₦airaland Forum

[quote author=Bamsyle. link=topic=571628.msg7492950#msg7492950 date=1294553684]

I thought you could answer ALL questions.

It's a simple question . . . why're you so shy??

I will not let you get away with disgracing your parents . . . tell me who stays at what position during s[i]e[/i]x??
Erm, if you answer this one appropriately . . . next one will be "who screams louder"?? . . . are you proud of your parents?? [/quote]This is what I said about unreasonableness . . . you're too old to be acting like this, I told you before.
But what uni did you learn to talk this way??

You see how I sound reasonable even when I joke, while you sound like a kid?? So what's the name of your uni??

[quote author=Bamsyle. link=topic=571628.msg7492885#msg7492885 date=1294552650]He answered . . .

Next, who normally gets on top during the act?? Your dad or your mom?? [/quote]Your mum . . . I will not let you get away with disgracing your uni . . . tell me what is the name of your uni??
Wole Soyinka is a a proud UI graduate . . . are you proud of your uni??

[quote author=Bamsyle. link=topic=571628.msg7492854#msg7492854 date=1294552089]Excuses?? OMG . . . I never thought you were this daft.

I'll be happy if this thread hits the front page . . . so all nairalanders can see who the mumu of this forum is . . . to think you were really expecting an answer to that??

Ok, ma own question to you - Are you a guinea fowl?? [/quote]No, I'm not . . . so what's the name of your Uni??
Why shame dey catch you na??

[quote author=Bamsyle. link=topic=571628.msg7492826#msg7492826 date=1294551388]Bamsyle is who he is . . . not to be compared with another

If your understanding of asking a question is popping a s[i]tu[/i]pid one in the middle of a debate, then I'm afraid you're not as smart as Tumfulu [/quote]More and more excuses . . . remember this threads are archived, I trust people to come here and laugh at you over this.
This is a 'who born the maga' question . . . your long story is helping me stay awake to work, but it's getting boring now, but I won't quit sha . . .
Bamishile . . . ile eko giga wo lo ti kawe e??

[quote author=Bamsyle. link=topic=571628.msg7492801#msg7492801 date=1294550884]Na wa o - this is how insanity begins.[/quote]How many excuses will you use gan naw?? Haba . . . when I asked Tosin, it was quick, I even found out that I attended the same school as Chamo, why are you ashamed of your uni??

[quote author=Bamsyle. link=topic=571628.msg7492774#msg7492774 date=1294550136]Run ke?? From an eel like you??

Your kids?? When are you gonna get a lady who'll be foolish enough to say "I do"?? [/quote]Yeah . . . I admit, I won't have kids, but that doesn't mean you shouldn't tell me the name of your Uni na . . . aiite, I want my younger sisters to enrol.
Do they accept A-levels??

[quote author=Bamsyle. link=topic=571628.msg7492768#msg7492768 date=1294549934]Hahahaha . . . I laugh the Obasanjo's way.

You must think I'm your younger brother to expect me to honour your question . . . I don't answer st[i]up[/i]id questions

Unlike you, I only reveal such information to those who deserve to know . . . on the commentary thingy, just wanted to let you know that despite the nosedive in your thinking and communication abilities in recent times, I still wanna force myself to believe that you are not this daft . . . well, maybe you're saying I'm wrong [/quote]BUHAHAHAHAH!!! We need a 'rolling on the floor holding mouth not to disturb neighbours while laughing' emoticon
I don't deserve to know?? Aiite . . . I think you come from a quack uni, I want to sue your uni for failing in their statutory duty to provide an acceptable standard of education to citizens of Nigeria . . . trying to help yo make money here.

So Bamsyle is not proud of his Uni nay, embarrassed on its behalf?? Come on, tell me . . .don't be shy.

@Bamsyle

Don't run na . . . help me to help you, aiite I promise I won't tell anyone . . .I just wanna know so I can send my kids there.

[quote author=Bamsyle. link=topic=571628.msg7492728#msg7492728 date=1294549017]I know we're joking but honestly, you're just another piece of trash to me . . . so I really dunno why I must tell you anything about myself.

You'll agree that knowing your own 'school' won't be a difficult task for me though . . . just a google search with your real names (if the 'school' exists on the world wide web ) and I'll go RM on you . . . [/quote]Hehehe . . . so basically you're embarrassed to say where your 'legal background' comes from??
What's with the commentary?? Do this for your uni, your lecturer will be proud of you, notice how my jokes aren't evasive.

[quote author=Bamsyle. link=topic=571628.msg7492696#msg7492696 date=1294548180]You need to bug a telephone call with me before I can tell ya [/quote]Hmmn . . . SMH!!!
This is where it even gets more hilarious, so you can type essays on wiki legal research but to say 'I'm from . . .' is hard for you??
I don't blame you . . . but come on man, don't be embarrassed, it's prolly not as bad as you think it is.

[quote author=Bamsyle. link=topic=571628.msg7492684#msg7492684 date=1294547865]Wiki research?? You wish. I waited for a while for your usual dumb replies and left ma lappy when you came with up with none.

Go fetch him . . . and lemme laugh harder than I'm already doing.

Why not?? But for starters, it ain't in Burundi [/quote]Boxer talk . . .oya na . . . what's the name of the Uni?? You dey fear??

Hehehe . . . how was you Wiki research??
This is going to be so much fun . . . let me finish with this paper.

You know so little about the law, it's amusing . . . there's a guy called Lawyer on NL, a solcitor . . . I'll try to find him, laughing at you will be so much fun.
By the way can you give me details of the Uni you studied law at?? Just so I can know who I'm arguing with.
I don't mind giving you my email to send it if you're embarrassed.

[quote author=Bamsyle. link=topic=571628.msg7491944#msg7491944 date=1294530757]Yeah . . . they'll do so because "Pope Eldee Tha Dunce IX" said so.

If endorsements of sensible posts irk you so much, say sumn sensible (for once in the past 2 years or thereabout) . . . and beat your chest when people endorse it [/quote]Hehehe . . . how can I seek endorsement on issues to beat my chest?? Come on man, you're prolly older than I am, act your age.
The post they all endorsed . . . Brown_suga killed it with three lines, you had to bring other reasons up. . . now you see why I said people should think before saying 'I agree' 'you're right'?? It's for their own goos.

[quote author=Bamsyle. link=topic=571628.msg7491921#msg7491921 date=1294530534]Osama has his moral justification for believing that all Americans must be killed.

No one is saying RM should regret it . . . we're just saying it is wrong.

Vindicated how?? "Vindication" must mean sumn else in your own dictionary [/quote]You see, that's where the big issue here is . . . what's the heinous crime in leaking a phonecall??
You just compared leaking a phonecall to killing thousands of innocent people. That's the lack of objectivity that I have having to deal with.
With the law, I can say sumn and give you court decisions and principles to back it up, but here you can put Osama and Ruggedman in the same line of thought and all I can say is, well . . . people have a right to be stupid.

Vindicated, yep he was . . . he didn't sleep with Toni Payne, 9ice said it in the phone call.

[quote author=Bamsyle. link=topic=571628.msg7491828#msg7491828 date=1294529506]You must think that the law court is a place where you can take every case of hatred, jealousy, and hostility to.

So, if in your words, I "send hate mail to RM, which threatens his right to livelihood", he can run to court and seek justice?? Like all of those don’t happen regularly on Facebook?? You must be the fellow that thanked Goodluck for bringing Facebook to humanity . . .  [/quote]No, Ruggedman doesn't have to bring any case to court . . . he's not the one bitching bout how someone leaked his phone call.
He had a problem, he dealt with it . . . if 9ice wants to take that to court . . . then the threats and harm to livelihood comes in as evidence.
At the end of the day . . it will be 'upblic interest in protecting privacy balanced against Rugged's right to livelihood, his need to protect his life, and the need to protect Payne from harm' . . . wasted court fees.

I’m saying if 9ice had pressed charges as his first and only reaction to the phone convo, he’ll have had a good case . . . and even now, he can still press charges - he’s the plaintiff, let RM defend himself by saying 9ice has had his pound of flesh . . . and the courts will decide the case on its merits

I already told you why he wouldn't have won . . . now will he have a good case now?? I laugh in English.
As I said . . .'he that comes to equity must come with clean hands'. You'll be struck out from the beginning.

And you had the guts to say privacy laws in the UK are not strong?? Why’re you lying?? It ain’t a shame to admit that you studied in Burundi

I said Data Protection is heavily undermined in the UK because of the numerous qualifications . . . the most important being freedom of Information.
Even if I studied in Burundi, it just shows how low the standard of education is in Nigeria . . . 

[quote author=Bamsyle. link=topic=571628.msg7491816#msg7491816 date=1294529344]Hear yourself - “Hearsay is perfectly admissible/this isn’t hearsay” . . . which one of those are you sticking to??

Hearsay is inadmissible in civil/criminal cases . . . the courts might allow you to state your hearsay case for sake of fair hearing . . . what happens to your evidence thereafter is what’s important here . . . it gets thrown outta the window as little or no weight is attached to it.

Lord have mercy . . . evidence on Facebook?? We’re saying evidence that links RM to the act of sleeping with his friend’s wife . . . you’re referring to comments being made on Facebook?? So if I organize 100 folks to make comments on Facebook alleging that RM is a homosexual, RM can head to court on the basis of such ‘evidence’ to exonerate himself??

You’ll make a woeful lawyer.[/quote]Just means you're wrong on two issues.

1. Hearsay is admissible in civil cases. 'Admissible' means the judge does not order it to be struck out, in a criminal case, the DA/Defence raises and objection and it is struck out by the judge. Anything that's allowed by the judge is evidence and is given the weight it deserves.

2. The Facebook threats don't count as hearsay . . . full evidence that he's being threatened. If Ruggedman wants to justify his intrusion on 9ice' privacy in court, all he needs to do is bring evidence that his and Toni's safety was at risk and it had affected his livelihood . . . evidence Facebook threats, Newspaper reports, even his word etc.
And yep . . . prosecutors have used even twitter as major evidence before, if you want cases, I can give you.

[quote author=Bamsyle. link=topic=571628.msg7491806#msg7491806 date=1294529261]Data Protection not strong in the UK/US?? The lie of the millennium.

How can you compare the Data Protection Act 1998 to FOI 2000?? The DPA applies to all individuals and organizations . . . the FOI applies to public authorities and seeks to allow people have general access to information held by public authorities . . . even if the purport of the UK Act flies over your head, that of Nigeria should not - recently there was general outcry by public authorities against the FOI Bill being passed into law in Nigeria . . . it was a major item in the news . . . every carpenter, plumber and mechanic knew about it.

And can you read the part of my post where I said you do not intrude privacy except in special circumstances?? How can you bring Assange into this?? A journalist . . . a journalist who published information about extrajudicial killings and crimes on Wikileak?? Even if you have not read about the exceptions to the general rule, does your sixth sense not tell you that investigation of a CRIMINAL CASE such as murder is a special circumstance?? How do you lump that with publishing a private convo over unfounded/spurious rumours about [i]s[/i]ex??

Abeg talk sensibly Eldee or go back to the Law School . . . you’re not arguing with Tumfulu here.[/quote]As I said before, I've challenged you on the fact that you can't bring a case under Data Protection against an individual. . . nay, I dare you.
And yep . . . the FOI weakens the effect of the data protection issues with public authorities and emanations of the state(which could be anything the courts want it to be), hence my statement bout how data protection has been weakened by FOI.

On Assange, go watch his interviews, his legal defense is the fact that he has a right to distribute information on things like discussions between government officials 1. Because he's not under a duty to protect information handed to him under the Espionage Act. 2. Freedom of information.

Most of those cables have nothing to do with criminal law.

[quote author=Bamsyle. link=topic=571628.msg7492007#msg7492007 date=1294531578]They are not . . . in spirit and in principle.

Plus, a lawfully qualified authority (person or organization) can process/assess info . . . who is the Information Commissioner??

The spirit, principle and intent of the DPA applies here . . . so don't attempt to get too technical about things . . . and if you wanna, I can assure you that 2 posts from here, you'll be saying sumn like "we're not arguing in a law court".

Disgrace?? Why not try n disgrace me for a start??[/quote]The Information Commissioner is not a person, it's an office . . . you don't sue Richard Thomas, you sue The office of the Information Commissioner.
I've said it before and I'll say it again . . . you cannot bring a case against Ruggedman under the Data Protection Act in the UK or Nigeria . . . no way.
I don't gain anything from disgracing you, you have nothing to lose, a solicitor has his reputation at stake.

[quote author=Bamsyle. link=topic=571628.msg7491796#msg7491796 date=1294529184]“Data Protection”, “Personal Right to Privacy” . . . six and half a dozen.

And who told you that Data Protection is all about organizations?? The UK DP Act (of 1998 if you must know) applies to both individuals and organizations . . . one of its precepts is that you do not have the right to process/deal with anyone’s personal data without their consent having been legally and fairly obtained . . . publishing someone’s private convo without obtaining his consent is an example.[/quote]They are so different . . . Data Protection Act relates to organisations that collect info on people.
9ice and Ruggedman's conversation is a domestic matter and can never be be brought up in a case under the Data Protection Act. Bring any lawyer to say otherwise and I'll disgrace him here on the internet.

[quote author=Bamsyle. link=topic=571628.msg7491779#msg7491779 date=1294529033]

How did I bring the UK Legal System into this?? So, by my simple analogy of saying "if it was in the UK" translates to me bringing the "English Legal System" into it . . . Eldee stop arguing blindly abeg.

You cannot answer long posts . . . you chose to dwell extensively on just a minor fraction of ma post . . . and proceeded to write a homiletic on it . . . what do you call that??

WTF??  

Now I have to reply in parts . . .[/quote]Hehehe . . how is that arguing blindly?? Don't make analogies relating the UK legal system when I'm around, if you're going to, come with valid facts.
I don't get it, is this your obiter explaining to me why I shouldn't argue bout this??

proudly9ja:
Walcott Apologises for diving against Leeds

www.arsenal.com

Idiot . . . he'll never win a penalty in his life after this.
It's a 50-50 thing, in England a light trip is all you need for a penalty . . . in Spain, tackling Messi is a crime, Walcott needs to grow up jare.

DBR:
Hehehe, pls eldee don't. The last time u put ir effort into sth,d whole NL waited foreva b4 abddulegend came tru lol

oNe

I'm so scared that I'll eff up with this one . . . I should get help from Abdullegend

Last one coming up soon . . . I'll put all my effort into this one.

dipo2much:
Eldee,now you see how their one goal lead became 'a goaless situation' since they couldnt score a second goal to kill the game.

You don't get it, we were playing crap, if they defended, we won't have scored.
What you're saying is that they shoulda tried to outscore Arsenal, this is Leeds not Chelsea, it's okay for them to stay back.

Chamakh V Bendtner??

Trust Arsenal to make every match look like the World Cup Final . . . #teamnomoredrama

kashmo:
^^^^where you see him papa?

Why im no use condom??

If anybody ever compares Bendtner to Chamackh again . . . I'll kill sumone.

Theo needs to start falling jare . . . Bendtner's dad is mad.

I Bendtner born to dive??

Like play like play we don lose.

kashmo:
Ashavin is on the decline and wtf by Walcott!

Aiite . . . he needs to go.

dipo2much:
Leeds want to kill the game. Thats perfectly logical. playin against arsenal is why they shouldnt just stay back. we are more likely score than not to score. if they dont try to kill the game by attackin us,their one goal lead may only be as good as a goalesss situation cos we WILL score

LOL . . . a bird in hand.

Another Arsiwin moment . . . wasting the Fab ball.

dipo2much:
I disagree papi. A team can be attacking,and still defend well. And contrary to your post, leeds aren't staying back even after their goal

They're defending crap by not staying back.
This is Arsenal at Emirates with Fabregas, even Barca had to score from long balls when they came here.