the reason for objecting to it? I am sure you would have noticed for a very good reason, why Leviticus 18:22 was specific of the gender here (i.e. it didnt talk of a female version practised)

AntiChristian:
What's all this rigmarole? Please if you have nothing tangible to offer in defense of the OP stop my mentions!

MuttleyLaff:
Exactly my POV too, so Dtruthspeaker whats your understanding of the purpose and intent of Leviticus 18:22 and Leviticus 20:13? You can throw in the "why"

AntiChristian:
Should one's salvation be based on Transactional reports, like a Burst of Pictures, reported independently like this?

valarinz:
Proud one at that, what do you stand for?

Anywhere the wind crowd blows?

mh53:
The mdx can stand the most abuse here but it’s a bit thirsty in stop and go traffic, the volvo only makes sense if you have a good technician that can handle it.

illicit:
so what did we do for God this time?

AntiChristian:
By Austin Cline

Christians point to Jesus’ resurrection as one of the things which distinguish Christianity from all other religions. After all, the founders of other religions (like Muhammad salallahu 'alayhi wa salam and Buddha) are all dead; Jesus conquered death. Or did he? For something so important and central to the message, theology, and very nature of Christianity, it’s curious that the gospel authors would all have such radically different stories about what happened.

Jesus’ First Resurrection Appearance
The resurrection of someone dead is an important event, but the Gospels don’t seem to know where and when Jesus first appeared.
Mark 16:14-15 - Jesus appears to Mary Magdalena, but it’s not clear where (in older endings of Mark, he didn’t appear at all)
Matthew 28:8-9 - Jesus first appears near his tomb
Luke 24:13-15 - Jesus first appears near Emmaus, several miles from Jerusalem
John 20:13-14 - Jesus first appears at his tomb

Who Sees Jesus First?
Mark - Jesus appears first to Mary Magdalena then later to “the eleven”
Matthew - Jesus appears first to Mary Magdalena, then to the other Mary, and finally to ”the eleven”
Luke - Jesus appears first to “two,” then to Simon, then to “the eleven”
John - Jesus appears first to Mary Magdalena, then the disciples without Thomas, then the disciples with Thomas

Women’s Reactions to the Empty Tomb
The gospels agree that the empty tomb was found by women (though not which women), but what did the women do?
Mark 16:8 - The women were amazed and afraid, so they kept quiet
Matthew 28:6-8 - The women ran away “with great joy.”
Luke 24:9-12 - The women left the tomb and told the disciples
John 20:1-2 - Mary told the disciples that the body had been stolen

Jesus’ Behavior After His Resurrection
If someone rises from the dead, his actions should be significant, but the gospels don’t agree on how Jesus first behaved
Mark 16:14-15 - Jesus commissions “the eleven” to preach the gospel
Matthew 28:9 - Jesus lets Mary Magdalene and another Mary hold his feet
John 20:17 - Jesus forbids Mary to touch him because he hasn’t ascended to heaven yet, but a week later he lets Thomas touch him anyway

Doubting Jesus’ Resurrection
If Jesus rose from the dead, how did his disciples take the news?
Mark 16:11, Luke 24:11 - Everyone doubts and is scared or both at first, but eventually they go along with it
Matthew 28:16 - Some doubt, but most believe
John 20:24-28 - Everyone believes but Thomas, whose doubts are eliminated when he gets physical proof

Jesus Ascends to Heaven
It wasn’t enough that Jesus rises from the dead; he also had to ascend to heaven. But where, when, and how did this happen?
Mark 16:14-19 - Jesus ascends while he and his disciples are seated at a table in or near Jerusalem
Matthew 28:16-20 - Jesus’ ascension isn’t mentioned at all, but Matthew ends at a mountain in Galilee
Luke 24:50-51- Jesus ascends outside, after dinner, and at Bethany and on the same day as the resurrection
John - Nothing about Jesus’ ascension is mentioned
Acts 1:9-12 - Jesus ascends at least 40 days after his resurrection, at Mt. Olivet.

https://www.learnreligions.com/jesus-resurrection-and-ascension-contradictions-250145

Codetemplar, Sagenaija

Strictly Biblical!